Growing out of Poverty: Trends and Patterns of Urban Poverty in China 1988–2002
Section snippets
INTRODUCTION
There is a widespread debate over the relative role of economic growth and public redistribution in poverty reduction. In the 1970s, an international consensus evolved for “redistribution with growth,” based in part on a perception of very inegalitarian growth in countries such as Brazil (see Fishlow, 1972). However, the 1980s saw the pendulum swing the other way, with a renewed emphasis being put on economic growth as central to poverty reduction. This stance was in no small part due to a
Data and measurement
This paper uses the Chinese Household Income Project (CHIP) surveys conducted by the Economics Institute, CASS, in 1988, 1995, 1999, and 2002 (see books reporting on these surveys by Griffin and Zhao, 1993, Gustafsson, Riskin). The CHIP surveys were initiated because the standard NBS surveys did not use a measure of income that accorded with international definitions. The CHIP surveys for 1988 and 1995 in particular were claimed to “provide a better empirical foundation for the analysis of the
DECOMPOSING CHANGES IN ABSOLUTE POVERTY
Further insight into poverty trends can be given by various decompositions. In this section, we use decompositions to quantify the role of growth in poverty reduction; to explain the paradox of poverty reduction during the emergence of mass unemployment; and to gauge the effectiveness of China’s social security system.
PATTERNS OF POVERTY—MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
We have documented the fall in absolute poverty among urban residents in China from 1988 to 2002. Insights into the changing patterns of poverty can be provided by simple multivariate modeling. We use three estimation methods, the first being a simple Ordinary Least Squares model of household income per capita (logged). This is of interest because household income per capita is the key variable underlying whether households are classified as poor or not. The second method uses a probit to model
CONCLUSION
China’s high economic growth is perhaps the most significant economic development in the world over the last two decades. Much of its significance has been in the improvement of rural livelihoods. Nonetheless, it also has important impacts on urban China—areas that accounted for 39% of its population in 2002. There has been a growing unease that this growth has been unequally shared and has led to the rise of a “new urban poverty.” Skeptics concede that economic efficiency and growth may have
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful the Ford Foundation for funding the data collection and to three referees for useful comments.
References (29)
- et al.
Labour retrenchment in China: Determinants and consequences
China Economic Review
(2002) - et al.
Has China crossed the river? The evolution of the wage structure in urban China
Journal of Comparative Economics
(2005) - et al.
Growth and redistribution components of changes in poverty measures: A decomposition with applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s
Journal of Development Economics
(1992) - et al.
Poverty, inequality, and growth in urban China, 1986–2000
Journal of Comparative Economics
(2005) - et al.
China’s uneven progress against poverty
Journal of Development Economics
(2007) “The rich are just like us, only richer” Poverty functions or consumption functions? Evidence from Uganda
Journal of African Economies
(2001)- et al.
Spatial price differences in China, estimates and implications
Economic Development and Cultural Change
(2006) - Chen, J. (ed.) (2001). China’s Social Security Development Report: 1997–2001 (Zhong Guo She Hui Bao Zhang Fa Zhan Bao...
- Chen, Shaohua, Ravallion, M., & Wang, Youjuan (2006). Di Bao: A guaranteed minimum income in China’s cities? World Bank...
- et al.
Growth is good for the poor
Journal of Economic Growth
(2002)
Distribution and development
Brazilian size distribution of income
American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings
A class of decomposable poverty indices
Econometrica
How has economic restructuring affected China’s urban workers?
China Quarterly
Cited by (33)
Reconciling the conflicting narratives on poverty in China
2021, Journal of Development EconomicsCitation Excerpt :However, there is no obvious reason why the relationship between the relative poverty measure and the Gini index found among OECD countries would also hold over time in rural China. Appleton et al. (2010) and Li and Sicular (2014) use 50% of the median income in poverty measures calculated from survey data for China. By this measure, Appleton et al. (2010) find a rising relative poverty rate in urban China over 1988–2012, from 3% to 10%.
Child income poverty in China from 2005 to 2015: The application and decomposition of the FGT indexes
2019, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :The poverty line they used is so low that it has received much criticism because it underestimates the poverty incidence rate (Khan, 1998; Riskin, 2006). In addition, the low official poverty line is partly responsible for the neglect of urban poverty (Appleton, Song, & Xia, 2010) because based on the official poverty line, the urban poverty rate was only 0.5% in 2001, far lower than that among rural children (12.5%) (Ravallion & Chen, 2007). It is scarcely surprising that child poverty in urban areas has been marginalized by both the government and scholars.
Social Capital and Its Contingent Value in Poverty Reduction: Evidence from Western China
2017, World DevelopmentCitation Excerpt :This study advances the existing social capital literature on poverty by empirically illustrating that the effects of individual-level social resources can be moderated by community-level institutional trust. To date, major theories have mainly focused either on the individual’s network attributes associated with poverty, or on macrolevel community characteristics of the overall poverty rate (Appleton, Song, & Xia, 2010). While this study finds effects of individual social network features and social resources, it extends the literature by suggesting that the social context in which households are embedded, especially the level of institutional trust within the community, is an additional and important contingent factor of the effectiveness of households’ social resources in helping them acquire economic resources and alleviate poverty.
Are poverty rates underestimated in China? New evidence from four recent surveys
2014, China Economic ReviewCitation Excerpt :By comparison, their income-based measures were much lower, at 4.0% (upper line) and 1.7% (lower line). Meanwhile, Appleton, Song, and Xia (2010) used the Chinese Household Income Project (CHIP) surveys to document trends and patterns of urban poverty. Although the CHIP survey questionnaires were designed by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, the sample was drawn from the China Household Income and Expenditure Surveys—government surveys—and fielded by the National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBS).
Economic growth and child poverty reduction in Bangladesh and China
2012, Journal of Asian EconomicsThe Effect of Digital Financial Inclusion on Relative Poverty Among Urban Households: A Case Study on China
2023, Social Indicators Research