Elsevier

World Neurosurgery

Volume 143, November 2020, Pages e127-e135
World Neurosurgery

Original Article
Does Fusion Affect Anterior Bone Loss in Adjacent Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in Contiguous Two-Level Hybrid Surgery?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.054Get rights and content

Objective

To investigate whether anterior bone loss (ABL) in cervical discarthroplasty (CDA) in 2-level hybrid surgery (HS) is affected by adjacent fusion in vivo compared with 1-level CDA alone.

Methods

A total of 180 patients undergoing either a 1-level CDA or contiguous 2-level HS were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected preoperatively and at routine postoperative intervals of 1 week, 3, 6, and 12 months, and at the last follow-up. The initial and postoperative radiographs were compared to determine the incidence and degree of ABL.

Results

ABL was identified in 68.7% of CDA cases (37.9% mild, 34.8% moderate, and 27.3% severe) and 44.0% of HS cases (54.1% mild, 27.0% moderate, and 18.9% severe). Sex, age, bone mineral density, operation time, blood loss, postoperative alignment, and range of movement at the arthroplasty segment were not related to the incidence of ABL. According to the logistic regression analysis results, ABL showed a significant correlation with the surgery type and body mass index. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence and degree of ABL with or without an adjacent fusion level. Compared with preoperative values, clinical outcome scores significantly improved after surgery in both the HS and CDA groups. No definite clinical effect associated with ABL was found.

Conclusions

ABL was common in both CDA and HS. Although HS had a lower incidence rate and degree than did CDA, the fusion location in HS did not affect the ABL of adjacent CDA.

Introduction

Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has been accepted as an alternative to traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). Previous studies have shown that CDA provides similar clinical outcomes to ACDF but has the advantages of theoretically maintaining the cervical range of motion (ROM), reconstituting the disc height, preventing adjacent segment degeneration, and allowing the earlier recovery of cervical function.1, 2, 3 In recent years, considering that the spondylotic spine is often associated with multiple-level disease, ACDF involving more fused levels has been found to lead to greater loss of mobility at operative levels, and the benefits from CDA for adjacent segments may be more essential.4 However, strict indications and higher medical cost may limit the application of CDA to treat multilevel CDDD.5, 6, 7 In this regard, as a combination of CDA and ACDF, hybrid surgery (HS) that can be tailored to each level allows segmental motion preservation at the index levels and minimizes hypermobility at adjacent levels; therefore, it has become an alternative procedure for the treatment of multilevel CDDD, with satisfactory outcomes.6, 7, 8, 9 However, some adverse outcomes of CDA have recently emerged in HS, including anterior bone loss (ABL), heterotopic ossification, prosthesis migration and subsidence, and segmental kyphosis.9, 10, 11

ABL was defined as nonprogressive early periprosthetic vertebral bone loss commencing within 6 months after surgery at the arthroplasty level.12 In 2011, Tumialan et al.13 reported vertebral bone resorption after CDA in a case study, and this phenomenon has since received increasing attention. The cause of ABL remains unknown, and the clinical implications vary. Several biomechanical studies have shown that mechanical strains are responsible for the development of periprosthetic bone loss.14, 15, 16 In addition, Kim et al.17 conducted a retrospective clinical study and reported that the anterior flange of the Bryan artificial disc might result in stress shield effects, indicating that the strains and stresses are important factors in ABL occurrence. Heo et al.18 reported that the spinal biomechanical environment may be influenced by stressful mechanical change on the vertebral bodies after CDA, with subsequent development of bone loss.

In addition, in vitro cadaveric studies have compared the biomechanical effects between cervical disc replacement and fusion using hybrid constructs8,19 and reported that CDA placed adjacent to the fusion was subjected to a more challenging biomechanical environment, especially higher intervertebral stress compared with stand-alone CDA. Our previous clinical study11 showed that fusion in 2-level HS partially affected the behavior of the adjacent disc prosthesis compared with CDA alone. More importantly, Kieser et al.10 reported that there was a relationship between the number of surgical levels and severe ABL. This result was similar when including the hybrid procedures. However, no previous reports have specifically discussed the occurrence of ABL in HS. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate whether the ABL in contiguous 2-level HS was affected by adjacent fusion in vivo compared with CDA alone.

Section snippets

Patients

This was a retrospective and comparative clinical study. All patients provided written informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University. From September 2009 to December 2018, 180 patients (63 men and 117 women) underwent surgical treatment for CDDD in our department, and these cases were reviewed. According to the surgical procedure, the patients were divided into the CDA group (n = 96) and the HS group (n = 84). Static

Patient Populations

The demographic and perioperative parameters are summarized in Table 2. The mean follow-up time in the CDA group and the HS group was 37.44 ± 23.69 months and 34.30 ± 15.43 months, respectively (P > 0.05). The mean age and body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) at the time of surgery were higher in the HS group, and there was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference

Discussion

This study reports 66 ABL cases in 96 patients undergoing CDA with a Prestige LP implant and 37 cases in 84 patients undergoing HS with an extra Zero-P implant. Periprosthetic bone loss was first observed in large joint replacements, such as total hip and knee arthroplasty.17,18 Since 2011, the incidence rate of ABL has been reported to range from 5.8% to 63.7% after CDA10,17,18,21,22 Based on the Kieser classification and grading system,12 ABL in our series was identified in 68.7% of CDA cases

Conclusions

ABL was common in both CDA and HS. No definite clinical effect associated with ABL was found. Multiple factors could increase the risk of ABL via affecting the local curvature and micromovement, and thus altering the mechanical environment. Although HS had a lower incidence rate than did CDA, the fusion location in HS did not relate to the ABL of adjacent CDA.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Junbo He: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft. Chen Ding: Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing - original draft. Hao Liu: Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Tingkui Wu: Formal analysis, Investigation. Kangkang Huang: Investigation. Ying Hong: Data curation, Formal analysis. Yang Meng: Data curation. Beiyu Wang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing.

References (33)

  • J.C. Eck et al.

    Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2002)
  • Z. Jia et al.

    Hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc diseases: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical evidence

    Eur Spine J

    (2014)
  • G. Grasso

    Clinical and radiological features of hybrid surgery in multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease

    Eur Spine J

    (2015)
  • X. Ren et al.

    Cervical disk replacement combined with cage fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical disk herniation

    Clin Spine Surg

    (2016)
  • D.C. Kieser et al.

    Risk factors for anterior bone loss in cervical disc arthroplasty

    J Neurosurg Spine

    (2018)
  • D.C. Kieser et al.

    Anterior bone loss in cervical disc arthroplasty

    Asian Spine J

    (2019)
  • Conflict of interest statement: The study was funded by research grants from Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (2019YFQ0002), Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (2020YFS0075), and 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence-Clinical Research Incubation Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (19HXFH040).

    Junbo He and Chen Ding contributed equally to this work and should be considered co—first authors.

    View full text