Elsevier

Waste Management

Volume 135, November 2021, Pages 309-317
Waste Management

Optimised design of concrete recycling networks: The case of North Rhine-Westphalia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Construction and demolition waste is either landfilled or used for roadworks.

  • Recycled concrete aggregates can be reused for the construction of new buildings.

  • Optimisation model minimises the total costs and the mining of natural aggregates.

  • Concrete with recycled aggregates is viable without natural aggregates supply.

  • Minimum quota of recycled concrete allows to strengthen closed loop material cycle.

Abstract

In Germany, construction and demolition waste is either landfilled or used for roadworks after being treated in recycling plants. However, recycled concrete aggregates from building demolition can be reused for the construction of new buildings, which allows to close the material loop of concrete. The aim of this study is to develop a decision support system (DSS) in order to investigate the economic impacts and consequences of recycling concrete from building demolition in a closed loop material cycle. To do so, we propose a bi-objective mixed-integer linear optimisation model that provides information on the number and location of installed sorting screens and defines the material flows within a comprehensive regional recycling network covering all processes from building demolition to construction of new buildings. While the economic objective function minimises the total costs of the recycling network, the circularity objective function minimises the amount of primary natural aggregates required for concrete manufacturing. We apply our optimisation model to the German federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia. Results show that under current conditions the manufacturing of concrete with recycled concrete aggregates is economically viable predominantly in areas without local supplies of natural aggregates. In addition, analysis of the trade-offs between the two objectives as well as recommendations on the design of political regulations and economic instruments to foster such recycling networks are presented.

Introduction

With 800 million tonnes and a high recycling potential, construction and demolition waste (CDW) is a priority waste stream within the European Union (EU) (European Commission, 2019). The Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC sets a target of 70% material recovery of CDW which should have been achieved by 2020 (Directive 2008/98/EC). Even though most of the EU states have accomplished this recycling goal (Eurostat, 2020), the quality of recycled materials and their markets vary (Gálvez-Martos et al., 2018).

The most widespread recovery practice so far is the usage of recycled concrete from building demolition in roadworks (Di Maria et al., 2018, Coelho and de Brito, 2013a). According to current legal regulations, this is defined as recycling, but does not allow to close a loop of the material cycle as the concrete cannot be used for construction of buildings again (Fig. 1 (a)). In contrast, in a closed material loop, concrete is kept within the system after extraction from demolished buildings and is used for the construction of new buildings (Schultmann and Rentz, 2002) (Fig. 1(b)). Due to the substitution of virgin material this type of recycling activity allows to reduce the amount of virgin material used for high grade applications like building construction. In a closed material loop, the consequences of mining virgin material like harmful emissions and solid wastes are reduced (Silva et al., 2017).

In Germany, less than 21% of recycled CDW from building demolition are applied for building construction, while 75% end up in roadworks and earthworks (Bundesverband Baustoffe — Steine und Erden e.V., 2019). The amount of recycling aggregates for roadworks is steadily increasing in Europe, while material demand for road construction is expected to remain stable or even to be reduced (Umweltbundesamt, 2015). Consequently, there is already an excess supply of low-quality recycled CDW in Belgium and the Netherlands (Hu et al., 2013). To avoid this in the German market, it is important to intensify activities aimed at closing the material cycle of concrete used for building construction in the existing recycling network. However, this needs extra investment for the installation of sorting screens to produce concrete aggregates suitable for the construction of new buildings.

The aim of this study is to develop a decision support system (DSS) in order to investigate the economic impacts and consequences of recycling concrete from building demolition in a closed loop material cycle. To do so, we propose a bi-objective mixed-integer linear optimisation model that provides information on the number and location of installed sorting screens and defines the material flows for a comprehensive regional recycling network that covers all processes from building demolition to construction of new buildings. The model identifies the existing recycling plants best suitable for the installation of sorting screens to produce recycled aggregates that can be used for concrete manufacturing for building construction. The objectives of the model are to minimise the total costs of the recycling network across the lifespan of the sorting screens (economic objective) and to decrease the amount of virgin material used for concrete manufacturing (circularity objective).

The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents our planning problem. Section 3 provides an overview of the existing literature and outlines the research gap. In Section 4, we present the optimisation model. Furthermore, we describe the framework and assumptions of the case study. Section 5 presents the results of our case study for North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) and provides recommendations for political instruments to intensify CDW recycling in the region. Finally, in Section 6, we draw conclusions and describe the outlook for further research.

Section snippets

Planning problem

The remainder of this paper focuses on concrete waste that represents 76% of CDW from building demolition in Germany (Mueller, 2018). This section discusses the planning problem and provides an overview of regulations on the quality of the aggregates produced from concrete waste and the composition of the final product.

Literature review

According to de Souza Melaré et al. (2017), optimisation is an important tool that is widely used for planning tasks in waste management. Optimisation models were already applied for the design of economically optimal CDW recycling networks advising on locations of landfills and recycling plants (AlZaghrini et al., 2019, Correia et al., 2015, Galan et al., 2013, Hiete et al., 2011), expansion of existing recycling plants (Trochu et al., 2019), and defining disposal processes and waste disposal

Methodology

In the following, we present our DSS in the form of a bi-objective mixed-integer optimisation model that provides information on where to install sorting screens as well as defines the material flows of the recycling network within a region in order to replace primary NA with RCA suitable for construction of new buildings, herein regarding economic as well as circularity targets.

Case study

We apply the bi-objective optimisation model to the case of NRW, one of the federal states of Germany. NRW is the largest federal state of Germany in terms of population and economic output (Melkonyan and Kuttler, 2012). This region has almost 18 million inhabitants and is characterised by a high population density as well as a high degree of industrialization (Landesbetrieb IT.NRW, 2020). The study area of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) is characterized by a dense concentration of recycling

Conclusions

With the increasing speed of urbanization and the flourishing construction industry in NRW, the use of CDW in roadworks can no longer be an option. This study develops a new bi-objective mixed-integer linear optimisation model that provides an evaluation of efficient regional concrete recycling networks from an economic as well as circular perspective, herein accounting for the complete end-of-life value chain considering CDW supply, logistics and treatment in recycling plants, mining of

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and our colleague Valentin Sommer for fruitful discussions.

References (46)

  • A. Melkonyan et al.

    Long-term analysis of NO, NO2 and O-3 concentrations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2012)
  • J. Shi et al.

    Bi-objective design of household E-waste collection with public advertising and competition from informal sectors

    Waste Manag.

    (2020)
  • R.V. Silva et al.

    Availability and processing of recycled aggregates within the construction and demolition supply chain: a review

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2017)
  • A. Stephan et al.

    Towards a more circular construction sector: estimating and spatializing current and future non-structural material replacement flows to maintain urban building stocks

    Resour. Conserv. Recyc.

    (2018)
  • J. Trochu et al.

    A two-stage stochastic optimization model for reverse logistics network design under dynamic suppliers’ locations

    Waste Manag.

    (2019)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    A simple augmented e-constraint method for multi-objective mathematical integer programming problems

    Eur. J. Oper. Res.

    (2014)
  • Bundesverband Baustoffe — Steine und Erden e.V, 2019. Mineralische Bauabfälle Monitoring 2016....
  • S. Cobo et al.

    Trade-offs between nutrient circularty and environmental impacts in the management of organic waste

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2018)
  • Correia, M.N., Gomes, M.C., Duque, J., 2015. Optimisation of construction and demolition waste management: application...
  • DAfStb, 2019. Beton nach DIN EN 206-1 und DIN 1045-2 mit rezyklierten Gesteinskörnungen nach DIN EN 12620....
  • Delvoie, S., Zhao, Z., Michel, F., Courard, L., 2019. Market analysis of recycled sands and aggregates in North-West...
  • Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste. OJ L 312, 2008....
  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2013. Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for Accelerated...
  • Cited by (5)

    • Urban mining potential to reduce primary material use and carbon emissions in the Dutch residential building sector

      2022, Resources, Conservation and Recycling
      Citation Excerpt :

      The economic perspective of construction material recycling should also be paid enough attention to. In our research, materials are individually collected from CDW, which is a time-consuming and labor-intensive process (Verhagen et al., 2021), and might be economically challenging for developed countries where the labor cost for deconstruction is very high (Tsydenova et al., 2021; Zabek et al., 2017). It is essential to change the legislation that currently limits the proportion of secondary materials in material inflows and promote the innovation of the circular business model for better managing the construction material supply chain (EASAC, 2021; Hart et al., 2019; Nußholz et al., 2019; Vegter et al., 2020; Verhagen et al., 2021).

    View full text