Elsevier

Veterinary Parasitology

Volume 250, 30 January 2018, Pages 52-59
Veterinary Parasitology

Research paper
Apparent prevalence of and risk factors for infection with Ostertagia ostertagi, Fasciola hepatica and Dictyocaulus viviparus in Swiss dairy herds

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.12.004Get rights and content

Highlights

Abstract

Infections with helminth parasites can negatively affect performance of dairy cows. Knowledge on infection intensity, spatial distributions and risk factors are key to develop targeted treatment strategies. Canada and most EU countries have conducted large investigations, but respective data for Switzerland were missing. We now performed a bulk tank milk serosurvey for Ostertagia ostertagi, Fasciola hepatica, and Dictyocaulus viviparus on a total of 1036 voluntarily participating dairy herds that were sampled at confinement periods, i.e. in winter 2014/15 or 2015/16, respectively. All samples were analyzed with commercial ELISAs for antibodies (AB) against O. ostertagi and F. hepatica, and those of the first sampling period additionally with an in-house ELISA for AB against D. viviparus. Testing for the latter parasite was not done in the second year of the study, as the sampling period might have missed infections due to the short lived nature of specific antibodies. The possible influence of geographic, climatic, and farm management variables on AB levels were assessed for each parasite using scanning cluster and multiple regression analysis.

Overall seroprevalence for O. ostertagi was 95.5% (95% C.I.: 94.0–96.6), with a mean optical density ratio (ODR) of 0.83, for F. hepatica 41.3% (95% C.I.: 38.3–44.4), and for D. viviparus 2.9% (95% C.I.: 1.6–4.7). There were no significant differences between the two sampling periods. For all parasites, significant geographic clusters of higher AB levels could be established. Furthermore, AB levels against all three parasites were positively correlated with each other, indicating either cross-reactions or co-infections. For O. ostertagi, herd size and percentage of pasture in the ration were positively correlated with AB levels. For F. hepatica, altitude above sea level (a.s.l.) positively, and milk production per cow and year was negatively correlated with AB levels.

This work provides baseline data for further studies performing in-depth risk factor analysis and investigating management as well as targeted treatment options to control the parasites.

Introduction

In Switzerland, as generally in Western Europe, dairy production is an important part of agriculture representing about 20% of the total revenue of Swiss agriculture (Leuenberger, 2016). In the last years, however, the number of dairy herds and dairy cows declined because producers had to face a drop in the milk price (Leuenberger, 2016). In this tough economic environment, producers aim at optimizing their systems. Thus, subclinical infections with parasites that have negative effects on productivity, such as Ostertagia ostertagi (reviewed in Charlier et al., 2009), Fasciola hepatica (Schweizer et al., 2005, Charlier et al., 2012), and Dictyocaulus viviparus (Dank et al., 2015, Charlier et al., 2016) gain more attention from both producers and veterinarians. The availability of anthelmintic drugs with zero day withdrawal for milk makes deworming of dairy cows attractive. However, there is a risk of anthelmintic resistance development, if drug pressure increases, as shown by emerging resistant gastrointestinal (GI)-nematodes in cattle (Demeler et al., 2009, Sutherland and Leathwick, 2011, Geurden et al., 2015), and, as a consequence of repeated treatments due to poor immunological response of cattle against liver fluke, triclabendazole-resistant F. hepatica (Brennan et al., 2007). Anthelmintic drugs therefore should only be used upon indication.

The availability of ELISAs that measure antibodies in bulk tank milk (BTM) against O. ostertagi, F. hepatica, and D. viviparus allow timely and cost reduced diagnostics on herd level and large seroepidemiological surveys. Such surveys have been conducted in e.g. Canada and many European countries in the last decade (among others: Forbes et al., 2008, Bennema et al., 2010, Höglund et al., 2010, Vanderstichel et al., 2012). They have evidenced marked differences in respective seroprevalences between different countries (Forbes et al., 2008, Bennema et al., 2010). Information about spatial distribution of the parasites and risk factors for infection helps in designing targeted treatment protocols, ideally reducing the number of anthelmintic treatments. For Switzerland, such studies have been lacking so far. The aims of the present study therefore were to (1) determine apparent seroprevalences for O. ostertagi, F. hepatica, and D. viviparus in Swiss dairy herds, and (2) to identify risk factors for infection as well as geographic clusters of high prevalence for each of the three parasites.

Section snippets

Study population

The dairy herds sampled in our study (n = 1036) represented approx. 4.8% of all Swiss dairy herds (Leuenberger, 2016). They were sampled by local veterinarians during the winter confinement period between November 2014 and March 2015, or November 2015 and March 2016, respectively. This period was chosen because during winter months, a period of less intense work load, farmers are generally more willing to participate in studies. Most of the samples (77%) were collected in November and December.

Description of the study population

In total, 1036 dairy herds participated in the study. In detail, 522 samples were taken in winter 2014/15 (samples taken November or December 2014: n = 395; samples taken January to March 2015: n = 127) and 673 samples in winter 2015/16 (samples taken November or December 2015: n = 402; samples taken January to March 2016: n = 112). A subset of 159 farms participated in both years. The 1036 herds corresponded to approximately 34,000 cows, i.e. 32,476 cows in 986 herds, while for 52 herds cow

Discussion

This is the first study measuring BTM antibodies against three major pasture-borne helminth infections in Switzerland. The sampling strategy was not targeted, and thus some biogeographical regions were underrepresented and farms suspecting a parasitic problem could have been overrepresented. The time when an individual sample was taken in the 5-months sampling period had an influence of the outcome of the D. viviparus ELISA, as antibodies against this parasite had been shown to persist only for

Conclusions

This study is the first large serosurvey of three major pasture-borne helminthic infections in dairy herds in Switzerland. In the studied population infections with O. ostertagi occurred ubiquitously, reflecting high infection pressure. F. hepatica was a common parasite in the sampled dairy herds and prevalence was higher than had been estimated for individual animals before. Seropositivity against D. viviparus seems to be infrequent (prevalence = 2.9%), but these results have to be interpreted

Conflict of interest

One of the authors (RE) works for Biokema SA. Other than that, we declare having no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to all farmers and veterinarians who participated in this study. We warmly acknowledge Larissa Hoffmann, Liliane Krähenbühl, and Christine Salvisberg for technical assistance. This study was funded by Biokema SA.

References (32)

Cited by (20)

  • Advances in diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematodes in livestock and companion animals

    2022, Advances in Parasitology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The commercial test, named SVANOVIR® O. ostertagi-Ab, was optimised to simplify the protocol; then, the within- and between-laboratory repeatability was assessed on different days and in four different laboratories (Charlier et al., 2009). The commercial ELISA has been used in several studies to determine the levels of exposure to O. ostertagi infection in different locations such as Mexico or Sweden (Frey et al., 2018; Höglund et al., 2010; Villa-Mancera et al., 2018), but also to predict the effect of anthelmintic treatment on individual milk yields (Vanderstichel et al., 2013). A different immunodiagnostic test was designed to detect infection by O. ostertagi in beef cattle using non-invasive sampling, i.e., meat juice collected at abattoirs (Charlier et al., 2009).

  • Risk factors for lungworm-associated milk yield losses in grazing dairy cattle

    2021, Veterinary Parasitology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Historically, parasitic bronchitis was considered to be a disease mainly affecting first-season grazers, but several studies have shown that adult dairy cows can also be affected (Gupta and Gibbs, 1969; Bateman et al., 1986; David, 1997 and 1999; Charlier et al., 2016a; Vanhecke et al., 2020). In Europe, herd level prevalences of D. viviparus, based on bulk-tank milk (BTM) surveys, varied between 3% in Switzerland and 63 % in Ireland (Bennema et al., 2009; Höglund et al., 2010; Klewer et al., 2012; Schunn et al., 2013; Bloemhoff et al., 2015; Frey et al., 2018). Since BTM ELISA’s have a low sensitivity, these data probably underestimate the true prevalence (Ploeger et al., 2012; Schunn et al., 2012; Charlier et al., 2016a; Vanhecke et al., 2020).

  • Association between Dictyocaulus viviparus bulk tank milk antibody levels and farmer-reported lungworm outbreaks

    2020, Veterinary Parasitology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Fiedor et al. (2009) adapted the ELISA developed by von Holtum et al. (2008) to be used for the testing of milk samples. This ELISA (hereafter called ‘Hannover ELISA’) is the basis of most of the ELISA’s that are being used in recent research projects (e.g. Schunn et al., 2012; Charlier et al., 2016; Strube et al., 2017; Frey et al., 2018; May et al., 2018). Originally, Fiedor et al. (2009) set the cut-off for the Hannover ELISA at an optical density ratio (ODR) of 0.49 for bulk-tank milk (BTM) samples.

  • Diagnostic Methods for Detecting Internal Parasites of Livestock

    2020, Veterinary Clinics of North America - Food Animal Practice
    Citation Excerpt :

    Beyond microscopy-based detection of F hepatica eggs, there has been strong emphasis on the development and validation of improved diagnostics of fasciolosis using DNA-based molecular methods and immunodiagnostics.32 Commercial ELISA tests for detection of F hepatica antibodies in serum and milk samples, and ELISA tests for detection of coproantigens are available in the Europe and other parts of the world, and have been used in epidemiologic studies in various continents, but not in the United States or Canada.24,33 Overall, immunodiagnostic tests have several advantages over microscopy-based tests, including increased sensitivity; suitability for high throughput formats that are used for a variety of biologic samples; and the ease for implementation in large-scale, herd-level epidemiologic studies.

  • Epidemiological survey of fasciolosis in yaks and sheep living on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau, China

    2020, Acta Tropica
    Citation Excerpt :

    In our present study, the overall prevalence of F. hepatica in yaks was 44.3%. Similar levels of F. hepatica infection was documented in the Guangxi, Xinjiang uygur autonomous region, in Yunnan (China) and Switzerland (Chen, 2012; Hadribek et al., 2017;He et al., 2017; Frey et al., 2018). The prevalence of F. hepatica infection in sheep was higher than sheep in Bangladesh (Rahman et al., 2017), Iran (Khanjari et al., 2014; Ashrafi et al., 2015b; Ezatpour et al., 2015) and the Yunnan province (Ai et al., 2013).

  • A novel pooled milk test strategy for the herd level diagnosis of Dictyocaulus viviparus

    2019, Veterinary Parasitology: X
    Citation Excerpt :

    Milk production losses due to husk have been estimated at 4 kg/cow/day for clinical outbreaks (Holzhauer et al., 2011) with subclinical infections carrying an average estimated loss of 0.5 kg/cow/day (Charlier et al., 2016). Using insensitive bulk tank milk (BTM) tests, dairy herd prevalence levels were shown to vary between 2.9% in Switzerland (Frey et al., 2018), 9% in conventional herds and 18% in organic herds in Sweden (Höglund et al., 2010), 21.1% in Germany (Klewer et al., 2012) and 62.8% in Ireland (Bloemhoff et al., 2015). Robust estimates are lacking for UK grazing herds but the incidence of outbreaks of dictyocaulosis has increased dramatically since the second half of the Nineties (McLeonard and Van Dijk, 2017).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text