Elsevier

Veterinary Parasitology

Volume 183, Issues 1–2, 29 December 2011, Pages 178-183
Veterinary Parasitology

Short communication
Prevalence of selected zoonotic and vector-borne agents in dogs and cats in Costa Rica

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.06.025Get rights and content

Abstract

To estimate the prevalence of enteric parasites and selected vector-borne agents of dogs and cats in San Isidro de El General, Costa Rica, fecal and serum samples were collected from animals voluntarily undergoing sterilization. Each fecal sample was examined for parasites by microscopic examination after fecal flotation and for Giardia and Cryptosporidium using an immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Giardia and Cryptosporidium IFA positive samples were genotyped after PCR amplification of specific DNA if possible. The seroprevalence rates for the vector-borne agents (Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum) were estimated based on results from a commercially available ELISA. Enteric parasites were detected in samples from 75% of the dogs; Ancylostoma caninum, Trichuris vulpis, Giardia, and Toxocara canis were detected. Of the cats, 67.5% harbored Giardia spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Ancylostoma tubaeforme, or Toxocara cati. Both Cryptosporidium spp. isolates that could be sequenced were Cryptosporidium parvum (one dog isolate and one cat isolate). Of the Giardia spp. isolates that were successfully sequenced, the 2 cat isolates were assemblage A and the 2 dog isolates were assemblage D. D. immitis antigen and E. canis antibodies were identified in 2.3% and 3.5% of the serum samples, respectively. The prevalence of enteric zoonotic parasites in San Isidro de El General in Costa Rica is high in companion animals and this information should be used to mitigate public health risks.

Introduction

There are more than 150 zoonoses, some of which are harbored by companion animals (Robertson and Thompson, 2002, Traub et al., 2002). Several parasites that are present in the feces of dogs and cats can cause serious public health concerns. For example, Toxocara canis, Toxocara cati, and Baylisascaris procynosis can induce visceral or ocular larva migrans. Ancylostoma caninum, Ancylostoma braziliense, Ancylostoma tubaeforme, Uncinaria stenocephala and Strongyloides stercoralis can induce cutaneous or visceral larva migrans. The common enteric protozoans Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. can also be zoonotic.

Previous studies reported enteric zoonotic agents in humans, animals and the environment in Costa Rica. Studies performed on samples from humans during 1960–1977 found that over 95% of those studied harbored intestinal parasites; Trichuris (73%), Ascaris (42%), Entamoeba histolytica (41%), hookworms (33%) and Giardia (22%) were common in one historical study (Botero, 1981). Dog or cat feces could have been the source of some of these infections. Toxocara spp. and A. caninum eggs have been found in dog fecal and environmental samples (sand and grass) in all geographical regions of Costa Rica that have been studied (Vargas and Contreras, 1998, Paquet-Durand et al., 2007). Additionally, previous studies have shown Toxocara spp. antibody prevalence rates are high in humans with suspected larva migrans (Paquet-Durand et al., 2007).

Dogs and cats can harbor both host-specific and zoonotic genotypes of Cryptosporidium and Giardia (Monis and Thompson, 2003). Cryptosporidium oocysts were reported in water, contaminated fruits and vegetables, and feces of humans and calves in Costa Rica (Luna et al., 2002, Calvo et al., 2004, Gutierrez et al., 1997, Pérez et al., 1998). However, to our knowledge, no studies have been published reporting Cryptosporidium oocysts in feces of dogs and cats in Costa Rica. While Giardia cysts were detected in the feces of children and dogs in Costa Rica, none of the studies genotyped the Giardia isolates and the potential for dogs and cats to harbor zoonotic assemblages is unknown in this country (Aguilar et al., 1988).

Vector-borne infections, including Dirofilaria immitis, have been detected in humans and dogs in Costa Rica (Beaver et al., 1986, Sancho, 1989, Rodriguez, 2002, Rodriguez, 2003). Additionally, dogs with clinical signs of ehrlichiosis are common in Costa Rica with the first case being reported in 1995 (Menses, 1995). Ehrlichia canis is thought to be the most common Ehrlichia spp. in the region and this tick borne agent is also potentially zoonotic (Menses, 1995, Sambri et al., 2004, Labruna et al., 2007). The presence of other rickettsial diseases, particularly Brazilian spotted fever (BSF; Rocky Mountain spotted fever) has also been reported in Costa Rica (Fuentes, 1986). However, to our knowledge, Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum seroprevalence rates in dogs of Costa Rica are unknown.

The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of enteric parasites in dogs and cats and the seroprevalence rates of the vector-borne agents D. immitis, B. burgdorferi, E. canis and A. phagocytophilum in the dogs of San Isidro de El General, San Jose, Costa Rica.

Section snippets

Study area

Fecal and serum samples were collected from dogs and cats that resided in San Isidro de El General, which is the capital city of Perez Zeledon County in San Jose province and the second largest city in Costa Rica. Pérez Zeledón covers an area of 1905.51 km2 and it has a population of 130,982 inhabitants (Wikipedia). The ecological map of Costa Rica comprises 12 life zones following the World Life Zone System by Holdridge (Paquet-Durand et al., 2007). These 12 regions can be grouped into three

Results

Fecal flotation was performed on samples collected from 60 dogs and 9 cats; adequate feces for IFA testing were available for 58 dogs and 7 cats. The overall prevalence rates for enteric parasites in dogs and cats were 75% and 66.7%, respectively (Table 1). In dogs, Ancylostoma caninum was most prevalent, followed by Trichuris vulpis, Giardia spp., and T. canis. Adult dogs were more likely than puppies to harbor T. vulpis (Table 2). In cats, Giardia spp., A. tubaeforme, Cryptosporidium spp. and

Discussion

Results of this study prove that the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in companion animals of San Isidro de El General in Costa Rica is very high. It is unknown whether any of the dogs or cats had been administered antihelmintics, which may have lessened the prevalence rates for the nematodes but this was considered unlikely. Worldwide, there is significant variation in the prevalence of intestinal parasites with ranges between 26% and 85% (Papazahariadou et al., 2007, Eguia-Aguilar et

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Pedro Boscan, Dr. Adrian Solano, Mariam Corrales, Dr. Alejandro Acevedo, Rosaura Barrantes, Dr. Roberto Carranza, Dr. Lora Ballweber, Juliette Hart and Suzie Friedman. IDEXX Laboratories, Portland ME, donated the SNAP 4DX kits used in the study. Other funding was provided by the Center for Companion Animal Studies at Colorado State University (http://csuvets.colostate.edu/companion/index.htm).

References (59)

  • P.T. Monis et al.

    Cryptosporidium and Giardia-zoonoses: fact or fiction?

    Infect. Genet. Evol.

    (2003)
  • U.M. Morgan et al.

    Molecular and phylogenetic characterization of Cryptosporidium from birds

    Int. J. Parasitol.

    (2001)
  • M. Papazahariadou et al.

    Gastrointestinal parasites of shepherd and hunting dogs in the Serres Prefecture, Northern Greece

    Vet. Parasitol.

    (2007)
  • I. Paquet-Durand et al.

    Prevalence of Toxocara spp., Toxascaris leonine and Ancylostomiadae in public parks and beaches in different climate zones of Costa Rica

    Acta Trop.

    (2007)
  • M. Paul et al.

    Zoonoses of people and their pets: a US perspective on significant pet-associated parasitic diseases

    Trends Parasitol.

    (2010)
  • E. Pérez et al.

    Infectious agents associated with diarrhoea of calves

    Prev. Vet. Med.

    (1998)
  • C. Read et al.

    Correlation between genotypes of Giardia duodenalis and diarrhea

    Int. J. Parasitol.

    (2002)
  • C.M. Read et al.

    Discrimination of all genotypes of Giardia duodenalis at the glutamate dehydrogenase locus using PCR-RFLP

    Infect. Gen. Evol.

    (2004)
  • R. Rimhanen-Finne et al.

    Evaluation of immunofluorescence microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia infections in asymptomatic dogs

    Vet. Parasitol.

    (2007)
  • I.D. Robertson et al.

    Enteric parasitic zoonoses of domesticated dogs and cats

    Microbes Infect.

    (2002)
  • S.L. Souza et al.

    Molecular identification of Giardia duodenalis isolates from humans, dogs, cats and cattle from the state of São Paulo, Brazil, by sequence analysis of fragments of glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) coding gene

    Vet. Parasitol.

    (2007)
  • A.C. Volotão et al.

    Genotyping of Giardia duodenalis from human and animal samples from Brazil using beta-giardin gene: a phylogenetic analysis

    Acta Trop.

    (2007)
  • P. Aguilar et al.

    Prevalence of coccidia and Giardia sp. in dogs in Costa Rica

    Cienc. Vet. Costa Rica

    (1988)
  • V. Alvarez et al.

    Determinación de la resistencia de la garrapata Boophilus

    Cienc. Vet. (Heredia)

    (1999)
  • H. Arai et al.

    Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection among domestic cats in the Tokyo metropolitan district

    Jpn. J. Med. Biol.

    (1990)
  • P.C. Beaver et al.

    Dirofilaria from the index finger of a man in Costa Rica

    Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.

    (1986)
  • P. Biancardi et al.

    Prevalence of Giardia antigen in stool samples from dogs and cats

    Revue Med. Vet.

    (2004)
  • R.E. Black

    Pathogens that cause travelers’ diarrhea in Latin America and Africa

    Rev. Infect. Dis.

    (1986)
  • D. Botero

    Persistence of the endemic intestinal parasitoses in Latin America

    Bull. Pan. Am. Health Organ.

    (1981)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Parasitic fauna of bats from Costa Rica

      2023, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ectoparasite DNA samples (n = 20) were screened for Borrelia spp. and Rickettsia spp. by cPCR targeting the flagelin gene (482bp) and the gltA gene (401bp), respectively (Wójcik-Fatla et al., 2009; Sgroi et al., 2021). Positive samples for Rickettsia spp. were tested by a second cPCR targeting the ompA gene (632bp) present only in SFG rickettsiae (Sgroi et al., 2021). For Borrelia spp. detection, the PCR protocol by Wójcik-Fatla et al. (2009) was slightly modified as follows: 95 °C for 5 min initial denaturation, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 45 s, and then 72 °C for 7 min for final elongation.

    • Cryptosporidium and Giardia in cats and dogs: What is the real zoonotic risk?

      2023, Current Research in Parasitology and Vector-Borne Diseases
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text