Elsevier

Veterinary Microbiology

Volume 175, Issues 2–4, 25 February 2015, Pages 325-331
Veterinary Microbiology

Association between animal age and the prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in a cohort of beef cattle

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.12.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Identified animal age as a critical factor that affects the prevalence of STEC.

  • Heifers had lower STEC prevalence than cows, but higher concentrations when present.

  • STEC prevalence peaked in cows that were two years of age.

  • Uniparous showed the highest STEC prevalence, and no difference among multiparous.

  • Findings have clear implications for the development of on-farm STEC mitigation.

Abstract

Even with advancements in pre- and post-harvest food safety, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) still present challenges to human health. Since cattle are the primary reservoir for STEC, lowering the prevalence of this pathogen in farm animals may reduce STEC outbreaks in humans. However, because many of the factors that modulate the colonization and persistence of STEC in cattle remain unknown, reducing STEC in this host is challenging. In this study, we evaluated a cohort of beef cattle one to eleven years of age to determine the effect of animal age on the prevalence of STEC. During the first year of sample collection, heifers had significantly lower STEC prevalence than cows (37.5% vs. 70%). In the second year of sample collection, STEC prevalence peaked in cows that were two years of age and tended to decrease as animals became older. In addition, by studying a subset of the animals in both years, we observed an increase in STEC prevalence from 40.6% to 53.1% in heifers, whereas cows had a net decrease in STEC prevalence from 71.4% to 61.9%. The results from this study indicate that animal age is a significant factor that influences the prevalence of STEC in cattle. These findings have implications for the development of on-farm mitigation strategies by targeting animals with the highest risk of shedding; it could be possible to reduce pathogen transmission among cattle and prevent zoonotic or foodborne transmission to humans.

Introduction

Even though progress has been made to reduce the incidence of diseases caused by foodborne pathogens, they remain of great economic and public health concerns. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has estimated that pathogenic Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) cause about 269,000 cases of illnesses (including ca. 3700 hospitalizations and 30 deaths) in the United States every year (Scallan et al., 2011). Among STEC serotypes, E. coli O157:H7 is the most well-known and can cause hemorrhagic colitis, bloody diarrhea, and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in humans (Kaper et al., 2004). Non-O157 STEC serogroups, such as O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145, commonly called the “Big Six” serogroups, accounted for about 71% of non-O157 STEC isolates between 1983 and 2002, and have been also associated with human disease outbreaks in United States (Brooks et al., 2005). As such, the Big Six non-O157 STEC have been declared as food adulterants by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2012).

Cattle are considered the primary reservoir for STEC with multiple STEC serogroups isolated from both dairy and beef cattle (Cernicchiaro et al., 2013, Murinda et al., 2004, Pradel et al., 2000). Estimates of the prevalence of STEC in herds of cattle vary widely from 4.6% to 55.9% (Cernicchiaro et al., 2013, Jenkins et al., 2003, Renter et al., 2007). A multitude of factors modulates the colonization and persistent shedding of STEC in cattle. These include bacterial factors that affect the colonization of the recto-anal junction (RAJ), which likely allows the persistence and shedding of this pathogen for weeks or months (Jeong et al., 2013, Naylor et al., 2003). Environmental factors, such as precipitation, temperature, soil characteristics, and presence of wild animals and insects are also believed to modulate the presence of STEC in the environment (Ferens and Hovde, 2011, Shere et al., 2002). It has been recently shown that animal factors, including breeds and physiological differences may affect the prevalence of E. coli O157 in cattle (Jeon et al., 2013).

Since several factors modulate the colonization and persistence of STEC in cattle, controlling the prevalence of STEC in cattle to reduce outbreaks of this pathogen in humans is challenging. It may explain why outbreaks of STEC continue despite a great deal of research focusing on improving food safety. Reducing the prevalence of STEC in cattle at the pre-harvest level has been recently highlighted as an intervention point (Arthur et al., 2011, Chase-Topping et al., 2007, Jeong et al., 2011), and it has been suggested that lowering the STEC prevalence on farms may reduce the total number of E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks in humans (Matthews et al., 2013). Recently we have shown that animal physiological differences contribute to the prevalence of E. coli O157 in cattle (Jeon et al., 2013), which lead us to hypothesize that animal age may also play a role in the prevalence of this pathogen. To better understand the effect of cattle age on the prevalence of STEC, a herd of beef cattle, one to eleven years of age, was monitored for two years to determine the prevalence of multiple STEC genotypes over time.

Section snippets

Ethics statement

Standard practices of animal care and use were applied to animals used in this project. Research protocols, including permission for animal care facility in the University of Florida—North Florida Research and Education Center (NFREC, Marianna, Florida, USA), were approved by the University of Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol no.: 201308027).

Animal management and sample collection

Fecal samples were collected with cotton-tipped swabs (Fisher Scientific, USA) to scrape off bacteria from recto-anal

Heifers had lower prevalence of STEC compared to older cows

In the samples collected during the first year (n = 90), the prevalence of STEC in cattle was 55.6%. Among STEC genotypes, stx2 (33.3%) and stx1/stx2 (30.0%) were the most dominant while only 5.6% of cattle shed STEC with stx1. Multiple genotypes of STEC isolates were detected from 11.1% of the animals (Fig. 1A). To test if animal age affects the prevalence of STEC, we categorized the animals into two groups: heifers (at least one year of age) and cows (at least two years old with at least one

Discussion

Our findings provide insight into the prevalence of STEC in cattle that could be used to mitigate transmission to humans by lowering this pathogen at the pre-harvest level. In this study, we demonstrated that animal age is associated with the prevalence of STEC in cattle. Heifers less than two years old had significantly lower STEC prevalence compared to cows that had previously given birth.

We showed that STEC shedding is lower in heifers compared to cows (Fig. 1). It is possible that multiple

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Drs. Soojin Jeon, Manhwan Oh, Dongjin Park, Seung Cheon Hong, and Ms. Maria B. Cevallos for technical support and helpful discussion. This work was supported by USDA-NIFA-CRIS program (FLA-ANS-005218) and also supported in part by USDA-AFRI Grants program (Nanotechnology for Agricultural and Food Systems, 2014-67021-21597) to KCJ.

References (30)

  • J. Bai et al.

    A multiplex PCR procedure for the detection of six major virulence genes in Escherichia coli O157:H7

    J. Microbiol. Methods

    (2010)
  • K.C. Jeong et al.

    Prevalent and persistent Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains on farms are selected by bovine passage

    Vet. Microbiol.

    (2013)
  • J. Kim et al.

    Factors impacting the regrowth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in dairy manure compost

    J. Food Prot.

    (2009)
  • T.M. Arthur et al.

    Prevalence and characterization of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli on carcasses in commercial beef cattle processing plants

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2002)
  • T.M. Arthur et al.

    Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on cattle hides

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2011)
  • L. Beutin et al.

    Epidemiological relatedness and clonal types of natural populations of Escherichia coli strains producing Shiga toxins in separate populations of cattle and sheep

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (1997)
  • E. Bok et al.

    Age as a factor influencing diversity of commensal E. coli microflora in pigs

    Pol. J. Microbiol.

    (2013)
  • J.T. Brooks et al.

    Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in the United States, 1983–2002

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (2005)
  • N. Cernicchiaro et al.

    Prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and associated virulence genes in feces of commercial feedlot cattle

    Foodborne Pathog. Dis.

    (2013)
  • M.E. Chase-Topping et al.

    Risk factors for the presence of high-level shedders of Escherichia coli O157 on Scottish farms

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (2007)
  • S. Cho et al.

    Cattle-level risk factors associated with fecal shedding of Shiga toxin-encoding bacteria on dairy farms, Minnesota, USA

    Can. J. Vet. Res.

    (2009)
  • S.E. Dowd et al.

    Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP)

    BMC Microbiol.

    (2008)
  • L.M. Durso et al.

    Animal-to-animal variation in fecal microbial diversity among beef cattle

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2010)
  • W.A. Ferens et al.

    Escherichia coli O157:H7: animal reservoir and sources of human infection

    Foodborne Pathog. Dis.

    (2011)
  • J. Frohlich et al.

    Maternally and naturally acquired antibodies to Shiga toxins in a cohort of calves shedding Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Seasonal effect on Salmonella, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 in the beef industry in Colombia, South America

      2021, Heliyon
      Citation Excerpt :

      The authors suggest that this can be due to a more developed stomach in which high volatile fatty acids suppress the growth of E. coli O157:H7 (Cray and Moon, 1995). Contrary to these results, Mir et al. (2015) found an inverse influence between animal age and STEC shedding in feces. Based on their study, heifers have an STEC prevalence of 37.5% while cows 70%.

    • The bacterial biota of laboratory-reared edible mealworms (Tenebrio molitor L.): From feed to frass

      2018, International Journal of Food Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      To date, STEC has been isolated in a wide variety of vectors, including insects (Amézquita-Lòpez et al., 2017). As reported by Mir et al. (2015), insects are capable of modulating the occurrence of STEC in the environment. Notwithstanding, there is a paucity of scientific literature on the occurrence of STEC in insects.

    • Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and bacterial diversity in corn silage contaminated with the pathogen and treated with chemical or microbial additives

      2017, Journal of Dairy Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      The estimated annual cost associated with EC illnesses can be as high as $405 million (Frenzen et al., 2005). Cattle harbor and shed EC in their manure (Lahti et al., 2003; Mir et al., 2015) and are considered the main reservoirs of the pathogen (Cernicchiaro et al., 2013). Up to 30% of all cattle are asymptomatic carriers of EC (Callaway et al., 2006; Reinstein et al., 2007) and livestock feeds are considered to be the vehicle of transmission among livestock (Hancock et al., 2001; Davis et al., 2003).

    • Control of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in contaminated alfalfa silage: Effects of silage additives

      2016, Journal of Dairy Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Escherichia coli O157:H7 is estimated to cause about 75,000 illness cases and 50 deaths yearly in the United States (Mead et al., 1999). Cattle are considered the primary reservoir of E. coli O157:H7 (Cernicchiaro et al., 2013), and they shed the pathogen in their manure (Lahti et al., 2003; Mir et al., 2015). Animal feeds, such as silage, have been suggested to be the vehicle for transmission of the pathogen among livestock (Hancock et al., 2001; Davis et al., 2003).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text