Optimizing dewaterability of drinking water treatment sludge by ultrasound treatment: Correlations to sludge physicochemical properties
Introduction
A typical byproduct resulting from the production of drinking water by use of aluminum or iron-based salts as coagulants is sludge that collects in the primary settling tanks and backwash drainage of filters [1]. Disposal of this drinking water treatment sludge (DWTS) depends on local conditions and customs, and may include reuse as building materials, burial into soil, application to farmland, sanitary landfills or ocean disposal [2], [3]. The most common disposal strategy in China is burying DWTS in deserted soils and sanitary landfills. However, prior to disposal, efficient dewatering of the sludge is of paramount importance as a reduced volume and weight results in lower management, transport and disposal costs. In addition to reducing waste disposal, the reuse of DWTS could contribute to improving coagulation and absorption process in terms of the removal of particulates [4], phosphorus [5], arsenate [6], boron [7], and heavy metals, i.e., copper (II) and lead (II) [8]. However, the enhanced capacity for pollutants removal associated with DWTS recycling process is undesirable due to the organic solubilization [9]. An effective pretreatment should be considered, aiming to degrading or inactivating the constituents in sludge, and to facilitating the solid-liquid separation of sonicated sludge flocs.
Specific treatments of waste-activated sludge (WAS) that facilitate the dewatering process include the addition of polymers and oxidants, thermal conditioning, and ultra-sonication individually or the combinations of thermo-chemo-sonic methods [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. Of these, we consider ultra-sonication as an environmental friendly and economically viable method. Ultra-sonication performs a series of compression and rarefaction cycles, leading to the generation of millions of cavitation bubbles. Spontaneous implosion of these bubbles results in extreme micro-localized conditions, with temperatures reaching up to 5000˚C, pressures of up to 100 MPa, and the generation of free radicals such as OH, HO2 and O [19]. Low frequency is widely used for WAS disintegration, whereas high frequency is applied for the decontamination of water and wastewater through sonochemical reactions [19], [20], [21].
Most information on ultra-sonication was available from treatment of WAS, with both positive and negative effects on dewatering efficiency being reported. In a number of studies ultra-sonication enhanced the dewaterability of WAS as evidenced by a decrease in capillary suction time (CST) and in the specific resistance to filtration (SRF) [22], [23]. In contrast, other studies described that WAS dewaterability was negatively affected by ultra-sonication, whereby CST and SRF increased in a time-dependent manner [24], [25]. WAS filterability was further affected by factors such as the concentration and properties of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS), floc size, the surface charge of flocs, and viscosity [18], [26], [27]. A high concentration of EPS generally leads to low WAS filterability, but the effect depends on the nature of the EPS and stratification structure of sludge (soluble, loosely bound or tightly bound EPS, polysaccharide vs. protein, etc.); soluble EPS most strongly decreases the filterability of WAS [12], [26], [27]. The abundance of floc size as supra- and true colloidal particles (smaller than 10 μm) correlates with a decreased WAS filterability. An increased negative surface charge of flocs also decreases the filterability, by enhancing the dispersivity of WAS suspension [28]. Thus, the increased stability of colloidal particles results in less aggregation and subsequently increases the packing density of flocs.
Knowledge on the effect of ultra-sonication on the dewaterability of DWTS is limited. There is large quantities of inorganic compounds in DWTS including sediment mainly hydroxides due to use of aluminum or iron-based coagulants, and other mineralizer origins i.e., wollastonite and silicon dioxide. The organic compounds in DWTS are attributed to the presence of algae and bacteria, of which the endogenous organics in the DWTS are humus-like derived from the decay of plants, and a small quantity of EPS are mainly attributed to the presence of pathogenic microorganisms (Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, etc) greatly differing from that in WAS predominated by nitrifying bacteria, denitrifying bacteria and polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria, etc. Our preliminary study demonstrated that the content of soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD), polysaccharide and protein in DWTS is very low, and that the number of microorganisms present in raw DWTS samples was four orders of magnitude lower than what is typically found in WAS [29]. Given the differences in physicochemical and biological properties of DWTS and WAS, ultrasound treatment will have different effects, ultimately affecting the sludge dewaterability in unexpected ways. Furthermore, DWTS can largely vary in terms of physical, chemical and biological characteristics, leading to a relatively unpredictable dewatering behavior.
To the best of our knowledge, there are few literatures throughout the world on the dewaterability of DWTS using ultra-sonication individually, and the relationship of solubilized organics from DWTS and/or sludge surface characteristics with dewaterability has not been well constructed. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were (i) to assess the dewatering performance of DWTS, as expressed as SRF and CST following different sonication conditions; for this we compared two sonoreactor types and varied frequency and energy density; (ii) to clarify the cause of dewaterability variation by establishing the relationship between dewaterability and solubilized organics and DWTS flocs surface characteristics; and (iii) to reveal the involved ultrasound mechanisms by analyzing corrosion patterns of aluminum foil as a measure for cavitation field distribution.
The results presented here can provide a theoretical basis for the practical application of ultra-sonication for DWTS dewatering, and can support implications for an effective dewatering strategies of DWTS when using ultra-sonication alone or combinations of ultra-sonication with polymers, acids, alkalis or oxidants.
Section snippets
Raw DWTS used in the experiments
The raw DWTS used in all experiments was collected from a full-scale water treatment plant in Beijing, China that uses a coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation-filtration process where poly-aluminum chloride and ferric chloride (FeCl3) are employed as coagulant. The characteristics of the raw DWTS batches are given in Table 1. The DWTS was transferred immediately to the laboratory and stored at 4 °C upon use. Prior to use the sludge was warmed to ambient temperature. All experiments were
Comparison of batch and probe-type sonoreactors
As indicated by a high SRF (12–22 × 1012m/kg, Table 1), the DWTS used is difficult to dewater. We determined if dewaterability could be improved by ultra-sonication using either a bath or a probe-type sonoreactor, at frequencies of 25 and 40 kHz, determining the SRF as a measure for dewaterability. The energy density was kept constant at 0.03 W/mL. The results are shown in Fig. 2.
In the bath sonoreactor, the SRF continuously increased as ultra-sonication prolonged, reaching a maximum after 30 min
Conclusions
Using an experimental setup, a number of ultra-sonication parameters were varied to identify the optimal conditions to increase dewaterability performance of DWTS. From the obtained results the following main conclusions can be drawn:
- (1)
Lower power level (0.03, 1.0 W/mL) and less sonication time (within10min) increased dewaterability, with marginal disintegration degree and few quantities of released soluble EPS. At a low acoustic energy density of 0.03 W/mL, the high frequencies tested up to160
Acknowledgements
This research is jointly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51278005, 51778012), Hubei Natural science foundation (2017CFB316), Hubei education department instructional foundation (B2017315) and Doctoral Fund of WTBU (D2016002). We would like to give our sincere thanks to the peer-reviews for their suggestions.
References (40)
- et al.
Effectiveness of a drinking-water treatment sludge in removing different phosphorus species from aqueous solution
Sep. Purif. Technol.
(2007) - et al.
Shang, Re-use of water treatment works sludge to enhance particulate pollutant removal from sewage
Water Res.
(2005) - et al.
Understanding removal of phosphate or arsenate onto water treatment residual solids
J. Hazard. Mater.
(2011) - et al.
Removal of boron using aluminum-based water treatment residuals (Al-WTRs)
Desalination
(2011) - et al.
Copper(II) and lead(II) removal from aqueous solution by water treatment residues
J. Hazard. Mater.
(2015) - et al.
Enhancement of waste activated sludge dewaterability using calcium peroxide pre-oxidation and chemical re-flocculation
Water Res.
(2016) - et al.
Variations in physical, chemical and biological properties in relation to sludge dewaterability under Fe(II)-Oxone conditioning
Water Res.
(2017) - et al.
Changes of physicochemical properties of sewage sludge during ozonation treatment: Correlation to sludge dewaterability
Chem. Eng. J.
(2016) - et al.
Influence of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) treated by combined ultrasound pretreatment and chemical re-flocculation on water plant sludge water settling performance
Chemosphere
(2017) - et al.
Combined thermo-chemo-sonic disintegration of waste activated sludge for biogas production
Bioresour. Technol.
(2015)
New sludge pretreatment method to improve dewaterability of waste activated sludge
Bioresour. Technol.
Effects of ultrasound pretreatment on the characteristic evolutions of drinking water treatment sludge and its impact on coagulation property of sludge recycling process
Ultrason. Sonochem.
Physiochemical properties of digested sewage sludge with ultrasonic treatment
Ultrason. Sonochem.
Ultrasonics treatment on activated sewage sludge from petro-plant for reducation
Ultrasonics
Components of released liquid from ultrasonic waste activated sludge disintegration
Ultrason. Sonochem.
Dewaterability of waste activated sludge with ultrasound conditioning
Bioresour. Technol.
Characterization of drinking water treatment sludge after ultrasound treatment
Ultrason. Sonochem.
Coagulation performance and flocs characteristics of recycling pre-sonicated condensate sludge for low-turbidity surface water treatment
Sep. Purif. Technol.
The removal characteristics of natural organic matter in the recycling of drinking water treatment sludge: Role of solubilized organics
Ultrason. Sonochem.
Effect of conditioning by PAM polymers with, different charges on the structural and characteristic evolutions of water treatment residuals
Water Res.
Cited by (20)
The use of power ultrasound in biofuel production, bioremediation, and other applications
2023, Power Ultrasonics: Applications of High-Intensity Ultrasound, Second EditionEffects of voltage and pressure on sludge electro-dewatering process and the dewatering mechanisms investigation
2022, Environmental ResearchCitation Excerpt :Thus, the dewatering step is indispensable to reduce sludge volume and enhance the sludge disposal efficiency. The conventional mechanical dewatering technologies, like plate-and-frame pressure filtration and centrifugation dewatering, usually requires some critical pre-processing, such as adding lime and ferric chloride (Yu et al., 2016) and adding polymers (Zhou et al., 2020), acid/alkaline treatment (He et al., 2017), advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) (Liang et al., 2020; Jin et al., 2022), sonication (Meng et al., 2018) and thermal and freeze treatment (Yu et al., 2014), and can only remove part of the free water and capillary combined water from sludge. After the conventional mechanical dewatering treatment, the final MC of sludge is still about 80% (Li et al., 2018).
SLUDGE FROM A WATER TREATMENT PLANT AS AN ADSORBENT OF ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS Sludge from a water treatment plant as an adsorbent of endocrine disruptors
2022, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringAluminium recovered coagulant from water treatment sludge as an alternative for improving the primary treatment of domestic wastewater
2022, Journal of Cleaner ProductionInsights into the enhancement of waste activated sludge dewaterability using sodium dichloroisocyanurate and dodecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride: Performance, mechanism, and implication
2021, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Therefore, it was crucial to take some measures to destroy the stability of sludge colloids and disrupt the rigid EPS network structure to release the trapped water. Physical methods with thermal treatment (Liu et al., 2019; Ge et al., 2019a), ultrasonication (Bian et al., 2021; Meng et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2020b), electrolysis (Li et al., 2016) and microwave irradiation included (Liu et al., 2016), are still in the laboratory research which does not have large-scale industrial application. Chemical approaches are based on acid and alkali treatment (Chen et al., 2001; Ruiz-Hernando et al., 2014; Ge et al., 2019b), and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) represented by Fenton and persulfate oxidation (Cai et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2016; Song et al., 2016; He et al., 2015; Xiao et al., 2017; Gholikandi et al., 2018).
An innovative approach to the application of ultrasounds to remove polyethylene microspheres from activated sludge
2021, Separation and Purification TechnologyCitation Excerpt :As colloids are generated from the disruption of the sludge floc, they will remain in suspension due to their low density, which increases the supernatant turbidity (Fig. 1. b) [36,37]. The ultrasound tests for the mixed liquor were performed at a frequency of 80 kHz, and varying the power input (30 W, 60 W and 90 W) and sonication time (5, 10 and 15 min).