Original ContributionDifferential Diagnosis between Pre- and Postganglionic Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Lesions by Ultrasonography
Introduction
The number of adult patients with brachial plexus injuries has increased in China in recent years. Brachial plexus injuries are usually caused by tractions or stretching that separates the arm from the shoulder and can be divided into two major categories: pre- and postganglionic brachial plexus injuries. Preganglionic lesions, or intraspinal nerve root avulsions, represent avulsions of nerve roots from the spinal cord (Fig. 1), which cannot be repaired directly and can only be treated with nerve transfers (neurolization). Postganglionic lesions are reparable and represent lesions distal to the dorsal ganglions (Fig. 1), including lesions of spinal nerves, trunks, fascicles and branches. It is important to distinguish preganglionic brachial plexus lesions from postganglionic lesions because surgical treatment differs and only accurate classification allows proper treatment (Midha, 1997, Penkert et al., 1999, Dubuisson and Kline, 2002, Chuang, 2008, Chuang, 2009). Although MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) or CT (computed tomography) myelography had been used, differentiation between pre- and postganglionic lesions remains critical (Midha, 1997, Penkert et al., 1999, van Es, 2001, Amrami and Port, 2005, van Es et al., 2010). Therapeutic decisions are presently based on a combination of clinical history, physical examination, neurologic tests and imaging tests. With the development of advanced ultrasound techniques, ultrasonography has already been used to determine the site, extent and severity of brachial plexus lesions (Apan et al., 2001, Retzl et al., 2001, Martinoli et al., 2002, Shafighi et al., 2003, Graif et al., 2004, Gruber et al., 2007). This study investigated the feasibility of differentiation between pre- and postganglionic brachial plexus lesions by preoperative ultrasonography.
Section snippets
Patients
Forty (36 males and four females) healthy adult volunteers (21 to 49, 35 ± 6 years) were recruited to assess the feasibility of ultrasonography to depict brachial plexus elements and observe normal brachial plexus ultrasonographic texture. Twenty-three consecutive patients with clinical evidence (including history review, neurologic examination and functional testing) of brachial plexus traumatic injuries participated in this study, including 21 males and two females, with an average age of 36
Ultrasonographic detection rate and normal manifestations of brachial plexus
C5, C6 and C7, the upper and middle trunks, and three fascicles of the brachial plexus and major braches were satisfactorily visualized in all patients and normal control subjects (126/126, 100%). The C8 roots and the lower trunks were satisfactorily visualized in 106 subjects (37/46 in patients and 69/80 in normal control subjects), such that the detection rate was 84%. The T1 roots were satisfactorily visualized in 81 subjects (29/46 in patients and 52/80 in normal control subjects) and the
Discussion
CT myelography and MRI have been proven to be useful in diagnosing brachial plexus injuries. Specifically, intraspinal alterations of root avulsions can be detected by CT myelography and MRI (Miller et al., 1993, Narakas, 1993, Hems et al., 1999, Amrami and Port, 2005, van Ouwerkerk et al., 2005, Yoshikawa et al., 2006, Sureka et al., 2009, van Es et al., 2010). However, insufficient coverage of the entire cervico-thoracic region and high radiation exposure limit the use of CT. MRI is currently
References (26)
- et al.
Imaging the brachial plexus
Hand Clin
(2005) - et al.
Surface landmarks of brachial plexus: Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for supraclavicular approach with anatomical correlation
Eur J Ultrasound
(2001) - et al.
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of traction injuries to the adult brachial plexus
J Hand Surg Br
(1999) - et al.
MRI of brachial plexopathies
Clin Radiol
(2009) - et al.
MRI of the brachial plexus: a pictorial review
Eur J Radiol
(2010) Brachial plexus reconstruction based on the new definition of level of injury
Injury
(2008)Adult brachial plexus reconstruction with the level of injury: Review and personal experience
Plast Reconstr Surg
(2009)- et al.
Sonographic mapping of the normal brachial plexus
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
(2003) - et al.
Brachial plexus injury: A survey of 100 consecutive cases from a single service
Neurosurgery
(2002) - et al.
Sonographic evaluation of brachial plexus pathology
Eur Radiol
(2004)
High-resolution ultrasound of the supraclavicular brachial plexus–Can it improve therapeutic decisions in patients with plexus trauma?
Eur Radiol
Sonography of brachial plexus traction injuries
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Ultrasonographic features of brachial plexus traumatic rupture. Case illustration
J Neurosurg
Cited by (16)
Diagnostic Ability of Ultrasonography in Brachial Plexus Root Injury at Different Stages Post-trauma
2022, Ultrasound in Medicine and BiologyCitation Excerpt :A previous study indicated that the detection of BP nerve roots was 100% for C5–C7, 84% for C8 and 64% for T1 (Chen et al. 2011), which is consistent with our findings that detection rates decrease as nerve depth increases. This is also why some C8 and T1 injuries can be missed with ultrasound because of poor visualization (Haber et al. 2006; Chen et al. 2011; Zhu et al. 2014). Considering the anatomic location, injury type and severity, ultrasound had an overall sensitivity of 87% (95% CI: 78%–94%) for identifying major lesions in a study by Chin et al. (2018) and 67% (95% CI: 64%–91%) in the study by Tagliafico et al. (2013).
High-resolution ultrasonography for the diagnosis of brachial plexus root lesions
2014, Ultrasound in Medicine and BiologyCitation Excerpt :The oblique coronal and transverse sections are the ultrasonographic planes most often used to observe the normal anatomy and abnormalities of BP roots (Haber et al. 2006). On these planes, BP roots are displayed in longitudinal views, which delineate the anatomy by showing the root exiting intervertebral foramina and running between the anterior and posterior tubercles of the transverse processes as tubular structures with hyper-echoic walls and thin, linear parallels within the hypo-echoic matrix (Chen et al. 2011). After exiting the intervertebral foramina, nerve roots become smaller.
Ultrasound Evaluation of Peripheral Nerves and Focal Neuropathies: Correlation With Electrodiagnosis, Second Edition
2020, Ultrasound Evaluation of Peripheral Nerves and Focal Neuropathies: Correlation With Electrodiagnosis, Second Edition