Review
Laboratory diagnosis of ruminant abortion in Europe

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.03.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Abortion in ruminants is a major cause of economic loss worldwide, and the management and control of outbreaks is important in limiting their spread, and in preventing zoonotic infections. Given that rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis is central to controlling abortion outbreaks, the submission of tissue samples to laboratories offering the most appropriate tests is essential. Direct antigen and/or DNA detection methods are the currently preferred methods of reaching an aetiological diagnosis, and ideally these results are confirmed by the demonstration of corresponding macroscopic and/or histopathological lesions in the fetus and/or the placenta. However, the costs of laboratory examinations may be considerable and, even under optimal conditions, the percentage of aetiological diagnoses reached can be relatively low. This review focuses on the most commonly occurring and important abortifacient pathogens of ruminant species in Europe highlighting their epizootic and zoonotic potential. The performance characteristics of the various diagnostic methods used, including their specific advantages and limitations, are discussed.

Introduction

An increase in the number of spontaneous abortions in a herd or flock is a dramatic event for the farmer involved, and a range of epizootic and/or zoonotic diseases, or even emerging diseases, may be the cause. Farmers, their veterinary practitioners and, where appropriate, State veterinarians require rapid and reliable results from diagnostic veterinary laboratories, a process that is not always easily achieved. While a plethora of pathogens can cause abortion in ruminants, there is no single diagnostic procedure that can be used to identify these, and in some circumstances the infectious event triggering an abortion may precede it by some weeks or even months and evidence of the presence of the pathogen may have become obliterated by autolysis. By this time it may no longer be possible to demonstrate a rise in maternal antibody indicative of recent infection. Since attempting to rule out all the possible causes of abortion can prove costly, diagnostic laboratories primarily focus on the most likely aetiologies and those with zoonotic potential.

This review assesses the most important viral, bacterial, fungal and protozoal causes of abortion in cattle, sheep and goats in Switzerland, focusing on the methods used to reach a diagnosis and highlighting protocols that optimise pathogen detection. The information presented will be of interest to laboratory diagnosticians, as well as veterinary practitioners and State veterinarians. An overview of the infectious abortifacients discussed is given in Table 1.

Section snippets

Bovine herpesvirus type I

Bovine herpesvirus 1 (BoHV-1) infections remain a major cause of abortion, venereal and respiratory disease in ruminants in countries where the pathogen has not been eradicated (Kirkbride, 1992). Latency with recurrent infection is typical of infection with these viruses: during latency the virus survives within cells without causing clinical signs, and upon reactivation, repeated abortion may occur (Nandi et al., 2009). Given that virus is shed during reactivation, an infected animal remains a

Brucella spp

Brucellosis causes significant losses due to abortion and infertility in ruminants, but is also zoonotic resulting in persistent or ‘undulant’ fever with influenza-like symptoms and can be fatal when endocarditis and encephalitis ensues (OIE, 2012). The genus Brucella contains highly infectious species that infect a wide variety of mammals. Brucella spp. are small, non-motile gram-negative rods, and infection in humans arises from direct or indirect contact with infected animals or through the

Neospora caninum

Neospora caninum is one of the most important causes of infectious abortion in dairy cattle in industrialised countries, with a prevalence rate of up to 40% (Dubey and Schares, 2011). Abortions due to N. caninum have also been reported for small ruminants (Hässig et al., 2003). This protozoan parasite is taxonomically located within the family Toxoplasmatidae and the order Eimeriina. It is closely related to Toxoplasma gondii, and dogs, wolves, coyotes and dingoes have been identified as final

Aspergillus spp

Mycotic abortions in ruminants are usually sporadic events. Knudtson and Kirkbride (1992) evaluated the results of the laboratory diagnoses of 6858 cases of bovine abortion and stillbirth in the northern plains region of the USA: they identified fungi as the cause of abortion in 6.8% of cases with Aspergillus fumigatus most frequently incriminated (5%). This fungal species was also determined to be the most common mycotic cause of abortion in Denmark (Jensen et al., 1991) and Ireland (Sheridan

Discussion

The objective of this review article is to provide essential information about the most commonly occurring causes of ruminant abortion in Europe. Veterinary laboratory diagnosticians need to provide expert advice to veterinary practitioners and state veterinarians on the taking of the most appropriate samples in cases of ruminant abortion as well as on the interpretation of test results. Sourcing the relevant information can prove challenging as such material is often dispersed over a wide

Conclusions

The accurate diagnosis of abortion in ruminants (or indeed other species) needs to be based on obtaining a concise clinical history, careful gross and histopathological examination of any placental/fetal lesions, and the selection and submission to the laboratory of appropriate samples. The results of the tests carried out should be correlated back to the particular circumstances of the abortion problem in order to validate their plausibility. While such stepwise, methodical procedures may not

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors of this paper has a financial or personal relationship with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank Professor M.M. Wittenbrink of the Institute for Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, at the University of Zurich for his helpful input und discussion.

References (142)

  • BrockK.V.

    The persistence of bovine viral diarrhea virus

    Biologicals: Journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization

    (2003)
  • BrodersenB.W.

    Immunohistochemistry used as a screening method for persistent bovine viral diarrhea virus

    Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice

    (2004)
  • BuxtonD. et al.

    Ovine chlamydial abortion: Characterization of the inflammatory immune response in placental tissues

    Journal of Comparative Pathology

    (2002)
  • Dal PozzoF. et al.

    Bovine infection with bluetongue virus with special emphasis on European serotype 8

    The Veterinary Journal

    (2009)
  • DavisonH.C. et al.

    Estimation of vertical and horizontal transmission parameters of Neospora caninum infections in dairy cattle

    International Journal of Parasitology

    (1999)
  • DijkstraT. et al.

    Natural postnatal Neospora caninum infection in cattle can persist and lead to endogenous transplacental infection

    Veterinary Parasitology

    (2008)
  • DubeyJ.P.

    Toxoplasmosis in sheep – the last 20 years

    Veterinary Parasitology

    (2009)
  • DubeyJ.P. et al.

    Diagnosis of bovine neosporosis

    Veterinary Parasitology

    (2006)
  • DubeyJ.P. et al.

    Neosporosis in animals – the last five years

    Veterinary Parasitology

    (2011)
  • GariglianyM.M. et al.

    Schmallenberg virus: A new Shamonda/Sathuperi-like virus on the rise in Europe

    Antiviral Research

    (2012)
  • GrahnR.A. et al.

    An improved molecular assay for Tritrichomonas foetus

    Veterinary Parasitology

    (2005)
  • GreubG.

    Parachlamydia acanthamoebae, an emerging agent of pneumonia

    Clinical Microbiology and Infection

    (2009)
  • GroomsD.L.

    Reproductive consequences of infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus

    Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice

    (2004)
  • HässigM. et al.

    Neospora caninum in sheep: A herd case report

    Veterinary Parasitology

    (2003)
  • JamesL.F. et al.

    Effect of natural toxins on reproduction

    Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice

    (1994)
  • LaroucauK. et al.

    Differential identification of Chlamydophila abortus live vaccine strain 1B and C. abortus field isolates by PCR-RFLP

    Vaccine

    (2010)
  • LongbottomD. et al.

    Animal chlamydioses and zoonotic implications

    Journal of Comparative Pathology

    (2003)
  • LongbottomD. et al.

    Vaccination against chlamydial infections in men and animals

    Veterinary Journal

    (2006)
  • LowJ.C. et al.

    A review of Listeria monocytogenes and listeriosis

    The Veterinary Journal

    (1997)
  • MaclachlanN.J.

    Bluetongue: History, global epidemiology, and pathogenesis

    Preventive Veterinary Medicine

    (2011)
  • MaclachlanN.J. et al.

    Bluetongue and equine viral arteritis viruses as models of virus-induced fetal injury and abortion

    Animal Reproduction Science

    (2000)
  • MaclachlanN.J. et al.

    The pathology and pathogenesis of bluetongue

    Journal of Comparative Pathology

    (2009)
  • MoeningV.

    Pestiviruses: A review

    Veterinary Microbiology

    (1990)
  • NettletonP.F. et al.

    Ruminant pestiviruses

    British Veterinary Journal

    (1995)
  • PantchevA. et al.

    Detection of all Chlamydophila and Chlamydia spp. of veterinary interest using species-specific real- time PCR assay

    Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

    (2010)
  • PresiP. et al.

    BVD eradication in Switzerland – A new approach

    Veterinary Microbiology

    (2010)
  • PresiP. et al.

    Bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) eradication in Switzerland – experiences of the first two years

    Preventive Veterinary Medicine

    (2011)
  • AitkenI.D. et al.

    Chlamydial abortion

  • Arricau-BouveryN. et al.

    Is Q fever an emerging or re-emerging zoonosis?

    Veterinary Research

    (2005)
  • BaszlerT.V. et al.

    Detection by PCR of Neospora caninum in fetal tissues from spontaneous bovine abortions

    Journal of Clinical Microbiology

    (1999)
  • BaudD. et al.

    Emerging role of Chlamydia and Chlamydia-like organisms in adverse pregnancy outcomes

    Current Opinion Infectious Diseases

    (2008)
  • BaudD. et al.

    Waddlia chondrophila: From bovine abortion to human miscarriage

    Clinical Infectious Diseases

    (2011)
  • BildfellR.J. et al.

    Coxiella burnetii infection is associated with placentitis in cases of bovine abortion

    Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

    (2000)
  • BonDurantR.H. et al.

    Detection of Tritrichomonas foetus by polymerase chain reaction in cultured isolates, cervicovaginal mucus, and formalin-fixed tissues from infected heifers and fetuses

    Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

    (2003)
  • BorelN. et al.

    Chlamydia-related abortions in cattle from Graubunden, Switzerland

    Veterinary Pathology

    (2006)
  • BraunU. et al.

    Border Disease in einem Schafbetrieb

    Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde

    (2002)
  • BrennerD.J. et al.
  • BritoB.P. et al.

    Variation in Bluetongue virus real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay results in blood samples of sheep, cattle, and alpaca

    Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

    (2011)
  • BrownlieJ. et al.

    Pathogenesis and epidemiology of bovine virus diarrhoea virus infection of cattle

    Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires

    (1987)
  • BurallL.S. et al.

    Genomic analysis of an attenuated Chlamydia abortus live vaccine strain reveals defects in central metabolism and surface proteins

    Infection and Immunity

    (2009)
  • Cited by (52)

    • Coxiella burnetii and Chlamydia spp. coinfection in small ruminant abortion in Portugal

      2022, Small Ruminant Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In Europe, it is considered the most frequent cause of abortion due to an infectious agent both in sheep and goats (Borel et al., 2014). OEA is characterized by the occurrence of abortion at the end of the gestation, weak or lifeless animals born at the end of the gestational time, with release of a large number of potentially infectious organisms (Borel et al., 2014). Placental membranes have great value for Chlamydia infection diagnose, however, vaginal swabs can also be collected at the time of abortion (Borel et al., 2014).

    • Bacterial, protozoal and viral abortions in sheep and goats in South America: A review

      2021, Small Ruminant Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Abortion rates up to 5% are often considered normal (Edmondson et al., 2012). Bacterial, parasitic (protozoal), viral, nutritional, genetic, metabolic and toxic causes of abortion have been identified (Borel et al., 2014). Among them, bacterial, protozoal and viral diseases are the most frequently recognized causes of abortion in sheep and goats worldwide (Kirkbride, 1993; Moeller, 2001).

    • Retrospective study of factors associated with bovine infectious abortion and perinatal mortality

      2021, Preventive Veterinary Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, calculating the prevalence of APM caused by BVDv, based only on fetal BVDv antigen detection, may lead to an underestimation of the true prevalence. However, Borel et al. (2014) mentioned that the use of ELISA Ag tests on fetal tissue might result in false-positive results, perhaps because of the effect of autolysis. As the fetus is able to produce BVDv specific antibodies when an infection is acquired after 150–180 days of gestation (Hansen et al., 2010), demonstrating antibodies in fetal/calf fluids may confirm intrauterine infection (Lanyon et al., 2014b).

    • Knowledge, attitude, and practices to zoonotic disease risks from livestock birth products among smallholder communities in Ethiopia

      2021, One Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      Animal to human transmission mainly results from direct contact with infected materials such as uterine discharge, aborted foetus, and placenta infected while assisting with animal delivery and while caring for the new-born, or through dealing with abortion cases or exposure to a contaminated environment with abortion products [28,40]. Animal birth products from an infected dam carry a large number of these pathogens, which can be a source of infection for an entire household because of their close contact with livestock in unsanitary conditions [13,22]. There is increasing evidence that zoonotic causes of animal abortion are prevalent and widely spread in all livestock production systems in Ethiopia [17,19,20,25,54,56,57].

    • Improvement of Leptospira spp. diagnosis in aborted bovine fetuses by qPCR

      2020, Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text