Elsevier

Thin Solid Films

Volume 496, Issue 2, 21 February 2006, Pages 389-394
Thin Solid Films

Epitaxial growth of rhenium with sputtering

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2005.09.091Get rights and content

Abstract

We have grown epitaxial Rhenium (Re) (0001) films on α-Al2O3 (0001) substrates using sputter deposition in an ultra high vacuum system. We find that better epitaxy is achieved with DC rather than with RF sputtering. With DC sputtering, epitaxy is obtained with the substrate temperatures above 700 °C and deposition rates below 0.1 nm/s. The epitaxial Re films are typically composed of terraced hexagonal islands with screw dislocations, and island size gets larger with high temperature post-deposition annealing. The growth starts in a three dimensional mode but transforms into two dimensional mode as the film gets thicker. With a thin (∼2 nm) seed layer deposited at room temperature and annealed at a high temperature, the initial three dimensional growth can be suppressed. This results in larger islands when a thick film is grown at 850 °C on the seed layer. We also find that when a room temperature deposited Re film is annealed to higher temperatures, epitaxial features start to show up above ∼600 °C, but the film tends to be disordered.

Introduction

Epitaxial superconducting films of refractory metals are a promising new template for single crystal tunnel barriers in Josephson junction quantum bit (qubit) devices [1]. In existing Josephson junction qubits, it is believed that the widely used amorphous AlOx tunnel barriers have undesirable two-state fluctuators. It is speculated that single-crystal tunnel barriers such as sapphire (α-Al2O3) may be free of such decoherence sources [1]. The refractory metals are appealing because preparation of a single-crystal tunnel barrier requires an epitaxial base electrode of high melting temperature with a good lattice match to the tunnel barrier. Along this line, Re is a good candidate because it has a very high melting temperature (3186 °C) and a hexagonal close packed (hcp) structure with a very good lattice match (a = 0.276 nm) to the oxygen sublattice (a = 0.277 nm) of α-Al2O3 (0001) [2]. Re also has a reasonably high superconducting critical temperature (Tc = 1.7 K) [3], which is compatible with the present qubit technology [1]. In addition, according to the free energy of oxide formation under the same oxidation condition, Re has much weaker tendency for oxidation than do most other elemental superconductors such as Nb [4], and thus a sharp interface between the base layer and the oxide tunnel barrier will be relatively easy to achieve with Re.

The most common epitaxial growth technique for refractory metals such as Re is the electron-beam (e-beam) based molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) technique [5], since the popular Knudsen cell based MBE [6] is not compatible with the high melting temperatures of refractory metals. On the other hand, the dominant thin film deposition method for device fabrication is sputtering [7]. While there are reports of epitaxial growth of Re by e-beam evaporation in the literature [3], [8] and epitaxial growth of other metals by sputtering [7], in this work we give a detailed report on the epitaxial growth of Re using sputter deposition technique. We describe the relationship between epitaxy and growth parameters using various analysis tools such as reflective high energy electron diffraction (RHEED), low energy electron diffraction (LEED), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM).

Section snippets

Experimental details

All of the films in this report were grown in an ultra high vacuum (UHV) sputtering chamber and transferred into analysis chambers for the RHEED, LEED, AES and STM studies without breaking vacuum. Base pressure of the system is about 1 × 10 10 Torr, and the system is composed of three isolated chambers and a load-lock. The sample is transferred between chambers using magnetically driven sample transfer rods. Among the three UHV chambers, the first one is dedicated to Re sputtering, equipped with

Results and discussion

As a first step for the epitaxial growth, we compared RF and DC operation using the same sputtering gun. Fig. 1(a) and (b) show the difference between RF and DC sputtered films grown both at 850 °C, respectively. The DC sputtered film shows better epitaxy even with a higher deposition rate than the RF sputtered film. AFM of these samples shows that the island sizes are much larger in DC sputtered films (> 100 nm in diameter) than for RF sputtered films (< 50 nm in diameter). In addition, DC

Summary

We described growth of epitaxial Re film on sapphire substrate with sputtering. Under similar growth conditions, DC sputtering gives noticeably better epitaxy than RF. The best epitaxy is obtained at the lowest deposition rate and at the highest growth temperature. With DC sputtering, considerable epitaxy is obtained only below 0.1 nm/s in deposition rate and above 700 °C in growth temperature. Epitaxial Re (0001) films are composed of hexagonal islands with screw dislocations and multiply

Acknowledgement

We appreciate useful discussions with Paul Welander, J.N. Eckstein and Alexander Popov. This work was supported by the National Security Agency (NSA) Advanced Research and Development Activity (ARDA) through Army Research Office grants W911NF-04-1-2004 and MOD717304, by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) through Grant PST.CLG.979374, and by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

References (14)

  • A.U. Haq et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1982)
  • A.R. Wildes et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (2001)
  • G.R. Harp et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1996)
  • P. Sobotik et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (1999)
  • R.W. Simmonds et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2004)
  • Y. Wu et al.

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A, Vac. Surf. Films

    (1996)
  • G.V. Samsonov, The Oxide Handbook, IFI/Plenum Data, New York, NY,...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (14)

  • Effect of rapid thermal annealing on damage of silicon matrix implanted by low-energy rhenium ions

    2020, Journal of Alloys and Compounds
    Citation Excerpt :

    The main drawback of ion implantation is its rather uncontrollable nature resulting in a very inhomogeneous system: dopant ions could frequently occupy substitutional and/or interstitial positions, form phase separation, and produce defects in the host lattice - all these factors have an impact on magnetic properties [22]. Nevertheless, in case of Re dopant, ion implantation seems to be the only choice as usage of MBE in this case [23,24] is difficult due to extremely high melting temperature of Re [25]. Moreover, it is worth noting that some transition metals cannot be dissolved in silicon at high enough concentration (usually at about 1 up to 10 at.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Contribution of the U.S. government, not subject to copyright.

1

Present address: Western State College, Gunnison, Colorado 81231, USA.

View full text