Trends in Ecology & Evolution
OpinionBayesian Models of Development
Section snippets
Why A Bayesian Framework for Development?
A basic premise in biology is that the phenotype of an organism is, at least to some extent, based on its estimates of variables in the external environment 1, 2. Theory suggests that information about the external environment can come from the genes of an organism 3, 4, parental effects 5, 6, and the many types of personal experience that can occur over the course of a lifetime. The question, then, is how information from all of these sources combines across ontogeny to affect the development
Variation among Bayesian Models of Development
Although Bayesian models of development are based on shared assumptions (Box 1), they also differ in important ways. Two-state models assume that all possible states of the world fall into two discrete categories (e.g., high food versus low food) 7, 8, 11, 12, whereas continuous models assume that many possible states vary continuously between minimum and maximum possible values (e.g., the level of danger) 9, 10. Two-state models are analytically simpler and more tractable, and provide a useful
Factors Affecting Bayesian Updating
Here, we use ‘E’ to refer to an individual's current point estimate of the state of the world, and ‘ΔE’ to indicate the difference between the prior and the posterior as a result of exposure to a given cue, stimulus, or experience (Box 1). ΔE provides the foundation for any Bayesian model of development 2, 15, which share the assumption that changes in E encourage changes in phenotype. Of course, many factors besides ΔE can also affect trait development, including the benefits and costs of
Specific Predictions of Bayesian Models of Development
Current Bayesian models make several interesting predictions about patterns of potential and realized developmental plasticity and developmental trajectories (Box 2).
Limited Plasticity and Individual Differences in Plasticity
Bayesian models help shed light on one of the most contentious questions in modern biology: why organisms do not exhibit ‘perfect’ plasticity 31, 53. Most theoreticians have explained limited plasticity and individual differences in developmental plasticity by invoking costs of plasticity 31, 54, but, despite considerable effort, empiricists have had difficulty documenting such costs 53, 54, 55. Less attention has been paid to the ways that information might limit the evolution and expression
Future Directions: Somatic State in Bayesian Models
Most current Bayesian models of development focus exclusively on the effects of information on development. However, experiences early in life can affect development not only because they provide information about the external world, but also because they have direct effects on an individual's somatic state (i.e., its body size, strength, motor skills, or other enduring aspects of the phenotype with broad implications for fitness) [57]. Thus far, only one Bayesian model [12] has predicted the
Concluding Remarks
An emerging trend in ecology and evolution is to model developmental plasticity and developmental trajectories using Bayesian updating. Here, we have reviewed the current set of Bayesian models and shown that these make several predictions, some of which are already supported by empirical data. As more Bayesian models of development are generated and tested, the value of the approach will become increasingly clear. Our prior estimate is that Bayesian approaches might become as central to the
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Sinead English, Marc Mangel, Karthik Panchanathan, Barbara Taborsky, and Fritz Trillmich for their comments and suggestions on previous drafts. This research was supported by a Veni grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) (016.155.195) awarded to W.F.
Glossary
- ΔE
- the difference between E for the prior and E for the posterior as a result of exposure to a given cue.
- Confidence
- an individual's level of confidence (degree of belief) in its current estimate of the state, E. In two-state models, confidence is determined by the value of p: lowest for p = 0.5, and highest for p = 0 or p = 1. In continuous models, confidence can be represented by the variance of the prior or the posterior.
- Cue
- a stimulus, experience, or event that can provide information about the
References (61)
Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2005)Genes as cues: phenotypic integration of genetic and epigenetic information from a Darwinian perspective
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2015)- et al.
Bayesian approximations and extensions: optimal decisions for small brains and possibly big ones too
J. Theor. Biol.
(2009) Dynamic information in uncertain and changing worlds
J. Theor. Biol.
(1990)Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(1998)- et al.
Adaptive auditory plasticity in developing and adult animals
Prog. Neurobiol.
(2007) Adolescence as a sensitive period of brain development
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2015)- et al.
Behavioural types and life history strategies during ontogeny in the mangrove killifish, Kryptolebias marmoratus
Anim. Behav.
(2011) Genotypic differences in behavioural entropy: unpredictable genotypes are composed of unpredictable individuals
Anim. Behav.
(2013)Phenotypic plasticity with instantaneous but delayed switches
J. Theor. Biol.
(2014)
An overview of the evolutionary causes and consequences of behavioural plasticity
Anim. Behav.
Information is a fitness enhancing resource
Oikos
A new perspective on developmental plasticity and the principles of adaptive morph determination
Am. Nat.
The information value of non-genetic inheritance in plants and animals
PLoS ONE
The evolution of transgenerational integration of information in heterogeneous environments
Am. Nat.
Balancing sampling and specialization: an adaptationist model of incremental development
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.
The evolution of age-dependent plasticity
Am. Nat.
Combining information from ancestors and personal experiences to predict individual differences in developmental trajectories
Am. Nat.
Individual differences in the potential and realized developmental plasticity of personality traits
Front. Ecol. Evol.
The evolution of sensitive windows in a model of incremental development
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
Adaptive use of information during growth can explain long-term effects of early-life experiences
Am. Nat.
Decision-making under uncertainty: biases and Bayesians
Anim. Cogn.
Bayes’ theorem and its applications in animal behaviour
Oikos
Rational approximations to rational models: Alternative algorithms for category learning
Psychol. Rev.
Types of approximation for probabilistic cognition: sampling and variational
Brain Cognition.
Evolutionary tipping points in the capacity to adapt to environmental change
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. XIII. Interactions with developmental instability
Ecol. Evol.
Context-dependent decision-making: a simple Bayesian model
J. R. Soc. Interface
Real exposure: field measurement of chemical plumes in headwater streams
Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
The evolution of plasticity and nonplastic spatial and temporal adaptations in the presence of imperfect environmental cues
Am. Nat.
Cited by (87)
Re-evaluating the relationship between pathogen avoidance and preferences for facial symmetry and sexual dimorphism: A registered report
2022, Evolution and Human BehaviorReciprocal plasticity and the diversification of communication systems
2021, Animal BehaviourAdolescent risk-taking in the context of exploration and social influence
2021, Developmental Review