Trends in Ecology & Evolution
OpinionHarnessing genomics for delineating conservation units
Section snippets
New tools for an old problem: delineating conservation units using genomic data
The rapid increase in the availability of genomic data (see Glossary) is quickly transforming how long-standing questions are addressed and answered in evolution 1, 2, 3, 4, ecology [5], and now conservation 6, 7, 8. Genomics has the potential to revolutionize understanding of adaptive differentiation and the delineation of CUs within species 7, 9. In particular, next-generation sequencing makes it easier to integrate information from neutral and adaptive loci to characterize CUs and adaptive
When should genomics be used to define CUs?
Before using genomic data to define CUs, the first consideration is whether a population genomic approach should be used as opposed to a more standard approach such as a population genetic analysis using microsatellite loci. We argue that genomic data will usually be better than microsatellite data for delineating CUs, as genomic data allow quantification of adaptive variation. Microsatellite data can be used to define ESUs and MUs, but are generally inadequate for characterizing adaptive
Premises of new genomic framework
Based on the above considerations, we developed a new framework for delineating CUs and quantifying adaptive differences among them (Box 3). Our framework is based on two premises. First, different classes of marker should be used for delineating ESUs versus MUs. Second, there may be important adaptive differences among ESUs and MUs that should be tested for and quantified using loci under divergent selection. Below, we describe each of these points in more detail.
The first premise of our new
Future directions
Many outstanding questions need to be answered to learn how best to take advantage of the power of genomic data to delineate CUs and characterize adaptive differentiation among them. Chief among these are: which analyses are most appropriate and effective for testing for adaptive differentiation using outlier loci? How many SNP loci are needed to delineate different CUs accurately and characterize spatial patterns of adaptation? When will incorporating genomic data change delineation of CUs or
Acknowledgments
We thank P. Craze, G. Luikart, J.M. Robertson, D.A. Tallmon, R.S. Waples and three anonymous reviewers for providing helpful suggestions that greatly improved this paper. This research was supported by NSF grants DEB 1046408 and DEB 1146489 to W.C.F., DEB 1022196 to J.K.M., and DEB 0742181 to F.W.A. P.A.H. received support from NIH/NCRR grant P20RR16448 to L. Forney.
References (71)
- et al.
Harnessing genomics for evolutionary insights
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2009) Adaptation genomics: the next generation
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2010)- et al.
Adaptation in the age of ecological genomics: insights from parallelism and convergence
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2011) - et al.
Genomics for the ecological toolbox
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2004) Genomics and conservation genetics
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2006)Challenges and opportunities of genetic approaches to biological conservation
Biol. Conserv.
(2010)Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(1986)Defining evolutionarily significant units for conservation
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(1994)Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2000)Identification of management units using population genetic data
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2007)
Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits
Trends Ecol. Evol.
The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation
Curr. Biol.
SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation
Trends Ecol. Evol.
A guide to the genomics of ecological speciation in natural animal populations
Ecol. Lett.
Genomics and the future of conservation genetics
Nat. Rev. Genet.
Genetics and the Conservation of Populations
Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units
Mol. Ecol. 10
Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp., and the definition of ‘species’ under the Endangered Species Act
Mar. Fish. Rev.
Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution
Adaptive vs. neutral genetic diversity: implications for landscape genetics
Landsc. Ecol.
The gap between the concept and definitions in the Evolutionarily Significant Unit: the need to integrate neutral genetic variation and adaptive variation
Ecol. Res.
Conservation units and translocations: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes
Hereditas
Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression
Conserv. Biol.
Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers
Mol. Ecol. Resour.
Next-generation RAD sequencing identifies thousands of SNPs for assessing hybridization between rainbow and westslope cutthroat trout
Mol. Ecol. Resour.
RAD in the realm of next-generation sequencing technologies
Mol. Ecol.
The impact of predation on life-history evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata)
Evolution
Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags
PLoS Genet.
Maintenance of genetic variability under joint effect of mutation, selection and random drift
Genetics
A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. VI. Isolation
Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc.
Evolution in Mendelian populations
Genetics
Gene flow in natural populations
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.
Variation in resistance and virulence in the interaction between Arabidopsis thaliana and a bacterial pathogen
Evolution
Local adaptation, patterns of selection, and gene flow in the Californian serpentine sunflower (Helianthus exilis)
Evolution
The power and promise of population genomics: from genotyping to genome typing
Nat. Rev. Genet.
Cited by (696)
Delineating conservation units should be independent of effective population size
2024, Trends in Ecology and EvolutionWhere to now with the evolutionarily significant unit?
2023, Trends in Ecology and Evolution