Elsevier

Tourism Management

Volume 40, February 2014, Pages 311-320
Tourism Management

Tourists' strategies: An acculturation approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.07.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We applied Berry's (1997) bidimensional acculturation model to a tourist context.

  • We examined recent tourists from China, Germany, and the United States.

  • Tourists were found to assimilate, integrate, separate, or marginalize.

  • Subgroup membership differentiates behavioral, activity and destination preferences.

  • Ethnocentrism and uncertainty avoidant differs between tourist subgroups.

Abstract

Acculturation theory has been widely used to understand and explain migrant and sojourner adaptation. However, it has yet to be examined in a tourist context. We extended the literature by evaluating the applicability of Berry's (1997) bidimensional acculturation model to a sample of 668 recent and prospective international travelers from China (n = 205), Germany (n = 201), and the United States (n = 262). Our results suggested that the acculturation model can be extended to tourist contexts and used for segmentation purposes. Specifically, tourists' acculturation strategies were associated with their preferences for home culture maintenance and host culture immersion, as well as behavioral, holiday, and activity preferences. Ethnocentrism and uncertainty avoidance were also found to vary as a function of tourists' acculturation strategy.

Introduction

Acculturation is the process of adjusting to a new cultural environment and can involve changes to an individual's attitudes, behaviors, and cognitions (Tsai, Chentsova-Dutton, & Wong, 2002). Most acculturation research has examined how these changes relate to the psychological and socio-cultural adaptation of immigrants (e.g., Berry, Phinney, Sam, & Vedder, 2006) and sojourners, including international students (e.g., Rasmi, Safdar, & Lewis, 2010) and expatriate workers (e.g., Ward & Rana-Deuba, 1999). Interestingly, although tourism is the most common form of face-to-face intercultural contact (Berno & Ward, 2005), there have been few applications of acculturation theory in tourism contexts (Ward, 2008).

This is surprising, as acculturation has direct relevance to tourism because it focuses on the degree to which people wish to immerse themselves in a host culture and/or maintain their home culture in intercultural contact situations (Berry, 2003). Interestingly, a number of tourism studies have identified subgroups of tourists who appear to vary in their preferences for host culture immersion and home culture maintenance. For example, Cohen (1972) categorized tourists based on their desire for familiarity (aligned with their home culture) versus strangeness (aligned with the host culture) and argued that these classifications were relevant to holiday activity and destination preferences. Although some tourism studies have considered home culture maintenance and host culture immersion, most have been descriptive rather than based on theoretical frameworks. Indeed, Berry's (1997) bidimensional acculturation theory, which is the most widely used acculturation model, has been largely overlooked by tourism researchers, despite being extremely influential in explaining and predicting immigrant and sojourners' behaviors and adaptation (Huynh, Howell, & Benet-Martinez, 2009).

In this paper, we posed three research questions that address gaps in the literature to provide useful information for tourism researchers and practitioners who are interested in segmenting tourist markets. First, we examined the applicability of Berry's (1997) acculturation model to a tourism context. Second, we investigated whether tourists' acculturation strategies were related to their behavioral, holiday activity, and destination preferences. Third, we explored whether individual difference factors, such as perceived cultural similarity, ethnocentrism and uncertainty avoidance, were related to tourists' acculturation strategies. We examined these issues by asking a sample of recent international travelers and prospective tourists from China, Germany, and the United States (US) to indicate their acculturation preferences as potential tourists to Australia.

Australia is a major tourist destination that had more than five million visitors in 2011. During this time, Australia hosted large numbers of tourists from Asian, European and North American countries (e.g., 154,000 Germans, 438,000 Americans and 463,000 Chinese). These and other tourists made substantial contributions to the Australian economy, as they spent almost two billion dollars in Australia (Tourism Research Australia, 2012). It is clear that tourism has a major impact on the Australian economy and that international visitors have widely varying backgrounds that should be taken into account.

China, Germany, and the US were chosen for the current study as they vary in cultural distance from Australia and are important source markets for this and other destinations. For example, Ng, Lee, and Soutar (2007) found China to be the most culturally distant and the US to be the least culturally distant of these three countries on five reported measures, including individual (i.e., perceived cultural distance) and country indicators (i.e., Clark and Pugh's (2001) cultural cluster distance index; Jackson's (2001) cultural diversity index; Kogut and Singh's (1988) cultural distance index; and West and Graham's (2004) linguistic distance). Further, more than 20% of Australia's inbound tourists come from these countries and all were in Australia's top ten source countries in 2011, ranking third, tenth, and fourth, respectively. However, less than 1% of the tourists from these countries came to Australia (Tourism Australia, 2012), suggesting tourism from these countries can be increased.

However, there are at least two challenges for long-haul destinations such as Australia (Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 2003). First, there is a changing international tourist trend toward shorter holidays spent in closer destinations. This shift is likely to affect Australia and other long-haul destinations more negatively than most. Thus, long-haul destinations will need to effectively position their offerings to overcome their distance from most home markets. Second, international tourists today seek different experiences, products, and activities. To maximize revenue, it is imperative to retain tourists who are already interested in visiting Australia, but to also attract those who may be less inclined to visit. In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary to identify subgroups, predict their behavioral preferences and attitudes toward holiday destinations and activities and understand the backgrounds of the various subgroups, so as to market to them more effectively. Here, subgroups of tourists were identified through Berry's (1997) bidimensional acculturation theory and these differences were examined.

Section snippets

Acculturation theory

The most influential and widely established acculturation theory is Berry's (1997) bidimensional model (e.g., Ryder, Alden, & Paulhus, 2000). Previous conceptualizations treated acculturation as a unidimensional continuum, suggesting that as an individual acquired a host culture, they simultaneously abandoned their home culture. In contrast, Berry argued that psychological acculturation centers around two choices: The extent to which people wish to interact with and adopt aspects of their host

Participants

Recent international travelers and prospective tourists to Australia from China, Germany, and the US were purposefully selected for the present study for two reasons. First, the three countries have significantly different cultures (Hofstede, 2001; Schwartz, 2006), which increased generalizability. Second, as noted earlier, these three countries are important source markets for Australia and had the highest global tourism expenditures in 2011. Taken together, it is important for the Australian

Results

Descriptive statistics for all of the constructs can be seen in Table 1. The presence of subgroups was tested by using the two-step clustering procedure contained in the SPSS program to group participants based on their responses to the acculturation strategies items, while differences between the clusters were assessed by using discriminant analysis (Wood, 2005). This approach is consistent with recent research that has derived acculturation strategies through cluster analysis (e.g., Schwartz

Discussion

The present study extended previous research by identifying and confirming the applicability of Berry's (1997) acculturation model in a tourism context. Despite extensive research on immigrants' and other sojourners' acculturation strategies, past studies have not examined tourists' acculturation strategies in foreign destinations. Like other sojourners, tourists confront the task of maintaining aspects of their home culture while adapting to a host culture during their international travel.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by an Australian Research Council grant, in conjunction with Tourism Western Australia. All authors contributed equally to this article.

Sarah Rasmi is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at the American University in Dubai. Prior to this, she was a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the University of Western Australia. She completed her Ph.D. in Applied Social Psychology at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada. Her research focuses on acculturation and personal values theories, with an emphasis on the psychological and socio-cultural adaptation of immigrant youth and families. Her publications have appeared in numerous

References (58)

  • A. Yiannakis et al.

    Roles tourists play

    Annals of Tourism Research

    (1992)
  • T. Berno et al.

    Innocence abroad: a pocket guide to psychological research on tourism

    American Psychologist

    (2005)
  • J.W. Berry

    Immigration, acculturation and adaptation

    Applied Psychology: An International Review

    (1997)
  • J.W. Berry

    Conceptual approaches to acculturation

  • J.W. Berry

    Contexts of acculturation

  • J.W. Berry et al.

    Comparative studies of acculturation stress

    International Migration Review

    (1987)
  • J.W. Berry et al.

    Immigrant youth: acculturation, identity, and adaptation

    Applied Psychology: An International Review

    (2006)
  • S. Bochner

    Sojourners

  • R.Y. Bourhis et al.

    Towards an interactive acculturation model: a social psychological approach

    International Journal of Psychology

    (1997)
  • Y.-H. Chang et al.

    Exploring the effects of consumer ethnocentrism on preference of choosing foreign airlines: a perspective of Chinese tourists

    African Journal of Business Management

    (2011)
  • E. Cohen

    Toward a sociology of international tourism

    Sociological Research

    (1972)
  • D. Collins et al.

    Changing travel patterns with age: Australian evidence and the need to modify current theories

    Australian Journal of Hospitality Management

    (2000)
  • J.L. Crompton

    Structure of vacation destination choice sets

    Annals of Tourism Research

    (1992)
  • G. Dona et al.

    Acculturation attitudes and acculturative stress of Central Americans refugees

    International Journal of Psychology

    (1994)
  • N. Donthu et al.

    Cultural influences on service quality expectations

    Journal of Service Research

    (1998)
  • C.R. Goelder et al.

    Tourism: Principles, practices, philosophies

    (2003)
  • N. Graburn

    The sacred journey

  • W.B. Gudykunst

    Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication

    (1991)
  • G. Hofstede

    Culture's consequences

    (2001)
  • Cited by (33)

    • British tourists’ adjustment to cultural expectations in Muslim-majority countries

      2022, Tourism Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is used when the individual is unable to apply their cultural knowledge successfully within one of the three adjustment strategies and experiences the cultural anxiety associated with culture shock. This study argues that trying to integrate tourists (as opposed to sojourners) into existing theoretical models of acculturation lacks credibility, resulting in misinterpretations such as those found in Rasmi et al. (2014). It thus proposes a new, more nuanced way of thinking about how tourists adapt to host cultures.

    • Impact of outbound tourism on outward FDI

      2021, Annals of Tourism Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The acculturation perspective proposes that during the tourist visit to a host country, cultural adaptation occurs through contact and communication with culturally dissimilar groups (Gibson, 2001). Thus, this process may reduce any stereotypes regarding the host country's business environment, lessening the uncertainties related to investment in the host country (Rasmi, Ng, Lee, & Soutar, 2014) ultimately, increase OFDI in that country. Based on this, we expect that outbound tourism in a host country is likely to be positively associated with OFDI in the host country because it reduces perceived equivocality and uncertainty of investing in that country.

    • Segmentation of passenger preferences for using digital technologies at airports in Norway

      2021, Journal of Air Transport Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cluster analysis has become a popular way of identifying segments based on survey data (Dolnicar, 2002). More specifically, TwoStep Cluster Analysis has been widely used in travel and transportation research to identify homogeneous groups (Abas et al., 2018; Groβe et al., 2018; Hadjikakou et al., 2014; Hsu et al., 2006; Kamruzzaman et al., 2013, 2014a, 2014b, 2015, 2018; Pitombo et al., 2011; Rasmi et al., 2014; Ritchie et al., 2016; Tiago et al., 2016; Tkaczynski and Rundle-Thiele, 2013; Tkaczynski et al., 2010, 2015). The analysis is easily conducted using the statistical software platform SPSS Statistics.

    • Long-stay tourists: Developing a theory of intercultural integration into the destination neighbourhood

      2019, Tourism Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      At the lowest level there was little evidence of any efforts to integrate with local Thai society. Subsequent levels indicate a progression in the degree of intercultural interaction – a finding consistent with Berry (1997) and Rasmi et al. (2014), who both suggest that integration is by far the main acculturation strategy. Results of this study extend this idea by suggesting that alternative acculturation strategies are unviable.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Sarah Rasmi is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at the American University in Dubai. Prior to this, she was a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the University of Western Australia. She completed her Ph.D. in Applied Social Psychology at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada. Her research focuses on acculturation and personal values theories, with an emphasis on the psychological and socio-cultural adaptation of immigrant youth and families. Her publications have appeared in numerous books and journals, including the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology and the International Journal of Conflict Management.

    SiewImm Ng is a Senior Lecturer in Faculty of Economics and Management. She completed PhD in year 2007 from University of Western Australia, where she studied the influence of cultural similarity perception on tourists' intercultural decisions in terms of vacation destination selection and extent of involvement in the destination's culture while touring in a destination, She has also authored and co-authored more than eight articles in refereed and professional journals including Tourism Management, International Marketing Review and Journal of Air Transport Management. Her current research interests are in the area of values' influence on expatriates' and employees' behavior.

    Julie A. Lee is a Winthrop Professor in the marketing discipline at the University of Western Australia. She completed her PhD at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign and has held positions at the University of Hawaii-Manoa and University of Miami. Her research focuses on cross-cultural theory, measurement and application in consumer contexts. Most recently, she has been examining cultural and personal values across cultures. Her publications have appeared in a wide range of journals, including Tourism Management, Annals of Tourism Research, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Psychology & Marketing, and Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. She also co-authored Marketing across Cultures with Jean-Claude Usunier, which is in its 6th edition.

    Geoff N. Soutar is Winthrop Professor and Nancy Keegan and Don Voelte Distinguished Scholar at the University of Western Australia Business School. He completed his PhD at Cornell University and has held positions at Curtin and Edith Cowan Universities. In recent years he has had a particular interest in customer service, service quality and its impact on organizational success, from which evolved a long term study of value and its impact in a variety of contexts, including tourism. He has published in many business related journals, including Tourism Management, Annals of Tourism Research, Journal of International Business Studies and Journal of Retailing.

    View full text