Elsevier

Thrombosis Research

Volume 184, December 2019, Pages 38-43
Thrombosis Research

Full Length Article
Thrombotic risk factors in patients with superior vena cava syndrome undergoing chemotherapy via femoral inserted central catheter

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2019.10.030Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Femoral inserted central catheter has been proved effective during clinical verifications.

  • Femoral inserted central catheter has become the preferred choice in patients with superior vena cava syndrome.

  • The incidence of femoral inserted central catheter -related thrombosis was 16.48%.

  • Bevacizumab is a risk factor of femoral inserted central catheter-related thrombosis.

  • Puncture site at the groin is a risk factor of femoral inserted central catheter-related thrombosis.

Abstract

Objective

Our study aimed to scrutinize the incidence and risk factors of femoral inserted central catheter (FICC)-related thrombosis in patients with superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) undergoing chemotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients with SVCS undergoing chemotherapy who received FICC catheterization at the Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province between May 2012 and February 2019 was performed. Both asymptomatic thrombosis and symptomatic thrombosis were diagnosed by color doppler ultrasound (CDUS). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify patient-, insertion-, and catheter-related factors.

Results

Eight hundred and seventy-four patients with SVCS undergoing chemotherapy, with a total of 157,180 catheter days were enrolled in our study. FICC-related thrombosis was detected in 144 patients, and yielding an overall incidence of 16.47% or 0.92 events per 1000 catheter days. Of these, 19(2.17%) patients had symptomatic thrombosis. The mean time interval between FICC insertion and thrombosis onset was (10.40 ± 6.32) days and the mean catheter indwelling time was (179.84 ± 46.15) days. The history of deep venous thrombosis, treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor (bevacizumab), puncture site (mid-thigh, groin), tip position and catheter size showed association with FICC-related thrombosis. Treatment with VEGF inhibitor [odds ratio (OR) = 2.779; 95%confidence interval (CI): 1.860–4.153; P < 0.001] and puncture site at the groin (OR = 10.843; 95%CI: 6.575–17.881; P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors of FICC-related thrombosis.

Conclusion

Treatment with VEGF inhibitor and puncture site at the groin during FICC catheterization were considered as high-risk factors in FICC-related thrombosis.

Introduction

Nowadays, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has been widely used to obtain central venous access for both hospitalized and discharged patients [[1], [2], [3]]. The advantages of PICC are as follows: firstly, it is considered to be a safe and well acceptable method by patients with a preferable cost-efficiency ratio [[4], [5], [6], [7]]; secondly, the PICC catheterization is minimally invasive and could be performed at patient's bedside, making it convenient for patients as well as providers [[8], [9]]; thirdly, PICC could eliminate the pain [10] of patients by repeated puncturing, causing no hemothorax or pneumothorax [11]; and finally, it is easy to maintain. So, PICC is considered as in situ for longer time, with shorter length of hospital stay.

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is caused by the obstruction or compression of superior vena cava, leading to the edema of head, neck, and upper extremities, shortness of breath, and headaches [12]. The severity of these symptoms is associated with decreased venous return from the head, neck, and upper extremities, which in turn depends on the degree of superior vena cava stenosis [13]. This might be due to benign causes, but advanced lung cancer and malignant lymphoma are the most often causes in most of the patients. In general, such patients should avoid infusion from the veins of upper extremities, external jugular veins and subclavian veins as much as possible, but for patients with complete superior vena cava obstruction, infusion from the veins of lower extremities is the only choice [14]. However, patients with malignant tumors complicated with SVCS require multi-stage chemotherapy due to their critical condition [15]. So, femoral inserted central catheter (FICC) has become the preferred choice for venous access in patients with SVCS undergoing chemotherapy [16].

However, studies have shown that catheterization is a risk factor of thrombosis [[17], [18]]. Current studies have largely focused on PICC-related upper extremity venous thrombosis, as well as on the incidence and independent risk factors of thrombosis, suggesting that they greatly differ. However, very little work has been focused on FICC-related thrombosis in patients with SVCS undergoing chemotherapy. Therefore, our study aimed to explore the incidence and risk factors of FICC-related thrombosis in patients with SVCS undergoing chemotherapy to provide a theoretical basis for clinical intervention and effective reduction of FICC-related thrombosis.

Section snippets

Study population

Our retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent FICC catheterization at the Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province from May 2012 to February 2019. This study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee and obtained informed consent from the patients. The catheters of all patients were maintained in the hospital during the period of hospitalization and discharge, and all patients were followed up. The patients who were diagnosed with SVCS by CT

General population data

Eight hundred and seventy-four patients with SVCS undergoing chemotherapy, with a total of 157,180 catheter days were enrolled in our study. Among the 874 cases, 348 suffered from lung cancer (39.8%), 307 from malignant lymphoma (35.1%) and 219 had other diseases (25.1%). Among these, 647(74.0%) were men and 227(26.0%) were women, with an age range of 20–89 years [mean (57.73 ± 9.72) years], and 19.0% were older than 65 years. The mean catheter indwelling time was (179.84 ± 46.15) days.

The general situation of FICC-related thrombosis

Among

Discussion

PICC is widely used in patients with malignant tumors undergoing chemotherapy. However, with the increasing incidence of malignant tumors, the incidence of SVCS is also gradually increasing. It is not suitable to insert PICCs from peripheral veins of upper extremities during the obstruction of superior vena cava, limiting its application and promotion of conventional PICC catheterization in these patients. To ensure the provision of chemotherapeutic drugs and other intravenous drugs in patients

Conclusion

In conclusion, FICC-related thrombosis is a serious complication after patients undergoing FICC catheterization. This, in turn, affects the follow-up treatment of patients with SVCS undergoing chemotherapy and greatly increases the cost of treatment for this disease. It is associated with history of DVT, treatment with VEGF inhibitor (bevacizumab), puncture site (mid-thigh, groin), tip position and catheter size. In addition, treatment with VEGF inhibitor (bevacizumab) and puncture site at the

Authorship/contributors

HOU Jianmei and ZHANG Jinghui provided statistical support and analysis. HOU Jianmei completed the data collection. All authors contributed to the conceptualization and design and manuscript preparation.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: this study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant No: 2019JJ40501), and a Project of Management in Xiangya Hospital of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (Grant No: 2016GL19). It was also supported by Hunan Science and Technology Innovation Platform and Talent Plan (The Key Laboratory of Hunan Province for Nursing

Declaration of competing interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References (51)

  • P. Cotogni et al.

    Peripherally inserted central catheters in non-hospitalized cancer patients: 5-year results of a prospective study

    Support. Care Cancer

    (2015)
  • S. Fukuda et al.

    Use of double-lumen peripherally inserted central catheters for safer perioperative management of esophageal cancer patients

    Journal of Vascular Access

    (2015)
  • E. Johansson et al.

    Advantages and disadvantages of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) compared to other central venous lines: A systematic review of the literature

    Acta Oncol.

    (2013)
  • W. Qingguo et al.

    Clinical effect of peripherally inserted central catheters based on modified seldinger technique under guidance of vascular ultrasound

    Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences

    (2016)
  • W. Chen et al.

    Spontaneous correction of misplaced peripherally inserted central catheters

    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

    (2018)
  • Y. Xiaohe et al.

    Risk factors related to peripherally inserted central venous catheter nonselective removal in neonates

    Biomed. Res. Int.

    (2018)
  • Kang J, Chen W, Sun W, et al. Health-related quality of life of cancer patients with peripherally inserted central...
  • A.J. Ullman et al.

    Antithrombogenic peripherally inserted central catheters: overview of efficacy and safety

    Expert Rev Med Devices

    (2019)
  • V. Stephanie et al.

    Superior vena cava (SVC) endovascular reconstruction with implanted central venous catheter repositioning for treatment of malignant SVC obstruction

    Frontiers in Surgery

    (2018)
  • K. Hohloch et al.

    Superior vena cava syndrome caused by a malignant tumor: a retrospective single-center analysis of 124 cases

    J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.

    (2014)
  • T. Friedman et al.

    Malignant venous obstruction: superior vena cava syndrome and beyond

    Semin. Interv. Radiol.

    (2017)
  • Zhang J, Tang S, Hu C, et al. Femorally inserted central venous catheter in patients with superior vena cava...
  • D. Grau et al.

    Complications with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) used in hospitalized patients and outpatients: a prospective cohort study

    Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control

    (2017)
  • J. Xie et al.

    Complications of peripherally inserted central catheters in advanced cancer patients undergoing combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy

    J. Clin. Nurs.

    (2017)
  • D. Péus et al.

    Appraisal of the Karnofsky performance status and proposal of a simple algorithmic system for its evaluation

    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text