Full Length ArticleThrombotic risk factors in patients with superior vena cava syndrome undergoing chemotherapy via femoral inserted central catheter
Introduction
Nowadays, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has been widely used to obtain central venous access for both hospitalized and discharged patients [[1], [2], [3]]. The advantages of PICC are as follows: firstly, it is considered to be a safe and well acceptable method by patients with a preferable cost-efficiency ratio [[4], [5], [6], [7]]; secondly, the PICC catheterization is minimally invasive and could be performed at patient's bedside, making it convenient for patients as well as providers [[8], [9]]; thirdly, PICC could eliminate the pain [10] of patients by repeated puncturing, causing no hemothorax or pneumothorax [11]; and finally, it is easy to maintain. So, PICC is considered as in situ for longer time, with shorter length of hospital stay.
Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is caused by the obstruction or compression of superior vena cava, leading to the edema of head, neck, and upper extremities, shortness of breath, and headaches [12]. The severity of these symptoms is associated with decreased venous return from the head, neck, and upper extremities, which in turn depends on the degree of superior vena cava stenosis [13]. This might be due to benign causes, but advanced lung cancer and malignant lymphoma are the most often causes in most of the patients. In general, such patients should avoid infusion from the veins of upper extremities, external jugular veins and subclavian veins as much as possible, but for patients with complete superior vena cava obstruction, infusion from the veins of lower extremities is the only choice [14]. However, patients with malignant tumors complicated with SVCS require multi-stage chemotherapy due to their critical condition [15]. So, femoral inserted central catheter (FICC) has become the preferred choice for venous access in patients with SVCS undergoing chemotherapy [16].
However, studies have shown that catheterization is a risk factor of thrombosis [[17], [18]]. Current studies have largely focused on PICC-related upper extremity venous thrombosis, as well as on the incidence and independent risk factors of thrombosis, suggesting that they greatly differ. However, very little work has been focused on FICC-related thrombosis in patients with SVCS undergoing chemotherapy. Therefore, our study aimed to explore the incidence and risk factors of FICC-related thrombosis in patients with SVCS undergoing chemotherapy to provide a theoretical basis for clinical intervention and effective reduction of FICC-related thrombosis.
Section snippets
Study population
Our retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent FICC catheterization at the Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province from May 2012 to February 2019. This study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee and obtained informed consent from the patients. The catheters of all patients were maintained in the hospital during the period of hospitalization and discharge, and all patients were followed up. The patients who were diagnosed with SVCS by CT
General population data
Eight hundred and seventy-four patients with SVCS undergoing chemotherapy, with a total of 157,180 catheter days were enrolled in our study. Among the 874 cases, 348 suffered from lung cancer (39.8%), 307 from malignant lymphoma (35.1%) and 219 had other diseases (25.1%). Among these, 647(74.0%) were men and 227(26.0%) were women, with an age range of 20–89 years [mean (57.73 ± 9.72) years], and 19.0% were older than 65 years. The mean catheter indwelling time was (179.84 ± 46.15) days.
The general situation of FICC-related thrombosis
Among
Discussion
PICC is widely used in patients with malignant tumors undergoing chemotherapy. However, with the increasing incidence of malignant tumors, the incidence of SVCS is also gradually increasing. It is not suitable to insert PICCs from peripheral veins of upper extremities during the obstruction of superior vena cava, limiting its application and promotion of conventional PICC catheterization in these patients. To ensure the provision of chemotherapeutic drugs and other intravenous drugs in patients
Conclusion
In conclusion, FICC-related thrombosis is a serious complication after patients undergoing FICC catheterization. This, in turn, affects the follow-up treatment of patients with SVCS undergoing chemotherapy and greatly increases the cost of treatment for this disease. It is associated with history of DVT, treatment with VEGF inhibitor (bevacizumab), puncture site (mid-thigh, groin), tip position and catheter size. In addition, treatment with VEGF inhibitor (bevacizumab) and puncture site at the
Authorship/contributors
HOU Jianmei and ZHANG Jinghui provided statistical support and analysis. HOU Jianmei completed the data collection. All authors contributed to the conceptualization and design and manuscript preparation.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: this study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant No: 2019JJ40501), and a Project of Management in Xiangya Hospital of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (Grant No: 2016GL19). It was also supported by Hunan Science and Technology Innovation Platform and Talent Plan (The Key Laboratory of Hunan Province for Nursing
Declaration of competing interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References (51)
- et al.
The influence of using antibiotic-coated peripherally inserted central catheters on decreasing the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections
Am. J. Infect. Control
(2016) - et al.
Incidence and risk factors of superficial and deep vein thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in children
J. Thromb. Haemost.
(2016) - et al.
Prospective follow-up of complications related to peripherally inserted central catheters
Med. Mal. Infect.
(2013) - et al.
Percutaneous endovascular treatment of an iatrogenic superior cava vein syndrome during the immediate post-operative period after mitral-aortic valve replacement
Rev. Esp. Anestesiol. Reanim.
(2019) - et al.
Women, thrombosis, and cancer: A gender-specific analysis
Thromb. Res.
(2017) - et al.
Epidemiology, pathophysiology, stratification, and natural history of pulmonary embolism
Tech. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.
(2017) - et al.
The Michigan Risk Score to predict peripherally inserted central catheter-associated thrombosis
J. Thromb. Haemost.
(2017) - et al.
Patterns, risk factors and treatment associated with PICC-DVT in hospitalized adults: A nested case–control study
Thromb. Res.
(2015) - et al.
Peripherally inserted central catheter-related deep vein thrombosis: contemporary patterns and predictors
Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis Jth
(2014) - et al.
The catheter to vein ratio and rates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in patients with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC): a prospective cohort study
Int. J. Nurs. Stud.
(2015)