Elsevier

Thoracic Surgery Clinics

Volume 24, Issue 1, February 2014, Pages 117-127
Thoracic Surgery Clinics

Treatment of Malignant Tracheoesophageal Fistula

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2013.09.006Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • This article focuses on the interventional treatment of malignant enterorespiratory fistulas, especially tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF).

  • TEF is a devastating condition for the patient, and typically occurs after radiochemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer or extensive mediastinal nodal disease from lung cancer.

  • Life expectancy of these patients is measured in months after successful treatment of the fistula, and only days to weeks with a persistent fistula.

  • To stop repeated episodes of

Epidemiology of mTEF

TEF develops in approximately 5% to 15% of patients with an esophageal malignancy and in less than 1% of those with bronchogenic carcinoma.3, 4, 5 Most patients with mTEF suffer from esophageal cancer and very few from other malignancies: 19 of 264 (7.2%) pulmonary tumors and 2 of 264 (0.8%) mediastinal tumors in the series from Balazs and colleagues.5 The incidence of mTEF seems to have increased over the last 30 years to a level well above 10% of all nonresected esophageal cancers. Malignant

Symptoms and diagnosis

Typical symptoms of mTEF, such as coughing, aspiration, and pneumonia, are neither uncommon nor surprising during radiochemotherapy. Thus the recognition of the formation of TEF may be delayed for 1 to 18 months after the first clinical symptoms.5 Patients may present in severe septic condition, with manifest aspiration pneumonia as the most frequent symptom (95% in the study of Balazs and colleagues5). Clinical confirmation of TEF is most easily achieved using a swallowing test of water in the

Treatment

Because of the underlying disease and radiation therapy, the general condition of these patients is always severely deteriorated. Repeated episodes of aspiration pneumonia can lead to respiratory insufficiency. Remaining life expectancy is measured in weeks to months. In this situation, major surgery for esophageal exclusion and extra-anatomical reconstruction of the gastrointestinal passage is rarely a reasonable option, whereas rapid and minimally invasive closure of the fistula, to stop

Postinterventional management and home care

Esophageal stents pose fewer problems and maintenance issues in comparison with tracheal stents. The patient should be advised to chew food very well and to swallow sparkling liquid with the food to avoid stent obstruction. Many of these patients lack their natural teeth, and their prosthesis often sits too loose after progressive weight loss and mandibular atrophy. Food should be pureed before offering it to a patient unable to chew properly.

Tracheal stents require frequent humid inhalations,

Complications and Mortality

Taking into account the often frail condition of the patients, and the demanding peri-interventional airway management in TEF, peri-interventional and procedure-related mortality is reported as surprisingly low: from 0% to 2%.5 It has been reported as higher, at 14.6%11; however, in this study, of 4 deaths only 1 was directly attributable to the stenting procedure because of esophageal perforation, leading to a 2.4% stenting-related mortality. The other deaths were more related to unsuccessful

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (11)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (54)

  • Tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal perforation in a patient with advanced gastroesophageal junction tumor post ramucirumab treatment. A case report and literature review

    2023, Current Problems in Cancer: Case Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    In view of clinical deterioration, do not attempt rescutation (DNAR) was discussed and the patient was moved to best supportive care and transferred to the palliative care team. Perforation and fistulation are well reported in multiple GI tract cancers (Liaw et al., 1993) (Ohkura et al., 2015) (Ferri et al., 2005), about 5% to 15% of esophageal malignancy patients develop TEF secondary to tumor invasion through the wall of the esophagus and trachea (Hürtgen and Herber, 2014). Fistula formation was seen more often in patients with advanced metastatic cancers, large tumor (T4 stage), ulcerative type, squamous cell cancer, and previous history of chemo-radiotherapy (Tsushima et al., 2016) (Zhu et al., 2020).

  • Airway stenting: State of the art

    2022, Revue des Maladies Respiratoires
  • Characteristics and Outcomes of Airway Involvement in Esophageal Cancer

    2021, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Performing airway stenting first may also reduce the risk of airway compression by the esophageal stent and minimize esophageal stent migration, especially when the TEF is large, without any obvious esophageal stenosis.11,23 Conversely, the airway stent could limit optimal expansion of the esophageal stent, thus leading to additional invasive procedures.23 Moreover, studies have not demonstrated the preferred sequence or timing of double stenting.

  • Metallic Endobronchial Stents: A Contemporary Resurrection

    2019, Chest
    Citation Excerpt :

    In a study of 63 patients with malignant TEF, complete closure was achieved in 45 patients (71%).59 One technical recommendation is that the stent should be 4 cm longer than the fistula to effect a 2-cm overlap on each end of the TEF.57 This practice is theorized to provide adequate coverage for the TEF and offer protection when the malignant TEF naturally increases in size.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text