Elsevier

Tectonophysics

Volume 482, Issues 1–4, 25 February 2010, Pages 170-181
Tectonophysics

Seismotectonic setting of the Karadere–Düzce branch of the North Anatolian Fault Zone between the 1999 Izmit and Düzce ruptures from analysis of Izmit aftershock focal mechanisms

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.07.012Get rights and content

Abstract

We investigate aftershock focal mechanisms along the eastern part of the Izmit Mw = 7.4 August 17, 1999 rupture zone during the time period August 22, 1999–October 17, 1999. Two spatial clusters of aftershock activity are analyzed representing the Karadere Fault (KF) and the Düzce Area (DA). Based on an aftershock hypocenter catalogue restricted to events with horizontal and vertical errors < 2 km, we determine fault plane solutions for 221 events. The high number of focal mechanisms at the eastern Izmit rupture zone could be determined only due to the low magnitude-detection threshold of the seismic network and allows to resolve the local deformation pattern with unprecedented precision. Focal mechanisms along the Karadere Fault allow us to identify dominantly dextral strike–slip mechanisms with normal faulting components on NE–SW trending fault planes. Focal mechanisms in the Düzce Area predominantly exhibit NE–SW extensional normal faulting but also a substantial part of strike–slip faulting. Further subdivision of the data set slightly decreases for the misfit for deeper (z > 10 km) events. North and east of the easternmost end of the Karadere Fault we observe a high variance in stress field orientation correlated with lower b-values. While the Karadere Fault reflects a predominant dextral strike–slip regime with normal faulting components, the Düzce Area further to the East that also hosted the forthcoming Mw = 7.2 mainshock 87 days after the Izmit earthquake can be subdivided into a dominantly NE–SW extensional normal faulting regime below the Düzce Basin (DB) and a first-order strike–slip regime along the western Düzce Fault (DF). We conclude that the Düzce Basin was set under tension by the Izmit rupture and partly released the slip deficit by extensional faulting on Karadere Fault parallel to the coseismic displacement. At the same time this area and in particular the Düzce Fault that bounds the Düzce Basin to the south reflects mostly strike–slip events representing a major asperity along the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) before initiating the Düzce rupture 87 days after the Izmit event.

Introduction

The North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) is one of the seismically most active transform faults worldwide extending along 1600 km from eastern Anatolia to the Aegean Sea (Fig. 1a). The direction of slip corresponds well with the Global Positioning System (GPS) derived 25–30 mm yr 1 westward motion of the Anatolian Block with respect to Eurasia (McClusky et al., 2000, Reilinger et al., 2006). The Mw = 7.4 August 17, 1999 Izmit earthquake exhibits a maximum surface displacement of > 5 m at the Sapanca–Akyazi segment (Barka et al., 2002, Fig. 1b). Average coseismic slip obtained from teleseismic waveform inversion is 2.5 m (Tibi et al., 2001) and 2.9 m from regional strong-motion records (Bouchon et al., 2002). Moreover, Synthetic Aperture Radar interferometry (InSAR) data inversion (Wright et al., 2001) and GPS data by Reilinger et al. (2000) show a maximum displacement of 5 m and 3.5 m near the mainshock epicenter, respectively. Delouis et al. (2002) identified four individual segments along the Izmit rupture by using combined GPS, SAR, teleseismic and strong-motion data.

Rupture propagation towards the east ended near Düzce where a large earthquake occurred 87 days after the Izmit event (November 12, 1999 Mw = 7.2). Fault plane solutions of both mainshocks reflect right-lateral strike–slip faulting on a vertical (Izmit) and steeply northward dipping (Düzce) fault plane (Tibi et al., 2001, see Fig. 1b). The easternmost segment of the 1999 Izmit earthquake rupture is right stepping at the Karadere area (1.5 m of co-seismic slip) with respect to the Düzce Area (no co-seismic slip at the surface). Izmit aftershock focal mechanisms for this area for magnitudes > 2 based on recordings from the combined German Task Force (GTF) and SApanca BOlu NETwork (SABONET) are predominantly strike–slip with normal faulting components (Bohnhoff et al., 2006).

The stress field that causes the aftershocks is a combination of the pre-existing stress field and that induced by the mainshock. The apparent dissimilarity between aftershock mechanisms is so strong that it suggests a highly heterogeneous stress field which could be due to either a highly heterogeneous rupture in the mainshock or almost complete stress drop in the mainshock which almost removes the pre-existing stress field (Michael et al., 1990, Michael, 1991).

In this study we determine and analyze a total of 221 Izmit aftershock focal mechanisms for the Karadere–Düzce branch for the entire recording period of the seismic network (August 22, 1999–October 17, 1999) and down to Ml = 0.9. We perform stress tensor inversion to determine the local stress field orientation. Results are compared to the local tectonic setting and discussed in the light of the proceeding Düzce earthquake that occurred on November 12, 1999 extending the Izmit rupture by ~ 50 km to the east.

Section snippets

Data base and procedure

We focus on recordings obtained by a 36-seismic station network covering the entire Izmit rupture zone extending from the eastern Sea of Marmara towards the Düzce Area. A long-term seismic network consisting of 15 stations was in operation since 1996 (SApanca-BOlu NETwork — SABONET, Milkereit et al., 2000, yellow triangles in Fig. 1b). With the aim to monitor the Izmit aftershock activity at low magnitude-detection threshold, the German Task Force for Earthquakes (GTF) of the Helmholtz-Centre

Stress tensor inversion

Numerous methods have been proposed for the determination of the stress field orientation from fault plane solutions. The most widely used ones are the inversion algorithms of Gephart and Forsyth (1984) and Michael (1984). Both methods are based on the assumption that, if various orientations of focal mechanisms exist within a region of uniform stress, one may determine the directions of the principal stresses (σ1-3) and a relative stress magnitude (Ф) from the condition that slip occurs in the

Results

In order to determine the stress field orientation at the Karadere–Düzce segment of the NAFZ from the fault mechanism data we started by inverting the entire set of 221 fault plane solutions (Fig. 7). A vertical orientation (plunge of 84°) is found for the maximum principal stress, σ1. The minimum principal stress, σ3, is found to be subhorizontal striking NE–SW. The intermediate principal stress, σ2, is subhorizontal trending NW–SE. The confidence intervals of σ1 and σ2 are strongly clustered

Discussion

The 1999 Izmit and Düzce mainshocks reflect a clear E–W trending right-lateral strike–slip faulting mechanism which is in good agreement with the regional tectonic setting along the NAFZ as a first order approximation (Tibi et al., 2001). Similar results for fault kinematics and local stress field orientations were found earlier for KDA based on the analysis of larger magnitude faulting mechanisms (Örgülü and Aktar, 2001, Bohnhoff et al., 2006). A regional right-lateral strike–slip regime

Conclusions

Fault plane solutions for Izmit aftershocks along the Karadere–Düzce section of the Izmit rupture are analyzed to determine the deformation and stress regimes. Fault mechanisms for aftershocks recorded by German Task Force and Sapanca Bolu Network are used. Two hundred and twenty one highly reliable fault plane solutions are determined from Izmit aftershocks along the eastern part of the rupture (Karadere–Düzce branch) covering a magnitude range between 0.9 and 4.3, during the time span between

Acknowledgements

We thank the German Task Force for Earthquakes (GTF) hosted at Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ and especially Jochen Zschau and Helmut Grosser for providing the continuous seismic recordings obtained by the GTF network after the 1999 Izmit earthquake. We thank Erwin Günther, Sami Zünbül and Salih Karakisa for maintenance of the network. Furthermore we thank Grzegorz Kwiatek and Katrin Plenkers for constructive discussions and, Dino Bindi and Stefano Parolai for support during magnitude

References (38)

  • FleritF. et al.

    The mechanical interaction between the propagating North Anatolian Fault and the back-arc extension in the Aegean

    EPSL

    (2004)
  • UmutluN. et al.

    The rupture process during the 1999 Düzce, Turkey, earthquake from joint inversion of teleseismic and strong-motion data

    Tectonophysics

    (2004)
  • AydinA. et al.

    Surface ruptures of the 17 August and 12 November 1999 Izmit and Düzce earthquakes in Northwestern Anatolia, Turkey: their tectonic and kinematic significance and the associated damage

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (2002)
  • BarkaA. et al.

    The surface rupture and slip distribution of the 17 August 1999 Izmit earthquake (M 7.4, North Anatolian Fault

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (2002)
  • BohnhoffM. et al.

    Fault mechanisms of induced seismicity at the superdeep German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB) borehole and their relation to fault structure and stress field

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2004)
  • BohnhoffM. et al.

    Strain partitioning and stress rotation at the North Anatolian Fault Zone from aftershock focal mechanisms of the 1999 Izmit Mw=7.4 Earthquake

    Geophys. J. Int.

    (2006)
  • BohnhoffM. et al.

    Seismotectonic setting at the North Anatolian Fault Zone after the 1999 Mw=7.4 Izmit earthquake based on high-resolution aftershock locations

    Adv. Geosci.

    (2007)
  • BottM.H.P.

    The mechanics of oblique slip faulting

    Geol. Mag.

    (1959)
  • BouchonM. et al.

    Space and time evolution of rupture and faulting during the 1999 Izmit (Turkey) earthquake

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (2002)
  • BulutF. et al.

    Characterization of aftershock-fault plane orientations of the 1999 Izmit (Turkey) earthquake using high-resolution aftershock locations

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (2007)
  • DelouisB. et al.

    Joint inversion of InSAR, GPS, teleseismic and strong-motion data for the spatial and temporal distribution of earthquake slip: application to the 1999 Izmit mainshock

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (2002)
  • DumanY.T. et al.

    Step-over and band structures along the 1999 Duzce earthquake surface rupture, North Anatolian Fault, Turkey

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (2005)
  • GephartJ.W.

    Stress and the direction of slip on fault planes

    Tectonics

    (1990)
  • GephartJ.W. et al.

    An improved method for determining the regional stress tensor using earthquake focal mechanism data: application to the San Fernando earthquake sequence

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1984)
  • GillardD. et al.

    Type of faulting and orientation of stress and strain as a function of space and time in Kilauea's south flank, Hawaii

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1996)
  • GörgünE. et al.

    Analysis of Izmit aftershocks 25 days before the November 12th 1999 Düzce earthquake, Turkey

    Tectonophysics

    (2009)
  • HardebeckJ.L. et al.

    Stress orientations obtained from earthquake focal mechanisms: what are appropriate uncertainty estimates?

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (2001)
  • LuZ. et al.

    Details of stress directions in the Alaska subduction zone from fault plane solutions

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1997)
  • McCluskyS. et al.

    Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Fax: +49 3312881328.

    View full text