Shedding light on biogas: Phototrophic biofilms in anaerobic digesters hold potential for improved biogas production

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2019.126024Get rights and content

Abstract

Conventional anaerobic digesters intended for the production of biogas usually operate in complete darkness. Therefore, little is known about the effect of light on their microbial communities. In the present work, 16S rRNA gene amplicon Nanopore sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing were used to study the taxonomic and functional structure of the microbial community forming a biofilm on the inner wall of a laboratory-scale transparent anaerobic biodigester illuminated with natural sunlight. The biofilm was composed of microorganisms involved in the four metabolic processes needed for biogas production, and it was surprisingly rich in Rhodopseudomonas faecalis, a versatile bacterium able to carry out photoautotrophic metabolism when grown under anaerobic conditions. The results suggested that this bacterium, which is able to fix carbon dioxide, could be considered for use in transparent biogas fermenters in order to contribute to the production of optimized biogas with a higher CH4:CO2 ratio than the biogas produced in regular, opaque digesters. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study characterising the phototrophic biofilm associated with illuminated bioreactors.

Introduction

Anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic matter is a robust technology for biogas synthesis from different types of waste [6], and numerous studies have been conducted to optimise the synthesis of biogas and evaluate potential substrates [28]. Anaerobic digesters can be fed with a wide range of substrates, such as grass biomass [2], [3], sewage sludge from water treatment [24], microalgal biomass [18], and food waste [70], among others. The main goal of AD is the production of methane, a renewable energy source that can be used for heating and electricity, as well as many other operations that use combustion engines [39]. Biogas is a mixture of methane (CH4; 55–70% of the total volume), carbon dioxide (CO2; 30–40%) and traces of other gases, such as hydrogen sulphide (H2S) [14], [54]. Whereas methane is a flammable gas over a relatively large range of concentrations in air at standard pressure (5.4–17%), carbon dioxide is an inert gas. Therefore, increasing the CH4:CO2 ratio is one of the keystones for the production of high-quality biogas. The CH4:CO2 ratio can vary depending on the digester type, the substrate composition, and other factors such as temperature, pH, the degradation rate and substrate concentration [21]. An appropriate design for an anaerobic digester is thus central for the production of optimized biogas.

The microbial communities operating in the digester are the final key players responsible for the quality of the biogas produced. The role of different microorganisms in the four metabolic steps carried out during the AD of organic matter (hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis) has been widely studied [74]. A diverse number of Bacteria are known to be involved in the hydrolysis and further acidogenesis of complex polymers, whereas the oxidation of intermediate metabolites to acetate (acetogenesis) is performed by either hydrogen- or formate-producing acetogens [61]. Lastly, methane synthesis is mainly derived from acetate and H2/CO2 by acetoclastic and hydrogenoclastic methanogenic Archaea. Therefore, an improved understanding of the microbial communities and their metabolic roles during the four stages of AD may also help to optimize biogas production in terms of quantity (yield) and quality (CH4:CO2 ratio of the gas produced).

Over the past few years, next-generation sequencing techniques, such as 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing, have been applied to study the structure and composition of microbial communities in different types of anaerobic digesters [1], [2], [3], [23], [24], [43], [62]. These studies have shown that each particular community is influenced by parameters such as the type of feedstock [62], temperature [5], [11], [19], retention time [19], salt content [17], [6], viscosity [24], pH [75], or the loading rate [11], [24]. Although the influence of many physicochemical parameters on microbial communities has been studied in anaerobic digesters, very little is known about the influence of light on the process [53], [59], [66], mainly because of the obvious fact that conventional AD systems operate in complete darkness. Interestingly, a previous study reported an increase of the relative concentration of methane when an anaerobic digester was operated under the influence of light [63]. However, the effect of light on the entire microbiome of anaerobic digesters has yet to be addressed.

Therefore, the aim of the present work was to analyse the effect of natural sunlight on the microbial community of a laboratory-scale anaerobic co-digester, in order to explore the possibility of inducing light-sensitive pathways, which might improve biogas quality due to carbon fixation. In order to reach this goal, full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon Nanopore sequencing, shotgun metagenomic sequencing and a complete bioinformatics analysis were used to unveil the structure and composition of the microbial community growing as a red-coloured biofilm over the transparent wall of a specifically designed transparent leach-bed bioreactor.

Section snippets

Substrate and seed sludge

Untreated grass biomass (Graminidae) from a pasture in Jena (Germany) was used as feedstock. Collected grass biomass was characterised by a total solids content (TS) of 30.4%, with 84.2% of the TS being volatile solids (VS). TS and VS were determined as described in Abendroth et al. [2]. One gram of fresh biomass showed a chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 260 mg O2. Sewage sludge from an anaerobic digester of the water treatment plant in Jena (Germany) was used as seed sludge.

Digestion conditions

The experiment was

Taxonomic diversity of the microbial community

After three weeks operating the anaerobic digester, a bright red-pigmented microbial biofilm appeared on the inner wall of the bioreactor (Supplementary Fig. S1). Since the microbiome of the main content of biodigesters has already been extensively studied [1], [2], [3], [23], [43], [62], we focused on the characterisation of the microbiome of the red-pigmented biofilm that developed on the transparent wall of the bioreactor.

The taxonomic composition of the biofilm microbial community was

Conclusions and further considerations

In the present work, a complete study was carried out of a biofilm developing on the transparent wall of a lab-scale anaerobic digester operated under sunlight conditions. The microbial community harboured members involved in the four metabolic stages needed for the anaerobic digestion of organic matter, namely breakdown of polymers into monomers, acidification, acetogenesis and methanogenesis. Methanosarcina was the dominant methanogen in the anaerobic digester. The key difference with regard

Acknowledgements

We are thankful for the funding received from the German Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy (grant nos. 16KN070128, 16KN070126). We are also grateful for funding by the European Union through the BioRoboost project, H2020-NMBP-TR-IND-2018-2020/ BIOTEC-01-2018 (CSA), Project ID 210491758. Moreover, we also thank Justus Hardegen, Andreas Underberg and Anja Schmidt for technical assistance. Adriel Latorre is a recipient of a Doctorado Industrial fellowship from the Spanish Ministerio de

References (75)

  • Z. Yang et al.

    Potential application of gasification to recycle food waste and rehabilitate acidic soil from secondary forests on degraded land in Southeast Asia

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2016)
  • J. Zhou et al.

    Biogas production and microbial community shift through neutral pH control during the anaerobic digestion of pig manure

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • C. Abendroth et al.

    Eubacteria and Archaea communities in seven mesophile anaerobic digester plants

    Biotechnol. Biofuels

    (2015)
  • C. Abendroth et al.

    Microbial communities involved in biogas production exhibit high resilience to heat shocks

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2017)
  • C. Abendroth et al.

    From grass to gas: microbiome dynamics of grass biomass acidification under mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures

    Biotechnol. Biofuels

    (2017)
  • A. Banach et al.

    Microbial community composition and methanogens’ biodiversity during a temperature shift in a methane fermentation chamber

    Environ. Technol.

    (2018)
  • G. Borrel et al.

    Methanogenesis and the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway: an ancient, versatile, and fragile association

    Genome Biol. Evol.

    (2016)
  • T. Brettin et al.

    RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes

    Sci. Rep.

    (2015)
  • R. Caspi et al.

    The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2018)
  • J. Chun et al.

    Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the Bacteria and Archaea

    Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.

    (2014)
  • R.J. Ciotola et al.

    The influence of loading rate and variable temperatures on microbial communities in anaerobic digesters

    Energies

    (2014)
  • A. Conklin et al.

    Growth kinetics and competition between Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta in mesophilic anaerobic digestion

    Water Environ. Res.

    (2006)
  • E. Corneli et al.

    Biotransformation of water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) to biohydrogen by Rhodopseudomonas palustris

    J. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2017)
  • T.Z.D. De Mes et al.

    Methane production by anaerobic digestion of wastewater and solid wastes

    Bio-methane Bio-hydrogen

    (2003)
  • T. DeSantis et al.

    Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2006)
  • J. De Vriezea et al.

    Microbial community redundancy in anaerobic digestion drives process recovery after salinity exposure

    Water Res.

    (2017)
  • A. Doloman et al.

    Qualitative analysis of microbial dynamics during anaerobic digestion of microalgal biomass in a UASB reactor

    Int. J. Microbiol.

    (2017)
  • J.C. Gaby et al.

    The effect of temperature and retention time on methane production and microbial community composition in staged anaerobic digesters fed with food waste

    Biotechnol. Biofuels

    (2017)
  • J. Goris et al.

    DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities

    Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.

    (2007)
  • S.D. Hafner et al.

    Predicting methane and biogas production with the biogas package

    (2017)
  • S. Hahnke et al.

    Description of Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans sp. nov., Petrimonas mucosa sp. nov. and Fermentimonas caenicola gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from mesophilic laboratory-scale biogas reactors, and emended description of the genus Proteiniphilum

    Syst. Evol. Microbiol.

    (2016)
  • R. Heyer et al.

    Metaproteome analysis reveals that syntrophy, competition, and phage-host interaction shape microbial communities in biogas plants

    Microbiome

    (2019)
  • J.S. Jeris et al.

    The biochemistry of methane fermentation using C14 tracers

    J. Water Pollut. Control Fed.

    (1965)
  • M. Kanehisa et al.

    KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2017)
  • S. Kato et al.

    Methanogenesis facilitated by electric syntrophy via (semi)conductive iron-oxide minerals

    Environ. Microbiol.

    (2012)
  • S. Kato et al.

    Enhancement of methanogenesis by electric syntrophy with biogenic iron-sulfide minerals

    MicrobiologyOpen

    (2018)
  • L.J. Kerkhof et al.

    Profiling bacterial communities by MinION sequencing of ribosomal operons

    Microbiome

    (2017)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Anaerobic biofilm reactor: fundamentals and applications

      2022, Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Advances in Biological Wastewater Treatment Systems
    • Enhanced treatment of landfill leachate with cathodic algal biofilm and oxygen-consuming unit in a hybrid microbial fuel cell system

      2020, Bioresource Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is worth noting that the relative abundance of Geobacter in the anodic compartment of AB-OCU2-MFC could promote electron transfer and organic matter degradation. Geobacter typically belongs to an anaerobic bacterium with superior electrochemical activity in anodic MFC (Abendroth et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019). Rhodopseudomonas was also observed in the AB-OCU2-MFC anode with 9.6% abundance, and was limited to 0.66% in AB-MFC.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Equal contributions.

    View full text