Elsevier

The Surgeon

Volume 13, Issue 5, October 2015, Pages 256-262
The Surgeon

Audit
Patient's experience of treatment for sleep apnoea with a mandibular advancement splint

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2014.05.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Background and aims

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a well recognised clinical disorder in which there is narrowing and repeated collapse of the upper airway during sleep resulting in the cessation of breathing. Patients with mild to moderate sleep apnoea are often provided with mandibular advancement splint (MAS) therapy as a form of first line or definitive treatment. The aims of this audit were to evaluate patient satisfaction and success of MAS therapy.

Methods

93 patients diagnosed with sleep apnoea and suitable for a splint were recruited prospectively at Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead between January 2009 and October 2010. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was developed by health professionals involved in the care of patients with sleep apnoea and assessed for face and content validity and reliability. Participants completed the questionnaire six weeks after the splint was fitted.

Results

44% who previously experienced snoring now reported no snoring and 47% reported less snoring since wearing the MAS appliance. 69% reported complete resolution of sleep apnoea symptoms. 37% experienced aching teeth and 33% experienced having a dry throat when wearing the appliance. 86% of sleeping partners felt that their quality of sleep was improved following their partners treatment.

Conclusions

The standards set for each criteria in this audit were met. MAS treatment has a key role to play in the management of obstructive sleep apnoea with high rates of patient satisfaction and the majority of patients partners reporting a significant improvement in their own and their partners sleep quality.

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a well recognised clinical disorder in which there is narrowing and repeated collapse of the upper airway during sleep resulting in the cessation of breathing. The prevalence reported in middle-aged males is 4% and in females 2%.1 The aetiology behind the collapse of the pharyngeal airway is due to a combination of anatomical and patho-physiological factors. The clinical features include excessive daytime sleepiness, impaired cognitive ability especially during driving, headaches and snoring. The diagnosis Obstructive Sleep Apnoea is based on a full comprehensive history from both the patient and sleeping partner, Epworth sleepiness scale, Mallampati classification, examination of the ear, nose and throat to rule out any physical obstructions, Body Mass Index and an overnight polysomnography. Polysomnography assesses the severity of Obstructive sleep apnoea in terms of Apnoea–Hypopnoea Index (AHI) which is the number of apnoeas or cessation of breathing lasting ten or more seconds per hour. Hypopnoea is measured by 50% reduction in the tidal volume with a 4% or greater fall in the oxygen saturation lasting 10 s or more per hour.

Obstructive sleep apnoea is a multi-factorial condition and therefore management is focused on providing a multi-disciplinary team approach. This team includes an ENT surgeon, Orthodontist, Maxillofacial surgeon and Anaesthetist.

Treatment options include behavioural interventions such as advicing weight loss and reduced alcohol intake, non-surgical options including continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and mandibular advancement splint (MAS) therapy, and surgical options.2

Section snippets

Aims

The aims of the audit are to evaluate patient satisfaction and success of mandibular advancement splints in subjects diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnoea using an outcome questionnaire.

Objectives

To assess:

  • 1.

    If participants were able to wear their MAS

  • 2.

    The number of nights per week participants were able to wear their MAS

  • 3.

    The effect on snoring when wearing the MAS

  • 4.

    The experience of sleep apnoea symptoms when wearing a MAS

  • 5.

    Problems experienced with wearing a MAS

  • 6.

    Quality of sleep improvement when wearing a MAS

  • 7.

    How participants felt in general after wearing the MAS

  • 8.

    How treatment affects the participants partners' quality of sleep

  • 9.

    The quality of service provided by the department.

Standards

The standards set for the audit are presented in Table 1.

Methods and materials

Patients aged 18 years and over were recruited prospectively following referral to the Department of Orthodontics at Queen Victoria Hospital in East Grinstead between January 2009 and October 2010. All patients who were referred and diagnosed with sleep apnoea and suitable for a splint were included in the study. Two types of mandibular advancement splints were fitted, a hard cured acrylic or a vacuum formed appliance. Both provided full occlusal coverage and the choice depended upon the

Results

During the audit period 102 splints were fitted and questionnaires distrubted. 93 patients returned their completed questionnaires thereby agreeing to participate through positive consent. The response rate was 91%. 60 participants were males and 33 were females. Eighty one (87%) participants reported compliance with MAS appliance. The remaining twelve (13%) reported that they felt unable to wear their appliance (Fig. 2). Sixty seven percent of participants (n = 54) reported that they were

Discussion

This audit assessed both the patient and partner's experience of MAS treatment for sleep apnoea.

Table 2 below compares the audit results to the standards set. The standards set for each criteria in this mandibular advancement splint audit were met.

Eighty seven percent of the subjects were wearing their splint but thirteen percent did not adapt to their appliance and terminated its use during the first six weeks. In previous studies reasons for terminating treatment included discomfort, social

Limitations of this audit

There may possibly be a degree of recall bias in this audit design. It could be argued that the patients that didn't return their questionnaire are not experiencing therapeutic benefit. In a future clinical review we plan to follow up all patients including those who did not comply with their MAS and see if they took up CPAP and had symptom resolution. It would be interesting to perform a repeat polysomnography following the intervention to demonstrate using an objective measurement the degree

Conclusion

The management of obstructive sleep apnoea should focus around a multidisciplinary team approach. Mandibular advancement splint treatment has a key role to play in the management of obstructive sleep apnoea as this audit shows with considerably high rates of patient compliance and satisfaction, minimal side effects reported and the majority of patients partners reporting a significant improvement in their own and their partners sleep quality.

Sources of financial support

Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust provided financial support to carry out this audit including the cost of stationary and postage.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of all clinicians in the department of Orthodontics at Queen Victoria Hospital with the collection of data for this audit.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (3)

  • Use of mandibular advancement devices for the treatment of primary snoring with or without obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): A systematic review

    2021, Sleep Medicine Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    Two studies did not specify the employed MAD type [35,41]. The most common adverse effects were temporomandibular joint (TJM) pain (9/10 studies) [2,31,35–38,43–45]; excessive salivation (7/10 studies) [2,24–26,31–33,45]; sensitivity in muscles or teeth (7/10 studies) [2,35,38,39,43–45]; and dry mouth or throat (5/10 studies) [2,20,35,38,44]. Notably, five studies reported progressive diminution of these side effects during treatment [2,20,31,36,43].

  • Is treatment of mandibular advancement device acceptable to snorers?

    2016, Indian Journal of Science and Technology
View full text