Hybridisation optimization of concentrating solar thermal and biomass power generation facilities
Introduction
Concentrating solar power (CSP)–biomass hybrid plants are a well accepted solution for comparatively low cost base-load/dispatchable renewable energy but are a niche market considering the limited areas with a sufficiently high direct normal irradiance, >1700 kW h/m2/year, and biomass resources. Countries such as Australia, Spain, Italy, Greece, Thailand, India, and Brazil are, amongst others, prime candidates for such projects as these countries have locations that meet both criteria. To maximize the commercial viability and efficient biomass use the power plant concepts should be as efficient as possible considering the economic realities of obtaining finance for such projects.
Recently, the first CSP–biomass hybrid plant commenced operation near Barcelona, Spain (Protermosolar, 2012), which proves that such concepts work technically and are bankable solutions. Despite other CSP–biomass configurations being investigated in the past, including Fresnel and tower systems, no other projects commenced construction at this point in time.
This paper investigates different possible CSP–biomass hybrid configurations with the aim of identifying the best in regards to technical, economic, and environmental performance, such as cycle efficiency, investment, and CO2 abatement potential. The efficient use of biomass is not only necessary to maximize plant output, but also to optimize usage as biomass has to be purchased competitively against other users, such as pulp and paper industry. Understanding the different CSP–biomass hybrid options will enable project developers to concentrate on the most promising ones therewith increasing chances to successfully implement such projects.
All scenarios investigated in this paper assume that the biomass boiler is operating constantly at full capacity, that the CSP system provides additional capacity during the daytime when electricity demand/prices are typically higher in Australia (Lekovic et al., 2011), and that the CSP and biomass systems can operate independent of each other by providing identical steam flows/parameters to the joint turbine. To minimize plant investment molten salt thermal storage is considered only for one high temperature scenario as its cost are still comparatively high and the biomass component can generate electricity at lower cost during the night and extended cloud coverage. Future work could investigate CSP–biomass hybrids with thermal storage in more detail by considering other storage media, such as pressurized water or steam, and tank configurations, such as single tanks.
Section snippets
Current hybrid proposals
First proposals to combine CSP with biomass/waste materials using dish systems were investigated briefly in the 1980s (McDonald, 1986). However, due to technical and financial issues no plants were built. It took more than two decades before the first commercial CSP–biomass hybrid plant, Termosolar Borges 22.5 MWe (Morell, 2012), commenced operation near Lleida, ca. 150 km west of Barcelona, Spain, see Fig. 1. The plant is located further north than any other CSP project in Spain and uses the
Methods
The assessment aims to identify the best CSP–biomass hybrid plant configuration by investigating the technical, economic and environmental performance of 17 different scenarios. A case study approach is chosen to compare the scenario differences but the assessment is transferable to other locations when adapting site and cost conditions.
Water–steam cycle analysis
Several options exist to increase the efficiency of a Rankine cycle systems, such as optimized feedwater heating, blowdown heat recovery and flue gas condensation. This section briefly outlines the effects of these options on the net cycle efficiency and provides the base case scenario (scenario 1) for the following CSP–biomass hybrid assessment.
Results
The technical, economic and environmental results shown for the 17 different scenarios are based on triple feedwater heating and blowdown heat recovery. Some information is provided on the impact of molten salt TS and less mature plant concepts.
To clearly identify the scenarios and its different results in Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 an abbreviation code is used where for example 1−PT+TO stands for scenario 1 using the parabolic trough technology with thermal oil. Each CSP technology is paired
Conclusion
The assessment shows that at the moment the best technical and environmental CSP–biomass hybrid configuration, being solar tower and gasification, is not the best commercial choice, being Fresnel and fluidised bed. While the efficiency differences for the 17 scenarios reach 13% the investment variations are with 31% significantly larger. The results also show that, based on identical annual electricity generation, the CSP–biomass hybrid plant investment is up to 69% lower compared to a
References (49)
- et al.
Economic impact of solar thermal electricity deployment in Spain
Energy Policy
(2009) - et al.
Biomass and central receiver system (CRS) hybridization: volumetric air CRS and integration of a biomass waste direct burning boiler on steam cycle
Sol. Energy
(Oct. 2012) - et al.
Co-benefits of utilizing logging residues for bioenergy production: the case for east Texas, USA
Biomass and Bioenergy
(Sep. 2007) A hybrid solar closed-cycle gas turbine combined heat and power plant concept to meet the continuous total energy needs of a small community
J. Heat Recover. Syst.
(1986)- et al.
Comparison of linear Fresnel and parabolic trough collector power plants
Sol. Energy
(2012) - et al.
The feasibility of hybrid solar–biomass power plants in India
Energy
(2012) - et al.
Concentrated solar power hybrid plants, which technologies are best suited for hybridisation?
Renew. Energy
(2013) - Abengoa Solar, Operating facilities – Spain. 2011....
- Acciona Energía. 2002. Biomass plant from straw combustion in Sangüesa....
- et al.
Power plant Holstebro/Struer with separately fired superheater
Eckrohrkessel Licensee Conf.
(1992)
San Joaquin Solar 1 & 2 Power Plant Licensing Case
Termosolar borges: a thermosolar hybrid plant with biomass
Third Int. Symp. Energy Biomass Waste
Personal Communication with ERK Eckrohrkessel GmbH
Design of the archimede 5 MW molten salt parabolic trough solar plant
SolarPaces
An assessment of biomass for bioelectricity and biofuel, and for greenhouse gas emission reduction in Australia
GCB Bioenergy
One year operation experience of gemasolar plant
SolarPaces Conf.
Cited by (77)
Experimental investigation of a hybridized flat-plate solar collector/gas burner for low-carbon production of hot water – Analysis of energy, exergy, and GHG emissions
2023, Sustainable Energy Technologies and AssessmentsOpportunities and challenges in using particle circulation loops for concentrated solar power applications
2023, Progress in Energy and Combustion ScienceDemonstration of a concentrated solar power and biomass plant for combined heat and power
2022, Energy Conversion and ManagementCitation Excerpt :The thermal oil was heated to 400 °C and used to generate steam. Subsequently, the steam was superheated to 520 °C by the dual biomass boilers (2 × 22 MWheat) to achieve a higher conversion efficiency [19]. The steam was used to power a 24.8 MWel turbine, with an efficiency of 37 % at full load [20].