A network approach to policy framing: A case study of the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan
Introduction
This article presents a unique approach to analysing policy development, combining two conceptual-methodological approaches in order to concurrently examine the network structure of organisations attempting to influence national policy, and the way in which the policy discourse is framed by different subgroups within the network.
Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Aboriginal) people, like other Indigenous populations within colonised Western countries, experience significant health inequalities compared to the non-Indigenous population (Anderson et al., 2007, Bramley et al., 2004, Ring and Brown, 2003). Life expectancy for Aboriginal Australians is ten years less than that of other Australians (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2015, Anderson et al., 2016).
Section snippets
Aboriginal health policy in Australia
Aboriginal health policy, a subsystem of health policy in Australia, is characterized by pressing and often seemingly intractable policy problems, and a large number of stakeholders and interest groups with competing discourses.
To many Aboriginal people, “health” is viewed as “not just the physical well-being of the individual but the social, emotional, and cultural well-being of the whole community. This is a whole-of-life view and includes the cyclical concept of life-death-life” (National
The National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan
In November 2011, it was announced that a new National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan (“Health Plan”) would be developed (Roxon and Snowdon, 2011) to guide action towards achieving the Closing the Gap targets over the next decade. The Australian Government's Department of Health and Aging released a discussion paper (Department of Health and Ageing, 2012) in September 2012, and invited written comments and answers to specific questions from key stakeholders to inform the
Conceptual-methodological approach
The number of policy process investigations deploying network theories has been increasing (Adam and Kriesi, 2007). This is unsurprising, since policy decisions result from engagement by, and reciprocally impact on, a variety of stakeholders; therefore, many of these individuals and organisations devote resources to attempt to influence the policy agenda, and each other, in order to progress their particular interests. It is suggested that these actors essentially determine policy, with the
Methods
In order to understand the structural and discursive features of the network of actors attempting to influence Aboriginal health policy in Australia, qualitative framing analysis was layered onto social network analysis. The organisational approach (Laumann et al., 1985), in which organisations participate in discrete “policy events”, was used to define the boundaries of the network. The submission process used in the development of the Health Plan is the policy event examined in this study.
The
Results
The Submissions (n = 80) were provided by a variety of Aboriginal and mainstream peak health bodies, service providers, professional associations, research institutions, Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) and Government agencies. Supplementary Table 1 summarizes the type of organisations included in the sample. The majority of submissions were from health professional groups (n = 16), followed by Aboriginal-controlled organisations or coalitions (n = 13) and mainstream health services/primary
Discussion
The publication of Health Plan submissions presented an opportunity to analyse the network of actors within this policy subsystem and their framing practices. Analysis of these submissions revealed that many actors were connected to one another in a variety of ways, and that network connections aligned with the collective action frames used to influence policy development.
The network maps produced in this study provide a clear picture of the structure of the network of organisations attempting
Conclusions
The combination of social network analysis with framing theory provides a methodology for concurrently examining the structural and discursive aspects of the Aboriginal health policy network. It has been suggested that the study of network structure and the function of actors in a policy subsystem should be integrated (Skok, 1995). The present study embraces the framework proposed by Skok, and adds the additional perspective of framing in order to analyse the actor behaviour within policy issue
References (66)
- et al.
Indigenous and tribal peoples' health (The Lancet–Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population study
Lancet
(2016) - et al.
Public health responses for skin cancer prevention: the policy framing of sun safety in Australia, Canada and England
Soc. Sci. Med.
(2001) - et al.
Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory
Soc. Sci. Med.
(2010) - et al.
Network structures and their relevance to the policy cycle: a case study of the National Male Health Policy of Australia
Soc. Sci. Med.
(2012) Being around and knowing the players: networks of influence in health policy
Soc. Sci. Med.
(2006)- et al.
Beneficial impact of the homelands movement on health outcomes in central Australian Aborigines
Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health
(1998) Ego's important discussants or significant people: an experiment in varying the wording of personal network name generators
Soc. Netw.
(2000)- et al.
The network approach
Policy processes
- et al.
Indigenous health 1: indigenous health in Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific
Lancet
(2007)
Aboriginal Health and Institutional Reform within Australian Federalism
Recent developments in national Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander health strategy
Aust. N. Z. Health Policy
The Health and Welfare of Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples 2015
Indigenous health organizations in Australia: connections and capacity
Int. J. Health Serv.
Understanding the structure of community collaboration: the case of one Canadian health promotion network
Health Promot. Int.
Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks
Where do small worlds come from?
Ind. Corp. Change
Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment
Annu. Rev. Sociol.
Organizing Babylon-on the different conceptions of policy networks
Public Adm.
Indigenous disparities in disease-specific mortality, a cross-country comparison: New Zealand, Australia, Canada, and the United States
N. Z. Med. J.
Stakeholder analysis: a review
Health Policy Plan.
Social Justice Report 2005
Close the Gap - National Indigenous Health Equality Targets: Outcomes from the National Indigenous Health Equality Summit
Framing theory
Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci.
Using visualizations to explore network dynamics
J. Soc. Struct.
Close the Gap Indigenous Health Equality Summit Statement of Intent
Participation in American Politics: the Dynamics of Agenda-building
Communiqué - 20 December 2007
National Partnership Agreement on Closing the Gap in Indigenous Health Outcomes
Health policy networks: connecting the disconnected
Health Promot. Policy Process
Juggling multiple networks in multiple streams
Eur. Policy Anal.
Toward a theory of collaborative policy networks: identifying structural tendencies
Policy Stud. J.
Development of an Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Health Plan: Discussion Paper
Cited by (21)
Advancing Indigenous self-determination and health equity: Lessons from a failed Australian public policy
2022, SSM - Qualitative Research in HealthA scoping review of social network analyses in interorganizational collaboration studies for child mental health
2020, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :Other notable communities of interest included regions of Colorado with the highest suicide rates (Menger et al., 2015), and regions of Los Angeles, CA, with high rates of uninsured children (Valente et al., 2008). The remainder of studies focused on U.S. regions (Bess et al., 2012; Eiler et al., 2017; Friedman et al., 2007; Heflinger, 1996; Retrum et al., 2013; Weech-Maldonado et al., 2003) and on international settings (Browne et al., 2017; Dávid, 2013; Nicaise et al., 2013) with no specific detail on context. This category captures outcomes that describe how SNA can examine the mediating role of networks in collaboration for collective health efforts.
How do actors with asymmetrical power assert authority in policy agenda-setting? A study of authority claims by health actors in trade policy
2019, Social Science and MedicineCitation Excerpt :The first authority claim, networked authority, was derived from evidence in the submissions of connections between actors that made a submission. This approach to using submissions to identify connections between policy actors has been used in other studies (Browne et al., 2017) and is adapted from traditional network analysis methods which ask participants to identify their relationships (Lewis, 2006; Knoke and Yang, 2008). Connections recorded included an actor referencing another actors' submission, endorsing another actors' submission, co-authoring a submission, and stating membership or partnership with another actor.
The social network of international health aid
2018, Social Science and MedicineCitation Excerpt :A recent survey of a large body of empirical research on knowledge transmission in social networks concludes that “[m]any studies across all levels have found that a central network position, defined either in terms of the number of direct contacts or both direct and indirect contacts, has a positive influence on knowledge creation, transfer, and adoption” (Phelps et al., 2012, 1138). An emerging literature on networks of health policy practitioners in domestic contexts also tends to stress the benefits that network connections can bring to performance (Blanchet and James, 2013; Blanchet et al., 2014; Browne et al., 2017; Gold et al., 2008; Jippes et al., 2010; Khosla et al., 2016; Merrill et al., 2010; Pagliccia et al., 2010; Weishaar et al., 2015). The favourable assessment of high connectivity that pervades SNA-inspired research stands in stark contrast with the perceptions of most analysts and practitioners in the field of development aid, who tend to stress the disadvantages of the proliferation of ties between aid providers and aid recipients (Acharya et al., 2006).
Strengthening Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health policy: Lessons from a case study of food and nutrition
2019, Public Health Nutrition