Elsevier

Social Networks

Volume 51, October 2017, Pages 40-59
Social Networks

Neighborhood isolation in Chicago: Violent crime effects on structural isolation and homophily in inter-neighborhood commuting networks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.01.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We examined violence effects on external social isolation of urban neighborhoods.

  • Commuting networks among Chicago's neighborhoods were analyzed over twelve years.

  • Violence predicted residential neighborhood isolation from the citywide network.

  • Similarity in violence predicted inter-neighborhood ties, indicating homophily.

  • Violence homophily affected tie formation; neighborhood violence dissolved ties.

Abstract

Urban sociologists and criminologists have long been interested in the link between neighborhood isolation and crime. Yet studies have focused predominantly on the internal dimension of social isolation (i.e., increased social disorganization and insufficient jobs and opportunities). This study highlights the need to assess the external dimension of neighborhood isolation, the disconnectedness from other neighborhoods in the city. Analyses of Chicago's neighborhood commuting network over twelve years (2002–2013) showed that violence predicted network isolation. Moreover, pairwise similarity in neighborhood violence predicted commuting ties, supporting homophily expectations. Violence homophily affected tie formation most, while neighborhood violence was important in dissolving ties.

Section snippets

Neighborhood violence and network isolation

Violence may affect a neighborhood's isolation from the citywide commuting network in multiple ways. Directly, violence increases residents’ concerns about the safety of public transportation (e.g., gang presence or illegal drug activity on one's way to the bus stop) (Harding, 2010) and about the reliability of private transportation (e.g., stolen or disassembled cars). Increased victimization risk discourages residents’ use of transportation to search for jobs and affects their informal

Homophily in inter-neighborhood commuting ties

It is important to note that resources and institutions are not always absent from impoverished neighborhoods (e.g., childcare programs like Head Start) and when present, they do connect their clients to resources and institutions across the city (Small and McDermott, 2006, Murphy and Wallace, 2010, Tran et al., 2013). Even then, important questions remain about the quality of such connections. Are impoverished and violent neighborhoods connected to areas of better quality or to similarly

Data, measures, and methods

The measures in the current study are based on data from the Decennial Census, police records, and the Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) (Abowd et al., 2005). The LEHD is a U.S. Census Bureau program that matches Unemployment Insurance earning records with other administrative records from state and local authorities to additional census and survey data on the firms, worker, and household statistics. The unemployment insurance data

Measures

The dependent variable is defined as a commuting relation from the home community to the work community. While ties based only on commuting do not represent all possible ties between neighborhoods, they are likely related to a broader range of interpersonal interactions and resource exchanges across space. To compute the commuting relation we used LEHD's LODES database to calculate the number of residents from a home community that commute to a work community. Then, we normalized this value by

Main independent variables

We calculated neighborhood violent crime rate based on the number of violent incidents located in the neighborhood during each year between 2001 and 2012, divided by the number of neighborhood residents, as assessed by the 2000 decennial census. The types of violent incidents included were homicide, assault, battery, sexual assault, domestic violence, and robbery. We used violent crime as a predictor in two different ways. First, we used the violence rates in the “home” (or sending)

Control variables

Spatial proximity. McPherson et al. (2001: 429) named space as “the most basic source of homophily,” drawing on the principle of least effort – that it takes more effort to connect over larger distances. While new communication technologies have lowered the cost of forming and maintaining ties over long distances (Wellman, 1996), geographic space remains powerful in influencing the presence and strength of ties (Hipp and Perrin, 2009, Schaefer, 2012). In our analysis, we define spatial

ERGM/p* and TERGM

Standard regression methods assume that observations are independent. However, the relations between communities are inter-dependent – violating the independence assumption. To address this challenge, we use Exponential Random Graph Models or p* models (ERGMs/p*) (Frank and Strauss, 1986, Robins and Pattison, 2005, Robins et al., 2007, Wasserman and Pattison, 1996). A key feature of ERGM/p* is the ability to control for purely structural effects (also called endogenous effects). For example,

Inter-neighborhood commuting networks

Fig. 1, Fig. 2 graphically present the 77 community areas of Chicago and their commuting network. Both graphs of Fig. 1 show the geographic distribution of communities. The leftmost map also depicts the geographic boundaries and the CA names, whereas the rightmost map shows a simplified representation of communities as nodes (circles located at the latitude and longitude coordinates of the CA centroids) connected through the 2013 commuting ties (0.5% cutoff). The size of the nodes varies

Descriptives

Table 1 reports the means, standard deviations, ranges, and correlations of the core neighborhood level measures in this study for 2002 and 2013 in order to give a sense of the temporal bounds of the values. We use 0.5% in defining the ties, which represents about 11% of all possible ties in 2002 and 9% in 2013. First, Table 1 presents information on neighborhood violence. The mean violent crime rate decreased over the course of the years, following the general pattern of decreasing crime in

Multivariate ERGM/p* estimates: static and dynamic network models

Table 2 presents the results of ERGM/p* estimations of the likelihood of a commuting relation between two communities. Model 1 includes the endogenous effects (i.e., network structure), attribute effects (i.e., sender and receiver effects), spatial proximity and the difference in violent crime rate between the “home” and “work” community. Model 2 adds a control for transportation ties. Finally, Model 3 also controls for the difference in residential stability, diversity and density of local

Supplementary analyses

Different cutoffs and tie strength. In additional analyses, we eliminate the need to choose a particular threshold value in dichotomizing the ties by using a multiscale backbone extraction algorithm (Serrano et al., 2009) to redefine the commuting networks. This procedure preserves only links with weights that significantly deviate from a null model (which determines the expected distribution of link weights around a node if those weights were distributed randomly). We then re-estimated our

Discussion

This study investigated the role of violence in predicting neighborhood isolation and differential exclusion from the ecological network structure of commuting flows across Chicago over the course of twelve years. Results from analyses of commuting networks showed that violence is significantly associated with commuting connections to fewer communities. Cross-sectional analyses, net of controls, indicated that during most years, violence in the residential and work neighborhoods was associated

Contributions and implications

Urban sociologists and criminologists have long been interested in the extent to which neighborhood conditions are related to crime (Shaw and McKay, 1942). The focus has been predominantly on internal processes of social isolation as measured through social disorganization, weakened neighborhood social fabric, and the disappearance of local jobs, institutions, and opportunities (Wilson, 1987, Wilson, 1996). This article highlights the importance of assessing neighborhood isolation in a broader

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF CNS-1544455), Penn State's Social Science Research Institute, Population Research Institute, and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NIH R24-HD044943).

References (92)

  • Wim Bernasco et al.

    Effects of residential history on commercial robbers’ crime location choices

    European Journal of Criminology

    (2010)
  • Marianne Bertrand et al.

    Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination

    American Economic Review

    (2004)
  • Max Besbris et al.

    Effect of neighborhood stigma on economic transactions

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2015)
  • Peter Michael Blau
    (1977)
  • Lyndsey N. Boggess et al.

    Violent Crime, residential instability, and mobility: does the relationship differ in minority neighborhoods?

    Journal of Quantitative Criminology

    (2010)
  • Robert J. Bursik

    Political decision-making and ecological models of delinquency: conflict and consensus

  • Robert J. Bursik et al.

    Neighborhoods and Crime

    (1993)
  • Todd R. Clear et al.

    Coercive mobility and crime: a preliminary examination of concentrated incarceration and social disorganization

    Justice Quarterly

    (2003)
  • Skyler J. Cranmer et al.

    Inferential network analysis with exponential random graph models

    Political Analysis

    (2011)
  • Rachel E. Dwyer

    Expanding homes and increasing inequalities: U.S. Housing development and residential segregation of the affluent

    Social Problems

    (2007)
  • Marcus Felson et al.

    Daily crime flows within a city

    Crime Science

    (2015)
  • Ove Frank et al.

    Markov graphs

    Journal of the American Statistical Association

    (1986)
  • J. Galaskiewicz et al.

    Leadership and networking among neighborhood human service organizations

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1981)
  • Geolytics

    Census CD Neighborhood Change Database

    (2003)
  • Laurent Gobillon et al.

    The mechanisms of spatial mismatch

    Urban Studies

    (2007)
  • Matthew R. Graham et al.

    Design Comparison of LODES and ACS Commuting Data Products

    (2014)
  • Corina Graif et al.

    Spatial heterogeneity in the effects of immigration and diversity on neighborhood homicide rates

    Homicide Studies

    (2009)
  • Corina Graif et al.

    Urban poverty and neighborhood effects on crime: incorporating spatial and network perspectives

    Sociology Compass

    (2014)
  • Mark S. Granovetter

    The strength of weak ties

    American Journal of Sociology

    (1973)
  • Robert T. Greenbaum et al.

    The impact of violence surges on neighborhood business activity

    Urban Studies

    (2004)
  • Judith K. Hallerstein et al.

    Neighbors and coworkers: the importance of residential labor market networks

    Journal of Labor Economics

    (2011)
  • Judith K. Hallerstein et al.

    Do labor market networks have an important spatial dimension?

    Journal of Urban Economics

    (2014)
  • Maureen T. Hallinan et al.

    Interracial friendship choice in secondary schools

    American Sociological Review

    (1989)
  • Mark S. Handcock et al.

    Temporal exponential random graph models for dynamic network modeling in statnet

    Sunbelt 2015

    (2015)
  • Steve Hanneke et al.

    Discrete temporal models of social networks

  • Steve Hanneke et al.

    Discrete temporal models of social networks

    Electronic Journal of Statistics

    (2010)
  • David J. Harding

    Living the Drama: Community, Conflict, and Culture among Inner-City Boys

    (2010)
  • John Hipp et al.

    Simultaneous effect of social distance and physical distance on the formation of neighborhood ties

    City and Community

    (2009)
  • John R. Hipp

    Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point

    American Sociological Review

    (2007)
  • Albert J. Hunter

    Private, parochial, and public social orders: the problem of crime and incivility in urban communities

  • Jeanne S. Hurlbert et al.

    Core networks and tie activation: what kinds of routine networks allocate resources in non-routine situations

    American Sociological Review

    (2000)
  • Herminia Ibarra

    Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1995)
  • Mathieu Jacomy et al.

    ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software

    PLoS ONE

    (2014)
  • John F. Kain

    Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics

    (1968)
  • David S. Kirk

    A natural experiment on residential change and recidivism: lessons from Hurricane Katrina

    American Sociological Review

    (2009)
  • David S. Kirk

    A Natural experiment of the consequences of concentrating former prisoners in the same neighborhoods

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2015)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Zooming into mobility to understand cities: A review of mobility-driven urban studies

      2022, Cities
      Citation Excerpt :

      From the collective perspective, mobility flows across places indicating social structures may have implications for understanding the place effects on crime. For instance, prior research constructed mobility networks at the neighborhood level for assessing neighborhood isolation, and the results showed that the high levels of segregation in the mobility networks were associated with higher violence (Sampson & Levy, 2020) and higher local crime rates (Graif et al., 2017). Another important but challenging objective of crime-related studies is crime prediction.

    • Photo elicitation to explore health and social exclusion with rooming house residents in Ottawa, Canada

      2022, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      The structure of the house itself can directly impact health, such as how dampness, mould and infestations lead to respiratory disease (Mendell et al., 2011). The neighbourhood and surrounding resources can impact health, such as when neighbourhood violence leads to isolation (Graif et al., 2017) and lack of self-care behaviours (Smalls et al., 2015). Housing is more than just physical space and shelter.

    • Aggravated social segregation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from crowdsourced mobility data in twelve most populated U.S. metropolitan areas

      2022, Sustainable Cities and Society
      Citation Excerpt :

      Meanwhile, most studies mainly focus on the residential space but fail to take into account the visiting and activity places where people spend time across the day. It is worth noting that with the advancement of transportation and communication technologies, people's activities and social interactions are no longer limited to their residential areas (Graif et al., 2017; Small, 2006). More and more social interactions are taken place at varying locations (a.k.a., third places) across the city (Park & Kwan, 2017).

    • Critical discourse analysis of urban park and public space development

      2022, Cities
      Citation Excerpt :

      The discourse produced by RCC affects other cities, because it is echoed by other nonprofits, foundations, advocates, the popular press, and is presented at industry conferences (Brackenbury et al., 2019; Capps, 2016; Kinney, 2016; Mullenbach et al., 2021). Contemporary cities are experiencing social and economic divides, but correcting that divide will take more than being together in public spaces, even if those public spaces are partly community-managed (Florida & Mellander, 2015; Glover et al., 2005; Graif et al., 2017). Implying that social fragmentation is the result of individuals who would rather use private spaces than public ones disregards the social structures that are likely responsible for social fragmentation and socioeconomic segregation (Rothwell, 2012).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text