A behavior genetic analysis of the tendency for youth to associate according to GPA
Section snippets
Homophily in peer groups
A large body of evidence has revealed that members of a peer group tend to resemble one another on a host of traits. Evidence from psychology reveals, for example, that individuals tend to resemble their peers on measures of physical characteristics, attitudes, and aspirations (Caspi and Roberts, 2001, Harris, 1998, McPherson et al., 2001). Similarly, sociological and criminological evidence indicates that peers tend to resemble one another on measures of delinquent and criminal involvement (
Cognitive ability as a sorting factor
Findings from one stream of research speak to the intellectual similarity of individuals within a peer group (Bonney, 1942). Two classic studies are particularly relevant when considering the level of similarity between peers on measures of cognitive ability. In the first study, Almack (1922) performed one of the first analyses examining intelligence as a peer-sorting factor. Participants were drawn from grammar and middle schools in San Jose, California and were administered IQ tests. Next,
Genetic influences on peer group selection
Building on principles of evolutionary biology, Rushton et al. (1984) proposed a genetic similarity theory which states that organisms detect other genetically similar organisms via the manifestation of genotype through phenotype (e.g., behavior) and exhibit favoritism and protective behaviors toward those similar others. In other words, the genetic influences are expressed as phenotypic outcomes, or signals, that are then noticed by similar others. The more phenotypically (genetically) similar
The current study
Much attention has been given to the role that peers play in personality development (Harris, 1998) and research findings have consistently shown that all aspects of human development are driven, at least partially, by genetic factors (Turkheimer, 2000). Among these genetically influenced traits is one's cognitive ability (Plomin, 1999, Plomin and Spinath, 2004). Juxtaposing the knowledge that between-individual differences in cognitive ability are partially the result of genetic influences
Data
Data drawn from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health; Harris, 2009) were analyzed in the current study. The Add Health is a prospective, nationally representative study of American adolescents who were enrolled in middle or high school during the 1994–1995 academic year. Sampling began at the school level and, from a list of nearly 30,000 schools, 132 schools were selected for inclusion in the study. On a designated day, all students attending each of the schools
Analysis plan
The analysis unfolded in three interrelated steps. First, the correlation between the target respondents’ grades/GPA and the average GPA for the peer network to which they belonged was examined in a series of multiple regression models (Hypothesis 1). These models employed ordinary least squares regression because the dependent variable, peer network average GPA, approximated a normal distribution. All target respondents in the wave 1 in-home data file who had valid network data were analyzed
Findings
Presented in Table 2 are the results from five regression models where the peer network average GPA served as the dependent variable and all in-home participants with non-missing data at wave 1 were analyzed. This table reveals one main finding: the target respondent's grade in all four subjects and the target respondent's overall GPA is positively and significantly related to the peer network average GPA. Standardized regression coefficients are presented in brackets to allow for the
Discussion
There is little doubt that peers resemble one another on myriad traits. Indeed, much research has reported a correlation between peers on a range of personality characteristics, health outcomes, behaviors, and even physical attractiveness (McPherson et al., 2001). What has yet to be determined is why peers resemble one another so closely. Undoubtedly, much of the extant research can be explained in a causal framework. The work by Christakis and Fowler, 2007, Christakis and Fowler, 2008 displays
Acknowledgements
This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for
References (47)
- et al.
The stability of individual differences in mental ability from childhood to old age: follow-up of the 1932 Scottish Mental Survey
Intelligence
(2000) - et al.
Why are some more peer than others? Evidence from a longitudinal study of social networks and individual academic performance
Social Science Research
(2011) Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance
(1998)The influence of intelligence on the selection of associates
School and Society
(1922)- et al.
A demonstration of the generalizability of twin-based research on antisocial behavior
Behavior Genetics
(2013) - et al.
The stability of delinquent peer associations: a biosocial test of Warr's sticky friends hypothesis
Crime and Delinquency
(2011) - et al.
Delinquent peer group formation: evidence of a gene × environment correlation
The Journal of Genetic Psychology
(2008) A study of the relation of intelligence, family size, and sex differences with mutual friendships in the primary grades
Child Development
(1942)- et al.
How social and genetic factors predict friendship networks
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
(2012) - et al.
Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota study of twins reared apart
Science
(1990)
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Network Variables Code Book
Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement
Journal of Labor Economics
Personality development across the life course: the argument for change and continuity
Psychological Inquiry
The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years
The New England Journal of Medicine
The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network
The New England Journal of Medicine
Sources of exposure to smoking and drinking friends among adolescents: a behavioral-genetic evaluation
The Journal of Genetic Psychology
The focused organization of social ties
American Journal of Sociology
Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study
British Medical Journal
Model of genetic variation in human social networks
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Genetic similarity shared by best friends among adolescents
Twin Research and Human Genetics
The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do
The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994–1996; Wave III, 2001–2002; Wave IV, 2007–2009 [Machine-readable Data File and Documentation]
Delinquent peers revisited: does network structure matter?
The American Journal of Sociology
Cited by (20)
Heritability in friendship networks
2022, Journal of Economic Behavior and OrganizationA model of peer effects in school
2021, Mathematical Social SciencesCitation Excerpt :Otherwise, it will increase the benefit from better connections. We assume that link formation is mainly driven by better quality agents, leading to homophily in grades, as documented in Barnes et al. (2014). This interpretation is consistent with the risk-sharing explanation.
The role of gender in the evolution of peer networks: Individual differences in relation to the Big Five
2021, Personality and Individual DifferencesAchievement in student peer networks: A study of the selection process, peer effects and student centrality
2020, International Journal of Educational ResearchCitation Excerpt :Finally, in a high school setting, Barnes et al. (2014) also showed a positive association between student performance and the performance of its friends. One of the proposed mechanisms behind the homophily process that relates to academic performance concerns cognitive processes and perception of cognitive ability (Barnes et al., 2014; McPherson et al., 2001). According to Huston and Levinger (1978), information received or perceptions made about someone will results in an impression of its cognitions.
Genes, depressive symptoms, and chronic stressors: A nationally representative longitudinal study in the United States
2019, Social Science and MedicinePersonality and cognitive skills in network of friends, for multi-ethnic schools
2019, Research in EconomicsCitation Excerpt :The endogenous peer group formation may hamper policies that manipulate peer groups to reach some desired social outcomes, as for example that of exposing low ability students to high ability classmates (Carrell et al., 2013). In summary, whether the similarity between peers is due to causation, selection or a mixture of both is an important and still open issue (Barnes et al., 2014; Boucher, 2016). The primary aim of this study is to investigate the relative importance of sex, ethnicity, personality traits and cognitive skills in predicting relationships among classmates.