Diversity in social support by role relations: A typology☆
Introduction
Individuals are part of a society through their contacts with others. These contacts make up the personal network of an individual. Personal networks are composed of all others (alters) with whom a person (ego) has a certain relationship. An important part of this personal network consists of those alters who provide social support. The significance of a person's social support network has been shown to have an impact on a wide range of aspects in a person's life. Social support correlates to stress, emotional and psychological well-being, physical well-being, health, and the longevity of individuals (e.g. Thoits, 1982, Thoits, 1983, Thoits, 1985, d’Abbs, 1982, Sarason and Sarason, 1985, House et al., 1988, Lin and Ensel, 1989, Veiel and Baumann, 1992a, Acock and Hurlbert, 1993, Umberson et al., 1996, Antonucci et al., 1997). Research has also found social support and personal networks in general to correlate with other variables, such as personality characteristics (Sarason et al., 1983) and attitudes towards life and society (Agneessens et al., 2003).
One facet of social support that has received considerable attention is the impact of the size of a person's support network. However, social support is a multidimensional concept, and the number of alters that are potential sources of support to a person captures only part of the complexity of a person's social support network. More complex measures of social support are needed to capture more qualitative aspects of this social support network and to differentiate according to the type of support. An aspect that deserves special attention is what types of support are provided by which types of alters.
The aim of this paper is to look at the diversity in dimensions of social support available from specific role relations. Such an objective calls for a condensed manner to acquire this extensive information about a respondent's social support network and also requires a method to represent this complexity in a compact manner. Therefore, we propose an easy and short measure of social support contents that can easily be incorporated into large-scale surveys. Subsequently, we will show how to shrink the diversities in support networks into groups of respondents with similar response patterns obtained in this way. The aim is to explore whether respondents can in an adequate way be reduced into typologies based on the types of support they can expect from specific role relations. We will be using latent class analysis to reduce the complexity of social support networks in a manageable way. This typology can be used as an explanatory variable in subsequent analyses.
Section snippets
Social support and different measures of social support networks
The definition and delineation of the complex concept that is social support has been one of the major points of discussion within the support literature. The main reason for this attention is that social support generally encompasses a very broad range of facets (Veiel and Baumann, 1992b: p. 2). Nevertheless, some agreement exists about what a person's social support network is. Sarason et al. (1983) describe social support as ‘the existence or availability of people on whom we can rely,
Methodological bases for measuring role diversity in social support
For an adequate measurement of social support by roles, we must make a number of important choices. To get a global view of a person's complex social support network, one needs a picture of the different support dimensions. One way of measuring this network in surveys is by including a series of social support items in the questionnaire (cf. Vaux, 1988, van der Poel, 1993). To avoid differences in interpretation, the different social support items used to capture the multidimensionality of
Data and method
The data are based on a two-stage random sample of 623 Belgians between the ages of 23 and 75 years living in the Flemish region. The questions we use in this paper are a subset of a large-scale survey on value orientations and social integration (Waege, 1997). The survey took place in February and March 1997.
For all five support items, respondents were asked to indicate from which role relation they could expect to receive that kind of support. Respondents could indicate an unlimited number of
Models
When using LCA for building response patterns we have to predetermine the number of classes of the latent variable. Because of the exploratory nature of this analysis, we considered all possible numbers of latent classes. Based on the selection of items and roles, we fitted eighteen models in total. We used lEM (Vermunt, 1993) for model-fitting and parameter estimation. Table 2 shows the fit of these models.
Obtaining an adequate fit between model and data can sometimes be problematical in LCA,
Conclusion and discussion
In this paper, we have discussed how an actor's social support network should be seen as a complex phenomenon. One aspect that has received considerable attention when explaining other aspects of a person is the size of a person's support network. Measuring the number of alters who provide emotional support, instrumental support, information or social companionship for a person assesses only a small part of the full complexity. More complex measures of social support are necessary to capture
References (53)
- et al.
Social networks, marital status, and well-being
Social Networks
(1993) - et al.
Comparing four different methods for measuring personal social networks
Social Networks
(1990) Network items and the general social survey
Social Networks
(1984)- et al.
Social resources and socioeconomic status
Social Networks
(1986) - et al.
Evaluation of social network measurement instruments
Social Networks
(1999) What do we mean by ‘Friends’? An inductive study
Social Networks
(1982)- et al.
National differences in network density: Israel and the United States
Social Networks
(1995) - et al.
Network range in personal networks
Social Networks
(1990) - et al.
Estimating the reliability and validity of personal support measures: full information ML estimation with planned incomplete data
Social Networks
(2002) Social support networks in urban Shanghai
Social Networks
(2001)
The resources generator: social capital quantification with concrete items
Social Networks
Delineating personal support networks
Social Networks
Over het verband tussen sociale relaties en attitudes, waarden en normen
Categorical Data Analysis
A Sociology of Friendship and Kinship
Social relations and depressive symptomatology in a sample of community-dwelling French older Adults
Psychology and Aging
Family and Social Networks: Roles, Norms, and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families
Distinguishing relational contents
Range
To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City
Centennial essay: The subcultural theory of urbanism: a 20th-year assessment
American Journal of Sociology
An international comparative study of interpersonal behavior and role relationships
L’Année Sociologique
Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models
Biometrika
Categorical Longitudinal Data: Log-linear Panel, Trend, and Cohort Analysis
Cited by (117)
Towards a general method to classify personal network structures
2024, Social NetworksNetwork effects on physical activity through interpersonal vs. masspersonal communication with the core and acquaintance networks
2023, Computers in Human BehaviorDimensions of social networks: A taxonomy and operationalization
2022, Social NetworksSocial networks of older patients with advanced cancer: Potential contributions of an integrated mixed methods network analysis
2021, Journal of Geriatric OncologyCitation Excerpt :Frequency of contact or length of relationship are not necessarily associated with influence on understanding and decision-making [14]. While close relatives might be expected to provide support [15] they might be sources of tension and hinder communication and self-management of the disease [16], leading older patients to rely primarily on weaker social connections and anonymous online networks [17]. Those weaker connections may also be important, for example, by raising issues that close relatives are reluctant to discuss.
- ☆
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Conference on Methodology and Statistics, Preddvor, Slovenia, 24–27 September 2000, Preddvor. The project was supported by the Flemish government, project PBO/98/60-59/62. We are very grateful for the helpful comments and advice from two anonymous reviewers.