The role of corporate social responsibility in strong sustainability
Section snippets
Weak and strong sustainability
The current burden on the planet's natural resources can result in global climate change, the growth of desert regions, and the homogenization of flora and fauna. There is an old argument among economists about the limits these problems set in light of the future of humanity (Homer-Dixon, 2004). The economic optimists (who think that there are no limits to population, economy, and consumption) and pessimists (according to whom the size of population and global economy is already too high for
Requirements of strong ecological sustainability
The aforementioned interpretations of sustainability are also important from the corporate point of view, since business corporations are the main actors in an economy which transforms natural capital into man-made capital. Based on the two interpretations, there are also two approaches used to measure corporate contributions to sustainability (Figge and Hahn, 2004, Callens and Tyteca, 1999): relative and absolute measures. The first approach investigates efficiency, while the second focuses on
The limits of technologically based concepts
Researchers dealing with corporate sustainability emphasize the role of more effective and less natural resource-intensive (both concerning energy and materials) production methods and systems. Although it is more than only eco-efficiency, which is basically at the centre of business attention (see, e.g. the official documents of the World Business Council on Sustainable Development),1
A consumption-based view
Concerning the existence of the rebound effect, many authors suggest that sustainability demands more than increased eco-efficiency by technological development. It also requires a change in consumption patterns. Northern societies in particular have been characterized by an enormous throughput of resources and energy for many years: 20% of the world population uses 80% of the material and energy resources annually extracted and exploited. Considering these huge differences in the level of
The role of business in consumption patterns
Natural resource depletion is the result of the activity of three different, closely connected, mutually influencing main spheres: government, the business sector, and citizens and their organizations (NGOs). Although governmental power is at the centre of media attention, it is moreover the business sector which could potentially play the most important role in making a move toward greater sustainability (Hutchinson, 1996, Buday-Sántha, 2002, van Kleef and Roome, 2007, Michaelis, 2003).
The concept of CSR
As mentioned, doubt can be raised on whether the weak concept of sustainability (including eco-efficiency) is in and of itself enough for resource conservation. Strong sustainability seems to also demand sustainable consumption patterns, and business (as probably the most powerful sphere in society) also has its role in contributing to it. We therefore will subsequently examine how the business sector can contribute to sustainable consumption. Our statements are formed on the basis of current
Conclusion
CSR is gaining more importance in today's business life, and its different definitions emphasize its contribution to sustainability. However, internal CSR practices, where most of the CSR resources are spent, mainly focus on relative sustainability and eco-efficiency, while external practices, although concentrating on absolute sustainability, still represent a very low rate of business resources, and mostly only focus on the local level.
Because of scientific uncertainty, the limits of
Acknowledgement
The authors want to thank the anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments and encouragements that contributed significantly to the development of this paper.
References (65)
- et al.
The ecological footprint: a metric for corporate sustainability
Corporate Environmental Strategy
(2001) - et al.
Towards indicators of sustainable development for firms: a productive efficiency perspective
Ecological Economics
(1999) - et al.
When, where, and by how much do biophysical limits constrain the economic process?
Ecological Economics
(1997) - et al.
Economic and other implications of integrated chain management: a case study
Journal of Cleaner Production
(1998) Beyond corporate social responsibility: minnows, mammoths and market
Futures
(2005)Industrial ecology: a framework and process design for product
Journal of Cleaner Production
(1997)- et al.
METHODS—an illustrative application of the CRITINC framework to the UK
Ecological Economics
(2003) Identifying critical natural capital—conclusions about critical natural capital
Ecological Economics
(2003)- et al.
Sustainable value added: measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency
Ecological Economics
(2004) - et al.
Does the selection of ISO 14001 registrars matter? Registrar reputation and environmental policy statements in China
Journal of Environmental Management
(2004)