Elsevier

Sedimentary Geology

Volume 294, 15 August 2013, Pages 205-218
Sedimentary Geology

Carbonate-platform scale correlation of stacked high-frequency sequences in the Arab-D reservoir, Saudi Arabia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2013.05.015Get rights and content

Abstract

The Late Jurassic Arab Formation contains a number of hydrocarbon-bearing carbonates, the most important of which is the lowermost Arab-D reservoir. The reservoir lithofacies in Khurais Field are: couplets of 1) lime mud and 2) intraclastic lithofacies representing basinal turbidites; 3) pelletal lithofacies representing lower shoreface sands and silts; 4) stromatoporoid lithofacies representing a reef; 5) Cladocoropsis and 6) dasyclad lithofacies representing a lagoon; 7) peloidal and 8) oolitic lithofacies representing shore-attached sand sheets; 9) cryptomicrobial lithofacies representing supratidal flats; 10) anhydrites representing sabkha followed by salina deposits; and 11) stratigraphically reoccurring dolomite.

These are arranged in two, partially preserved, third-order sequences, the upper of which represents the Arab-D Member and the lower of which represents the upper Jubaila Formation. Within these sequences lie six fourth-order high frequency sequences, composed of fifth-order parasequences and parasequence-scale cycles.

The preserved upward shallowing trend of the Arab-D reservoir is manifested laterally by a regional eastward thickening interpreted to be the result of an eastward progradation across the shallow Late Jurassic epeiric shelf and into the relatively deep Arabian intrashelf basin.

This study presents a correlation model that explains the drastic thickening and downward climb of the reservoir lithofacies that is observed between the outcrops south of Riyadh and the subsurface in Ghawar Field.

This model is different from the one currently used and predicts an eastward porosity improvement in the upper part of the reservoir accompanied by a porosity reduction in the lower part, assuming a null diagenetic modification effect.

Introduction

Predicting the existence of a facies, and harder still its extent and geometry, in the subsurface posits a defying task to the stratigrapher. This task becomes even more daunting in the realm of carbonate sequence stratigraphy owing to the in situ nature of carbonate sedimentation. The matter becomes further complicated when stratigraphic analysis is conducted in a regional, shelf-to-basin, scale since complete, shelf-to-basin, platformal transects are less common in outcrops (Goldhammer et al., 1990, Mitchum and Van Wagoner, 1991, Handford and Loucks, 1994, Tinker, 1998). Yet, regional stratigraphic analysis is key in comprehending lateral and vertical facies changes and predicting intra-reservoir geometric relationships, which together with diagenesis and fracturing shape the porosity–permeability schemes of carbonate reservoirs. Thus, platform-scaled correlation, if this could be conducted at the high-frequency-sequence scale, can contribute in resolving reservoirs' architectural heterogeneities and pin down fluid-flow patterns.

This paper presents the results of a detailed sequence stratigraphic analysis of one of the world's most prolific reservoirs, the Arab-D reservoir, in Saudi Arabia. The Arab-D is one of four carbonate reservoirs of the Upper Jurassic Arab Formation. Each of these carbonate reservoirs possesses remarkable porosity and permeability, and each is capped by a nonpermeable anhydrite unit (Fig. 1). The Arab Formation reservoirs are sandwiched between the organic-rich mudstones of the Hanifa and Tuwaiq Mountain formations below and the tight anhydrites of the Arab and Hith formations above (Fig. 1). Giant expansive structural traps, such as the anticlines of Ghawar and Khurais fields (Fig. 2), proficiently harvest the Arab Formation oils from the extensive source rocks that lay across the Arabian Peninsula. In 2009, Saudi Aramco successfully completed the largest oil expansion project in the earth's history, known as the Khurais Mega Project bringing to production nationally significant rates from Khurais and adjacent satellite fields mainly from the 100-m-thick Arab-D reservoir (Al-Ghamdi et al., 2008, Al-Mulhim et al., 2010, Mouawad, 2010).

This paper details the stratal patterns of the high-frequency sequences that compose the reservoir, discusses the sequences' characteristics and identification criteria and correlates them on a platform-wide, shelf-to-basin, scale. The study also addresses the long-standing controversy surrounding the progradational direction of the reservoir, which has been suggested to be prograding in virtually all directions — north, south, east and west (Mitchell et al., 1988, Meyer and Price, 1993, Al‐Saad and Sadooni, 2001, Handford et al., 2002, Lindsay et al., 2006, Stephens et al., 2009). To address this controversy, the study uses an extensive, never previously used data set of 32 cored wells described meticulously at a 10-cm scale and 500 thin sections. Working at such high-resolution enables the detection of subtle lithofacies variations and deciphers what they disclose in terms of key geologic factors, their relative significance, and how they interplayed to control the paleoenvironments of deposition. The study also manifests the benefits of expanding the scope of geologic observations to a broader, trans-political-boarders sense, as it makes use of reported observation on the regional thinning and pinches out trends of the Arab and Hith formation carbonates and anhydrites in the United Arab Emirates, as discussed in Section 5.

Examining the cores from Khurais Field offered an excellent opportunity to formulate a regional perspective of the reservoir's configuration and bridge, for the first time, the correlational gap between the Arab-D outcrop in Wadi Nisah, south of the Saudi capital, Riyadh, and the subsurface beneath Ghawar Field (Fig. 2). Two cross-sections are presented, a W–E one that extends from the Arab-D outcrop to Ghawar Field across a distance of 413 km; and a N–S cross-section that extends from the Safaniya area down to the southern tip of Khurais Field along a 397 km line of section (Fig. 2).

The concluded correlation model differs from the one presently in use and relies on the authors' previously proposed depositional environments' model and sequence stratigraphic framework of the reservoir (Al-Awwad and Collins, in press, Al-Awwad and Collins, in review). This model is able to predict lateral and vertical heterogeneities and architectural arrangements of the reservoir facies regionally. This could potentially guide future modeling of three-dimensional-spatial distribution of porosity, permeability, diagenetic, structural and other petrophysical parameters within the reservoir and depict how they dictate the architecture of fluid-flow and -baffle units.

Section snippets

Depositional model and sequence stratigraphic framework

The Arab-D lithofacies recognized in the Khurais Field are detailed in Al-Awwad and Collin's (in press) paper and summarized in Table 1; these lithofacies start at the bottom of the succession with monotonously interbedded couplets of lime mud and intraclastic lithofacies representing offshore basinal turbidites, followed by pelletal lithofacies that represent lower shoreface sands and silts, and then by stromatoporoid lithofacies which formed a shelf fringing reef. The reef protected a lagoon

Regional and structural settings

The Arabian plate formed by the accretion of the Midyan, Hijaz, and Asir terranes (Fig. 2c) to northeastern Africa before 715 Myr (Stoeser and Camp, 1985). After that, the Afif Terrane was accreted between 680 and 640 Myr, forming the Nabitah Suture. The Rayn Terrane, which is comprised of eastern and central Arabia fused with the Afif Terrane in what is known as the Amar collision, which took place between 640 and 620 Myr and yielded the Amar Suture, an obducted N-trending thrust slices of

Methodology

One dimensional sequence stratigraphic analysis was initially conducted on 32 cored wells in Khurais and presented in Al-Awwad and Collins's (in review) paper (Fig. 3a). Lithofacies components, repetitive motifs of lithofacies stacking patterns, recognition of retrogradational, aggradational and progradational modulations, vertical thickening versus thinning trends, upward fining versus coarsening and/or shallowing versus deepening trends (Van Wagoner et al., 1990) coupled with gamma log

Regional correlation

Bridging the correlational gap between the Arab-D outcrop and the subsurface in Ghawar Field has only been tentatively attempted before by Leinfelder et al. (2005). Another regional correlation was attempted by Handford et al. (2002), but it did not account for the area west of Ghawar, which, in light of this study, has a significant role in understanding the regional configuration of the reservoir and interlacing the outcrop to the subsurface (Al‐Saad and Sadooni, 2001).

It has been established

Composite sequence boundaries

The different sequence stratigraphic interpretations concluded by different authors who worked on the Arab Formation, as presented in Fig. 1, are imputed to the inherent difficulties of the succession represented by the inaccuracies of the biostratigraphic–radiometric timing that marks the entire Phanerozoic of the Arabian platform (Al-Husseini and Matthews, 2005, Al-Husseini and Matthews, 2008). This combines with the Arab Formation's lack of biostratigraphic age control (Hughes, 2004) and

Conclusions

Predicting lateral and vertical heterogeneities and architectural arrangements of carbonates in the subsurface are a challenging task. High-frequency-sequence scaled stratigraphic analysis and correlation is crucial in tackling this task and is presented here through the analysis of one of the world's most significant reservoirs, the Arab-D reservoir.

The preserved upward shallowing trend of the Arab-D reservoir across the Khurais Field is manifested by an eastward progradational trend. This is

Acknowledgments

We thank Aus Al-Tawil of Saudi Aramco for his unrelenting support and commitment to this study. We would like to thank Saudi Aramco for granting permission to publish this study. Our appreciation is also extended to Luis Pomar, University de les Illes Balears, Spain for his beneficial discussions and keen insights.

References (75)

  • A. Al-Ghamdi et al.

    Collaboration breeds success in the Khurais Mega-Project in Saudi Arabia

  • M.I. Al-Husseini

    Jurassic sequence stratigraphy of the western and southern Arabian Gulf

    GeoArabia (Manama)

    (1997)
  • M.I. Al-Husseini

    Origin of the Arabian Plate structures; Amar collision and Najd rift

    GeoArabia (Manama)

    (2000)
  • M. Al-Husseini

    Update to Late Triassic–Jurassic stratigraphy of Saudi Arabia for the Middle East geologic time scale

    GeoArabia (Manama)

    (2009)
  • M.I. Al-Husseini et al.

    Arabian orbital stratigraphy: Periodic second-order sequence boundaries?

    GeoArabia (Manama)

    (2005)
  • M. Al-Husseini et al.

    Jurassic–Cretaceous Arabian orbital stratigraphy; the AROS-JK chart

    GeoArabia (Manama)

    (2008)
  • W.A. Al-Mulhim et al.

    Khurais complex; 1, field development required best practices, leveraged technology

    Oil & Gas Journal

    (2010)
  • H. Al‐Saad et al.

    A new depositional model and sequence stratigraphic interpretation for the Upper Jurassic Arab ‘D’ reservoir in Qatar

    Journal of Petroleum Geology

    (2001)
  • A.S. Alsharhan et al.

    Precambrian to Jurassic rocks of Arabian Gulf and adjacent areas; their facies, depositional setting, and hydrocarbon habitat

    AAPG Bulletin

    (1986)
  • M.S. Al-Silwadi et al.

    New insights into regional correlation and sedimentology, Arab Formation (Upper Jurassic), offshore Abu Dhabi

    GeoArabia (Manama)

    (1996)
  • M.G. Ayres et al.

    Hydrocarbon habitat in main producing areas, Saudi Arabia

    AAPG Bulletin

    (1982)
  • S.R. Azer et al.

    Sequence stratigraphy of the Hith/Upper Arab Formations offshore Abu Dhabi, UAE

  • P. Blanchon et al.

    Anatomy of a fringing reef around Grand Cayman: storm rubble, not coral framework

    Journal of Sedimentary Research

    (1997)
  • B. Blasband et al.

    Late Proterozoic extensional collapse in the Arabian–Nubian Shield

    Journal of the Geological Society

    (2000)
  • A.H. Bouma

    Sedimentology of Some Flysch Deposits: A Graphic Approach to Facies Interpretation

    (1962)
  • G.F. Brown

    Tectonic map of the Arabian Peninsula

  • G.F. Brown et al.

    The Arabian Shield. Proceedings of the 21st International Geological Congress

    Copenhagen

    (1960)
  • G.F. Brown et al.

    Geology of the Arabian Peninsula; shield area of western Saudi Arabia

    United States Geological Survey Professional Paper

    (1989)
  • J.E. de Matos et al.

    Regional characteristics and depositional sequences of the Oxfordian and Kimmeridgian, Abu Dhabi

  • M. Elrick et al.

    Cyclic ramp-to-basin carbonate deposits, Lower Mississippian, Wyoming and Montana; a combined field and computer modeling study

    Journal of Sedimentary Petrology

    (1991)
  • R. Enay

    Les Apports sud-tethysiens parmi les faunes jurassiques nord-ouest europeennes; interpretation paleobiogeographique

  • E. Flügel

    Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks: Analysis, Interpretation and Application

    (2004)
  • A. Genna et al.

    Rifting of the Arabian Platform during the Proterozoic-to-Phanerozoic interval

    GeoArabia (Manama)

    (2000)
  • R.K. Goldhammer et al.

    Depositional cycles, composite sea-level changes, cycle stacking patterns, and the hierarchy of stratigraphic forcing; examples from Alpine Triassic platform carbonates

    Geological Society of America Bulletin

    (1990)
  • J. Golonka

    Plate-tectonic maps of the Phanerozoic

    Special Publication — Society for Sedimentary Geology

    (2002)
  • F.M. Gradstein et al.

    A geological time scale 2004

    Miscellaneous Report — Geological Survey of Canada

    (2004)
  • C.R. Handford et al.

    Carbonate depositional sequences and systems tracts-responses of carbonate platforms to relative sea-level changes

    Houston Geological Society Bulletin

    (1994)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Impact of depositional and diagenetic features on petrophysical and rock mechanical properties in Arab-D reservoir equivalent upper Jubaila Formation, Saudi Arabia

      2021, Marine and Petroleum Geology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Detailed biostratigraphic studies include Enay et al. (1987), Tintant (1987), Almeras (1987), Depeche et al. (1987), Manivit (1987), Okla (1987), Manivit et al. (1990), Fischer et al. (2001), and Hughes (2004a, 2004b). Genetically based depositional sequences were first defined by Mitchell et al. (1988), followed by Le Nindre (1990), Al-Husseini (1997), Handford et al. (2002), Lindsay et al. (2006), Al-Awwad and Collins (2013, 2013), Al-Awwad and Pomar (2015), and Al-Mojel et al. (2020). From a structural perspective, the study area in Wadi Laban west of Riyadh is part of the central Arabian graben system, which consists of a complex pattern of numerous smaller individual grabens and lineaments up to 90 km long.

    • Reservoir quality of the Surmeh (Arab-D) reservoir in the context of sequence stratigraphy in Salman Field, Persian Gulf

      2021, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since no specific reservoir study was carried out on the reservoir interval of the Surmeh Formation, these zones can be used as an index for the next wells which are going to be drilled in this field and other fields in the northern part of the Persian Gulf. Also there is a strong correlation between the recognized sequences in the Surmeh reservoir and their equivalents in the Arab-D reservoir of the Arabian Plate (Meyer et al., 1996; Lindsay et al., 2006; Al-Awwad and Collins, 2013a). The introduced sequences in the Salman Field are correlated with an outcrop and three different fields in Saudi Arabia (Fig. 10).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text