Methane production from the anaerobic digestion of substrates from corn stover: Differences between the stem bark, stem pith, and leaves

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133641Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The methane yields and hydrolysis kinetic constants of SB, SP, and LV were evaluated.

  • The chemical and physical changes of the substrates during digestion were inspected.

  • Correlation was established between chemical changes and methane production.

  • The crystalline structure of cellulose had limit effect to anaerobic digestion of SB.

  • The abundance of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes was positively related to methane yields.

Abstract

This work evaluated the methane potential and methane production rate of the stem bark (SB), stem pith (SP), and leaves (LV) of corn stover from batch anaerobic digestion. The obtained cumulative methane potential and the hydrolysis kinetics constant were 0.201, 0.214, and 0.199 L g−1 VS (volatile solids) and 0.090, 0.149, and 0.227 d−1 for SB, SP, and LV, respectively. The chemical composition and the crystalline structure of the substrates as well as their changes during the anaerobic digestion were inspected, and their impacts on the characteristics of methane production were assessed. The methane production rate correlated positively with the hemicellulose and soluble compounds content and negatively with the cellulose and lignin content, but the degradation rates of hemicellulose and cellulose in the specific substrate were complex and comparable. The methane production has limit correlation with the crystalline structure of the substrates. Microbial community structure was analyzed to elucidate functional microorganism contributing to methane production of different substrate. The abundance of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes was most affected by the substrate, and positively related to methane yields.

Introduction

China is one of the largest agricultural countries in the world and has abundant biomass resources, and thus has a significant amount of crop residues awaiting utilization. In 2017, 884 million tons of agricultural straw was produced in China, about 32.5% of which was corn stover (National Burean of Statistics of China, 2018). Although many methods have been developed to reutilize corn stover as energy source, livestock feeding stuff, pulp, biofertilizer, etc., still a large amount of it is burnt in the open field, which causes serious problems including air pollution, surface water pollution, fire disaster, and potential safety concerns for air craft and ground traffic (Wang et al., 2007). Research works about the anaerobic digestion of corn stover to produce of methane has attracted significant attention in the past decade because they cannot only solve the environmental problems but also help in the energy structure adjustment and ecological agriculture development (Dang et al., 2014).

The production of biogas from lignocellulosic biomass by anaerobic digestion has great potential for bioenergy but has not been widely adopted because lignocellulose has a complicated structure that readily resists microbial attack (Chandra et al., 2012), which prolongs the reaction time of the anaerobic digestion and undermines the economic feasibility of the biogas production due to the slow degradation of lignocellulose.

Treating the different substrates having different anaerobic fermentation characteristics with different processes can improve the project operation efficiency. Corn stover is an inhomogeneous material composed of stem bark (SB), stem pith (SP), and leaves (LV). These parts differ significantly from each other in compositional and structural properties, and their properties in biotransformation are thus very different. Hence, the different parts should be handled with different technology or at least with different parameters of anaerobic digestion for the sake of effective utilization and optimal operation performance. Before using corn stover as feedstock at an industrial scale, it is necessary to evaluate the effect of the chemical and structural properties of the different parts on the bioconversion.

Pretreatment of the recalcitrant lignocellulosic biomass is essential for attaining high biogas yield in the anaerobic digestion. Various techniques of physical, chemical, and biological pretreatments have been developed over the past decades (Yang and Wyman, 2008), but they were most based on the pretreatment of the whole corn stover (Chandra et al., 2012; Ward et al., 2008). In view of the big differences in the chemical composition of different parts of corn stover, the uniform pretreatment and anaerobic digestion would unsurprisingly give rise to different performance for different parts. Furthermore, this may be a very important reason as for why comparable results are hard to achieve when it comes biogas production from corn stover.

On the other hand, the different parts of corn stover are good model substrates to study the anaerobic digestion process of lignocellulosic material. Lignocellulose, which consists of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, is the main component of corn stover, and the hydrolysis of lignocellulose is the main limiting step in the anaerobic degradation of corn stover (Divya et al., 2015). Some works used a single component (e.g., microcrystalline cellulose, xylan, etc.) as the substrate to study the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass (Wang et al., 1994; Yu et al., 2012). However, since the primary hurdle in the degradation of lignocellulose is the bonding and wrapping between the structures of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, it makes much better sense to use realistic lignocellulose materials with different chemical compositions as the substrates to study the anaerobic digestion process.

With these considerations in mind, this paper evaluated the methane potential and studied experimentally the anaerobic degradation kinetics of different parts of corn stover. We firstly estimated the methane potential and methane production rate of the SB, SP, and LV of corn stover, and we then examined the effects of their chemical composition and physical structure on the anaerobic digestion properties. Finally, we evaluated the correlation between methane production and the chemical composition changes of these parts of corn stover.

Section snippets

Substrates and inocula

The corn stover used in the study was collected from the Licheng District of Jinan, China, and separated manually into the SB, SP, and LV. To standardize and accurately detect the chemical composition, each part of the corn stover was chopped finely by a cutting mill and filtered (10–20 mesh), and the resulting particulate samples were packed in plastic bags and stored at 4 °C until use. Table 1 lists the characteristics of the SB, SP, and LV of the corn stover. The anaerobic sludge, which

Methane potential in batch digestion

Fig. 1 shows the cumulative methane productions of the SB, SP, and LV in the batch experiment over 41 days. In all cases, the cumulative methane production increased exponentially in the initial phase of anaerobic digestion, which corresponded to the hydrolysis of readily biodegradable organic matter, except that the velocity and volume of methane production varied for different samples. The reaction rate gradually decreased as the easily degradable components depleted.

Compared with SP and LV,

Conclusions

Because of their different chemical composition, the stem bark, stem pith, and leaves of corn stover had very different performance in the anaerobic digestion that produces methane. The stem bark had higher lignin and cellulose content and thus degraded more slowly than the stem pith and leaves, whereas the leaves had the highest degradation rate because of its high content of soluble components and hemicellulose. The degradation rate of cellulose and hemicellulose was not uniform in corn

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (51608314), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2018LB031), Shandong Province Key Research and Development Program of China (2017GSF217003), Qilu University of Technology and Shandong Academy of Sciences Youth Joint Foundation (2017BSHZ003).

References (44)

  • W.S. Adney et al.

    Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass and wastes

    Cellulases and related enzymes

    (1991)
  • American Public Health Association, A

    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater

    (1998)
  • R.H. Atalla et al.

    Native cellulose: a composite of two distinct crystalline forms

    J Science

    (1984)
  • M. Carlsson et al.

    The effects of substrate pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion systems: a review

    Waste Manag.

    (2012)
  • R. Chandra et al.

    Methane Production From Lignocellulosic Agricultural Crop Wastes: A Review in Context to Second Generation of Biofuel Production

    (2012)
  • D. Chynoweth et al.

    Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks

    bioenergy

    (1993)
  • P.H. Dang et al.

    A Mini Review on Renewable Sources for Biofuel

    (2014)
  • E. Dinuccio et al.

    Evaluation of the biogas productivity potential of some Italian agro-industrial biomasses

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2010)
  • D. Divya et al.

    A review on current aspects and diverse prospects for enhancing biogas production in sustainable means

    Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.

    (2015)
  • R.C. Edgar

    UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads

    Nat. Methods

    (2013)
  • J.H. El Achkar et al.

    Anaerobic digestion of grape pomace: biochemical characterization of the fractions and methane production in batch and continuous digesters

    Waste Manag.

    (2016)
  • T.L. Hansen et al.

    Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste

    Waste Manag.

    (2004)
  • A.J.F.m.r Hatakka

    Lignin-modifying Enzymes From Selected White-rot Fungi: Production and Role From in Lignin Degradation

    (1994)
  • T.W. Jeffries

    Biodegradation of lignin and hemicelluloses

  • H.-J. Jördening et al.

    Environmental Biotechnology: Concepts and Applications

    (2005)
  • M.M. Kabir et al.

    Biogas from lignocellulosic materials

  • E. Klimiuk et al.

    Theoretical and observed biogas production from plant biomass of different fibre contents

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2010)
  • P.L. Laureano et al.

    Understanding factors that limit enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass: characterization of pretreated corn stover

    Biotechnology

    (2005)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Influence of inoculum to substrate ratios (ISRs) on the performance of anaerobic digestion of algal residues

    Ann. Microbiol.

    (2013)
  • H.M. Lo et al.

    Modeling biogas production from organic fraction of MSW co-digested with MSWI ashes in anaerobic bioreactors

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2010)
  • J.D. McMillan

    Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass

  • F. Monlau et al.

    Comparison of seven types of thermo-chemical pretreatments on the structural features and anaerobic digestion of sunflower stalks

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Positive effect of antibiotics on methane production from corn straw

      2023, Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology
    • Biochemical characterization and anaerobic degradability of flower wastes: Preliminary assessment and statistical interpretation towards energy recovery

      2022, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Conversely, the content of lignin and cellulose are highly negatively correlated to the BMP. Similar results were found by H. Xu et al. (2019a) on corn stover with a negative correlation between anaerobic biodegradability and cellulose and lignin, and a positive correlation between anaerobic biodegradability and the soluble fraction. Although all samples tested can be regarded as a single group according to anaerobic degradability, the part of the flowering plant influences the biochemical composition, which in turn is correlated to the BMP due to the different contributions of FW chemical components to the methane yield.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text