Methane production from the anaerobic digestion of substrates from corn stover: Differences between the stem bark, stem pith, and leaves
Graphical abstract
Introduction
China is one of the largest agricultural countries in the world and has abundant biomass resources, and thus has a significant amount of crop residues awaiting utilization. In 2017, 884 million tons of agricultural straw was produced in China, about 32.5% of which was corn stover (National Burean of Statistics of China, 2018). Although many methods have been developed to reutilize corn stover as energy source, livestock feeding stuff, pulp, biofertilizer, etc., still a large amount of it is burnt in the open field, which causes serious problems including air pollution, surface water pollution, fire disaster, and potential safety concerns for air craft and ground traffic (Wang et al., 2007). Research works about the anaerobic digestion of corn stover to produce of methane has attracted significant attention in the past decade because they cannot only solve the environmental problems but also help in the energy structure adjustment and ecological agriculture development (Dang et al., 2014).
The production of biogas from lignocellulosic biomass by anaerobic digestion has great potential for bioenergy but has not been widely adopted because lignocellulose has a complicated structure that readily resists microbial attack (Chandra et al., 2012), which prolongs the reaction time of the anaerobic digestion and undermines the economic feasibility of the biogas production due to the slow degradation of lignocellulose.
Treating the different substrates having different anaerobic fermentation characteristics with different processes can improve the project operation efficiency. Corn stover is an inhomogeneous material composed of stem bark (SB), stem pith (SP), and leaves (LV). These parts differ significantly from each other in compositional and structural properties, and their properties in biotransformation are thus very different. Hence, the different parts should be handled with different technology or at least with different parameters of anaerobic digestion for the sake of effective utilization and optimal operation performance. Before using corn stover as feedstock at an industrial scale, it is necessary to evaluate the effect of the chemical and structural properties of the different parts on the bioconversion.
Pretreatment of the recalcitrant lignocellulosic biomass is essential for attaining high biogas yield in the anaerobic digestion. Various techniques of physical, chemical, and biological pretreatments have been developed over the past decades (Yang and Wyman, 2008), but they were most based on the pretreatment of the whole corn stover (Chandra et al., 2012; Ward et al., 2008). In view of the big differences in the chemical composition of different parts of corn stover, the uniform pretreatment and anaerobic digestion would unsurprisingly give rise to different performance for different parts. Furthermore, this may be a very important reason as for why comparable results are hard to achieve when it comes biogas production from corn stover.
On the other hand, the different parts of corn stover are good model substrates to study the anaerobic digestion process of lignocellulosic material. Lignocellulose, which consists of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, is the main component of corn stover, and the hydrolysis of lignocellulose is the main limiting step in the anaerobic degradation of corn stover (Divya et al., 2015). Some works used a single component (e.g., microcrystalline cellulose, xylan, etc.) as the substrate to study the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass (Wang et al., 1994; Yu et al., 2012). However, since the primary hurdle in the degradation of lignocellulose is the bonding and wrapping between the structures of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, it makes much better sense to use realistic lignocellulose materials with different chemical compositions as the substrates to study the anaerobic digestion process.
With these considerations in mind, this paper evaluated the methane potential and studied experimentally the anaerobic degradation kinetics of different parts of corn stover. We firstly estimated the methane potential and methane production rate of the SB, SP, and LV of corn stover, and we then examined the effects of their chemical composition and physical structure on the anaerobic digestion properties. Finally, we evaluated the correlation between methane production and the chemical composition changes of these parts of corn stover.
Section snippets
Substrates and inocula
The corn stover used in the study was collected from the Licheng District of Jinan, China, and separated manually into the SB, SP, and LV. To standardize and accurately detect the chemical composition, each part of the corn stover was chopped finely by a cutting mill and filtered (10–20 mesh), and the resulting particulate samples were packed in plastic bags and stored at 4 °C until use. Table 1 lists the characteristics of the SB, SP, and LV of the corn stover. The anaerobic sludge, which
Methane potential in batch digestion
Fig. 1 shows the cumulative methane productions of the SB, SP, and LV in the batch experiment over 41 days. In all cases, the cumulative methane production increased exponentially in the initial phase of anaerobic digestion, which corresponded to the hydrolysis of readily biodegradable organic matter, except that the velocity and volume of methane production varied for different samples. The reaction rate gradually decreased as the easily degradable components depleted.
Compared with SP and LV,
Conclusions
Because of their different chemical composition, the stem bark, stem pith, and leaves of corn stover had very different performance in the anaerobic digestion that produces methane. The stem bark had higher lignin and cellulose content and thus degraded more slowly than the stem pith and leaves, whereas the leaves had the highest degradation rate because of its high content of soluble components and hemicellulose. The degradation rate of cellulose and hemicellulose was not uniform in corn
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (51608314), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2018LB031), Shandong Province Key Research and Development Program of China (2017GSF217003), Qilu University of Technology and Shandong Academy of Sciences Youth Joint Foundation (2017BSHZ003).
References (44)
- et al.
Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass and wastes
Cellulases and related enzymes
(1991) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
(1998)- et al.
Native cellulose: a composite of two distinct crystalline forms
J Science
(1984) - et al.
The effects of substrate pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion systems: a review
Waste Manag.
(2012) - et al.
Methane Production From Lignocellulosic Agricultural Crop Wastes: A Review in Context to Second Generation of Biofuel Production
(2012) - et al.
Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks
bioenergy
(1993) - et al.
A Mini Review on Renewable Sources for Biofuel
(2014) - et al.
Evaluation of the biogas productivity potential of some Italian agro-industrial biomasses
Bioresour. Technol.
(2010) - et al.
A review on current aspects and diverse prospects for enhancing biogas production in sustainable means
Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.
(2015) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads
Nat. Methods
(2013)
Anaerobic digestion of grape pomace: biochemical characterization of the fractions and methane production in batch and continuous digesters
Waste Manag.
Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste
Waste Manag.
Lignin-modifying Enzymes From Selected White-rot Fungi: Production and Role From in Lignin Degradation
Biodegradation of lignin and hemicelluloses
Environmental Biotechnology: Concepts and Applications
Biogas from lignocellulosic materials
Theoretical and observed biogas production from plant biomass of different fibre contents
Bioresour. Technol.
Understanding factors that limit enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass: characterization of pretreated corn stover
Biotechnology
Influence of inoculum to substrate ratios (ISRs) on the performance of anaerobic digestion of algal residues
Ann. Microbiol.
Modeling biogas production from organic fraction of MSW co-digested with MSWI ashes in anaerobic bioreactors
Bioresour. Technol.
Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
Comparison of seven types of thermo-chemical pretreatments on the structural features and anaerobic digestion of sunflower stalks
Bioresour. Technol.
Cited by (26)
Enhancement of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis for methane production by nano zero-valent iron in soils
2024, Environmental ResearchUtilization of agricultural wastes for co-production of xylitol, ethanol, and phenylacetylcarbinol: A review
2024, Bioresource TechnologyPositive effect of antibiotics on methane production from corn straw
2023, Biocatalysis and Agricultural BiotechnologyRecent progress on corn (Zea mays L.)-based materials as raw, chemically modified, carbonaceous, and composite adsorbents for aquatic pollutants: A review
2023, Journal of Analytical and Applied PyrolysisBiochemical characterization and anaerobic degradability of flower wastes: Preliminary assessment and statistical interpretation towards energy recovery
2022, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Conversely, the content of lignin and cellulose are highly negatively correlated to the BMP. Similar results were found by H. Xu et al. (2019a) on corn stover with a negative correlation between anaerobic biodegradability and cellulose and lignin, and a positive correlation between anaerobic biodegradability and the soluble fraction. Although all samples tested can be regarded as a single group according to anaerobic degradability, the part of the flowering plant influences the biochemical composition, which in turn is correlated to the BMP due to the different contributions of FW chemical components to the methane yield.