Elsevier

Science of The Total Environment

Volume 654, 1 March 2019, Pages 832-840
Science of The Total Environment

Current ambient and elevated ozone effects on poplar: A global meta-analysis and response relationships

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.179Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Effects of O3 pollution on poplar were quantified by a meta-analysis.

  • Current [O3] has reduced photosynthesis (33%) and total biomass (4%).

  • High [O3] (88 ppb) significantly reduced the isoprene emission rate by 34%.

  • Relationships of Asat, Chl and biomass with the exposure metric AOT40 are provided.

Abstract

The effects of current and future elevated O3 concentrations (e[O3]) were investigated by a meta-analysis for poplar, a widely distributed genus in the Northern Hemisphere with global economic importance. Current [O3] has significantly reduced CO2 assimilation rate (Pn) by 33% and total biomass by 4% in comparison with low O3 level (charcoal-filtered air, CF). Relative to CF, an increase in future [O3] would further enhance the reduction in total biomass by 24%, plant height by 17% and plant leaf area by 19%. Isoprene emissions could decline by 34% under e[O3], with feedback implications in reducing the formation of secondary air pollutants including O3. Reduced stomatal conductance and lower foliar area might increase runoff and freshwater availability in O3 polluted areas. Higher cumulated O3 exposure over a threshold of 40 ppb (AOT40) induced larger reductions in Pn, total biomass and isoprene emission. Relationships of light-saturated photosynthesis rates (Asat), total biomass and chlorophyll content with AOT40 using a global dataset are provided. These relationships are expected to improve O3 risk assessment and also to support the inclusion of the effect of O3 in models addressing plantation productivity and carbon sink capacity.

Introduction

Poplars are one of the most economically important trees in temperate areas of the world (Weisgerber and Han, 2000). They provide raw material supplies for industrial processing (e.g., pulp, paper, engineered wood products, pallets, furniture and increasingly bioenergy) and valuable non-wood products (e.g. livestock fodder or medicinal extracts). Furthermore, as fast-growing species, poplars sequester carbon faster than many other woody plants, thus contributing to the mitigation of climate change effects (Liang et al., 2006). Natural forests and woodlands host 91% of the poplar resources, while plantations represent a 6% and agroforestry systems a 3% (Balatinecz et al., 2014). The total area of poplars in the world is 79.1 million ha and the total area of poplar plantations is 5.3 million ha (FAO, 2009).

Despite significantly control efforts and legislation to reduce its precursor emissions, tropospheric ozone (O3) is the most important air pollutant in terms of adverse effects on natural vegetation and cultivated crops (Feng and Kobayashi, 2009; Li et al., 2017; The Royal Society, 2008), and it is also of primary interest due to its strictly relation with climate change (Ochoa Hueso et al., 2017; Lefohn et al., 2018). A recent analysis based on measured data from air quality stations has shown that the increasing trend in [O3] observed since the 19th century has stopped in Europe and other parts of the world (Cooper et al., 2014) but, on the contrary, [O3] are still increasing in Asia due to rising NO2 emissions (Cooper et al., 2014; Feng et al., 2015). Compared to 2000, the relative changes in the mean tropospheric O3, estimated using an ensemble of 15 models, will be −4%, 2%, 1% and 7% in 2030, and −16%, −7%, −9% and 18% in 2100, for IPCC scenarios RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5, respectively (Young et al., 2013).

The effects of O3 on poplar have been documented in many studies, and poplars are considered to be rather O3 sensitive plants with a variable sensitivity among clones (Berrang et al., 1991; Dumont et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2015; Karnosky et al., 1996; Shang et al., 2017). Common effects of this pollutant on poplar were an onset of visible leaf injuries (Marzuoli et al., 2009; Novak et al., 2003), an impairment of photosynthetic processes (e.g., Shang et al., 2017; Yun and Laurence, 1999), a decrease in growth (e.g., Mäenpää et al., 2011; Volin et al., 1998) and biomass production (e.g., Hu et al., 2015; Nikula et al., 2009), but also reductions in isoprene emission (e.g., Calfapietra et al., 2008; Yuan et al., 2017) and changes in the chemical composition of leaves and wood (e.g., Häikiö et al., 2009; Seija et al., 2010). However, despite the high economic relevancy of this widely distributed tree, and its well-recognized O3 sensitivity, at present there is no review including globally published results summarizing and quantifying the impact of current and elevated [O3] (e[O3]).

On the other hand, several modeling studies have considered the impact of current and future e[O3] on the productivity of the plants and on the CO2 land‑carbon sink, highlighting the importance of changes in atmospheric chemistry as a driver of twenty-first-century climate change (e.g., Sitch et al., 2007). For modeling approaches, the availability of robust response relationships between relevant variables such as light-saturated CO2 assimilation rate (Asat), chlorophyll content (Chl) or biomass and [O3] is essential for estimating the impacts of this pollutant on different plant receptors. Response relationships, especially of biomass in the case of trees, are also central for risk assessment of the O3 effects (LRTAP, 2017). At present, both exposure- and flux-based response relationships have been proposed for several species (e.g. birch and beech, Norway spruce) and plant functional types (Büker et al., 2015; Mills et al., 2007, Mills et al., 2011), including five poplar clones (Hu et al., 2015; Shang et al., 2017). However, response functions based on multiple studies with the potential of being used worldwide are not available yet for poplar.

Therefore, the main two objectives of the present paper are to provide a synthesis of the O3 effects on poplar by means of a meta-analytic review and also to develop O3 exposure-response relationships for key response variables. The following questions are specifically addressed: 1) to what extent current and future e[O3] affect response variables such as gas exchange, growth, biomass, or nutrient content of leaves in comparison with low O3 levels? 2)Do the O3 effects differ for different poplar genotypes, for different O3 exposures (i.e., AOT40, the accumulated O3 exposure over a threshold of 40 ppb during daylight hours)?; 3) Can robust exposure-response relationships (AOT40) for selected tree responses indicators (Asat, Chl and biomass) be established when different poplar species and clones are taken into account?

Section snippets

Database

The database for this meta-analysis was built based on peer-reviewed journal articles searched in the Web of Science (Thompson-ISI, Philadelphia, PA, USA, http://apps.webofknowledge.com). A search was done using the key words ‘ozone’ and ‘poplar’ between years 1980 and 2017. To avoid missing relevant references, the reference lists of any article identified by the key-word search were cross-checked. Articles and their measurements were excluded if (1) O3 fumigation was shorter than thirty days

Effects of ambient [O3] relative to CF

Current ambient O3 concentrations (means of 40–50 ppb) induced significant effects in several variables in comparison with CF (means of 7–27 ppb) (Fig. 1). Compared with CF, current [O3] significantly impaired photosynthesis, as indicated by the reduction in CO2 assimilation rate (Pn) by 33%, Chl by 13% and the maximum quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm) by 2%. The stomatal conductance (gs) was also significantly reduced by 25%. Significant effects were also observed in growth and in

Effects of ambient [O3] relative to CF

In meta-analytic reviews addressing O3 effects, CF is considered as a representative of [O3] in preindustrial times (e.g., Feng et al., 2008; Wittig et al., 2007, Wittig et al., 2009), when average [O3] was around 15 ppb (Marenco et al., 1994; Volz and Kley, 1988). Certainly, the [O3] in CF treatment exceed this value at preindustrial times due to air filtration technical limitations and high ambient O3 concentration; hence the estimation of the effects may be conservative in these cases. Our

Conclusions and implication

The results of the present study suggest that current [O3] have produced negative effects on poplar, significantly increasing leaf senescence, and reducing the carbon-sink capacity and productivity of natural and planted poplar stands. Future increases of [O3] in some parts of the world (e.g. Asia) are expected to further enhance the decline in total biomass and to compromise growth. The magnitude of the effects in comparison with other tree species confirms that poplar is among the most

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (QYZDB-SSW-DQC019), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31500396 & 41771034), Chinese Academy of Sciences President's International Fellowship Initiative (PIFI) for Senior Scientists (2013T2Z0009). VC also thanks GEISpain project (CGL2014-52838-C2-2-R).

References (67)

  • P.E. Karlsson et al.

    New critical levels for ozone effects on young trees based on AOT40 and simulated cumulative leaf uptake of ozone

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2004)
  • P. Li et al.

    Nationwide ground-level ozone measurements in China suggest serious risks to forests

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2018)
  • H.K. Lichtenthaler et al.

    Biosynthesis of isoprenoids in higher plant chloroplasts proceeds via a mevalonateindependent pathway

    FEBS Lett.

    (1997)
  • D.W. McKenney et al.

    Cost estimates for carbon sequestration from fast growing poplar plantations in Canada

    Forest Policy Econ.

    (2004)
  • G. Mills et al.

    A synthesis of AOT40-based response functions and critical levels of ozone for agricultural and horticultural crops

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2007)
  • G. Mills et al.

    New stomatal flux-based critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2011)
  • R. Musselman et al.

    A critical review and analysis of the use of exposure- and flux-based ozone indices for predicting vegetation effects

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2006)
  • K. Novak et al.

    Ozone air pollution and foliar injury development on native plants of Switzerland

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2003)
  • R. Ochoa Hueso et al.

    Ecological impacts of atmospheric pollution and interactions with climate change in terrestrial ecosystems of the Mediterranean Basin: current research and future directions

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2017)
  • B. Shang et al.

    Ozone exposure- and flux-based response relationships with photosynthesis, leaf morphology and biomass in two poplar clones

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2017)
  • B. Shang et al.

    Elevated ozone affects C, N and P ecological stoichiometry and nutrient resorption of two poplar clones

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2018)
  • P. Sicard et al.

    An epidemiological assessment of stomatal ozone flux-based critical levels for visible ozone injury in southern European forests

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2016)
  • E.A. Ainsworth et al.

    A meta-analysis of elevated [CO2] effects on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, growth and yield

    Glob. Chang. Biol.

    (2002)
  • E.A. Ainsworth et al.

    The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change

    Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.

    (2012)
  • A. Anav et al.

    Comparing concentration-based (AOT40) and stomatal uptake (PODy) metrics for ozone risk assessment to European forests

    Glob. Chang. Biol.

    (2016)
  • J. Balatinecz et al.

    Properties, processing and utilization

  • P.C. Berrang et al.

    Natural selection for ozone tolerance in Populus tremuloides: evalution of nationwide trends

    Can. J. For. Res.

    (1991)
  • S. Braun et al.

    Forest damages by the storm ‘Lothar’ in permanent observation plots in Switzerland: the significance of soil acidification and nitrogen deposition

    Water Air Soil Pollut.

    (2003)
  • C. Calfapietra et al.

    Isoprene emission rates under elevated CO2 and O3 in two field-grown aspen clones differing in their sensitivity to O3

    New Phytol.

    (2008)
  • O.R. Cooper et al.

    Global distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone: an observation-based review

    Elementa (Wash. D.C.)

    (2014)
  • J. Dumont et al.

    Ozone affects ascorbate and glutathione biosynthesis as well as amino acid contents in three euramerican poplar genotypes

    Tree Physiol.

    (2014)
  • EEA

    Air Quality in Europe – 2015 Report. EEA Report No 5/2015

    (2015)
  • FAO

    Report of the 23rd Session of the International Poplar Commission and 44th Session of Its Executive Committee. Beijing, China, 26–30 October 2008., 2009. Rome

    (2009)
  • Cited by (57)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text