Elsevier

Science of The Total Environment

Volume 505, 1 February 2015, Pages 649-657
Science of The Total Environment

Responses of soil ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms to repeated exposure of single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.044Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The impact of repeated exposure of carbon nanotubes on the microbial communities was investigated.

  • The first exposure caused stronger effects on microbial biomass compared with the second exposure.

  • SWNTs and MWNTs produced different effects on the net N nitrification.

  • The abundance and diversity of AOA were higher than that of AOB under the exposure of carbon nanotubes.

Abstract

The impacts of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) including single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) on soil microbial biomass and microbial community composition (especially on ammonium oxidizing microorganisms) have been evaluated. The first exposure of CNTs lowered the microbial biomass immediately, but the values recovered to the level of the control at the end of the experiment despite the repeated addition of CNTs. The abundance and diversity of ammonium-oxidizing archaea (AOA) were higher than that of ammonium-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) under the exposure of CNTs. The addition of CNTs decreased Shannon–Wiener diversity index of AOB and AOA. Two-way ANOVA analysis showed that CNTs had significant effects on the abundance and diversity of AOB and AOA. Dominant terminal restriction fragments (TRFs) of AOB exhibited a positive relationship with NH4+, while AOA was on the contrary. It implied that AOB prefer for high-NH4+ soils whereas AOA is favored in low NH4+ soils in the CNT-contaminated soil.

Introduction

Nanotechnology has provided a basis for innovation in a wide range of fields and resulted in an exponential increase in products of novel materials (Gao et al., 2013, Maurer-Jones et al., 2013). Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are one of the most promising nanomaterials and have become the subject of numerous investigations in chemical, physical and material science research areas since its discovery in 1991 (Iijima, 1991, Odom et al., 1998). Based on their outstanding physicochemical and mechanical properties, CNTs could be potentially applied in consumer electronics, building materials, agricultural smart delivery and so on (Rodrigues and Elimelech, 2010, Tong et al., 2012, Li et al., 2013a). CNTs can be classified as single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), which are hollow tubes of carbon capped at either end with a hemi-fullerene (Iijima and Ichihashi, 1993), and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) consisting of concentric layers of graphene sheets, where smaller diameter tubes are encased in larger diameter tubes (Ebbesen et al., 1993).

With their expanding role of CNTs in manufacturing, some environmental exposure is raising concerns about their potential environmental risk (Helland et al., 2007). The knowledge on the impacts of CNTs on the environment microbes is currently limited and most researches have been limited to pure culture studies (Ahmed et al., 2012, Rodrigues and Elimelech, 2010), which were carried out in less complex and more controlled environment than in the soil environment (Jin et al., 2013). Toxicity studies taking Escherichia coli (E. coli) as a model microorganism showed that over 80% of the cells attached to non-functionalized SWNTs aggregates died after an incubation of 60 min (Kang et al., 2008). Gene analysis of the E. coli which was exposed to CNTs showed an efficient expression of stress-related genes, corroborating the cytotoxic effects of CNTs on E. coli (Rodrigues and Elimelech, 2010). There are a handful of studies focused on the toxic effects of CNTs on microbial communities (Rodrigues et al., 2013). However, the majority of the studies addressed the bacteria in activated sludge (Goyal et al., 2010, Luongo and Zhang, 2010), wastewater (Kang et al., 2009), animals (Lam et al., 2004, Roberts et al., 2007, Zhang et al., 2008) and plants (Caňas-Carrell et al., 2008, Stampoulis et al., 2009). Although some recent studies have addressed the fate of CNTs in soil, few studies have investigated their toxicity on microbial communities in soil environment (Li et al., 2013b, Li et al., 2013c). Jin et al. found that SWNTs can reduce the soil enzyme activity and alter the microbial community structures (Jin et al., 2013, Jin et al., 2014). Shrestha et al. observed that there was no effect of MWNTs on soil respiration, enzymatic activities, and microbial community at 10, 100 and 1000 mg kg 1 soil (Shrestha et al., 2013), while a study indicated that most enzyme activity was repressed under MWNTs of 1000 mg kg 1 soil (Chung et al., 2011). These different results are divergent. Furthermore, the effects of repeated exposure of CNTs on the soil microorganisms are still not clear.

Nitrification is a key process in the soil nitrogen (N) cycle (Tan et al., 2013). Ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms (AOM) including AOB (Rousidou et al., 2013) and AOA (Konneke et al., 2005) have been identified as the key group that controls the rate-limiting step of nitrification i.e. the oxidation of ammonium to hydroxylamine (Prosser and Nicol, 2008). A previous study reported that the abundance of AOB and AOA could serve as a relevant and cost-effective bio-indicator for soil monitoring (Wessén and Hallin, 2011). Meanwhile, Pereira-Silva et al. suggested that ammonium-oxidation represents a well measurable disturbance-sensitive microbial process and proposed that analysis of the abundance and diversity of AOM could provide a good estimation of soil health (Pereira-Silva et al., 2013). Studies on the pollutants that affect AOM have been mostly focused on fertilization (Zhou et al., 2014), pesticides (Li et al., 2008, Wan et al., 2014), and nitrification inhibitor (Kleineidam et al., 2011). To our knowledge, the effects of nanomaterials on AOM, especially CNTs, have still not been explored.

In this study, the impacts of repeated exposure of SWNTs or MWNTs on soil microbial activity were investigated. The potential effects on AOB and AOA were examined using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis and terminal restriction fragments length polymorphism (T-RFLP) during a short term laboratory incubation experiment. The results will provide a wide range of data to characterize the communities of AOM and stimulate a subsequent research aiming at the risk assessment of CNTs that were repeatedly accumulated in soil environment.

Section snippets

CNTs characterization

Commercial CNTs were purchased from Cheng du Organic Chemicals Co. Ltd., Chinese Academy of Sciences. CNTs were characterized before they were applied. To characterize the shape and size distribution of CNTs, samples were prepared by depositing liquid samples on TEM grid and air drying and analyzed using a high resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) (JEM-2100F STEM). The thermal stability of the CNTs was determined using thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) by heating the CNTs from

Microbial biomass carbon

Fig. 1A showed that the first exposure of SWNTs decreased the Cmic significantly especially on the 3rd day. Although negative effect of MWNTs on Cmic was also found at the beginning of the experiment, the effects were much smaller than those of SWNTs. The repeated addition of SWNTs caused different effect on Cmic compared with the first exposure. The highest concentration of SWNTs produced a significant positive effect on Cmic. However, for MWNTs, the effect of the repeated addition on Cmic was

Responses of microbial biomass

As far as we know from the literatures, there are few studies on the effects of CNTs on soil microbial biomass (using culture-dependent or culture-independent methods) in soil environment. The previous studies presented some impact of CNTs on the microbial communities. Jin et al. investigated the effects of SWNTs on soil enzyme and soil microbial community composition, demonstrating that soil enzyme activity was decreased significantly and soil microbial community composition was altered under

Conclusions

In this experiment, we found that: 1) The first addition of CNTs lowered soil microbial biomass carbon especially with the high concentrations of CNTs, and the repeated addition of CNTs still had negative effects on soil microorganism. The microbial biomass carbon under most treatments recovered to the level of the control at the end of the short-term incubation. 2) The addition of CNTs had significant effect on AOB and AOA diversity. The abundance and the diversity of AOA were higher than that

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41101530; 31270586), Science and Technology Development Plan of Shandong Province (2014GSF117029), International Cooperative Project of Shandong Province (2012GHZ21702), and Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program (J11LB17). The authors sincerely thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their thorough revision and invaluable comments which have helped to significantly improve the manuscript.

References (61)

  • S. Li et al.

    Comparative studies of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) and octadecyl (C18) as sorbents in passive sampling devices for biomimetic uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soils

    Sci Total Environ

    (2013)
  • S. Li et al.

    Determination of multi-walled carbon nanotube bioaccumulation in earthworms measured by a microwave-based detection technique

    Sci Total Environ

    (2013)
  • S. Li et al.

    Mobility of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil in the presence of carbon nanotubes

    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf

    (2013)
  • L.A. Luongo et al.

    Toxicity of carbon nanotubes to the activated sludge process

    J Hazard Mater

    (2010)
  • C. Rousidou et al.

    Bio-pesticides: harmful or harmless to ammonia oxidizing microorganisms? The case of a Paecilomyces lilacinus-based nematicide

    Soil Biol Biochem

    (2013)
  • B. Shrestha et al.

    An evaluation of the impact of multiwalled carbon nanotubes on soil microbial community structure and functioning

    J Hazard Mater

    (2013)
  • S.L. Strauss et al.

    The response of ammonia-oxidizer activity and community structure to fertilizer amendment of orchard soils

    Soil Biol Biochem

    (2014)
  • G. Subrahmanyam et al.

    Response of ammonia oxidizing microbes to the stresses of arsenic and copper in two acidic alfisols

    Appl Soil Ecol

    (2014)
  • H. Tan et al.

    Effects of chlorimuron-ethyl application with or without urea fertilization on soil ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea

    J Hazard Mater

    (2013)
  • E. Vance et al.

    An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C

    Soil Biol Biochem

    (1987)
  • R. Wan et al.

    Dynamics of communities of bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms in response to simazine attenuation in agricultural soil

    Sci Total Environ

    (2014)
  • E. Wessén et al.

    Abundance of archaeal and bacterial ammonia oxidizers-possible bioindicator or for soil monitoring

    Ecol Indic

    (2011)
  • E. Wessén et al.

    Responses of bacterial and archaeal ammonia oxidizers to soil organic and fertilizer amendments under long-term management

    Appl Soil Ecol

    (2010)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Influence of carbon nanotube scaffolds on human cervical carcinoma HeLa cell viability and focal adhesion kinase expression

    Carbon

    (2008)
  • Z. Zhou et al.

    Abundance and community structure of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea in purple soil under long-term fertilization

    Eur J Soil Biol

    (2014)
  • F. Ahmed et al.

    Antimicrobial applications of electroactive PVK-SWNT nanocomposites

    Environ Sci Technol

    (2012)
  • S. Bao

    Soil agricultural chemical analysis

    (2005)
  • J.E. Caňas-Carrell et al.

    Effects of functionalized and nonfunctionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes on root elongation of select crop species

    Environ Toxicol Chem

    (2008)
  • N. Fierer et al.

    The biogeography of ammonia-oxidizing bacterial communities in soil

    Microb Ecol

    (2009)
  • M.J. Frijlink et al.

    The bioenergetics of ammonia and hydroxylamine oxidation in Nitrosomonas europaea at acid and alkaline pH

    Arch Microbiol

    (1992)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Carbon nanomaterial addition changes soil nematode community in a tall fescue mesocosm

      2022, Pedosphere
      Citation Excerpt :

      In mice, single-walled carbon nanotubes accumulated in the spleen, lungs, and kidneys and caused liver inflammation and damage (Principi et al., 2016). Carbon nanotubes reduced the amount of microbial carbon in bacteria and affected bacterial diversity (Chen et al., 2015). To date, most studies regarding the toxicity of carbon nanomaterials on soil animals have focused on earthworms (Kwak and An, 2015; Liné et al., 2017).

    • Interaction of nanomaterials with microbes

      2021, Nano-Bioremediation: Fundamentals and Applications
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text