Contaminants in Canadian arctic biota and implications for human health: Conclusions and knowledge gaps
Introduction
The individual papers and reviews in this special issue present a large amount of new information on contaminants in biota, humans, associated risk management strategies and application of this information in international forums to reduce anthropogenic emissions of contaminants to the environment.
Section snippets
Biota
The biota papers present new and updated information on temporal trends of organic and metal contaminants; spatial trends of mercury and persistent organochlorines (OCs) in freshwater, marine and terrestrial biota; food web dynamics of PCBs, mercury and other elements and biological effect indicators in fish and seabirds. Perhaps the most significant advance has been the expansion of temporal trend data sets, which were previously limited to OCs in ringed seals and polar bears. These now cover
Human health
The human health paper presents new and updated data on human exposure to and possible health effects of current levels of environmental contaminants in the Canadian Arctic. It addresses concerns about possible adverse health effects in people exposed to contaminants. These concerns are significant for northern Aboriginal peoples because of the high proportion of traditional/country foods in their diet. Bioaccumulation of lipophilic environmental contaminants contributes to the high
Risk/benefit management and communication
The Human Health paper in this special issue presents the unique structures and processes that have developed in the Canadian Arctic under the Northern Contaminants Program (NCP) of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, to build partnerships and manage and communicate the benefits and risks associated with contaminant exposure. The paper also demonstrates how this information has gone on to support the establishment of international agreements to help achieve the Program's primary goal “to reduce
References (10)
- et al.
Spatial and temporal trends and effects of contaminants in the Canadian Arctic marine ecosystem: a review
Sci Total Environ
(1999) - et al.
Evaluation of the Greenland AMAP programme, 1994–1995, by use of power analysis illustrated by/selected heavy metals and POPs
Sci Total Environ
(2000) - et al.
Human health implications of environmental contaminants in Arctic Canada: a review
Sci Total Environ
(1999) - et al.
Recent temporal trend monitoring of mercury in Arctic biota—how powerful are the existing data sets?
J Environ Monit
(2004) - et al.
AMAP assessment 2002: persistent organic pollutants in the Arctic
(2004)
Cited by (16)
Development and validation of a modified QuEChERS method for extracting polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides from marine mammal blubber
2023, ChemosphereCitation Excerpt :Marine mammals are important sentinels used in international monitoring programs including the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) and national programs such as the Canadian Northern Contaminants Program (NCP) for assessing exposures and effects of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) (Muir et al., 2005; Dietz et al., 2019; Borgå et al., 2022).
A review of multiple stressor studies that include ionising radiation
2012, Environmental PollutionCitation Excerpt :An estimated 2000 new chemicals are introduced annually for applications in everyday items such as foods, personal care products, prescription drugs, household cleaners, and lawn care products (Duncan, 2006). Mixtures of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, endocrine disruptors, fire retardants, heavy metals and radionuclides are now ubiquitous in our environment (Muir et al., 2005). Although contaminants never occur in isolation, legislation (e.g., benchmarks, clean-up standards) is largely based on studies that examined the effects caused by single contaminants, not mixtures.
Identification of genes expressed in juvenile Haliotis rufescens in response to different copper concentrations in the north of Chile under controlled conditions
2011, Marine Pollution BulletinCitation Excerpt :These human activities along the coast, together with a demographic increase in the littoral zones, have intensified considerably the stress factors in those areas (David et al., 2005; Lotze et al., 2006). These factors can be of variable nature: abiotic, biotic, or chemical, such as hydrocarbons, pesticides, heavy metals, etc. (Boutet et al., 2004; Muir et al., 2005; Tanguy et al., 2005; Vasseur and Cossu-Leguille, 2006; Zapata et al., 2009; Sussarellu et al., 2010). Metals are present in all compartments of the atmosphere, particularly in water, where concentrations vary depending on the elements.
Assessing risk of mercury exposure and nutritional benefits of consumption of caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in the Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation community of Old Crow, Yukon, Canada
2011, Environmental ResearchCitation Excerpt :The main source of human exposure to methylmercury is large predatory fish and marine mammals, as these organisms feed at high levels on the long aquatic food chain in which methylmercury is readily bioavailable (Derome et al., 2005; Hansen and Gilman, 2005). Much research with Inuit communities has been conducted to assess the risks posed by contaminants in marine food sources (Muir et al., 2005; Deutch et al., 2007). Risk of mercury exposure in non-coastal northern communities is comparably less than in marine environments since diets in these areas include more herbivorous terrestrial animals (Chan and Receveur, 2000; Hansen and Gilman, 2005).
Development of mussel mRNA profiling: Can gene expression trends reveal coastal water pollution?
2006, Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of MutagenesisRisk communication and perceptions about lead ammunition and Inuit health in Nunavik, Canada
2023, International Journal of Circumpolar Health