Contributions of subtype and spectral frequency analyses to the study of P50 ERP amplitude and suppression in schizophrenia
Introduction
Inhibitory properties of the central nervous system have long been examined using conditioning-testing paradigms, under which the amount of attenuation in the neural response to the second of two identical stimuli indexes the strength of the inhibitory pathway (e.g., Eccles, 1969). This paradigm has been adapted in psychophysiological research as a test of “sensory gating” and has provided basic support for theories postulating that individuals with schizophrenia demonstrate less effective regulation over the influx of sensory information to the brain (Adler et al., 1982, Braff et al., 1995). Specifically, decrement in the amplitude of the P50 event-related potential (ERP) evoked by the second (S2) relative to the first (S1) of two auditory “clicks,” commonly expressed as the suppression ratio S2 / S1, is smaller in schizophrenia and thought to reflect weak inhibition or gating of the repeated stimulus (Freedman et al., 1987).
The P50 suppression deficit may indicate genetic liability for schizophrenia (Clementz et al., 1998, Freedman et al., 2003) and is, according to one meta-analytic study, one of the strongest and most reliable findings in the schizophrenia literature (Heinrichs, 2004). However, while highly important, these findings are not without limitation. For instance, clear relationships between this psychophysiological abnormality and symptoms of schizophrenia have eluded investigations to date. Although a relationship with negative symptoms was supported in one study (Ringel et al., 2004), others suggest that this deficit does not relate to the severity of negative symptoms (Adler et al., 1990) or those in any specific symptom domain (Boutros et al., 2004). Divergent findings of this nature are not uncommon and likely arise, in part, as a consequence of the clinically heterogeneous presentation of this illness. Relatively modest effect size differences observed throughout the schizophrenia neuroscience literature indicate considerable overlap between patients and healthy comparison groups (Heinrichs, 2004), and suggest that as with other indices of brain function, P50 suppression deficits apply to only a subset of patients studied. Consistent with this interpretation, only 50% of patients interviewed in one study reported experiencing anomalies of perception and attention related to sensory gating (Bunney et al., 1999).
As originally conceptualized, schizophrenia represents a diverse taxon with three primary illness variants, paranoid, hebephrenic, and catatonic (Kraepelin, 1919); these appear in similar form today as conventional DSM-IV subtypes (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). While other subtype classifications have been proposed (e.g., Andreasen et al., 1995, Carpenter et al., 1988, Crow, 1985), a paranoid–nonparanoid dichotomy is perhaps the most consistently supported, wherein the latter class represents a relatively more severe course and symptom presentation (Nicholson and Neufeld, 1993). When schizophrenia subgroups have been investigated according to this dichotomy, P50 amplitudes appear normal in paranoid schizophrenia (Boutros et al., 1993, Boutros et al., 1991). Alternatively, nonparanoid individuals produced smaller amplitude responses to the first click stimulus (S1) and, consequently, relatively less attenuation of P50 amplitude at S2. Similar results are found in comparison of “systematic” (i.e., disorganized) patients to healthy normal participants and patients with “unsystematic” schizophrenia or cycloid psychosis (Ringel et al., 2004). Considered in light of relatively worse neuropsychological performance in patients with severe negative and disorganized symptoms than those characterized as paranoid (Hill et al., 2001), questions arise as to whether cognitive disturbances unrelated to sensory processing per se mediate P50 amplitude in schizophrenia. Evidence for relationships between P50 and attentional impairments in schizophrenia (Cullum et al., 1993, Erwin et al., 1998, Yee et al., 1998) and the attentional manipulation of P50 in healthy adults (Guterman et al., 1992) support this possibility. Taken together, there is good reason to believe that clinical features most related to P50 are those pertaining to cognitive or “disorganization” dimension.
Most studies of auditory suppression in schizophrenia have relied on information obtained by amplitude measurements of specific peaks in the time domain (e.g., P50, N100). There is evidence, however, that at least two broadly defined frequency bands, each associated with a distinct role in information processing, contribute to these auditory-evoked response amplitudes (Clementz and Blumenfeld, 2001). The gamma-band response (GBR; 20–50 Hz), characterized by high frequency oscillations emerging approximately 20 ms post stimulus (Pantev et al., 1991), is associated with the initial neural registration of a sensory stimulus (Karakas and Basar, 1998). Although the P50 ERP is thought to be a subcomponent of gamma (Basar et al., 1987, Clementz et al., 1997), auditory suppression deficits in schizophrenia might, to an even greater extent, reflect poor activation of a low frequency response (LFR) occupying the 1–20 Hz range (Clementz and Blumenfeld, 2001). The LFR oscillates at theta frequency, generally associated with new information encoding (Klimesch, 1999) and working memory functions (Grunwald et al., 1999, Jensen and Tesche, 2002). Additionally, the initiation and maintenance of stimulus-locked hippocampal theta might facilitate the processing of novel occurrences in the sensory scene (Tesche and Karhu, 2000, Grunwald et al., 1999). Taken together, the integration of these frequency components seems necessary for normal cognitive function: gamma synchrony establishes the neural communication necessary to “bind” sensory components into a unified percept (Lee et al., 2003), after which a gamma to low frequency shift occurs, theoretically denoting a modification of neural circuitry accompanying activation by new or particularly salient stimuli (Traub et al., 1999). In examination of these frequency domain responses under the paired-click paradigm, individuals with schizophrenia have previously been found to exhibit deficient LFR in the presence of normal GBR, in which case LFR magnitude to S1 but not S2 distinguished patients from healthy participants (Clementz and Blumenfeld, 2001). Compared to conventional time-domain analysis of P50 and N100, which also detected smaller S1 amplitude responses in schizophrenia, group separations appeared largest for the LFR.
In view of the centrality of sensory gating research to the study of schizophrenia, three critical questions concerning the psychophysiological measurement and conceptualization of this construct are addressed in the present study. First, do cortical ERP indices of sensory gating vary as a function of clinical subtypes of schizophrenia? Second, in which frequency band of the auditory ERP are information processing abnormalities most prominent? That is, which electroencephalogram (EEG) frequencies of the neural response, and related neural functions, are most affected in the disorder and its subtypes? Third, from what source are neurophysiological abnormalities in the dual-click paradigm derived in schizophrenia, in terms of S1 and S2 responses? Specifically, is poor P50 suppression the result of weak recurrent inhibition of the S2 response, as suggested by the prevailing “gating” model, or is this phenomenon better explained by compromised recruitment and engagement of substrates normally activated at S1? Answers to these questions are critical to clarifying the nature of information processing deficits associated with schizophrenia, especially with respect to extant sensory gating, or inhibitory, models of the disorder.
Consideration and integration of the relevant P50 and frequency domain research led to the following predictions: (1) “nonparanoid” participants would demonstrate impaired P50 suppression relative to healthy controls, while “paranoid” participants would not differ from healthy controls; (2) concerning the frequency domain analyses, between-group comparisons would yield larger effect size differences for the low frequency than the gamma band response, and the low-frequency response would best discriminate nonparanoid from healthy control participants, and; (3) where differences in suppression occur, these differences would be attributed to lower S1 amplitude in the impaired group, rather than higher S2 response.
Section snippets
Method
Thirty-eight individuals meeting DSM-IV criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) for schizophrenia (age = 41.6 years ± 9.6 SD, 63% male, 21% Caucasian) were compared to 38 age-matched healthy adults (age = 41.3 years ± 8.8 SD, 45% male, 71% Caucasian). Groups differed significantly with respect to educational attainment [χ2(5) = 38.86, p < .001], for which the majority of patients (81%) did not matriculate to college, while most of the healthy control sample (87%) had at least some college or
Results
Scalp plots depicting the distribution of electrode “loadings” on spatial components representing the P50, LFR, and GBR are presented in Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, respectively (panel a). Grand-averaged waveforms (“virtual ERPs”) representing the time course of the auditory response by group (panels b–e; healthy control, combined schizophrenia group, paranoid, nonparanoid) are presented for each analysis. Although hypotheses were based primarily on schizophrenia subtype analyses, tests were also
Discussion
The present study aimed to address three critical issues relevant to the interpretation of P50 suppression deficits in schizophrenia: (1) whether deficits vary as a function of schizophrenia subtype; (2) whether deficits reside in a specific frequency band of the auditory-evoked response; and (3) the extent to which deficits can be attributed to poor recurrent inhibition of the evoked response at S2. Consistent with previous reports (Boutros et al., 1993, Boutros et al., 1991), individuals
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Jenifer L. Vohs, B.S., Misty Bodkins, M.A., and Andrew Bismark, B.A. for their valuable assistance with subject recruitment and data acquisition. This research was funded in part by two Young Investigator Awards from the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression and NIMH R03 MH066149-01A1 to William P. Hetrick.
References (67)
- et al.
Lack of relationship of auditory gating defects to negative symptoms in schizophrenia
Schizophr. Res.
(1990) - et al.
Five-component model of schizophrenia: assessing the factorial invariance of the positive and negative syndrome scale
Psychiatry Res.
(1994) - et al.
Concurrent validity of the cognitive component of schizophrenia: relationship of PANSS scores to neuropsychological assessments
Psychiatry Res.
(1994) - et al.
Response to the first stimulus determines reduced auditory evoked response suppression in schizophrenia: single trials analysis using MEG
Clin. Neurophysiol.
(2001) - et al.
The P50 component of the auditory evoked potential and subtypes of schizophrenia
Psychiatry Res.
(1993) - et al.
Comparison of four components of sensory gating in schizophrenia and normal subjects: a preliminary report
Psychiatry Res.
(1999) - et al.
Sensory gating deficits during the mid-latency phase of information processing in medicated schizophrenia patients
Psychiatry Res.
(2004) - et al.
Neurophysiological and neuropsychological evidence for attentional dysfunction in schizophrenia
Schizophr. Res.
(1993) - et al.
P50 abnormalities in schizophrenia: relationship to clinical and neuropsychological indices of attention
Schizophr. Res.
(1998) - et al.
Source distribution of neuromagnetic slow-wave activity in schizophrenic patients — effects of activation
Schizophr. Res.
(2003)
Power of theta waves in the EEG of human subjects increases during recall of haptic information
Neurosci. Lett.
Neuronal substrates of sensory gating within the human brain
Biol. Psychiatry
Attentional influence on the P50 component of the auditory event-related brain potential
Int. J. Psychophysiol.
Effects of P50 temporal variability on sensory gating in schizophrenia
Psychiatry Res.
Transient impairment in P50 auditory sensory gating induced by a cold-pressor test
Biol. Psychiatry
Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects
Clin. Neurophysiol.
Early gamma response is sensory in origin: a conclusion based on cross-comparison of results from multiple experimental paradigms
Int. J. Psychophysiol.
EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis
Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.
Synchronous gamma activity: a review and contribution to an integrative neuroscience model of schizophrenia
Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.
Sensory gating deficit in a subtype of chronic schizophrenic patients
Psychiatry Res.
The role of hippocampal theta activity in sensory gating in the rat
Physiol. Behav.
A fuzzy clustering approach to study the auditory P50 component in schizophrenia
Psychiatry Res.
Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in neuronal mechanisms involved in sensory gating in schizophrenia
Biol. Psychiatry
Yohimbine impairs P50 auditory sensory gating in normal subjects
Neuropsychopharmacology
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Symptoms of schizophrenia: methods, meanings, and mechanisms
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
The associations between 40 Hz-EEG and the middle latency response of the auditory evoked potential
Int. J. Neurosci.
Replication and extension of P50 findings in schizophrenia
Clin. Electroencephalogr.
Gating and habituation deficits in the schizophrenia disorders
Clin. Neurosci.
EEG synchronization to modulated auditory tones in schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and schizotypal personality disorder
Am. J. Psychiatry
P50 and acoustic startle gating are not related in healthy participants
Psychophysiology
Structured interview for assessing perceptual anomalies (SIAPA)
Schizophr. Bull.
Deficit and nondeficit forms of schizophrenia: the concept
Am. J. Psychiatry
Cited by (83)
Is a paired-stimuli configuration necessary to obtain typical evoked response differences in studies of psychosis? An MEG study
2021, Biomarkers in NeuropsychiatryMeta-analysis of auditory P50 sensory gating in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
2020, Psychiatry Research - NeuroimagingAbnormal beta and gamma frequency neural oscillations mediate auditory sensory gating deficit in schizophrenia
2020, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchCitation Excerpt :Beta oscillations are associated with salience detection, encoding, and consolidation of sensory information across cortical regions (Brenner et al., 2009; Haenschel et al., 2000; Kisley and Cornwell, 2006; Kopell et al., 2000). Abnormalities in evoked gamma- (Clementz et al., 1997a; Johannesen et al., 2005; Hall et al., 2011; Uhlhaas et al., 2008) and evoked (Clementz and Blumenfeld, 2001; Hall et al., 2011) and induced (Hong et al., 2008) beta-bands post-S1 have been identified among patients with schizophrenia (Uhlhaas and Singer, 2010). Hall et al. (2011) have found significant positive correlations between evoked gamma power and P50 S1 and S2 amplitudes in healthy controls, while Hong et al. (2004) found a similar relationship only in patients with schizophrenia (Hong et al., 2004).
Effect of alpha-NETA on auditory event related potentials in sensory gating study paradigm in mice
2019, Neuroscience LettersGulf War illness associated with abnormal auditory P1 event-related potential: Evidence of impaired cholinergic processing replicated in a national sample
2019, Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging