Elsevier

Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

Volume 197, 15 October 2013, Pages 205-217
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

Review paper
Eighty years of chitinozoan research: From Alfred Eisenack to Florentin Paris

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2013.05.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We review the research on Chitinozoa since their first description in the 1930s.

  • Chitinozoa (or “chitinozoans”) became a major microfossil group in the Palaeozoic.

  • Original studies, including the creation of the name, date back to Alfred Eisenack.

  • Most modern studies, since the 1970s, have been coordinated by Florentin Paris.

Abstract

In the early 1930s Alfred Eisenack first reported unknown, bottle-shaped, organic-walled microfossils that he had discovered in erratic boulders from the south-eastern shores of the Baltic Sea. Eisenack erected the new group Chitinozoa to classify these strange microfossils of unknown biological affinity. From the 1930s to the 1950s, a few publications appeared reporting new findings and providing descriptions of these fossil organisms. It was only since the 1960s, with the development of the oil industry and the intensive biostratigraphical use of organic-walled microfossils, that publications dealing with chitinozoans became more numerous and that the description of new genera and species rapidly increased. The peak of description of new species was reached in the 1960s, but the number of publications remained high into the late 1990s. Since the 1990s the research activities on chitinozoans are conducted by a much smaller number of scientists. One of the major driving forces of chitinozoan research in the last forty years was Florentin Paris at the University of Rennes (Brittany, France). He first established a high-resolution chitinozoan biostratigraphy of the Ordovician of southern Europe and played an active role in bringing all scientists together for the development of global biostratigraphical schemes and palaeobiogeographical scenarios of the Ordovician, Silurian and Devonian. It was also Florentin Paris, together with his Estonian colleague Jaak Nõlvak, who suggested the now widely accepted biological interpretation that Chitinozoa are most probably egg cases of a planktonic organism unknown from the fossil record. F. Paris was also the first to collaborate with experts to use biogeochemical analyses and the C isotope signal of the chitinozoans to better understand their biological affinity and detect biogeochemical changes in Palaeozoic oceans.

Introduction

Alongside the acritarchs (generally related to phytoplanktonic organisms), the spores and pollen grains (related to land-plants) and the scolecodonts (elements of the jaws of polychaetes), the chitinozoans are considered today as one of the major groups of the Palaeozoic organic-walled microfossils (palynomorphs). The group was first discovered and described some 80 years ago by Eisenack (1930), who proposed the name Chitinozoa for these bottle- or urn-shaped organic microfossils. Since the 1960s the chitinozoans have become very important in biostratigraphy, and today they are widely considered as one of the major groups providing solid biostratigraphical correlations at local, regional and global scales, with a similar or, in some intervals, even more precise resolution than that of the graptolites and conodonts, considered as the two ‘classical’ biostratigraphic fossil groups of the Ordovician, Silurian and Devonian. In addition, chitinozoans have the advantage that they can be easily found in both limestones and mudstones, unlike graptolites and conodonts, respectively.

During the last 40 years, Florentin Paris, ‘Directeur de Recherches’ at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) at the University of Rennes (Brittany, France), was the driving force behind chitinozoan research. He contributed to all aspects of chitinozoan investigations: taxonomy, biostratigraphy, palaeobiogeography, palaeoecology, palaeobiodiversity and biogeochemistry. The stratigraphical information provided by his work proved to be crucial for the understanding of regional geology and palaeobiogeography, first of all of Brittany, but later of the entire Armorican Terrane Assemblage, southern Europe and most areas of the ‘northern Gondwana domain’.

This paper attempts to outline the main trends in chitinozoan research of the last 80 years, i.e. since the pioneering work by Alfred Eisenack in the early 1930s to the standards reached at the beginning of the 21st century. We do not attempt to provide an exhaustive list of all the chitinozoan papers that have been published since 1930; readers are invited to consult the listed bibliography to find the references not cited herein. Because Florentin Paris was one of the major actors in chitinozoan research during the last 40 years, this review will inevitably highlight his contribution during that period. This review paper is the first of a set of papers of a special issue on Palaeozoic marine palynomorphs respectfully dedicated to Florentin Paris.

Section snippets

The first discoveries: Alfred Eisenack

It was Alfred Eisenack, a German amateur collector, trained as a chemist and working as a school teacher, who first discovered and defined the Chitinozoa in the 1930s. He continued research after World War II as a scientific collaborator at the University of Tübingen. In the first half of the 20th century Eisenack studied the numerous fossils contained in the erratic boulders strewn by glaciers along the south-eastern coast of the Baltic Sea near the town of Königsberg in Eastern Prussia, the

Taxonomical concepts and classification

Of the different Palaeozoic marine organic-walled microfossil groups the chitinozoans are very important, with over 1200 papers describing chitinozoans published up to the 2000s. After the first species defined by Eisenack in the 1930s, only a few species were described between 1940 and 1955, but the number of new species exploded in the last part of the 1950s and in particular in the 1960s, with over 100 new descriptions during this decade (Servais and Paris, 2000). These numbers were never

Chitinozoan biostratigraphy

Some fossil groups, such as the ammonites of the Jurassic and Cretaceous, are considered stratigraphic index fossils. In the Lower Palaeozoic, the classical stratigraphic fossils for the Cambrian are the trilobites, while the planktonic graptolites were considered for many years the most important index fossils for the Ordovician, Silurian, and Lower Devonian (Lapworth, 1879, Webby, 1998). With the development of micropalaeontology in the second half of the 20th century, the conodonts also

Biogeographical distribution patterns of the chitinozoans

As a fossil group commonly interpreted as belonging to the plankton, the chitinozoans have for a long time been considered to be of limited use in biogeographic reconstructions. Like the graptolites and the acritarchs, they have been considered (e.g., Fortey and Mellish, 1992) to be geographically widespread and often of cosmopolitan distribution, which is an advantage for global correlations, but a disadvantage for defining biogeographic provinces or establishing palaeogeographic boundaries.

Chitinozoan biodiversity

Research in micropalaeontology and palynology has undergone a cyclic evolution through time. Strongly supported by the oil industry in the second half of the 20th century, micropalaeontological studies were mostly focused on stratigraphy, and, since most palynologists were stratigraphers, this became, as indicated above, the main trend in chitinozoan research. At the beginning of the 1980s an additional focus became important for Palaeozoic palaeontologists: the study of palaeogeography and the

Florentin Paris' impact on chitinozoan research and ‘northern Gondwanan’ studies

This short review on chitinozoan research, from the first discovery in 1930 to the present day, clearly shows that Florentin Paris was one of the major contributors of chitinozoan studies in the last part of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries. At the beginning of his career he focused his research on the detailed stratigraphic documentation of chitinozoan faunas, establishing a high-resolution chitinozoan biostratigraphy of the Ordovician of southwestern of Europe. On the basis of

Acknowledgments

We are particularly grateful to Jaak Nõlvak, Thijs Vandenbroucke and Jacques Verniers for reviewing the paper and for adding useful ‘background information’. This study is a contribution to the IGCP 591 “The Early and Middle Palaeozoic Revolution” project. It was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant RGPIN/4226-2006 to Aicha Achab). It is a Natural Resources Canada — Earth Sciences Sector Contribution 20120108. We wish to thank Kheira Boumendjel,

References (273)

  • A. Achab

    Mise en évidence d'un provincialisme chez les Chitinozoaires ordoviciens

    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences

    (1988)
  • A. Achab

    Ordovician chitinozoan zonation of Quebec and western Newfoundland

    Journal of Paleontology

    (1989)
  • A. Achab

    Biogeography of Ordovician Chitinozoa

  • A. Achab et al.

    Ordovician chitinozoans from the Arctic Platform and the Franklinain miogeosyncline in northern Canada

    Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

    (1995)
  • A. Achab et al.

    The Ordovician chitinozoan biodiversification and its leading factors

    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology

    (2007)
  • A. Achab et al.

    Chitinozoan contribution to the Ordovician and Lower Silurian paleobiogeography

    Journal of Geology

    (1992)
  • A. Achab et al.

    Chitinozoan assemblages from the third-order transgressive–regressive cycles of the Upper Gaspé Limestones (Lower Devonian) of eastern Canada

    Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

    (1997)
  • A. Achab et al.

    The Laurentian Ordovician Chitinozoan Zonation: some modifications and some remaining problems

    INSUGEO, Serie de Correlacion Geologica

    (2003)
  • A. Achab et al.

    Chitinozoan biostratigraphy of a new Upper Ordovician stratigraphic framework for Anticosti Island, Canada

    Geological Society of America Bulletin

    (2011)
  • R. Albani et al.

    Integrated chitinozoan, conodont, and graptolite biostratigraphy from the upper part of the Cape Cormorant Formation (Middle Ordovician), western Newfoundland

    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences

    (2001)
  • S. Al-Hajri et al.

    Age and paleoenvironment of the Sharawra Member (Silurian of north-western Saudi Arabia)

    Geobios

    (1998)
  • A. Ancilletta

    New observations of chitinozoan associations from the Caradoc type section, Onny Valley, Shropshire

    Mémoire DEA (M.Sc.)

    (1997)
  • M. Ballèvre et al.

    Corrélations ibéro-armoricaines au Paléozoïque: une confrontation des données paléo-biogéographiques et tectonométamorphiques

    Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris

    (1992)
  • S.M. Bergström et al.

    The new chronostratigraphic classification of the Ordovician System and its relations to major regional series and stages and to δ13C chemostratigraphy

    Lethaia

    (2009)
  • T.G. Bockelie

    Early Ordovician Chitinozoa from Spitsbergen

    Palynology

    (1980)
  • J.L. Bonjour et al.

    U–Pb zircon dating of the Early Palaeozoic (Arenigian) transgression in Western Brittany, France: a new constraint for Lower Palaeozoic time scale

    Chemical Geology

    (1988)
  • K. Boumendjel

    Nouvelles espèces de Chitinozoaires dans le Silurien et le Dévonien du Bassin d'Illizi (S.E. du Sahara algérien)

    Revue de Micropaleontologie

    (1985)
  • K. Boumendjel

    Les Chitinozoaires du Silurien supérieur et Dévonien du Sahara algérien (Cadre Géologique – Systématique – Biostratigraphie)

  • K. Boumendjel

    Nouvelles espèces de chitinozoaires du Silurien Superieur et du Dévonien Inférieur du bassin de Timimoun (Sahara central, Algérie)

    Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

    (2002)
  • K. Boumendjel et al.

    Chitinozoaires du Dévonien d'Ougarta (Sahara occidental). Les faunes du Dévonien d'Ougarta (Sahara occidental, Algérie)

    Annales de la Société Géologique du Nord

    (1997)
  • K. Boumendjel et al.

    Biostratigraphie des miospores et des chitinozoaires du Silurien supérieur et du Dévonien dans le bassin d'Illizi (S.E. du Sahara algerien)

    Geobios

    (1988)
  • A. Bourahrouh et al.

    Biostratigraphy, biodiversity and palaeoenvironments of the chitinozoans and associated palynomorphs from the Upper Ordovician of the Anti-Atlas, Morocco

    Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

    (2004)
  • A. Butcher

    Early Llandovery chitinozoans from Jordan

    Palaeontology

    (2009)
  • A. Butcher et al.

    Late Ordovician–Early Silurian chitinozoans from north-eastern and western Illinois, USA

    Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

    (2010)
  • P.B. Cashman

    The affinity of the chitinozoans: new evidence

    Modern Geology

    (1990)
  • P.B. Cashman

    Lower Devonian chitinozoan juveniles — oldest fossil evidence of a juvenile stage in protists, with an interpretation of their ontogeny and relationship to allogromiid Foraminifera

    Journal of Foraminiferal Research

    (1991)
  • X.-h Chen

    Early Ordovician Chitinozoa from Huaqiao at Changyang, Hubei Province

    Journal of Graduate School, China University of Geosciences, Geoscience

    (1994)
  • X.-h Chen et al.

    Llanvirn and Llandeillian chitinozoan biostratigraphy in Central Yangtze Platform

    Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica

    (1996)
  • X.-h. Chen et al.

    Early Ordovician chitinozoans from the Honghuayuan Formation and Lower Part of Meitan Formation in Datangkou of Chengkou, Chongqing. Gushengwu Xuebao

    Acta Palaeontologica Sinica

    (2005)
  • X.-H. Chen et al.

    Arenig chitinozoan biostratigraphy and palaeobiogeography in South China

    Geological Review

    (1996)
  • X.-h. Chen et al.

    Chitinozoans from the Fengxiang Formation (Early Ordovician) of Yichang, Hubei Province, China

    Acta Geologica Sinica

    (2008)
  • X.-H. Chen et al.

    Early and Middle Ordovician chitinozoans from the Dapingian type sections, Yichang area, China

    Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

    (2009)
  • C.W. Collinson et al.

    North American Paleozoic Chitinozoa

  • C.W. Collinson et al.

    Chitinozoan faunule of the Devonian Cedar Valley formation

    Illinois State Geological Survey, Circular

    (1958)
  • A. Combaz et al.

    Étude palynostratigraphique de l'Ordovicien dans quelques sondages du Bassin de Canning (Australie occidentale)

    Bulletin du Centre de Recherche de Pau—SNPA

    (1972)
  • A. Combaz et al.

    Microfossiles organiques du Paléozoïque

    Les Chitinozoaires (2): Morphographie

    (1967)
  • N.M. Costa

    Distribuição Estratigráphica e Biocronologia de Quitinozoários da Formação Trombetas, Estado do Pará./Stratigraphic and biochronologic distribution of chitinozoans in the Trombetas Formation, Para

  • F.H. Cramer

    Microplancton from three Palaeozoic Formations in the province of Léon (NW-Spain)

    Leidse Geologische Mededelingen

    (1964)
  • F.H. Cramer

    Chitinozoans of a composite section of Upper Llandoverian to basal Lower Gedinnian sediments in northern Léon, Spain. A preliminary report

    Bulletin de la Société belge de Géologie, de Paléontologie et d'Hydrologie

    (1967)
  • F.H. Cramer et al.

    Iberian chitinozoans. I. Introduction and summary of pre-Devonian data

    Palinologia, Numero Extraordinario

    (1978)
  • M.P. Dabard et al.

    Relationship between phosphogenesis and sequence architecture: sequence stratigraphy and biostratigraphy in the Middle Ordovician of the Armorican Massif (NW France)

    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology

    (2007)
  • J.R. Davies et al.

    A revised sedimentary and biostratigraphical architecture for the Type Llandovery area, Central Wales

    Geological Magazine

    (2013)
  • G. Deflandre

    Microfossiles des calcaires siluriens de la Montagne Noire

    Annales de Paléontologie

    (1944–1949)
  • A. Desrochers et al.

    A far-field record of the end Ordovician glaciation; the Ellis Bay Formation, Anticosti Island, Eastern Canada

    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology

    (2010)
  • M.d.C.R. Díez et al.

    Iberian chitinozoans. II. Lower Devonian forms (La Vid Shales and equivalents)

    Palinologia, Numero Extraordinario

    (1978)
  • C. Downie et al.

    Microfossils from the Manx Slate Series

    Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society

    (1966)
  • P. Dufka

    Chitinozoans from the Sheinwoodian/Homerian boundary beds (Wenlock) in the Prague Basin (Barrandian, Bohemia)

    Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

    (1995)
  • S. Dutta et al.

    Highly aromatic character of biogeomacromolecules in Chitinozoa: a spectroscopic and pyrolytic study

    Organic Geochemistry

    (2007)
  • A. Eisenack

    Neue Mikrofossilien des baltischen Silurs (Vorläufige Mitteilung)

    Die Naturwissenschaften

    (1930)
  • A. Eisenack

    Neue Mikrofossilien des baltischens Silurs. I

    Paläontologische Zeitschrift

    (1931)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Evolution and Biostratigraphy

      2020, Geologic Time Scale 2020
    • The Silurian Period

      2020, Geologic Time Scale 2020
    • Optical thermal maturity parameters and organic geochemical alteration at low grade diagenesis to anchimetamorphism: A review

      2015, International Journal of Coal Geology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The earliest chitinozoans, an extinct group of organic-walled microfossils and tentatively assigned to ontogenetic vesicles of unknown soft-bodied organisms (Paris and Nõlvak, 1999), have been recorded from the Cambrian Stage 5 (mid-Cambrian) of southern China (Shen et al., 2013). Recently, detailed reviews on chitinozoans have been published by Grahn and Paris (2011) and Servais et al. (2013). Poorly preserved and graphitized chitinozoans have even been extracted from high-grade metamorphic gneisses (Hanel et al., 1999).

    • On future directions of Ordovician chitinozoan research

      2023, Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences
    • An overview of the taxonomic groups of non-pollen palynomorphs

      2021, Geological Society Special Publication
    View full text