Does social media usage matter? An analysis of online practices and digital media perceptions of communication practitioners in Europe

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Public relations practitioner's personal and professional social media usage.

  • Practitioners with a high level of usage of social media give more importance to social media channels.

  • Active employees and consumers on the social web are more relevant gatekeepers for organizations.

  • The divergences in age are progressively diminishing with regard to professional use.

  • Right social media strategies and instruments are not being used.

Abstract

A key aspect for understanding and explaining online communication is the micro level of communication practitioners’ social media usage and their general attitudes towards digital platforms. This paper investigates how public relations practitioner's personal and professional use of social media is related to their perceptions of social media. A quantitative methodology was applied to perform this research. A population of 2710 professionals from 43 European countries working on different hierarchical levels both in communication departments and agencies across Europe were surveyed as part of a larger transnational online survey. Results show that practitioners with a high level of usage of social media give more importance to social media channels, influence of social media on internal and external stakeholders and relevance of key gatekeepers and stakeholders along with a better self-estimation of competences. Issues about diverse levels of overestimation of social media use, application and importance in the professional arena are also debated.

Introduction

The incorporation of social media and online platforms into communication strategies of organizations has been intensively discussed during the last years. The focus of research shifted from normative propositions like the promise of more symmetrical and dialogical communication approaches (e.g., Duhé, 2012, Kent et al., 2003Wilcox, 2006, Wright, 1998, Wright, 2001) to rational arguments about benefits, limits and structural prerequisites of online strategies (e.g., Treem and Leonardi, 2012, Zerfass and Pleil, 2012) to empirical studies on online practices in various regions of the world (Macnamara and Zerfass, 2012, Verhoeven et al., 2011, Wright and Hinson, 2009, Wright and Hinson, 2012).

The introduction of Web 2.0 technology and social media has dramatically impacted and transformed the day-to-day activities of public relations practitioners, who need to master digital tools for timely, accurate and effective communication (Taylor & Perry, 2005). There are various theoretical perspectives on individual acceptance of new technologies which mostly stem from the ‘uses and gratifications’ perspective (Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis, 2003).4

As diffusion of innovations theory states, the rate of adoption of any change follows an S-shaped curve (Rogers, 1995), starting slowly and, if the innovation is considered by members of a social system to be useful, begins to accelerate. This theory helps frame questions of adoption of social media by public relations practitioners by underscoring the importance of attributes of the innovations, the communication channels involved in diffusion, the decision processes of adopters over time, and the social systems in which adopters live and work (Kelleher and Sweeter, 2012, Savery, 2005).

Although it has been widely recognized that the speed at which new technology has been adopted by organizations and considerable research has focused on the specific use of a single platform (Bortree and Seltzer, 2009, Porter et al., 2007, Rybalko and Seltzer, 2010, Waters and Jamal, 2011), more knowledge is required about the professional use of social media tools in public relations in diverse regions of the world through empirical and cross-cultural studies. There is a lack of previous research which is related to professional and private use of social media by public relations practitioners with their perception of social media. This paper focuses on these relations with the perception of influence of social media, self-evaluation of competences and importance of gatekeepers and social media tools.

Section snippets

Social media use and digital competences

Following the approach of new institutionalism applied to communication management and public relations (Sandhu, 2009, Zerfass, 2009), most of the research about social media in communication management has been approached from a meso-level perspective. The meso-level is above the individual and below the general societal system and allows studying organizations in a broad perspective. This level has been mainly studied from normative perspectives and produced rational arguments about benefits

Professional competences for social media

When analyzing the development of specific competencies for modern communication practitioners (Tench et al., 2013), it is essential to consider their use and understanding of technology-driven skills. Literature has revealed the necessity of incorporating online technologies into the public relations education (Curtin and Witherspoon, 1999, Gustafson and Thomsen, 1996) and broader the strategic professional use of the Internet (Curtin and Witherspoon, 1999, Gower and Cho, 2001). Practitioners

Social media use and gatekeeper perceptions

Regarding stakeholders, social media has changed the landscape for communications and empowered publics, who are able to post, share and republish information easily and quickly (Guth and Marsh, 2001, Kent, 2008, Porter et al., 2009, Segev et al., 2012, Smith, 2011). This forces organizations to build and maintain positive relationships with active consumers as well as with bloggers, community managers and other gatekeepers on the social web.

The tendency to establish relationships with

Research questions and hypotheses

The aim of this research is to investigate how public relations practitioner's personal and professional use of social media is related to their evaluation of (a) their own digital competencies (b) the relevance of gatekeepers on the social web, (c) the impact and importance of social media. The paper focuses on five research questions derived from a literature review and previous studies; each of them is supplemented by several hypotheses:

  • RQ1. To what extent are social media platforms used by

Methodology

A quantitative methodology was applied to perform this research. A population of professionals working on different hierarchical levels both in communication departments and agencies across Europe were surveyed in spring 2013 as part of the annual ECM. The final sample included 2710 participants from 43 European countries. Data were analyzed with SPSS for descriptive and analytical purposes.

A pre-test with 36 practitioners in 13 European countries was held before the English language survey was

The use of social media platforms for private and professional reasons

The empirical study shows that European public relations practitioners have mostly incorporated social media and use them daily both for private (65.2%, N = 2710) and professional (55%, N = 2710) reasons. Regarding social media use, 65.2% (N = 2710) of respondents reported daily use in their private life and then 55% at work (N = 2710). In fact, only 4.6% of those surveyed said they had never used these digital communication tools. There was an increase of 9.1% from the private daily use of social

Discussion

Results from this research confirm all the proposed hypotheses but the third party effect. Regarding the adoption of social media by European communication management practitioners the results confirm earlier studies of high levels of usage. However, with regard to the debate about differences in behaviour across demographic age groups and social media usage, in Europe every two practitioners use social media daily, and only those in their twenties report more intense usage patterns. Moreover

Acknowledgements

The European Communication Monitor is conducted by the European Public Relations Education and Research Association (EUPRERA) in partnership with the European Association of Communication Directors (EACD) and the Communication Director Magazine, and supported by Ketchum.

References (86)

  • P.J. Kitchen et al.

    Online public relations: The adoption process and innovation challenge, a Greek example

    Public Relations Review

    (2010)
  • R.W. Lariscy et al.

    Research in brief: An examination of the role of online social media in journalists’ source mix!

    Public Relations Review

    (2009)
  • K. Lovejoy et al.

    Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less

    Public Relations Review

    (2012)
  • S. McAllister-Spooner

    Fulfilling the dialogic promise: A ten-year reflective survey on dialogic Internet principles

    Public Relations Review

    (2009)
  • T. McCorkindale et al.

    An analysis of the mobile readiness and dialogic principles on Fortune 500 mobile websites

    Public Relations Journal

    (2013)
  • L.R. Men et al.

    How companies cultivate relationships with publics on social network sites: Evidence from China and the United States

    Public Relations Review

    (2012)
  • H. Park et al.

    Relationship building and the use of web sites: How fortune 500 corporations use their web sites to build relationships

    Public Relations Review

    (2008)
  • L.V. Porter et al.

    Web power: A survey of practitioners’ World Wide Web use and their perceptions of its effects on their decision-making power

    Public Relations Review

    (2005)
  • L.V. Porter et al.

    Blog power: Examining the effects of practitioner blog use on roles and power in public relations

    Public Relations Review

    (2007)
  • S. Rybalko et al.

    Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter

    Public Relations Review

    (2010)
  • L.M. Sallot et al.

    Practitioners’ web use and perceptions of their own roles and power: A qualitative study

    Public Relations Review

    (2004)
  • F. Schultz et al.

    Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media

    Public Relations Review

    (2011)
  • E.J. Sommerfeldt et al.

    Activist practitioner perspectives of website public relations: Why aren’t activist websites fulfilling the dialogic promise?

    Public Relations Review

    (2012)
  • K.D. Sweetser et al.

    A survey of social media use, motivation and leadership among public relations practitioners

    Public Relations Review

    (2011)
  • M. Taylor et al.

    Anticipatory socialization in the use of social media in public relations: A content analysis of PRSA's Public Relations Tactics

    Public Relations Review

    (2010)
  • M. Taylor et al.

    Diffusion of traditional and new media tactics in crisis communication

    Public Relations Review

    (2005)
  • R.D. Waters et al.

    Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ Twitter updates

    Public Relations Review

    (2011)
  • E. Avery et al.

    Diffusion of social media among public relations practitioners in health departments across various community population sizes

    Journal of Public Relations Research

    (2010)
  • S.A. Banning et al.

    How much do they think it affects them and whom do they believe?: Comparing the third-person effect and credibility of blogs and traditional media

    Communication Quarterly

    (2007)
  • N.G. Barnes et al.

    Social media surge by the 2012 Fortune 500: Increase use of blogs, Facebook, Twitter and more

    (2012)
  • L. Capozzi et al.

    The conversation age: The opportunity for public relations

    Corporate Communications: An International Journal

    (2012)
  • P. Curtin et al.

    Computer skills integration in public relations curricula

    Journalism and Mass Communication Educator

    (1999)
  • F.D. Davis

    Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology

    MIS Quarterly

    (1989)
  • F.D. Davis et al.

    User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models

    Management Science

    (1989)
  • W.P. Davison

    The third-person effect revisited

    International Journal of Public Opinion Research

    (1996)
  • M.W. DiStaso et al.

    Social media: Uses and opportunities in public relations. Review of the three books Groundswell: Winning in a world transformed by social technologies. Measure what matters: Outline tools for understanding customers, social media, engagement, and key relationships, and Engage! The complete guide for brands and businesses to build, cultivate, and measure success in the new web

    Global Media Journal – Canadian Edition

    (2012)
  • S. Duhé

    Introduction: A thematic analysis of 30 years of public relations literature addressing the potential and pitfalls of new media

  • K.A. Gower et al.

    Use of the Internet in the public relations curriculum

    Journalism and Mass Communication Educator

    (2001)
  • R. Gustafson et al.

    Merging the teaching of public relations and advertising onto the information superhighway

    Public Relations Quarterly

    (1996)
  • D.W. Guth et al.

    Public Relations: A values-driven approach

    (2001)
  • S. Holtz et al.

    Tactical transparency: How leaders can leverage social media to maximize value and build their brand

    (2009)
  • S.J. Hong et al.

    Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: The case of mobile data services

    Information Systems Research

    (2006)
  • T.J. Johnson et al.

    Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users

    Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly

    (2004)
  • Cited by (80)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +34 91 4887278.

    2

    Tel.: +44 0113 8127539.

    3

    Tel.: +49 341 97 35040; fax: +49 341 97 35049.

    View full text