Does social media usage matter? An analysis of online practices and digital media perceptions of communication practitioners in Europe
Introduction
The incorporation of social media and online platforms into communication strategies of organizations has been intensively discussed during the last years. The focus of research shifted from normative propositions like the promise of more symmetrical and dialogical communication approaches (e.g., Duhé, 2012, Kent et al., 2003Wilcox, 2006, Wright, 1998, Wright, 2001) to rational arguments about benefits, limits and structural prerequisites of online strategies (e.g., Treem and Leonardi, 2012, Zerfass and Pleil, 2012) to empirical studies on online practices in various regions of the world (Macnamara and Zerfass, 2012, Verhoeven et al., 2011, Wright and Hinson, 2009, Wright and Hinson, 2012).
The introduction of Web 2.0 technology and social media has dramatically impacted and transformed the day-to-day activities of public relations practitioners, who need to master digital tools for timely, accurate and effective communication (Taylor & Perry, 2005). There are various theoretical perspectives on individual acceptance of new technologies which mostly stem from the ‘uses and gratifications’ perspective (Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis, 2003).4
As diffusion of innovations theory states, the rate of adoption of any change follows an S-shaped curve (Rogers, 1995), starting slowly and, if the innovation is considered by members of a social system to be useful, begins to accelerate. This theory helps frame questions of adoption of social media by public relations practitioners by underscoring the importance of attributes of the innovations, the communication channels involved in diffusion, the decision processes of adopters over time, and the social systems in which adopters live and work (Kelleher and Sweeter, 2012, Savery, 2005).
Although it has been widely recognized that the speed at which new technology has been adopted by organizations and considerable research has focused on the specific use of a single platform (Bortree and Seltzer, 2009, Porter et al., 2007, Rybalko and Seltzer, 2010, Waters and Jamal, 2011), more knowledge is required about the professional use of social media tools in public relations in diverse regions of the world through empirical and cross-cultural studies. There is a lack of previous research which is related to professional and private use of social media by public relations practitioners with their perception of social media. This paper focuses on these relations with the perception of influence of social media, self-evaluation of competences and importance of gatekeepers and social media tools.
Section snippets
Social media use and digital competences
Following the approach of new institutionalism applied to communication management and public relations (Sandhu, 2009, Zerfass, 2009), most of the research about social media in communication management has been approached from a meso-level perspective. The meso-level is above the individual and below the general societal system and allows studying organizations in a broad perspective. This level has been mainly studied from normative perspectives and produced rational arguments about benefits
Professional competences for social media
When analyzing the development of specific competencies for modern communication practitioners (Tench et al., 2013), it is essential to consider their use and understanding of technology-driven skills. Literature has revealed the necessity of incorporating online technologies into the public relations education (Curtin and Witherspoon, 1999, Gustafson and Thomsen, 1996) and broader the strategic professional use of the Internet (Curtin and Witherspoon, 1999, Gower and Cho, 2001). Practitioners
Social media use and gatekeeper perceptions
Regarding stakeholders, social media has changed the landscape for communications and empowered publics, who are able to post, share and republish information easily and quickly (Guth and Marsh, 2001, Kent, 2008, Porter et al., 2009, Segev et al., 2012, Smith, 2011). This forces organizations to build and maintain positive relationships with active consumers as well as with bloggers, community managers and other gatekeepers on the social web.
The tendency to establish relationships with
Research questions and hypotheses
The aim of this research is to investigate how public relations practitioner's personal and professional use of social media is related to their evaluation of (a) their own digital competencies (b) the relevance of gatekeepers on the social web, (c) the impact and importance of social media. The paper focuses on five research questions derived from a literature review and previous studies; each of them is supplemented by several hypotheses:
- •
RQ1. To what extent are social media platforms used by
Methodology
A quantitative methodology was applied to perform this research. A population of professionals working on different hierarchical levels both in communication departments and agencies across Europe were surveyed in spring 2013 as part of the annual ECM. The final sample included 2710 participants from 43 European countries. Data were analyzed with SPSS for descriptive and analytical purposes.
A pre-test with 36 practitioners in 13 European countries was held before the English language survey was
The use of social media platforms for private and professional reasons
The empirical study shows that European public relations practitioners have mostly incorporated social media and use them daily both for private (65.2%, N = 2710) and professional (55%, N = 2710) reasons. Regarding social media use, 65.2% (N = 2710) of respondents reported daily use in their private life and then 55% at work (N = 2710). In fact, only 4.6% of those surveyed said they had never used these digital communication tools. There was an increase of 9.1% from the private daily use of social
Discussion
Results from this research confirm all the proposed hypotheses but the third party effect. Regarding the adoption of social media by European communication management practitioners the results confirm earlier studies of high levels of usage. However, with regard to the debate about differences in behaviour across demographic age groups and social media usage, in Europe every two practitioners use social media daily, and only those in their twenties report more intense usage patterns. Moreover
Acknowledgements
The European Communication Monitor is conducted by the European Public Relations Education and Research Association (EUPRERA) in partnership with the European Association of Communication Directors (EACD) and the Communication Director Magazine, and supported by Ketchum.
References (86)
The theory of planned behavior
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process
(1991)- et al.
Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles
Public Relations Review
(2009) - et al.
Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations
Public Relations Review
(2010) - et al.
Social media use, perceptions of decision-making power, and public relations roles
Public Relations Review
(2009) - et al.
Multi-method analysis of transparency in social media practices: Survey, interviews and content analysis
Public Relations Review
(2012) - et al.
How public relations executives perceive and measure the impact of social media in their organizations
Public Relations Review
(2011) - et al.
PR practitioners’ use of social media tools and communication technology
Public Relations Review
(2008) Critical analysis of blogging in public relations
Public Relations Review
(2008)Using social media dialogically: Public relations role in reviving democracy
Public Relations Review
(2013)- et al.
Learning Web analytics: A tool for strategic communication
Public Relations Review
(2011)
Online public relations: The adoption process and innovation challenge, a Greek example
Public Relations Review
Research in brief: An examination of the role of online social media in journalists’ source mix!
Public Relations Review
Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less
Public Relations Review
Fulfilling the dialogic promise: A ten-year reflective survey on dialogic Internet principles
Public Relations Review
An analysis of the mobile readiness and dialogic principles on Fortune 500 mobile websites
Public Relations Journal
How companies cultivate relationships with publics on social network sites: Evidence from China and the United States
Public Relations Review
Relationship building and the use of web sites: How fortune 500 corporations use their web sites to build relationships
Public Relations Review
Web power: A survey of practitioners’ World Wide Web use and their perceptions of its effects on their decision-making power
Public Relations Review
Blog power: Examining the effects of practitioner blog use on roles and power in public relations
Public Relations Review
Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter
Public Relations Review
Practitioners’ web use and perceptions of their own roles and power: A qualitative study
Public Relations Review
Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media
Public Relations Review
Activist practitioner perspectives of website public relations: Why aren’t activist websites fulfilling the dialogic promise?
Public Relations Review
A survey of social media use, motivation and leadership among public relations practitioners
Public Relations Review
Anticipatory socialization in the use of social media in public relations: A content analysis of PRSA's Public Relations Tactics
Public Relations Review
Diffusion of traditional and new media tactics in crisis communication
Public Relations Review
Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ Twitter updates
Public Relations Review
Diffusion of social media among public relations practitioners in health departments across various community population sizes
Journal of Public Relations Research
How much do they think it affects them and whom do they believe?: Comparing the third-person effect and credibility of blogs and traditional media
Communication Quarterly
Social media surge by the 2012 Fortune 500: Increase use of blogs, Facebook, Twitter and more
The conversation age: The opportunity for public relations
Corporate Communications: An International Journal
Computer skills integration in public relations curricula
Journalism and Mass Communication Educator
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
MIS Quarterly
User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models
Management Science
The third-person effect revisited
International Journal of Public Opinion Research
Social media: Uses and opportunities in public relations. Review of the three books Groundswell: Winning in a world transformed by social technologies. Measure what matters: Outline tools for understanding customers, social media, engagement, and key relationships, and Engage! The complete guide for brands and businesses to build, cultivate, and measure success in the new web
Global Media Journal – Canadian Edition
Introduction: A thematic analysis of 30 years of public relations literature addressing the potential and pitfalls of new media
Use of the Internet in the public relations curriculum
Journalism and Mass Communication Educator
Merging the teaching of public relations and advertising onto the information superhighway
Public Relations Quarterly
Public Relations: A values-driven approach
Tactical transparency: How leaders can leverage social media to maximize value and build their brand
Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: The case of mobile data services
Information Systems Research
Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users
Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly
Cited by (80)
Muzzling social media: The adverse effects of moderating stakeholder conversations online
2021, Technology in SocietySpreading expertise: think tanks as digital advocators in the social media era
2023, Policy and Society