Short communication
Seroprevalence of, and risk factors for, peste des petits ruminants in sheep and goats in Northern Jordan

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.01.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is an economically important disease that affect sheep and goat industry in Asia and Africa. In this study, we investigated the seroprevalence, and risk factors, of PPR in sheep and goat flocks from five different governorates (Irbid, Jarash, Ajloun, Mafraq and Zarka) located in Northern Jordan. Serum samples from 929 and 400 sheep and goats, respectively, corresponding to 122 sheep flock and 60 goats flock were collected. Seroprevalence was determined using PPR competitive ELISA. Health status and management information were collected using a semi-structured pre-tested questionnaire. The individual true prevalence of PPR in sheep and goats was 29 and 49%, respectively. The flock level true prevalence of PPR was 60 and 74% in sheep and goats, respectively. In both sheep and goat flocks, large flock size, visiting live animals market and inadequate veterinary services were identified as risk factors for PPR seropositivity. Mixed (sheep and goats) raising was identified as a risk factor for PPR seropositivity in sheep flocks only.

Introduction

Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is an acute and highly contagious viral disease of small ruminants that is characterized by high fever, ocular and nasal discharge, pneumonia, necrosis, ulceration of the mucous membranes and inflammation of the gastro-intestinal tract leading to severe diarrhea (Radostits et al., 2000). This disease is of high economical importance because of the high mortality rate, especially among young animals, and the restriction on livestock trading. Goats are severely affected but sheep undergo a mild form of the disease (Lefèvre et al., 1991). Morbidity and mortality rates in small ruminants vary but can be as high as 100% (Lefèvre et al., 1991, Anderson and McKay, 1994). Infection with PPR virus is usually magnified if complicated with other concurrent respiratory and/or gastro-intestinal infections.

The PPR virus (a member of the Morbillivirus genus) is antigenically related to rinderpest virus which infects cattle and other large ruminants (Anderson and McKay, 1994). As of today, PPR-virus isolates were grouped into four distinct lineages on the basis of partial sequence analysis of the fusion (F) protein genes; lineage III is the lineage found in Eastern Africa (Ethiopia) (Shaila et al., 1996). However, lineage IV was reported in Asia (Ozkul et al., 2002). In Jordan, lineage IV was isolated form one single outbreak in 1993 (Al domy, 1993).

PPR was first reported from West Africa in the early 1940s and later recognized as an endemic disease in West and Central Africa (Anderson and McKay, 1994). It has been reported in Sudan, Kenya, Uganda and in Ethiopia (El Hag and Taylor, 1984, Wosu, 1994). In addition, the disease was reported in most of the countries of the Arabian Peninsula and the Middle East (Taylor, 1997, Lefèvre et al., 1991, AL-Afaleq et al., 2004). Many outbreaks were reported in the Indian sub-continent (Singh et al., 2004).

The objectives of this study were to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies against PPR in sheep and goats from five different governorates located in the northern part of Jordan and to elucidate risk factors associated with sheep and goat flocks seropositivity to PPRV.

Section snippets

Study site

Five governorates (Irbid, Jarash, Ajloun, Mafraq and Zarka) located in the northern part of Jordan were selected for this epidemiological investigation. The records of the Department of General Statistics indicated that about 41% of the sheep and goat populations are located in this study location. This study area are located at 35°51′–36°49′E, 32°22′–32°33′N at 616–681 m above the sea level. The total human population in the five studied governorates is close to 2.5 million. The total of

Prevalence of PPR

The individual animal apparent prevalence of PPR antibodies in sheep and goats was 33 and 51.7%, respectively. After adjusting to the PPR ELISA sensitivity and specificity, the true individual prevalence was 29 and 49% in sheep and goats, respectively. However, the apparent prevalence of PPR at the flock level was 62 and 75% for sheep and goats, respectively. The true flock level prevalence was 60 and 74% for sheep and goat flocks, respectively. At both levels (individual and flock), the

Discussion

Peste des petits ruminants epidemiology is not well understood in the Middle East region. The only serological study that was performed in Jordan was in 1990 and only addressed small population of sheep (Lefèvre et al., 1991). The current study is the first one that addresses the prevalence of PPR and risk factors associated seropositivity to the PPRV infection in both sheep and goats in Jordan.

In this study, the prevalence (in both individual and flock levels) of PPR antibodies in goats was

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Ministry of Agriculture and its veterinary staff located in Northern Jordan. This study is part of a project funded by IFAD (TAG 608) and implemented by ILRI and ICARDA.

References (19)

  • A.M. Al-Majali

    Seroepidemiology of caprine brucellosis in Jordan

    Small Ruminant Res.

    (2005)
  • M.S. Shaila et al.

    Geographic distribution and epidemiology of peste des petits ruminants viruses

    Virus Res.

    (1996)
  • Al domy, F., 1993. Country report, Fifth (wrap-up) Coordination Meeting of TC Regional Project RAW/5/004. Support for...
  • A. AL-Afaleq et al.

    Serosurveillance for PPR and rinderpest antibodies in naturally exposed Saudi sheep and goats

    Vet. Arhiv.

    (2004)
  • J. Anderson et al.

    The detection of antibodies against peste des petits ruminants virus in cattle, sheep and goats and the possible implications to rinderpest control programmes

    Epidemiol. Infect.

    (1994)
  • B.P. Dhar et al.

    Recent epidemiology of peste de petits ruminants virus

    Vet. Microbiol.

    (2002)
  • A.B. El Hag et al.

    lsolation of peste des petits ruminant virus from Sudan

    Res. Vet. Sci.

    (1984)
  • P.C. Lefèvre et al.

    Serological evidence of peste des petits ruminants in Jordan

    Vet. Rec.

    (1991)
  • S.W. Martin et al.

    Veterinary Epidemiology

    (1987)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • Sentinel surveillance of selected veterinary and public health pathogens in camel population originating from Southern Punjab province, Pakistan

    2020, Acta Tropica
    Citation Excerpt :

    This is not unexpected because PPR is endemic in the country and viral genome and antibody-based prevalence has previously been reported in wild animals (Ibex), semi-domestic yak (Abubakar et al., 2019) and small ruminants (Khan et al., 2008; Zahur et al., 2008; Zahur et al., 2011; Abubakar et al., 2011). The virus generally causes infection in small ruminants worldwide (Al-Majali et al., 2008; Megersa et al., 2011; Intisar et al., 2017); however, it also has the propensity to cause infection in wild ungulates (Aziz-ul-Rahman et al., 2018, Rahman, 2019) and other unusual hosts such as buffalo, cattle (Balamurugan et al., 2014) and camels (Omani et al., 2019). Indeed, there exists a controversy regarding clinical infection of PPRV in camels (Ul-Rahman et al., 2020).

  • Sero-epidemiological study of peste des petits ruminants (PPR) in sheep and goats under different production systems in South Omo, southern Ethiopia

    2018, Small Ruminant Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The seroprevalence of PPR, in our study, was found to be significantly higher in goats (41.8%) than in sheep (16.2%). A number of researchers from different parts of the world also reported higher sero-prevalence of PPR in goats than in sheep (Al-Majali et al., 2008; Swai et al., 2009; Ayari-Fakhfakh et al., 2011; Zahur et al., 2011; Kihu et al., 2015). Conversely, some authors have reported higher seroprevalence in sheep than in goats (Özkul et al., 2002; Abraham et al., 2005; Khan et al., 2007).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text