Elsevier

Physics Reports

Volume 616, 29 February 2016, Pages 1-37
Physics Reports

A review of snapshot multidimensional optical imaging: Measuring photon tags in parallel

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.12.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Multidimensional optical imaging has seen remarkable growth in the past decade. Rather than measuring only the two-dimensional spatial distribution of light, as in conventional photography, multidimensional optical imaging captures light in up to nine dimensions, providing unprecedented information about incident photons’ spatial coordinates, emittance angles, wavelength, time, and polarization. Multidimensional optical imaging can be accomplished either by scanning or parallel acquisition. Compared with scanning-based imagers, parallel acquisition–also dubbed snapshot imaging–has a prominent advantage in maximizing optical throughput, particularly when measuring a datacube of high dimensions. Here, we first categorize snapshot multidimensional imagers based on their acquisition and image reconstruction strategies, then highlight the snapshot advantage in the context of optical throughput, and finally we discuss their state-of-the-art implementations and applications.

Section snippets

Introduction to multidimensional imaging

When performing optical measurement with a limited photon budget, it is important to assure that each detected photon provides as much information as possible. Conventional optical imaging systems generally capture light with just two characteristics (x,y), measuring its intensity in a 2D (x,y) lattice. However, this throws away much of the information content actually carried by a photon. This information can be written in nine dimensions as (x,y,z,θ,φ,λ,t,ψ,χ): the spatial coordinates (x,y,z

General acquisition schemes and advantages of parallel measurement in multidimensional imaging

To acquire a multidimensional datacube, a system must be able to differentiate photons with different characteristics. The most intuitive approach is to successively apply a variety of filters to the incident light and let photons with only desired characteristics pass through at each stage (Fig. 1a). Unfortunately, this results in a severe loss in optical throughput. By contrast, if an approach directs, rather than filters, photons with different tags towards distinct pixels on an FPA, the

Snapshot spectral imaging (x,y,λ)

Rather than simply capturing two-dimensional intensity images like a monochromatic camera or measuring spectra like a spectrometer, a spectral imager acquires entire 3D datacubes (x, y, λ) for multivariate analysis, providing structural, molecular, and functional information about the sample with unprecedented detail  [28], [29]. Using the conceptual framework in Fig. 2, snapshot spectral imagers can be divided into two categories. In the direct-measurement category, representative techniques

Discussions and outlook

In this review, we categorized snapshot multidimensional imagers based on their acquisition strategies and reconstruction strategies, and we discussed their state-of-the-art implementations in spectral imaging, plenoptic imaging, volumetric imaging, temporal imaging, and polarization imaging. Compared with their scanning-based counterparts, snapshot imagers have a remarkable advantage in optical throughput. The more datacube dimensions a snapshot imager measures, the greater the advantage in

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor James Ballard for close reading of the manuscript. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants DP1 EB016986 (NIH Director’s Pioneer Award) and R01 CA186567 (NIH Director’s Transformative Research Award). L.V.W. has a financial interest in Microphotoacoustics, Inc. and Endra, Inc., which, however, did not support this work.

References (251)

  • R.M. Willett et al.

    Compressed sensing for practical optical imaging systems: a tutorial

    Opt. Eng.

    (2011)
  • F. Bucholtz et al.

    Compressive sensing demystified

    Opt. Photonics News

    (2014)
  • G. Chapman

    Ultra-precision machining systems; an enabling technology for perfect surfaces

  • R. Williamson

    Field Guide to Optical Fabrication

    (2011)
  • A. Wagadarikar et al.

    Single disperser design for coded aperture snapshot spectral imaging

    Appl. Opt.

    (2008)
  • A.A. Wagadarikar et al.

    Video rate spectral imaging using a coded aperture snapshot spectral imager

    Opt. Express

    (2009)
  • D. Reddy, A. Veeraraghavan, R. Chellappa, P2C2: Programmable pixel compressive camera for high speed imaging, in:...
  • Nanotech, 250 UPL v2 Compact Diamond Turning Lathe, in: Nanotech...
  • N. Bedard et al.

    Image mapping spectrometry: calibration and characterization

    Opt. Eng.

    (2012)
  • L.A. Gao et al.

    Snapshot Image Mapping Spectrometer (IMS) with high sampling density for hyperspectral microscopy

    Opt. Express

    (2010)
  • L. Gao et al.

    Compact Image Slicing Spectrometer (ISS) for hyperspectral fluorescence microscopy

    Opt. Express

    (2009)
  • B. Javidi et al.

    Multi-Dimensional Imaging

    (2014)
  • P. Jacquinot

    The luminosity of spectrometers with prisms, gratings, or Fabry–Perot etalons

    J. Opt. Soc. Am.

    (1954)
  • N. Hagen et al.

    Snapshot advantage: a review of the light collection improvement for parallel high-dimensional measurement systems

    Opt. Eng.

    (2012)
  • J.S. Tyo et al.

    Review of passive imaging polarimetry for remote sensing applications

    Appl. Opt.

    (2006)
  • L.I.o. America

    American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers

    (2000)
  • L. Gao et al.

    Depth-resolved image mapping spectrometer (IMS) with structured illumination

    Opt. Express

    (2011)
  • M. Levoy et al.

    Light field microscopy

  • K. Nakagawa et al.

    Sequentially timed all-optical mapping photography (STAMP)

    Nature Photon.

    (2014)
  • L. Gao et al.

    Single-shot compressed ultrafast photography at one hundred billion frames per second

    Nature

    (2014)
  • L. Gao et al.

    Optical hyperspectral imaging in microscopy and spectroscopy–a review of data acquisition

    J. Biophotonics

    (2014)
  • G. Lu et al.

    Medical hyperspectral imaging: a review

    J. Biomed. Opt.

    (2014)
  • A. Bodkin, A. Sheinis, A. Norton, J. Daly, C. Roberts, S. Beaven, J. Weinheimer, Video-rate chemical identification and...
  • A. Bodkin et al.

    Snapshot hyperspectral imaging: the hyperpixel array camera

  • A. Bodkin et al.

    Hyperspectral imaging systems

  • T.C. George et al.

    Distinguishing modes of cell death using imagestream (TM) multispectral imaging cytometry

    Cytometry A

    (2004)
  • D.W.F.-H. Alistair Gorman et al.

    Generalization of the Lyot filter and its application to snapshot spectral imaging

    Opt. Express

    (2010)
  • M.W. Kudenov et al.

    Compact real-time birefringent imaging spectrometer

    Opt. Express

    (2012)
  • M.W. Kudenov et al.

    Compact snapshot birefringent imaging Fourier transform spectrometer

  • M.W. Kudenov et al.

    White-light Sagnac interferometer for snapshot multispectral imaging

    Appl. Opt.

    (2010)
  • B.K. Ford et al.

    Large-image-format computed tomography imaging spectrometer for fluorescence microscopy

    Opt. Express

    (2001)
  • F. Henault, R. Bacon, R. Content, B. Lantz, F. Laurent, J. Lemonnier, S. Morris, Slicing the universe at affordable...
  • S. Vives et al.

    Original image slicer designed for integral field spectroscopy with the near-infrared spectrograph for the James webb space telescope

    Opt. Eng.

    (2006)
  • R.T. Kester et al.

    Development of image mappers for hyperspectral biomedical imaging applications

    Appl. Opt.

    (2010)
  • L. Gao et al.

    Correction of vignetting and distortion errors induced by two-axis light beam steering

    Opt. Eng.

    (2012)
  • R.T. Kester et al.

    Real-time snapshot hyperspectral imaging endoscope

    J. Biomed. Opt.

    (2011)
  • A.D. Elliott et al.

    Real-time hyperspectral fluorescence imaging of pancreatic β-cell dynamics with the image mapping spectrometer

    J. Cell Sci.

    (2012)
  • L. Gao et al.

    Snapshot image-mapping spectrometer for hyperspectral fluorescence microscopy

    Opt. Photonics News

    (2010)
  • L. Gao et al.

    Quantitative comparison between full-spectrum and filter-based imaging in hyperspectral fluorescence microscopy

    J. Microsc.

    (2012)
  • L. Gao et al.

    Snapshot hyperspectral retinal camera with the Image Mapping Spectrometer (IMS)

    Biomed. Opt. Express

    (2012)
  • Cited by (131)

    • Current advances and future perspectives of image fusion: A comprehensive review

      2023, Information Fusion
      Citation Excerpt :

      This model comprises three parts: feature extraction, fusion, and reconstruction, which resolve the LD and feature representation issues. Photons carry a prosperity of information, which can be represented by nine-dimensional data (x, y, z, θ, φ, λ, t, ψ, χ), where (x, y, z) represents the spatial dimensions, (θ, φ,) represents the propagation angle of light, λ represents the wavelength, t represents the emission time of photons, (ψ, χ) represents the polarization state of light and ellipticity [218]. Imaging technology is a technology for recording target photon information.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text