Elsevier

Physiotherapy

Volume 105, Issue 1, March 2019, Pages 53-64
Physiotherapy

Individualised manual therapy plus guideline-based advice vs advice alone for people with clinical features of lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain: a randomised controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To determine whether individualised manual therapy plus guideline-based advice results in superior outcomes to advice alone in participants with clinical features potentially indicative of lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain.

Design

Multi centre parallel group randomised controlled trial.

Setting

14 physiotherapy clinics in Melbourne, Australia.

Participants

Sixty-four participants with clinical features potentially indicative of lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain.

Interventions

10-weeks of physiotherapy comprising individualised manual therapy based on pathoanatomical, psychosocial and neurophysiological barriers to recovery plus guideline-based advice (10 sessions) or advice alone (two sessions).

Main outcome measures

Primary outcomes were activity limitation (Oswestry Disability Index), and separate 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for leg pain and back pain. Measures were taken at baseline and 5, 10, 26 and 52-week.

Results

Between-group differences for back pain favoured individualised manual therapy over advice for back pain at 5 (1.0; 95% CI 0.6 to 2.0), 10 (1.5; 95% CI 0.5 to 2.4) and 26-weeks (1.4; 95% CI 0.4 to 2.3) as well as for activity limitation at 26 (8.3; 95% CI 2.6 to 14.2) and 52-weeks (8.2; 95% CI 2.3 to 14.2). There were no significant between-group differences for leg pain. Secondary outcomes and responder analyses also favoured individualised manual therapy at almost all time-points.

Conclusions

In participants with clinical features potentially indicative of lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain, individualised manual therapy led to greater reduction in back pain at 5, 10 and 26-week follow-up as well as activity limitation at 26 and 52-weeks. Between-group differences were likely to be clinically important.

Trial registration

ACTRN12609000334202.

Introduction

Low-back-disorders (LBD) are a major cause of disability adjusted life years [1] as well as being prevalent and costly [2]. Recent onset LBD improve rapidly but symptoms commonly persist and/or recur [3] and the identification of effective treatment is a high research priority [4].

Advice for LBD has demonstrated positive effects on clinical outcomes [5], is cost-effective [6], requires no additional training [7] and is commonly used in clinical practice. Advice is also recommended in clinical guidelines for LBD [4]. However, LBD can be complex and advice may not lead to positive outcomes for all patients [8], [9].

Manual therapy is a common physiotherapy treatment for LBD [10], [11] but evidence of effectiveness remains limited [12]. However, clinical trials often use a generic approach to manual therapy rather than individualising treatment based on pathoanatomical (e.g. nociceptive source of symptoms), psychosocial (e.g. fear avoidance), and neurophysiological (e.g. central sensitisation) barriers to recovery [13], [14], [15], [16]. An individualised approach to manual therapy is more reflective of clinical practice and has been described as being more likely to demonstrate effectiveness in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) [13], [14], [15], [16].

Preliminary evidence has been published in a systematic review supporting the effectiveness of individualised manual therapy for LBD [17]. However none of the RCTs identified evaluated a manual therapy program based on the commonly used [10] Maitland approach [18] in combination with addressing individual barriers to recovery such as altered motor control [19]. In addition no clinical trial has investigated the effectiveness of manual therapy on patients with a “regular compression” pattern of localised unilateral pain reproduced on lumbar extension and ipsilateral lateral flexion [20]. This commonly observed [21] presentation has been reported as responding in a consistent and predictable manner to manual therapy techniques [18], [22], [23] and may comprise features indicative of lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain [24].

The aim of this trial was therefore to report the findings of a preplanned subgroup analysis to determine the effectiveness of individualised manual therapy (IMT) plus guideline-based advice compared to advice alone in people with LBD and clinical features potentially indicative of lumbar zygapophyseal joint (LZJ) origin.

Section snippets

Methods

A multi centre parallel group randomised controlled trial was conducted at 16 private physiotherapy clinics across metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Ethical approval was provided by the La Trobe University Human Ethics Committee and informed consent received from all participants prior to enrolment.

The trial was prospectively registered (ACTRN12609000334202). Recruitment and treatment occurred concurrently with four other trials, each targeting a different LBD subgroup. After registration, a

Results

Recruitment took place between 28th April 2009 and 30th March 2012. When the STOPS trial reached its target enrolment, 64 participants with LZJ pain had been enrolled from a total 2038 screened volunteers. Fig. 1 presents the flow of participants through the trial. The most common reason for exclusion was duration of symptoms >6 months (n = 857), duration of symptoms <6 weeks (n = 94), meeting the eligibility criteria of one of the other four STOPS subgroups (n = 236), or not meeting eligibility

Discussion

This trial shows that people with LBD and clinical features indicative of LZJ experience greater and more rapid improvements in back pain (at 5, 10 and 26-weeks) and activity limitation (at 26 and 52-weeks) with IMT and guideline-based advice compared to advice alone. The size of between-group differences was close to the commonly accepted MCID [48]. To further explore clinical importance and in accordance with our a-priori statistical plan [27], a primary outcome responder analysis was

Conclusion

In patients with clinical features potentially indicative of LZJ pain, IMT with guideline-based advice is more effective than advice alone for achieving faster improvements in back pain as well as faster and sustained improvement in activity limitation, but not for improvement in leg pain. The outcomes appear clinically important. Physiotherapists should consider providing IMT to patients with features potentially indicative of LZJ pain.

Key messages

  • IMT is more effective than advice in patients

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the trial-physiotherapists who volunteered to treat participants in this trial free of charge. We also acknowledge LifeCare Health for providing facilities, personnel and resources to allow treatment of trial participants free of charge. We thank Dr. Siew-Pang Chan (Biostatistician) for his advice regarding statistical analysis and Dr Rana Hinman for guidance re trial design. We acknowledge La Trobe University for internal research funding awarded to JF, AH, SS, LS, AC,

References (76)

  • R.H. Dworkin et al.

    Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations

    Pain

    (2009)
  • J.C. Hill et al.

    Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2011)
  • J.J. Ford et al.

    Pathoanatomy and classification of low back disorders

    Man Ther

    (2013)
  • K. van den Berge et al.

    Cognitive diagnostic error in internal medicine

    Eur J Intern Med

    (2013)
  • K.M. Smart et al.

    Mechanisms-based classifications of musculoskeletal pain: part 3 of 3: symptoms and signs of nociceptive pain in patients with low back (+/− leg) pain

    Man Ther

    (2012)
  • R.A. Deyo et al.

    Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain

    J Pain

    (2014)
  • G. Jull et al.

    Hands on, hands off? The swings in musculoskeletal physiotherapy practice

    Man Ther

    (2012)
  • M.O. Shacklock

    The clinical application of central pain mechanisms in manual therapy

    Aust J Physiother

    (1999)
  • S.K. Bhogal et al.

    The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jada Scale in stroke rehabilitation literature

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (2005)
  • Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

    Lancet

    (2017)
  • C.J. Itz et al.

    Clinical course of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies set in primary care

    Eur J Pain

    (2013)
  • I.A. Bernstein et al.

    Low back pain and sciatica: summary of NICE guidance

    BMJ

    (2017)
  • A. Indahl et al.

    Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered

    Spine

    (1995)
  • O. Rivero-Arias et al.

    Cost-utility analysis of physiotherapy treatment compared with physiotherapy advice in low back pain

    Spine

    (2006)
  • D. Liddle et al.

    Physiotherapists’ use of advice and exercise for the management of chronic low back pain: a national survey

    Man Ther

    (2009)
  • N. Foster et al.

    Management of nonspecific low back pain by physiotherapists in Britain and Ireland. A descriptive questionnaire of current clinical practice

    Spine

    (1999)
  • L. Li et al.

    Physical therapy management of low back pain: an expolratory survey of therapist approaches

    Phys Ther

    (2001)
  • S.M. Rubinstein et al.

    Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low back pain: an update of the cochrane review

    Spine

    (2013)
  • A. Delitto

    Research in low back pain: time to stop seeking the elusive “Magic Bullet”

    Phys Ther

    (2005)
  • M.J. Hancock et al.

    Discussion paper: what happened to the ‘bio’ in the bio-psychosocial model of low back pain?

    Eur Spine J

    (2011)
  • J. Ford et al.

    Classification systems for low back pain: a review of the methodology for development and validation

    Phys Ther Rev

    (2007)
  • G.D. Maitland

    Vertebral manipulation

    (1986)
  • C. Richardson et al.

    Therapeutic exercise for lumbopelvic stabilisation: a motor control approach for the treatment and prevention of low back pain

    (2004)
  • B. Edwards

    Manual of combined movements

    (1999)
  • P. Kent et al.

    Classification in non-specific low back pain: what methods do primary care clinicians currently use?

    Spine

    (2005)
  • B. Edwards

    Manual of combined movements

    (1992)
  • J.J. Ford et al.

    A classification and treatment protocol for low back disorders. Part 1: specific manual therapy

    Phys Ther Rev

    (2011)
  • A.J. Hahne et al.

    Specific treatment of problems of the spine (STOPS): design of a randomised controlled trial comparing specific physiotherapy versus advice for people with subacute low back disorders

    BMC Musculoskelet Disord

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text