Treatment of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2014.09.006Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most common cancer diagnosed in children.

  • Risk stratification allows treatment intensity to vary based on risk of treatment failure, and is based on age, initial leukocyte count, involvement of sanctuary sites, immunophenotype, cytogenetics, and response to treatment.

  • The 4 main components of therapy are remission induction, consolidation, maintenance, and central nervous system–directed therapy, with an overall duration of therapy of 2 to 3 years.

Risk stratification of newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia

One of the hallmarks of the treatment of childhood ALL is the reliance on risk-based stratification. By identifying the features that have been shown to affect prognosis, patients can be classified into groups based on risk of treatment failure. Those with favorable features can be treated with less toxic regimens, whereas more aggressive regimens are reserved for those with more high-risk disease.

It is therefore paramount to identify those features shown to consistently affect prognosis and,

Treatment of newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia

There are 4 major components of treatment of newly diagnosed ALL, reflecting a reliance on multidrug regimens to avoid development of resistance. Different blocks of chemotherapy have varying intensity depending on the group of patients at risk, with increasingly intensive regimens corresponding to more aggressive disease categories.

Remission induction is the first block of chemotherapy, lasting 4 to 6 weeks. Patients are usually admitted to the hospital for their initial treatment and workup,

Considerations for particular subgroups of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Infants with ALL represent a particularly high-risk subclass, with higher risks of both treatment failure and treatment complications. The highest rates of treatment failure are seen in infants diagnosed before 6 months of age, those with high initial WBC count, or those with MLL gene rearrangements (which occur in 70%–80% of infants diagnosed with ALL). Infant regimens often contain intensive chemotherapy not typically administered on other ALL protocols. In cases with MLL rearrangement, the

Treatment of relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Despite significant advances in treatment, approximately 15% to 20% of patients with ALL will suffer relapsed disease, the most common cause of treatment failure. With intensive therapy that may include HSCT, overall survival from relapsed ALL is approximately 40%.37 Similar to those patients with newly diagnosed ALL, those with relapsed disease can be risk stratified. Length of first complete remission (CR1) and site of relapse have consistently been demonstrated to be the 2 most important

Novel agents in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Current efforts in advancing the treatment of ALL focus on unique mechanisms that contrast with the nonspecific targeting of conventional chemotherapy. Immunotherapy is a broad and promising field that seeks to harness the power of the immune system to allow for a more targeted approach. Chimeric antigen receptors are one example of modified adoptive cell transfer whereby the patient’s own cytotoxic T cells are genetically engineered to express an antibody to target leukemic antigens (often

Toxicities in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Almost all chemotherapy agents cause myelosuppression, mucositis, and nausea/vomiting. Unique effects of common chemotherapeutic agents used in the treatment of ALL are listed in Box 2.

Summary

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is treated with a combination of chemotherapy drugs over the course of several years, with an overall survival of approximately 80% for all newly diagnosed patients. Those patients with higher risk of relapse receive more aggressive treatment, whereas those with more favorable features can be spared the more toxic effects. Treatment is progressively less intensive as the duration of therapy progresses, and must include central nervous system (CNS) directed therapy

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (52)

  • S.H. O'Brien et al.

    Venous thromboembolism and adolescent and young adult oncology inpatients in US children's hospitals, 2001 to 2008

    J Pediatr

    (2011)
  • J.E. Rubnitz et al.

    Acute mixed lineage leukemia in children: the experience of St Jude Children's Research Hospital

    Blood

    (2009)
  • F. Locatelli et al.

    How I treat relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Blood

    (2012)
  • C. Eckert et al.

    Minimal residual disease after induction is the strongest predictor of prognosis in intermediate risk relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia - long-term results of trial ALL-REZ BFM P95/96

    Eur J Cancer

    (2013)
  • C. Parker et al.

    Effect of mitoxantrone on outcome of children with first relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL R3): an open-label randomised trial

    Lancet

    (2010)
  • G.K. Rivera et al.

    Effectiveness of intensified rotational combination chemotherapy for late hematologic relapse of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Blood

    (1996)
  • P.S. Gaynon et al.

    Long-term results of the children's cancer group studies for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia 1983-2002: a Children's Oncology Group Report

    Leukemia

    (2010)
  • A. Möricke et al.

    Prognostic impact of age in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: data from the trials ALL-BFM 86, 90, and 95

    Klin Padiatr

    (2005)
  • J.E. Haydu et al.

    Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

    Curr Opin Hematol

    (2013)
  • H. Gerr et al.

    Acute leukaemias of ambiguous lineage in children: characterization, prognosis and therapy recommendations

    Br J Haematol

    (2010)
  • K. Seeger et al.

    Relapse of TEL-AML1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood: a matched-pair analysis

    J Clin Oncol

    (2001)
  • B.H. Pollock et al.

    Racial differences in the survival of childhood B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study

    J Clin Oncol

    (2000)
  • J.E. Rubnitz et al.

    Prospective analysis of TEL gene rearrangements in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • N.A. Heerema et al.

    Intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 is associated with inferior outcomes in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated in contemporary standard-risk children's oncology group studies: a report from the children's oncology group

    J Clin Oncol

    (2013)
  • M. Schrappe et al.

    Outcomes after induction failure in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • G. Escherich et al.

    Doxorubicin or daunorubicin given upfront in a therapeutic window are equally effective in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A randomized comparison in trial CoALL 07-03

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2013)
  • Cited by (241)

    • Cytogenetics and genomics in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

      2023, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Haematology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text