Gender and age differences in emotion regulation strategies and their relationship to depressive symptoms
Highlights
► Women were more likely than men to report using most emotion regulation strategies. ► Use of most strategies except suppression and acceptance decreased with age. ► Maladaptive but not adaptive strategies were associated with depressive symptoms.
Introduction
The strategies people use to regulate their emotions are the focus of a great deal of recent theoretical and empirical work, and a number of specific strategies have been argued to be generally adaptive or maladaptive (see reviews in Gross and Thompson, 2007, Kring and Sloan, 2010). A recent meta-analysis showed that rumination and suppression were correlated with greater symptoms of depression, anxiety, substance use, eating disorders with moderate to strong effect sizes across dozens of studies (Aldao, Nolen-Hoeksema, & Schweizer, 2010). In contrast, positive reappraisal, problem-solving and acceptance were negatively related to psychopathology, albeit weakly and somewhat inconsistently.
One question not addressed by the Aldao et al. (2010) meta-analysis is whether there are gender differences in adaptive or maladaptive strategies and their relationships to depressive symptoms. Thoits, 1991, Thoits, 1994 found that women use a wider variety of both adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies than men do. Similarly, a meta-analysis found significant gender differences in 11 of 17 coping strategies, with women reporting more use of all strategies than men (Tamres, Janicki, & Helgeson, 2002), including rumination, seeking social support, positive self-talk (or reappraisal), active coping and suppression.
Tamres et al. (2002) noted, however, that women may have reported more use of coping strategies because they were experiencing more stress than men. They addressed this issue by testing whether gender differences in stressor appraisal moderated the gender difference in strategies. They found that for active coping, avoidance, positive reappraisal, and self-blame, women reported using the strategy more than men only in studies in which women appraised the stressor as more severe than men did, suggesting that gender differences in these strategies could be the result of gender differences in stressor appraisal. In contrast, the gender differences in rumination and social support seeking were not moderated by stressor appraisal. Although this analysis is informative, Tamres et al. (2002) were not able to directly control for gender differences in stressor appraisal when examining gender differences in strategy use. A goal of the current study is to examine whether gender differences in an array of emotion regulation strategies can be accounted for by gender differences in distress, specifically in depressive symptoms.
If women do use both more adaptive and maladaptive strategies than men, might their use of adaptive strategies mitigate the negative effects of their use of maladaptive strategies? Aldao et al. (2010) found that adaptive strategies were only weakly related to depressive symptoms, while maladaptive strategies were robustly related to depressive symptoms. This suggests that, although women may use adaptive strategies more than men, this does not help prevent distress; in contrast, women’s use of maladaptive strategies more than men puts them at increased risk for distress. The present study examined whether the pattern of maladaptive strategies being more strongly related to depressive symptoms than adaptive strategies was consistent across gender.
The vast majority of the adult studies in the meta-analysis by Aldao et al. (2010) were conducted with college students, also raising the question of whether the trends found are consistent across adult age groups. Carstensen (1993) and Carstensen, Fung, and Charles (2003) argued that, as we age, we put more emphasis on emotion regulation and get better at it (see also Blanchard-Fields, 2007). Older adults believe they are better at regulating their emotions than younger adults (Lawton, 2001). Some studies have found that older adults endorse using positive reappraisal (e.g., “I try to look at the situation in a different light”) more than younger adults (Blanchard-Fields et al., 2007, John and Gross, 2004), and at least one study found that positive reappraisal reduced subjective distress and physiological arousal in a laboratory paradigm more in older adults (60s) than in middle (40s) or younger (20s) adults (Shiota & Levenson, 2009). Other studies have found that, while younger adults endorse primarily active problem-solving approaches to salient problems, older adults tend to endorse both problem-solving and emotion regulation responses, suggesting they have a wider repertoire of regulation strategies (Blanchard-Fields et al., 1997, Blanchard-Fields et al., 2007).
The emotion regulation processes endorsed by older adults, however, tend to be more “passive” than those endorsed by younger adults, and include avoidance, suppression, or withdrawal (Blanchard-Fields et al., 2004, Blanchard-Fields et al., 1997). Such strategies may protect older adults from aversive emotional arousal and help them maintain energy and concentration (Consedine, Magai, & Bonanno, 2002). The Aldao et al. (2010) meta-analysis, however, found that these strategies are consistently related to psychopathology (Aldao et al., 2010). Again, the studies in that meta-analysis were done primarily in younger adults, raising the question of whether such relationships would be found in older adults.
If older adults are more effective at emotion regulation than younger adults, this would help explain why rates of emotional problems such as depressive symptoms decline with age (Charles et al., 2001, Fiske et al., 2009). On the other hand, declines in depressive symptoms with age could cause older adults to report fewer maladaptive and more adaptive emotion regulation strategies than younger adults. In other words, age differences in emotion regulation strategies could be attributable to age differences in depressive symptoms. This possibility was examined in this study.
In summary, the goals of the present study were to examine gender and age differences in (a) the self-reported use of adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, controlling for levels of depressive symptoms, and (b) the relationships of adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies to depressive symptoms. We examined the two maladaptive strategies that Aldao et al. (2010) found to be strongly related to depressive symptoms: rumination and suppression. We also examined the adaptive strategies included in the Aldao et al. (2010) meta-analysis: problem-solving, positive reappraisal, and acceptance. We additionally examined the use of social support as a strategy, because it is relevant across the life span (Carstensen, 1993) and Tamres et al. (2002) showed a strong gender difference in this strategy in their meta-analysis.
Section snippets
Participants
Participants were recruited through random-digit dialing of residential telephone numbers in the San Francisco Bay area of California. Individuals between the ages of 25 and 35 years, 45 and 55 years, or 65 and 75 years were recruited to represent samples of young, middle-aged, and older adults. Only one adult per household was recruited. Of the 1789 individuals initially contacted, 1312 agreed to participate; among the 25–35 year-olds, there were 254 women and 237 men; among the 45–55 year olds,
Results
A univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) with BDI symptoms as the dependent variable and gender and age group as the independent variables yielded a significant effect of gender (F[1, 1306] = 10.86, p = 0.001, ) and age group (F[2, 1306] = 5.60, p = 0.004, ), but no significant gender by age interaction (F[2, 1306] = 0.79, ns, ). Women had higher depressive symptoms than men, and depressive symptoms decreased with age, with significant differences between the older age group and
Discussion
Gender and age differences in putatively adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies emerged. Replicating previous studies (Tamres et al., 2002), women reported using a wide range of strategies more than men, including rumination, reappraisal, active coping (or problem-solving), acceptance, and social support. Importantly, these gender differences were significant even when controlling for self-reported depressive symptoms, suggesting they are not simply a reflection of women’s
Conclusions
Three general trends were observed in this study. First, across both men and women and all age groups, maladaptive emotion regulation strategies were consistently related to higher levels of depressive symptoms, but adaptive strategies were unrelated to depressive symptoms. This suggests that the findings of the meta-analysis of Aldao et al. (2010) that maladaptive strategies are more robustly related to psychopathology than adaptive strategies hold across genders and the life span. It further
References (35)
- et al.
Emotion regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analysis
Clinical Psychology Review
(2010) - Beck, A. T., & Beck, R. W. (1972). Screening depressed patients in a family practice: A rapid technique. Postgraduate...
Everyday problem solving and emotion: An adult developmental perspective
Current Directions in Psychological Science
(2007)- et al.
Everyday problem solving across the adult life span: Influence of domain specificity and cognitive appraisal
Psychology and Aging
(1997) - et al.
Age differences in everyday problem-solving effectiveness: Older adults select more effective strategies for interpersonal problems
Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
(2007) - et al.
Age differences in emotion-regulation strategies in handling everyday problems
Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
(2004) - et al.
Gender differences in responses to depressed mood in a college sample
Sex Roles
(1994) Motivation for social contact across the life span: A theory of socioemotional selectivity
- et al.
Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life
Motivation and Emotion
(2003) - Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. International...
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Moderators of the emotion inhibition-health relationship: A review and research agenda
Review of General Psychology
Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis 1 disorders–non-patient edition (version 2.0)
Depression in older adults
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations
Cited by (487)
Learning to be inventive in the face of statistics: A positive reappraisal intervention for statistics anxiety
2024, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental PsychiatryEmotion regulation tendencies and cardiovascular responses to repeated acute psychological stress
2023, International Journal of PsychophysiologyA Transdiagnostic Model for Depression, Anxiety, and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
2024, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease