Elsevier

Organic Electronics

Volume 38, November 2016, Pages 48-54
Organic Electronics

Optimization of electrohydrodynamic-printed organic electrodes for bottom-contact organic thin film transistors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2016.07.040Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Optimization of electrohydrodynamic printing of PEDOT:PSS

  • Printed PEDOT:PSS acts as source-drain electrode of the organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs)

  • Conductivity of the printed PEDOT:PSS is improved by adding a surfactant and a polar solvent.

  • Pentacene OTFTs using printed PEDOT:PSS electrodes show field-effect mobility up to 0.157 cm2/V·s.

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the optimization of printed (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) as source/drain electrodes for organic thin film transistors (OTFTs) through electrohydrodynamic (EHD) printing process. The EHD-printed PEDOT:PSS electrodes should fulfill the prerequisites of not only high conductivity but also optimum surface tension for successful jetting. The conductivity of PEDOT:PSS was dramatically enhanced from 0.07 to 352 S/cm by the addition of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). To use the DMSO-treated PEDOT:PSS solution in the EHD printing process, its surface tension was optimized by the addition of surfactant (Triton X-100), which was found to enable various jetting modes. In the stable cone-jet mode, the patterning of the modified PEDOT:PSS solution was realized on the surface-functionalized SiO2 substrates; the printed line widths were in the range 384 to 81 μm with a line resistance of 8.3 × 103 Ω/mm. In addition, pentacene-based OTFTs employing the EHD-printed PEDOT:PSS as source and drain electrodes were found to exhibit electrical performances superior to an equivalent vacuum-deposited Au-based device.

Introduction

Over the last decade, there has been significant progress in the development of organic thin film transistors (OTFTs) for use in organic and flexible electronics [1]. For example, new organic semiconductor materials such as diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) have been prepared with high field-effect mobility values (up to 11 cm2/V·s) that surpass that of amorphous silicon which is currently used as a semiconductor material in displays [2]. In particular, the fabrication of OTFTs with solution processing techniques is advantageous because of their low cost, flexibility, and the possibility of large area deposition under ambient conditions [3]. The solution processing of organic electrodes has been performed in various applications such as flexible displays, radio frequency identification tags, solar cells, and sensor applications [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Although metal- or oxide-based electrode materials (e.g., gold, aluminum, and indium tin oxide) exhibit good conductivity and alternation of work function for the injection of free carriers from the electrode to the channel, their poor mechanical stability and the inhomogeneity of the organic semiconductor film between the electrode and the channel, especially in bottom-contact OTFT architectures, are critical bottlenecks to the commercialization of OTFTs [9]. Therefore, organic electrode materials providing efficient carrier injection and good conductivity are required. Among the available organic electrode materials, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) exhibits great potential for the various electronic applications because of solution processability, thermal stability and high transparency. However, the conductivity of pristine PEDOT:PSS electrode (<1 S/cm) is typically inferior to those of vacuum-deposited metal electrodes, which has prompted diverse attempts to modify PEDOT:PSS so as to enhance its conductivity [10]. Various co-solvents such as dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP), and ethylene glycol (EG) have been used in such attempts [11], [12], [13]. DMSO is an excellent co-solvent to use in electrode fabrication with a view to improving conductivity, and it also promotes smooth surface morphologies which are important in multilayered organic devices [14].

Inkjet printing is considered a low cost and simple fabrication technique for patterning electrodes [15]. However, the unpredictable positions of droplets and drop spreading during the printing process result in poor resolution and low OTFT performance [16]. Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) printing can be used as an alternative because the electric field enables uniform jetting without disruption. In particular, the EHD printing process for fabricating electronics has the important advantages of easy solution processability, high accuracy, non-vacuum system with low cost, and the possibility of large area deposition [17]. However, water-based inks such as PEDOT:PSS are not generally suitable for EHD printing processes because the surface tension of H2O is too high, which prevents stable jetting formation and thus causes printing problems [18], [19]. Hence, further systematic investigation is required for the micro-patterning of PEDOT:PSS as a electrode of organic devices, and its conductivity must be improved.

In the present study, we successfully demonstrated the preparation of PEDOT:PSS electrodes for OTFTs by using the EHD printing process. The addition of DMSO and surfactant (Triton X-100) to the PEDOT:PSS plays a significant role in enhancing its conductivity and adjusting its surface tension as well. The dramatic increase in conductivity of PEDOT:PSS (352 S/cm) was achieved by varying the DMSO ratio. Moreover, the parameters of the EHD printing process including the flow rate, voltage, and printing speed were precisely controlled for various surface tension values of PEDOT:PSS solution to produce the optimum patterning of the PEDOT:PSS electrodes. As a result, bottom-contact OTFTs with EHD-printed PEDOT:PSS electrodes and a device architecture with pentacene and HMDS-treated SiO2 as the semiconductor and dielectric layers, respectively, were fabricated with a field-effect mobility of 0.157 cm2/V·s. This value is approximately 100-fold higher than that of the equivalent bottom-contact pentacene OTFT with Au electrodes. In addition, we examined the work function of PEDOT:PSS and Au electrodes and crystalline morphologies of pentacene films on those electrodes to investigate the charge carrier injection behaviors of the two OTFTs.

Section snippets

Materials

PEDOT:PSS (CLEVIOS™ PH 1000) and DMSO were purchased from Heraeus and Aldrich, respectively. These materials were used without any purification. Four different solutions of PEDOT:PSS were prepared with DMSO in the volume ratios 1:0.04, 1:0.08, 1:0.16, and 1:0.2. Thin films were spin-coated with the solutions on cleaned glass at 2000 rpm for 20 s. Triton X-100 as a surfactant was added to each sample at 0.1 wt% to optimize the surface tension of the PEDOT:PSS ink for the EHD printing [20].

The

Results and discussion

Fig. 2a shows the variation in the conductivity with the DMSO to PEDOT:PSS volume ratio. The conductivity increased with increasing the volume ratio; the maximum conductivity was obtained at the ratio 1:0.2. In general, DMSO, a polar solvent with a high dielectric constant, reduces the electrostatic interaction between PEDOT (positively charged) and PSS (negatively charged) because of the screen effect, which results in an increased hopping rate [21]. Moreover, the change in the conformation of

Conclusion

In summary, we have systematically investigated the optimization of the PEDOT:PSS electrodes for use in OTFT applications via the EHD printing process. By modulating the conductivity and surface tension of PEDOT:PSS with the addition of DMSO and Triton X-100, we demonstrated that the EHD jet printing method could be tuned to a specific jetting mode, such as the micro-dripping or cone-jet modes. We found that the printed line resolution could be controlled by manipulating the flow rate, and as a

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (NRF-2014R1A1A1005896).

References (41)

  • M.W. Lee et al.

    Org. Electron.

    (2010)
  • J.S. Yeo et al.

    Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells

    (2013)
  • N. Duraisamy et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2013)
  • N. Duraisamy et al.

    Mater. Lett.

    (2012)
  • O. Lastow et al.

    J. Electrost.

    (2007)
  • J.Y. Kim et al.

    Synth. Met.

    (2002)
  • J. Ouyang et al.

    Polymer

    (2004)
  • O.P. Dimitriev et al.

    Synth. Met.

    (2009)
  • H. Do et al.

    Thin Solid Films.

    (2009)
  • Y. Kim et al.

    Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells

    (2012)
  • K. Fic et al.

    Electrochim. Acta.

    (2010)
  • S. Khan et al.

    Curr. Appl. Phys.

    (2011)
  • K. Hong et al.

    Org. Electron.

    (2008)
  • M. Zirkl et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2007)
  • Y. Diao et al.

    Nat. Mater.

    (2013)
  • M.H. Yoon et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2005)
  • B. Yoo et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2006)
  • C. Kim et al.

    Science

    (2007)
  • D.J. Gundlach et al.

    Nat. Mater.

    (2008)
  • D. Braga et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Non-lithographic direct patterning of carbon nanomaterial electrodes via electrohydrodynamic-printed wettability patterns by polymer brush for fabrication of organic field-effect transistor

      2020, Applied Surface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fig. 1c reveals that the width of the pattern decreased as the printing speed increased: the line widths were 228, 163, 130, 112, 57, 19, and 6 μm for printing speeds of 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 15 mm/s respectively. This decreasing trend of pattern width may be caused by the decrease in the volume of solution deposited per unit time as the printing speed increased, thus obstructing line spreading [44]. The micro-dripping mode of the PS-brush solution allowed production of sub-10 µm scaled fine patterns with various shapes at the 6-μm printing condition (Fig. 1d), and such results are expected to expand the fabrication of wettability patterns with EHD printing in various applications.

    • Electrical evaluations of anisotropic conductive film manufactured by electrohydrodynamic ink jet printing technology

      2020, Organic Electronics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the field of sensors, studies on sensors, such as biosensors, have been actively conducted [25]. The development of transistors in the electric field is also being studied [26–28]. Finally, in the field of electronics, research is being actively carried out to realize micro-circuits for use in semiconductors [29,30].

    • Metal-electrode-free inverted organic photovoltaics using electrospray-deposited PEDOT:PSS and spin-coated HAT-CN exciton blocking layer

      2020, Current Applied Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      To improve the electrospray, the PEDOT:PSS solution was diluted with deionized (DI) water and 2-propanol with a weight ratio of 1:5:5. To increase the conductivity of PEDOT:PSS, dimethyl sulfoxide (7.5 vol%) was added [17,18]. P3HT (Mw > 45,000, regioregularity > 93%) and PCBM (purity > 99.5%) were purchased from Luminescence Technology.

    • Electrospray application to powder production and surface coating

      2018, Journal of Aerosol Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      The OFETs had typical accumulation mode p-channel transistor characteristics, with charge-carriers mobility of 0.002 cm2 V−1 s-1, and the Ion/Ioff current ratio ranging from 103 to 104. Park et al. (2016) demonstrated the printed tracks of (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT: PSS) as the source/drain electrodes for an organic thin film transistor. To obtain the stable cone-jet mode, the DMSO and surfactant (Triton X-100) was added to this PEDOT: PSS polymer.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Equally contributed as first authors.

    View full text