Applied nutritional investigationNutritional self-screening in <1 min: Evaluation of a measuring station using sonic measurement of height
Introduction
Although nutritional screening is recommended in various care settings, malnutrition remains underrecognized and undertreated. This is problematic because malnutrition adversely affects well-being, predisposes to disease, delays recovery from illness, and increases disease complications, at immense cost to social and health care services [1]. A reason why recommended nutritional screening is not performed routinely is that it is not a high enough priority among busy care workers (professionals such as doctors and nurses and/or assistants such as nurse assistant), which means that they may miss malnutrition [2], [3]. Another reason [4] is that certain screening tools are time-consuming, not linked to care plans, and subject to calculation or categorization errors. Self-administered questionnaires can be valuable, but they typically lack objective measurements of weight, height, and body mass index (BMI), which are cornerstones of many nutrition screening tools. Self-screening using automated processes and a valid, reliable tool linked to care may overcome such difficulties [3]. Self-screening studies of hospital outpatients [5], [6], [7] showed that reproducible and accurate results could be obtained quickly using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) [3]. One such study [7], using a modified digital weight and height machine with electronic transmission of results to a computer, reported self-screening in 1.29 min. It suggested considerably faster screening could occur if height was measured sonically, obviating the need to lower a horizontal plate over the head. However, sonic measurements can be confounded by ambient temperature and head position relative to the sonic emitter(s) and sensor(s). The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate a device with sonic technology, with respect to accuracy, reproducibility, user friendliness, and suitability for routine nutritional self-screening. In addressing this issue, the accuracy of height and BMI measurements were assessed, and results of MUST categorization obtained on the sonic machine were compared with those on a mechanical machine.
Section snippets
General
Unless otherwise stated, all sonic (40 kHz) height measurements of plates/skull and calibration bar (see later) were made at 19°C to 22°C, barometric pressure 101 to 104 kPA and humidity 40% to 60%, vertically above the central point of the horizontal standing platform. This point was defined as the midpoint of the rectangular area [16.5 cm (width) × 15 cm (depth)] enclosing two small footmarks. To ensure stable positions during measurements, the plates/skull were supported by wide vertical
Instrument tilt
The column of the sonic machine (∼213 cm) was tilted 0.6 cm to the left and 0.7 cm to the back (left and back referring to participant position during routine measurement). The midpoint of the middle two sensors/emitters was vertically above a point 0.6 cm to the left and 1.75 cm behind the central point of the standing platform.
Precision (reproducibility) and accuracy
On the sonic device, reference weights (0–160 kg) weighed only 0.003 ± 0.022 (SD) kg (0.003% ± 0.021%) more than the values attributed to them. The height of the 81.5
Discussion
This study found that patients can reliably and accurately self-screen for malnutrition using a device that simultaneously measures height sonically and weight, with automated calculation of BMI, weight loss, and malnutrition categories. A series of studies also identified the strengths and limitation of the device.
Conclusion
This study of ambulatory patients, involving self-screening using sonic height measurements, paves the way toward electronically assisted screening of malnutrition risk in routine practice. The procedure avoids calculation and categorization errors and produces results for almost immediate printing or electronically transmission into patient notes. Self-screening in the community (e.g., general practices and pharmacies) could help prevent malnutrition or facilitate early treatment.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the clinic staff for their support, Seca for information about its devices, and D Turville for programming for automation.
References (7)
- et al.
Malnutrition self-screening by using MUST in hospital outpatients: validity, reliability, and ease of use
Am J Clin Nutr
(2012) - et al.
Rapid and reliable self-screening for nutritional risk in hospital outpatients using an electronic system
Nutrition
(2013) The cost of malnutrition in England and the potential cost savings from nutritional interventions (full report)
(2015)
Cited by (4)
General practitioners’ views on malnutrition management and oral nutritional supplementation prescription in the community: A qualitative study
2020, Clinical Nutrition ESPENCitation Excerpt :A recent study in The Netherlands using two online screening tools found that approximately 57% of community-living older adults were at risk of malnutrition, thus, concluding that this easy access online screening could be useful to reach older adults at nutritional risk and could therefore, contribute to early identification and prevention [41]. Another recently published study by Elia et al. used a device with sonic height measurement for nutritional self-screening of gastrointestinal outpatients, finding excellent agreement between HCPs screening and self-screening [42]. NICE guidelines recommend the use of ONS in the case of patients at risk of malnutrition or who are already malnourished [35].
Reflections on a seminal article on malnutrition published in the British Journal of Nutrition, 2004
2022, British Journal of NutritionMelatonin Supplementation and Anthropometric Indices: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Clinical Trial
2021, BioMed Research International
This study was made possible by the University of Southampton and the National Health Service (NHS), which allowed the study to be undertaken as a service delvelopment by staff already employed by these organisations, without financial support from external funding agencies.Conception and design of the study: ME conceived of and designed the study and was responsible for generation and assembly of the study results, as well as analysis and interpretation of the data. ME, AC, TS, and TA collected the data. ME, AC, TS drafting and revised the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.