Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 30, Issue 3, 15 April 2006, Pages 787-793
NeuroImage

Spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, and smoothing in multi-subject functional MRI studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Functional MRI is aimed at localizing cortical activity to understand the role of specific cortical regions, providing insight into the neurophysiological underpinnings of brain function. Scientists developing fMRI methodology seek to improve detection of subtle activations and to spatially localize these activations more precisely. Except for applications in the clinical environment, such as functional mapping in patients prior to neurosurgical intervention, most basic neuroscience studies involve group level random-effects analyses. Prior to grouping data, the data from each individual are typically smoothed. A wide range of motivations for smoothing have been given including to match the spatial scale of hemodynamic responses, to normalize the error distribution (by the Central Limit Theorem) to improve the validity of inferences based on parametric tests, and, in the context of inter-subject averaging smoothing has been shown necessary to project the data down to a scale where homologies in functional anatomy are expressed across subjects. This work demonstrates that, for single-subject studies, if smoothing is to be employed, the data should be acquired at lower resolutions to maximize SNR. The benefits of a low-resolution acquisition are limited by partial volume effects and by the weak impact of resolution-dependent noise on the overall group level statistics. Given that inter-subject noise dominates across a range of tasks, improvements in within-subject noise, through changes in acquisition strategy or even moving to higher field strength, may do little to improve group statistics. Such improvements however may greatly impact single-subject studies such as those used in neurosurgical planning.

Introduction

Acquisition resolutions in typical functional MR imaging experiments today are approaching 3 × 3 × 3 mm3 voxel sizes. As more centers move to higher field strength (>1.5 T), one of the goals appears to be to increase this spatial resolution further. Higher spatial resolution can provide better localization, down to the level of the cortical columns in the human visual cortex (Menon et al., 1997) and in animals (Kim and Duong, 2002), and in a layer-specific manner in other cortical regions (Silva and Koretsky, 2002). The majority of human cognitive neuroscience studies are performed on group data, and this places certain demands and constraints on the data. Group analyses, and in many cases single-subject analyses, are performed using SPM (Friston et al., 1995) or other statistical packages that smooth the functional data using a typical filter with a FWHM of 8 mm. A wide range of motivations for smoothing have been given including to match the spatial scale of hemodynamic responses, to normalize the error distribution (by the Central Limit Theorem) to improve the validity of inferences based on parametric tests, and, finally, in the context of inter-subject averaging, it has been shown that it is necessary to smooth to project the data down to a scale where homologies in functional anatomy are expressed across subjects. In particular, recent work demonstrates that, using a wide spectrum of state-of-the-art registration algorithms, the misalignment in anatomic registration alone (without considering functional organizational variability), across multiple subjects, is of the order of 9 mm due to individual anatomic variability (Hellier et al., 2001, Hellier et al., 2003). Recent developments in non-linear spatial normalization might improve image registration accuracy, but, even if perfect alignment could be achieved based on anatomy (which is often impossible due to fundamental anatomic differences), there may still be additional variance introduced by differences in functional organization present in cortical regions.

Thus, if one accepts the premise that the data must be smoothed to accommodate the anatomic and functional variations, or for the statistical reasons given above, then the physics of MR suggest that acquiring at progressively higher resolutions will result in an unnecessary and irrecoverable loss of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In this paper, we sought to demonstrate that, if smoothing is to be employed, the data should be acquired at lower resolutions in order to maximize SNR since smoothing high-resolution data to a lower resolution does not recover the SNR loss that occurs when the data are acquired in high resolution. In addition, we investigated the increased signal loss from partial volume effects associated with moving to a larger voxel size and examined the impact of single-subject SNR improvement in multi-subject studies.

Section snippets

Theory

The equation for signal to noise ratio in a conventional 2D echo planar imaging pulse sequence can be written as follows:SNRΔxΔyΔzNxNyNave/υ

where Δx, Δy, and Δz are the voxel dimensions, Nx and Ny represent the acquisition matrix size in the x and y directions respectively, Nave represents the number of averages, and υ represents the bandwidth. Assume that the last 4 terms are held constant, and define this constant as κ, such that the equation becomesSNR =ΔxΔyΔz·κ

This equation

Materials and methods

Images were acquired on a 3 T Siemens Trio whole body imaging system with a quadrature head coil. All volunteers (N = 17:10 males, 7 females) gave informed consent, and this study was approved by the Yale IRB.

Results

Data from some subjects were discarded due to incomplete motor cortex coverage and/or audio equipment malfunction, resulting in useable motor data from N = 11 subjects, auditory data from N = 10 subjects, and visual data from all N = 17 subjects. Mean t values for individual subjects and z scores of mean percent signal changes across subjects were obtained within specific volumes of interest (VOIs), namely, those comprising the motor cortex, right and left auditory cortices, and the visual

Discussion

Noise in functional MRI can be divided into at least four categories: Johnson or thermal noise, physiological noise, system noise, and inter-subject variability (Desmond and Glover, 2002). The first noise source, the thermal noise, is directly impacted by the choice of spatial resolution, flip angle, TE, TR, acquisition matrix, and bandwidth. Physiological noise arises from fluctuations in basal cerebral metabolism, pulsatile blood flow, and motion, and as such it is signal-dependent (Krueger

Conclusions

In agreement with theory, the current study revealed that, for single-subject fMRI studies, there is a clear SNR advantage in acquiring data at a lower resolution whether or not spatial smoothing is to be employed. The LR benefit is further increased when one capitalizes on the possibility of acquiring more images per slice by using the optimal TR for the lower resolution. The advantage of the LR acquisition in single subjects is hampered in part by the fact that spatial resolution only impacts

Acknowledgments

Special thanks for support from NIH NS40497, NS38467, and EB00473.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (40)

  • Accuracy and precision in super-resolution MRI: Enabling spherical tensor diffusion encoding at ultra-high b-values and high resolution

    2021, NeuroImage
    Citation Excerpt :

    Notably, both regularization and smoothing always lead to an effective resolution that is lower than the original or nominal resolution. As such, sampling directly at the effective resolution would increase both SNFR (Fig. 2) and SNR efficiency (Scouten et al., 2006) compared to sampling at the original resolution and performing post-hoc smoothing. For an evaluation of effective spatial resolution and therefore better assessment of SRR, suitable phantoms could be used in future work (Fellner et al., 2001; Price et al., 1990).

  • Reduced regional volumes associated with total psychopathy scores in an adult population with childhood lead exposure

    2018, NeuroToxicology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Normalized images were modulated by multiplying voxels by non-linear components, correcting for differences in subject brain sizes. An 8 mm full-width half-maximum (FWHM) Gaussian Kernel was used to smooth modulated gray and white matter images to improve the signal to noise ratio, help normalize the distribution of the data, and minimize the impact of registration errors (Scouten et al., 2006, Kiebel et al., 1999). Our statistical analyses were conducted in multiple steps.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text