Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 22, Issue 2, June 2004, Pages 492-502
NeuroImage

Commentary
Statistical parametric mapping for event-related potentials: I. Generic considerations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.012Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, we frame the strategy and motivations behind developments in statistical parametric mapping (SPM) for the analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data. This work deals specifically with SPM procedures for the analysis of event-related potentials (ERP). We place these developments in the larger context of integrating electrophysiological and hemodynamic measurements of evoked brain responses through the fusion of EEG and fMRI data. In this paper, we consider some fundamental issues when selecting an appropriate statistical model that enables diverse questions to be asked of the data and at the same time retains maximum sensitivity. The three key issues addressed in this paper are as follows: (i) should multivariate or mass univariate analyses be adopted, (ii) should time be treated as an experimental factor or as a dimension of the measured response variable, and (iii) how to form appropriate explanatory variables in a hierarchical observation model. We review the relative merits of the different options and explain the rationale for our choices. In brief, we motivate a mass univariate approach in terms of sensitivity to region-specific responses. This involves modeling responses at each voxel or space bin separately. In contradistinction, we treat time as an experimental factor to enable inferences about temporally distributed responses that encompass multiple time bins.

In a companion paper, we develop statistical models of ERPs in the time domain that follow from the heuristics established here and illustrate the approach using simulated and real data.

Introduction

There is a clear consensus that the most promising applications of neuroimaging rest upon the integration of different modalities. It has been shown recently that multimodal data acquisition and fusion are useful for gaining additional insight into the neuronal causes of observed hemodynamic and electrophysiological brain responses Czisch et al., 2002, Goldman et al., 2002, Lemieux et al., 2001, Salek-Haddadi et al., 2002, Salek-Haddadi et al., 2003, Trujillo-Barreto et al., 2001.

In this paper, we work towards one aspect of a particular combination of modalities, electroencephalography (EEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). An integration of these modalities is promising because of the complementary spatiotemporal resolution of fMRI and EEG. Furthermore, both techniques are the most accessible modalities in research and clinics. An integration of EEG and fMRI is not only potentially useful from a theoretical point of view, but also in practice. One important component of any integrative initiative is the ability to model both types of data in the same mathematical framework to make inferences that are mutually informed. This first component can be seen as a prelude to a full data fusion based on an integrated model for fMRI and EEG.

A candidate for a such a framework is statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (Friston, 2004), which is a mass univariate approach to modeling spatiotemporal neuroimaging data. SPM was originally developed to deal with metabolic or hemodynamic imaging time series, that is, PET, SPECT, and fMRI data. A similar spatiotemporal model can be derived for EEG data. Other groups have already illustrated the usefulness of SPM techniques through applications of SPM to EEG data. For example, Bosch-Bayard et al. (2001) have described an SPM approach to source reconstructed Fourier transformed EEG data. Park et al. (2002) have implemented a procedure that produces statistical parametric maps with source reconstructed EEG data. Barnes and Hillebrand (2003) have applied SPM to source reconstructed MEG data. These developments demonstrate the applicability of SPM to many kinds of neuroimaging data.

This paper deals specifically with the characterization of event-related potentials (ERPs) as measured with the EEG using the same SPM concepts developed for metabolic imaging Friston, 2004, Friston et al., 2002b. The extension of SPM procedures, to cover ERPs, entails a number of critical choices, which are the subject of this paper. In a companion paper, we describe a temporal model for averaged ERPs, which can be used to test hypotheses about localized effects in peristimulus time or in the peristimulus time or frequency domain. These hypotheses can be tested using the same model. Inference is made in a classical sense based on the t or F statistic. A future communication will extend the model to deal with spatiotemporal data based on the principles described below.

This paper is structured as follows. We will first review, briefly, multimodality integration and outline the overall strategy that we are pursuing. The second section focuses on the different observation and statistical models that could be used for the analysis of ERP data in the light of two key distinctions. These distinctions are between multivariate and mass univariate analyses over space and between treating time as a continuous dimension of the response variable versus a discrete replication factor. The implications of these different approaches for estimation and inference will be described and the motivation for the choices we have made is presented. In the third and final section, we describe the general analysis procedures that ensue. These procedures are based on a hierarchical linear observation model. In a companion paper, the specific operational details and model assumptions for ERP data are presented. These are then applied to synthetic and real data to establish their construct validity in relation to established approaches.

Section snippets

Integration of fMRI and EEG data

Over the past years, there has been an enormous interest in the fusion or integration of electrophysiological and hemodynamical measurements of evoked neuronal responses. The integration of these data (usually fMRI and EEG or MEG) can be classified into three sorts:

  • integration through temporal prediction;

  • integration through spatial constraints; and

  • integration through fusion.

The simplest approach, integration through temporal prediction, is to use one modality to predict the other. A significant

Statistical models for source reconstructed EEG time series

There are some fundamentally different alternatives that present themselves when choosing an appropriate statistical model for the analysis of EEG time series. We restrict ourselves to the analysis of (averaged) ERP data (Fig. 1). By ERP data, we mean averaged event-related time courses (Rugg and Coles, 1995), where each of these time courses has been averaged within subject and trial type (condition) to provide one peristimulus time series for each trial type and each subject.

Reconstruction

The temporal dimension

Having established the utility of an SPM-like approach to the analysis of each voxel time series, we now have to consider whether time is a fourth dimension of the response variable or a discrete series of observations over time bins. The RFT correction has been generalized to any arbitrary number of dimensions by Worsley et al. (1996). Many interesting applications of high-dimensional SPMs exist, for example, augmenting space with scale–space dimensions (Siegmund and Worsley, 1995) or even

Conclusion

In this paper, we have set out the choices guiding the development of analytic procedures for ERP data using the statistical parametric mapping framework. We have focussed on motivation and justification, particularly in relation to the different sorts of statistical models and analyses that could have been used. Guided largely by the sorts of questions that are asked of the data, we conclude that a mass univariate approach is appropriate. In the temporal domain, the linear two-level

Acknowledgements

The Wellcome Trust funded this work. We would like to thank Marcia Bennett for help in preparing the manuscript and Rik Henson for valuable discussions.

References (45)

  • C. Phillips et al.

    Systematic regularization of linear inverse solutions of the EEG source localization problem

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • A. Salek-Haddadi et al.

    Simultaneous EEG correlated ictal fMRI

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • K. Toma et al.

    Generators of movement-related cortical potentials: fMRI constrained EEG dipole source analysis

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • L.J. Trejo et al.

    Feature extraction of event-related potentials using wavelets: an application to human performance monitoring

    Brain Lang.

    (1999)
  • M.W. Woolrich et al.

    Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of fFMRI data

    NeuroImage

    (2001)
  • K.J. Worsley et al.

    Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited—Again

    NeuroImage

    (1995)
  • K.J. Worsley et al.

    Characterizing the response of PET and fMRI data using multivariate linear models

    NeuroImage

    (1997)
  • F. Abramovich et al.

    Wavelet analysis and its statistical applications

    Statistician

    (2000)
  • S. Baillet et al.

    A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem

    IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.

    (1997)
  • G. Barnes et al.

    Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2003)
  • J. Bosch-Bayard et al.

    3D statistical parametric mapping of EEG source spectra by means of variable resolution electromagnetic tomography (VARETA)

    Clin. EEG Electroencephalogr.

    (2001)
  • M. Breakspear

    Nonlinear phase desynchronization in human electroencephalograhic data

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (102)

    • Reading direct speech quotes increases theta phase-locking: Evidence for cortical tracking of inner speech?

      2021, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Topographic images were stacked to create a 3D space-time image volume. The volume was smoothed with a Gaussian kernel at FWHM=[16 mm 16 mm 16 ms], about 3 times of voxel size, which is in accordance with the assumptions of Random Field Theory (Kiebel and Friston, 2004; Worsley et al., 1996). To verify that the observed results reflect theta-specific rather than broad-band phase-locked responses, a full time-frequency analysis was conducted.

    • Using multilevel models for the analysis of event-related potentials

      2021, International Journal of Psychophysiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text