Elsevier

Neurobiology of Aging

Volume 76, April 2019, Pages 35-44
Neurobiology of Aging

Regular article
DNA methylation variability in Alzheimer's disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.12.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Conventional epigenetic analysis focuses on testing the mean difference in DNA methylation between cases and controls, but DNA methylation instability (e.g., increased variability) may also affect disease susceptibility.

  • No study has examined the association of methylation variability with Alzheimer's disease.

  • We identified genomic regions harboring variably methylated probes associated with Aβ plaques and neurofibrillary tangles.

  • These regions are largely nonoverlapped with regions detected by mean methylation analysis, highlighting the importance of testing methylation variability in future research.

Abstract

DNA methylation plays a critical role in brain aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD). While prior studies have largely focused on testing mean DNA methylation, DNA methylation instability (quantified by DNA methylation variability) may also affect disease susceptibility. Using DNA methylation data collected by the Religious Orders Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project, we identified 249 and 115 variably methylated probes (VMPs) associated with amyloid-β and neurofibrillary tangles, respectively. These VMPs clustered into 133 and 14 regions, respectively. Notably, we found that most of these VMPs did not overlap with differentially methylated probes, indicating that VMPs and differentially methylated probes may capture different sets of genes associated with AD pathology. Overall, our results demonstrated that DNA methylation instability affects AD neuropathology and highlights the importance of testing methylation variability in epigenetic research.

Introduction

Alzheimer's dementia is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder affecting over 35 million people worldwide, and this number is expected to nearly triple by 2050 (Duthey, 2013). Accumulation of extracellular amyloid-β and intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles are the 2 hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD). DNA methylation plays an important role in regulating gene expression, and altered DNA methylation has been implicated in AD pathology (Irier and Jin, 2012). Several epigenome-wide association studies (De Jager et al., 2014, Lunnon et al., 2014, Smith et al., 2018, Watson et al., 2016) identified differentially methylated probes (DMPs) and differentially methylated regions associated with AD. While previous studies have largely focused on testing the difference in mean DNA methylation level between patients and controls, recent evidence suggests that DNA methylation instability may also affect disease susceptibility (Palumbo et al., 2018). For example, several recent studies found that increased DNA methylation variability in multiple genes was associated with cancers (Hansen et al., 2011), type 1 diabetes (Paul et al., 2016), aging (Jones et al., 2015), and rheumatoid arthritis (Webster et al., 2018). This evidence suggests that, in addition to the mean change in DNA methylation, altered DNA methylation variability or instability of DNA methylation may also play an important role in disease pathophysiology. To date, we are not aware of any study that examined the role of DNA methylation variability in AD neuropathology. Using existing DNA methylation and gene expression data generated in postmortem prefrontal cortex of older individuals participating in 2 community-based population cohorts of aging and dementia (the Religious Orders Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project [ROSMAP]) (Bennett et al., 2012b), we conducted analyses to examine whether altered DNA methylation stability contributes to AD pathology by identifying variably methylated probes (VMPs) and variably methylated regions (VMRs) in the postmortem brain tissue. For comparison purpose, we also examined the potential overlap between variably methylated genes (e.g., genes showing altered methylation variability) and differentially methylated genes (e.g., genes showing altered mean DNA methylation level) at a genome scale. Moreover, we assessed the impact of DNA methylation instability on gene expression profiled on the same brain cortex.

Section snippets

Study population

This study included deceased participants from 2 ongoing, prospective studies of brain aging and dementia in older individuals, as described in the following. Detailed study design and assessment methods were described previously (Bennett et al., 2006, Bennett et al., 2012a, Bennett et al., 2012b). Both studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Rush University Medical Center. Data are available for sharing at www.radc.rush.edu. Clinical characteristics of the study

VMPs/VMRs associated with AD neuropathology

At the level of q < 0.05, we identified 249 VMPs (223 hypervariable [i.e., greater variability with more neuropathology], 26 hypovariable [i.e., less variability with more neuropathology]) associated with amyloid-β load (Fig. 1A). By contrast, 115 VMPs (48 hypervariable, 67 hypovariable) were associated with tangles (Fig. 1B). Table 2, Table 3 list the top 50 most significant VMPs associated with amyloid-β and tangles, respectively. The identified VMPs are clustered into 133 and 14 VMRs for

Discussion

In 2 community-based population cohort studies of aging and dementia, we found that the variability in DNA methylation was related to AD neuropathology. Specifically, we identified 249 VMPs (clustered into 133 VMRs) and 115 VMPs (clustered into 14 VMRs) significantly associated with amyloid-β and tangles, respectively. The identified VMR genes were enriched in biological processes related to excitatory synapse, neuron differentiation, calcium ion transmembrane transport, positive regulation of

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participants of the Religious Orders Study and Memory and Aging Project studies and the staff of the Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center.

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants RF1AG52476, P30AG10161, RF1AG15819, R01AG17917, R01AG16042, U01AG46152, RF1AG36042, and R01AG36836.

References (61)

  • D.A. Bennett et al.

    Neuropathologic intermediate phenotypes enhance association to Alzheimer susceptibility alleles

    Neurology

    (2009)
  • D.A. Bennett et al.

    Overview and findings from the religious orders study

    Curr. Alzheimer Res.

    (2012)
  • D.A. Bennett et al.

    Overview and findings from the rush memory and aging project

    Curr. Alzheimer Res.

    (2012)
  • M.B. Brown

    400: a method for combining non-independent, one-sided tests of significance

    Biometrics

    (1975)
  • D. Campion et al.

    Alzheimer disease: modeling an A$β$-centered biological network

    Mol. Psychiatry

    (2016)
  • A. Cozza et al.

    SNPs in neurotrophin system genes and Alzheimer’s disease in an Italian population

    J. Alzheimers Dis.

    (2008)
  • G. Csardi et al.

    The igraph software package for complex network research

    InterJournal Complex Syst.

    (2006)
  • C.V. Dang

    c-Myc target genes involved in cell growth, apoptosis, and metabolism

    Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (1999)
  • P.L. De Jager et al.

    Alzheimer’s disease: early alterations in brain DNA methylation at ANK1, BIN1, RHBDF2 and other loci

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2014)
  • B. Duthey

    Background paper 6.11: Alzheimer disease and other dementias

  • A.P. Feinberg et al.

    Stochastic epigenetic variation as a driving force of development, evolutionary adaptation, and disease

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A

    (2010)
  • J. Guintivano et al.

    A cell epigenotype specific model for the correction of brain cellular heterogeneity bias and its application to age, brain region and major depression

    Epigenetics

    (2013)
  • K.D. Hansen et al.

    Increased methylation variation in epigenetic domains across cancer types

    Nat. Genet.

    (2011)
  • T. Hastie et al.

    impute: imputation for microarray data

    Bioinformatics

    (2001)
  • H.A. Irier et al.

    Dynamics of DNA methylation in aging and Alzheimer’s disease

    DNA Cell Biol.

    (2012)
  • D.C. Jean et al.

    It cuts two ways: microtubule loss during Alzheimer disease

    EMBO J.

    (2013)
  • M.J. Jones et al.

    DNA methylation and healthy human aging

    Aging Cell

    (2015)
  • G. Jun et al.

    A novel Alzheimer disease locus located near the gene encoding tau protein

    Mol. Psychiatry

    (2016)
  • T. Kanekiyo et al.

    Neuronal clearance of amyloid-$β$ by endocytic receptor LRP1

    J. Neurosci.

    (2013)
  • J.S.K. Kauwe et al.

    Genome-wide association study of CSF levels of 59 Alzheimer’s disease candidate proteins: significant associations with proteins involved in amyloid processing and inflammation

    PLoS Genet.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (21)

    • LncRNA XR_351665 Contributes to Chronic Pain-Induced Depression by Upregulating DNMT1 via Sponging miR-152-3p

      2023, Journal of Pain
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the pathogenesis for chronic pain-induced depression remains unclear. DNA methylation, catalyzed by the DNMTs, have been shown to play important roles in neurodegenerative diseases,2,22,38 cognition and aging,10,47,57 and neurogenesis.26,52 Recent studies have suggested DNMTs, especially DNMT1 is associated with depression and pain respectively.12,55,61

    • Nucleic acid liquid biopsies in Alzheimer's disease: current state, challenges, and opportunities

      2022, Heliyon
      Citation Excerpt :

      These disease hallmarks have been considered as biomarkers for liquid biopsies in AD, as well as various nucleic acid species. Nucleic acids leak from the brain into surrounding tissues such as the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which surrounds the brain and spinal cord, and into the bloodstream during aging [13, 14]. While precision oncology commonly uses blood among other tissues for liquid biopsies, determining the most beneficial and least invasive tissue for AD detection is still being elucidated [15].

    • The glial-specific hypermethylated 3′ untranslated region of histone deacetylase 1 may modulates several signal pathways in Alzheimer's disease

      2021, Life Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      DNA methylation plays a critical role in AD. Evidence has illustrated that both mean DNA methylation and variably methylated probes contribute to Aβ plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, which are hallmarks of AD [5]. Moreover, Mano et al. [6] found that hypomethylation was consistent with up-regulation of BRCA1 in AD brains and increased in response to Aβ-induced DNA damage, which triggered deterioration of genomic integrity and synaptic plasticity.

    • Mendelian randomization integrating GWAS and mQTL data identified novel pleiotropic DNA methylation loci for neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease

      2021, Neurobiology of Aging
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some of the pleiotropic CpGs identified in our study have been reported to be associated with Aβ load or AD-related risk factors. For example, the epigenetic locus cg24523650 in EIF2AK2 was associated with Aβ load by a previous epigenome-wide association study of AD neuropathology (Huo et al., 2019). Two other methylation loci, cg08152546 and cg13180678, which reside in or are close to CENPV, were associated with aging (Florath et al., 2014; Weidner et al., 2014), a major risk factor for AD.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text