Elsevier

Neuroscience Letters

Volume 494, Issue 2, 25 April 2011, Pages 94-98
Neuroscience Letters

Limited persistence of the sensorimotor memory when transferred across prehension tasks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.02.066Get rights and content

Abstract

A recent study has shown that the sensorimotor memory for the fingertip forces used to grasp and lift an object can be shared across two prehension tasks. However, the persistence (or decay) of these memory resources is not known. Reports of within-task sensorimotor memory indicate persistence of lifting forces, with evidence for reduced persistence of grip forces. Here we investigated the temporal dynamics of the transfer of memory related to vertical lifting forces across prehension tasks. Young adult participants in two separate experimental groups first held the object placed on their palm and ‘hefted’ it (moved it up and down) followed by lifting the object using a precision grip (thumb-finger) with the dominant hand after a delay of 10 s, or 20 min. The Control group lifted the object with the dominant hand using a precision grip and then did so again 20 min later. The Control group used higher load force rates (LFR) for their first lift compared to subsequent lifts, both before and after the 20-min delay. This suggests that the Control group initially overestimated the weight of the object, corrected their LFRs, and then was able to retain this corrected force scaling after the 20-min delay. The Experimental 10-second delay group accurately scaled their LFRs upon their first lift, indicating that they obtained an accurate memory for LFR scaling during hefting, and transferred it to the lift task. In contrast, the Experimental 20-minute delay group was unable to scale their LFRs upon their first lift, as indicated by high LFRs that were no different than those of the Control group. Thus, the memory related to the production of LFR remained stable over 20 min when obtained from the same task, while that obtained from a different task decayed completely within 20 min. This decay may indicate weakened sensorimotor memories related to prehension forces due to its dependence not only on the memory for object mechanical properties, but also on sensory signals generated during the prehension act, along with strong visual prior estimates of a size-weight relationship.

Research Highlights

► We studied the persistence of sensorimotor memory when transferred across tasks. ► The memory from hefting scaled the lift force rates during a lift task after 10 sec. ► The memory from hefting decayed for a lift performed 20 minutes later. ► This may indicate weakened memory due to sensory signals from the tasks. ► The memory may be influenced by visual prior estimates of size-weight representation.

References (29)

  • J.R. Flanagan et al.

    Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2000)
  • J.R. Flanagan et al.

    Sensorimotor prediction and memory in object manipulation

    Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (2001)
  • A.M. Gordon et al.

    The integration of haptically acquired size information in the programming of precision grip

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1991)
  • A.M. Gordon et al.

    Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1991)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Time-course of pain threshold after continuous theta burst stimulation of primary somatosensory cortex in pain-free subjects

      2020, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      We estimated active motor threshold (aMT) to set the stimulation intensity of continuous theta burst stimulation. For aMT estimation, subjects were instructed to exert 20 % of their maximum voluntary force (MVF) on a grip device instrumented with force transducers (Nano-25; ATI Industrial Automation, Garner, NC, 1 kHz sampling rate) with the tips of index finger and thumb using visual feedback provided on a computer monitor [26]. Each subject was instructed to grip the device as hard as possible for one second followed by a break (∼1 min).

    • Sensorimotor memory for object weight is based on previous experience during lifting, not holding

      2019, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, another experiment contradicts these results by failing to disrupt sensorimotor memory with an isometric force task (Cole et al., 2008). Furthermore, there is evidence that sensorimotor memory for objects can be transferred between hands (Chang et al., 2008; Gordon et al., 1994; Green et al., 2010) and there is also some transfer across tasks (Parikh and Cole, 2011). It has also been suggested that sensorimotor memory represents a memory of visual object size, as participants adjusted their forces correctly to a slightly smaller object without consciously noting the size change (Cole, 2008).

    • Force control in object manipulation-A model for the study of sensorimotor control strategies

      2013, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      This observation supports the notion that lift forces and grip force differ in their relationship with heaviness perception. There is recent evidence that the predictive programming in the grip-lift task operates independently for grip and lift force (Cole et al., 2008; Chang et al., 2008; Parikh and Cole, 2011; Quaney et al., 2003; Nowak et al., 2004a,b; Rabe et al., 2009). The object-specific force scaling based on central representations of both object and body dynamics (internal models) is obvious when grasping and lifting known objects (Gordon et al., 1993).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text