Dissociation between “where” and “how” judgements of one's own motor performance in a video-controlled reaching task
References (16)
- et al.
Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand
Curr. Biol.
(1995) - et al.
Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects
Neuropsychologia
(1998) - et al.
Visual illusion and action
Neuropsychologia
(1996) - et al.
When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation
Curr. Biol.
(2002) - et al.
Pointing movement visually controlled through a video display: adaptation to scale change
Ergonomics
(2000) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action
Behav. Brain Sci.
(2004)- et al.
The effect of visuomotor displacements on arm movement paths
Exp. Brain Res.
(1999) - et al.
Visual capture produced by prisms spectacles
Psychonomic Sci.
(1965)
Cited by (12)
Multiple representations and mechanisms for visuomotor adaptation in young children
2012, Human Movement ScienceCitation Excerpt :Taking into account the results from all the rotations, the errors of the children were higher during both the CP and TP tests (which had similar errors) compared to the SE and MR tests (which had similar errors). However, the errors caused by 45° rotations were similar during all the tests, and the results failed to show a difference between the SE and MR errors, as previously described by Boy et al. (2005). Moreover, the mechanisms used to re-map visual and motor spaces varied between the tests, as indicated by the Rotation × Test interaction seen in the children, F(12, 357) = 8.98, p < .001.
Visuo-motor gain adaptation and generalization following left hemisphere stroke
2011, Neuroscience LettersIntrospective duration estimation of reactive and proactive motor responses
2010, Acta PsychologicaCitation Excerpt :As noted above this has been already shown in the 19th century (see James, 1890) but never pursued since. A standing issue in the study of motor actions is the extent to which their consequences are (implicitly or explicitly) used by subjects to calibrate and putatively (meta)judge their motor performances (e.g. Blakemore & Decety, 2001; Boy, Palluel-Germain, Orliaguet, & Coello, 2005; Harris, 1965; Jeannerod, 1997, 2003; Matute, 1996; Passingham, 1993; Wegner, 2002). To our knowledge no study has broached the issue as it applies to the time perception of one’s own actions.
Embodiment, spatial categorisation and action
2007, Consciousness and CognitionInfluence of visual constraints in the trajectory formation of grasping movements
2006, Neuroscience Letters