Review
Adjusting behavior to changing environmental demands with development

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Plasticity is the capacity to adapt to changing environmental demands.

  • Environmental demands change with development, especially during adolescence.

  • The prefrontal cortex is involved in flexibly adjusting behavior to changing demands.

  • Reward regions can render the prefrontal cortex unable to flexibly modulate behavior.

  • Biological constraints and experiential history shape our behavioral flexibility.

Abstract

Plasticity refers to changes in the brain that enable an organism to adapt its behavior in the face of changing environmental demands. The evolutionary role of plasticity is to provide the cognitive flexibility to learn from experiences, to monitor the world based on learned predictions, and adjust actions when these predictions are violated. Both progressive (myelination) and regressive (synaptic pruning) brain changes support this type of adaptation. Experience-driven changes in neural connections underlie the ability to learn and update thoughts and behaviors throughout life. Many cognitive and behavioral indices exhibit nonlinear life-span trajectories, suggesting the existence of specific sensitive developmental periods of heightened plasticity. We propose that age-related differences in learning capabilities and behavioral performance reflect the distinct maturational timetable of subcortical learning systems and modulatory prefrontal regions. We focus specifically on the developmental transition of adolescence, during which individuals experience difficulty flexibly adjusting their behavior when confronted with unexpected and emotionally salient events. In this article, we review the findings illustrating this phenomenon and how they vary by individual.

Introduction

One of the fundamental purposes of brain plasticity is to provide the capacity to adapt and optimize behavior in accordance with the current environmental demands. This capability to learn through experience to obtain reward or to avoid danger serves a clear evolutionary purpose. An organism's fitness may critically depend on the ability to adjust behavior to maximize the likelihood of a successful hunt or, more contemporarily, a lucrative business deal. Subcortical systems have been shown to support essential, evolutionarily-conserved learning processes involving reward (Galvan et al., 2005, Pagnoni et al., 2002, Schultz et al., 1997) and threat (Delgado et al., 2008, Soliman et al., 2010). But these systems do not operate independently; rather they are part of a broad interactive network of brain regions (Casey et al., 2001). Regions of prefrontal cortex are thought to play a modulatory role within this network, by enabling the suppression of the subcortical regions involved in immediate motivationally-driven behaviors in favor of longer term goal-oriented ones (for a review, see (Somerville and Casey, 2010).

The ability to adapt and optimize behavior varies as a function of age, the individual, as well as context. Age-related differences in cognitive flexibility may arise due to both maturational constraints of developing brain regions (Galvan et al., 2006), and the connectivity between interacting brain systems (Liston et al., 2006). These differences are particularly apparent during transitional periods, when previously adaptive behaviors may gradually become incompatible with a new range of experiences that arise across the lifespan. Flexibility in adjusting behavior to changing environmental demands also depends upon an individual‘s unique experiential history. As such, some individuals are less able than others to flexibly suppress an inappropriate action, such as not eating cookies when dieting. That flexibility is particularly challenged in the context of highly salient cues (e.g., an ice cream sundae). This paper examines flexibility and rigidity in behavioral adaptation as environmental demands vary across development and individuals.

Section snippets

Experience-expectant and experience-dependent learning

Learning across development is a continuous interactive process shaped by both progressive (synaptogenesis, myelination) and regressive (synaptic pruning, apoptosis) neuronal changes (Brown et al., 2005, Casey et al., 2006, De Haan and Johnson, 2003, Thompson and Nelson, 2001) as the brain adapts to its environment. These plastic changes have been classified as either experience-expectant or experience dependent (Greenough et al., 1987). Experience-expectancy characterizes plasticity mechanisms

Behavioral development

The capacity to change one's actions in order to cope with new demands appears to develop progressively in life (Somerville et al., 2010). A challenge for developmental neuroscience is to understand the neural changes that bridge the gap between detecting changes in the environment and the actual adaptation of behavior. Predictive learning is a cornerstone of behavioral development. Knowing what events to expect when, and in which contexts, is critical for planning and maintaining contextually

Individual differences in flexibly adjusting behavior

Adolescence is clearly a period during which the individual must rapidly adapt to changing environmental demands given the social, sexual, and intellectual challenges of this developmental period that prepare the individual for independence. Yet, even as adults we vary in the ability to control our impulses. Perhaps one of the best examples of individual differences reported in these abilities in the social, cognitive and developmental psychology literatures is the ability to delay of

Summary

Plasticity is the capacity to adapt to changing environmental demands. This paper provides evidence that this ability varies by age, individual and context. Evolution has shaped the brain to appropriately deal with expected demands of the world to provide the cognitive flexibility to learn from experiences, to monitor the world based on learned predictions, and adjust actions when these predictions are violated. These demands change with developmental transitions from infancy to late adulthood,

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants R01 DA018879, R01 HD069178, and by National Science Foundation Grant 06-509 (BJC).

References (128)

  • T.A. Hare et al.

    Biological substrates of emotional reactivity and regulation in adolescence during an emotional go–nogo task

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • P.R. Huttenlocher

    Morphometric study of human cerebral cortex development

    Neuropsychologia

    (1990)
  • R.T. Knight

    Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man

    Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

    (1984)
  • B. Luna et al.

    What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence?

    Brain and Cognition

    (2010)
  • B. Luna et al.

    Maturation of widely distributed brain function subserves cognitive development

    Neuroimage

    (2001)
  • L.L. Meschke et al.

    The influence of puberty, family processes, and leisure activities on the timing of first sexual experience

    Journal of Adolescence

    (1997)
  • Y. Munakata et al.

    A unified framework for inhibitory control

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences

    (2011)
  • E.J. Nestler

    Historical review: molecular and cellular mechanisms of opiate and cocaine addiction

    Trends in Pharmacological Sciences

    (2004)
  • J.P. O’Doherty et al.

    Neural responses during anticipation of a primary taste reward

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • J.A. Pascual-Leone

    A mathematical model for transition in Piaget's developmental stages

    Acta Psychologica

    (1970)
  • O. Arias-Carrion et al.

    Dopamine, learning, and reward-seeking behavior

    Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis

    (2007)
  • M.R. Asato et al.

    White matter development in adolescence: a DTI study

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2010)
  • D.E. Astle et al.

    Using developmental cognitive neuroscience to study behavioral and attentional control

    Developmental Psychobiology

    (2009)
  • J. Belsky et al.

    Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: and evolutionary theory of socialization

    Child Development

    (1991)
  • F.M. Benes et al.

    Convergence and plasticity of monoaminergic systems in the medial prefrontal cortex during the postnatal period: implications for the development of psychopathology

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2000)
  • R.H. Bixler

    Why littermates don’t: the avoidance of inbreeding depression

    Annual Review of Sex Research

    (1992)
  • J.M. Bjork et al.

    Incentive-elicited striatal activation in adolescent children of alcoholics

    Addiction

    (2008)
  • J.M. Bjork et al.

    Adolescents, adults and rewards: comparing motivational neurocircuitry recruitment using fMRI

    PLoS ONE

    (2010)
  • M.H. Bornstein

    Stability in mental development from early life: methods, measures, model meanings and myths

  • J.P. Bourgeois et al.

    Synaptogenesis in the prefrontal cortex of rhesus monkeys

    Cerebral Cortex

    (1994)
  • H.C. Brenhouse et al.

    Transient D1 dopamine receptor expression on prefrontal cortex projection neurons: relationship to enhanced motivational salience of drug cues in adolescence

    The Journal of Neuroscience

    (2008)
  • T.T. Brown et al.

    Developmental changes in human cerebral functional organization for word generation

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2005)
  • M.J. Buckley et al.

    Dissociable components of rule-guided behavior depend on distinct medial and prefrontal regions

    Science

    (2009)
  • R.N. Cardinal et al.

    Impulsive choice induced in rats by lesions of the nucleus accumbens core

    Science

    (2001)
  • B.J. Casey

    Neuroscience Windows into the human brain

    Science

    (2002)
  • B.J. Casey

    Frotostriatal and frontocerebellar circuitry underlying cognitive control

  • B.J. Casey et al.

    Learning about learning and development with modern imaging technology

  • Casey, B.J., Caudle, K., in press. Self control. Current Directions in Psychological...
  • B.J. Casey et al.

    Frontostriatal connectivity and its role in cognitive control in parent-child dyads with ADHD

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • Casey, B.J., Jones, R.M., in press. Neurobiology of the adolescent brain and behavior....
  • B.J. Casey et al.

    The adolescent brain

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    (2008)
  • B.J. Casey et al.

    Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2011)
  • B.J. Casey et al.

    The role of the anterior cingulate in automatic and controlled processes: a developmental neuroantomical study

    Developmental Psychobiology

    (1997)
  • E. Cauffman et al.

    Age differences in affective decision making as indexed by performance on the Iowa Gambling Task

    Developmental Psychology

    (2010)
  • J. Chein et al.

    Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain's reward circuitry

    Developmental Science

    (2011)
  • J.R. Cohen et al.

    A unique adolescent response to reward prediction errors

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2010)
  • C.M. Crockett et al.

    Consequences of sex differences in dispersal for juvenile red howler monkeys

  • H.C. Cromwell et al.

    Effects of expectations for different reward magnitudes on neuronal activity in primate striatum

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2003)
  • M. Csikszentmihalyi et al.

    Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method

    The Journal of nervous and mental disease

    (1987)
  • M.G. Cunningham et al.

    Increasing Interaction of amygdalar afferents with GABAergic interneurons between birth and adulthood

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2008)
  • Cited by (40)

    • What makes people more polarized? The effects of anonymity, being with like-minded others, and the moderating role of need for approval

      2023, Telematics and Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, before the Internet, people had limited experience communicating with each other anonymously (Danezis, et al., 2009). The impact of this new anonymous environment could have a notable impact on people’s psychological processes and behaviors (Aldwin and Stokols, 1988; Lourenco and Casey, 2013). Hence, people who were not familiar with anonymous communication would have been more prone to experiencing the strong impact of such anonymous environment.

    • Reinforcement learning and Bayesian inference provide complementary models for the unique advantage of adolescents in stochastic reversal

      2022, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      In mammals and other species with parental care, there is typically an adolescent stage of development in which the young are no longer supported by parental care, but are not yet adult (Natterson-Horowitz and Bowers, 2019). This adolescent period is increasingly viewed as a critical epoch in which organisms explore the world, make pivotal decisions with short- and long-term impact on survival (Frankenhuis and Walasek, 2020), and learn about important features of their environment (Steinberg, 2005; DePasque and Galván, 2017), likely taking advantage of a second window of brain plasticity (Piekarski et al., 2017b; Larsen and Luna, 2018; Lourenco and Casey, 2013). In humans, adolescence often involves an expansion of environmental contexts (e.g., new pastime activities, growing relevance of peer relationships) and increasingly frequent transitions between such contexts, creating contextual volatility (Albert et al., 2013; Somerville et al., 2017).

    • Adaptability in the workplace: Investigating the adaptive performance job requirements for a project manager

      2021, Project Leadership and Society
      Citation Excerpt :

      Adaptability is prominent in a range of literature, from evolutionary studies where adaptability is seen as “the capacity of a human organism to intentionally modify its reactions in the presence of unfamiliar external circumstances, or unfamiliar internal states, in such a way as to make for its survival” (Laycock, 1929 pp. 18). To psychology and human behavioural studies, which refer to adaptability as a person's ability to adapt or adjust to the environment in which he or she lives (Lourenco and Casey, 2013). Most recently the field of Strategic Management considers adaptability as a dynamic capability where adaptive companies and an adaptive workforce freely communicate and recombine according to the situation at hand, contributing to “Adaptive Advantage” (Reeves and Deimler, 2011).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text