Clinical education
Can a one-on-one mentorship program reduce the turnover rate of new graduate nurses in China? A longitudinal study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.08.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Nursing graduates experience “reality shock” upon entering the workplace as well as face challenges and stress during their transition from nursing student to qualified nurse. The high turnover rate of new graduate nurses not only increases an organization's human resources costs but also results in a shortage of nurses. In particular, a poor experience during the transition from nursing student to qualified nurse can lead to significant turnover. A three-year longitudinal study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of one-on-one mentorship program in reducing the turnover rate of nurses in China. A total of 199 new graduate nurses, recruited in 2013, were considered the control group and received a basic preceptorship, and 239 nurses in 2014 were considered the experimental group, for which a one-on-one mentorship program was implemented. Propensity-score-matching analysis was conducted to adjust the baseline of the two groups, and survival analysis was performed to compare the two groups. The findings showed that the turnover rates for the experimental group were 3.77%, 3.48%, and 8.11% as compared to 14.07%, 9.36%, and 14.19% for the control group at the end of the first three years, respectively. The survival curves of the two groups were significantly different (p < 0.001). The turnover rate for the first year in the experimental group was significantly lower than that for the control group, but the rates in the second and third years were not different. The results indicate that a one-on-one mentorship program is beneficial for the retention of new graduate nurses, particularly during the first year.

Introduction

Nursing graduates experience “reality shock” upon entering the workplace (Kramer et al., 2013) as well as face challenges and stress during their transition from nursing student to qualified nurse (Cho et al., 2012, Hoffart et al., 2011, Teoh et al., 2013). Studies have found that the turnover rate of new graduate nurses in their first year on the job varies from 8% to 69% and from 26.2% to 57% in their second year (Bowles and Candela, 2005, Cho et al., 2012, Mills and Mullins, 2008, Salt et al., 2008, Scott and Smith, 2008, Zhang et al., 2016). The high turnover rate of new graduate nurses not only increases an organization's human resources costs but also leads to nursing shortages, which has been a persistent concern globally (Casey et al., 2004, Hayes et al., 2012, Salt et al., 2008). Therefore, research has focused on the underlying factors and has sought ways to reduce the turnover rate.

In China, the Bachelor of Nursing (BN) degree program usually consists of four or five years of academic and clinical study. Although undergraduate nursing students are required to have a clinical placement for eight to twelve months during the last year of the program, new graduates still have reported having a stressful experience when they first enter the workplace. Notably, the gap between theory and practice can make it difficult for them to adapt to the new environment. The difficulties during the transition period could cause these new nurses to feel overwhelmed, with some as leaving their first jobs or even quitting their nursing career. Because this is a global issue, helping new graduate nurses to manage the transition and retaining them in the profession is an urgent issue for all nursing managers and hospital leaders.

Section snippets

Literature review

Previous studies on the transition period from student to nurse have found that there are many ways to support new nurses and to improve the experience of the transition period, including internships, residencies, orientation, preceptorships, and mentorship programs (Edwards et al., 2015). Research has shown that preceptorship or mentorship programs do help new nurses to have higher competence, confidence, critical thinking, and job satisfaction and can even reduce the degree of stress and

Design and sample

This research was designed as a three-year longitudinal, non-randomized control study. We included new graduate nurses who were recruited into our hospital in August 2013 and 2014. To be recruited, the nurses needed to have earned a bachelor's degree in nursing and to have passed the nursing registration examination. Nurses who had previous work experience were excluded in this study. New graduate nurses recruited in August 2013 were assigned to the control group and received a basic

Demographics of participants

The control group included 199 new graduate nurses, and the experimental group included 239 new graduate nurses. The demographics of the nurses in both groups are shown in Table 2. The majority of new nurses in both groups were female (about 85%) and averaged about 23 years old. More than 50% came from provinces other than Zhejiang, and approximately 60% had their internship in a hospital other than the hospital of employment. Approximately 70% were assigned to medical and surgical units. There

Discussion

The aims of the present study were to clarify how a one-on-one mentorship program is distinctive from a basic preceptorship program and to examine the effect of a one-on-one mentorship program on the turnover rate of new graduate nurses, who were followed up for three years. The results showed that the turnover rate for the experimental group was 3.77%, 3.48%, and 8.11% as compared to 14.07%, 9.36%, and 14.19% for the control group at the end of each of the three years, respectively. The

Conclusion

The shortage of nurses has drawn our attention to the recruitment and retention of new nurses. As is known, many hospitals in China need to recruit at least 200 to 300 nurses each year, most of whom are new graduates. Their retention, however, is a challenge for nursing managers and hospital administrators. This was a longitudinal study conducted to trace the effects of a mentorship program, as compared with a basic preceptorship program, on the turnover rate of new graduate nurses. Even with

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest

The manuscript has not been submitted for consideration to any other journal either partly or totally.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all new graduate nurses who kindly agreed to participate in the study. And thank Marcia A. Petrini for writing assistance in this paper.

References (31)

Cited by (22)

  • Mentorship in nursing in Canada – A scoping review

    2022, Nurse Education in Practice
    Citation Excerpt :

    These findings were also consistent with a study that assessed the effectiveness of one-on-one mentorship in reducing the turnover rates among new graduate nurses. The authors reported that the graduate nurses stayed longer in the profession when they were provided with one-on-one mentorship than the graduates who were not provided with such mentors (Zhang et al., 2019). In a systematic review of the effectiveness of the mentorship programs for recently graduated nurses, the authors have identified that the mentorship programs reduced the turnover rates and improved job satisfaction and professional identity (Chen and Lou, 2014).

  • Interventions to support graduate nurse transition to practice and associated outcomes: A systematic review

    2021, Nurse Education Today
    Citation Excerpt :

    Again, across this group of studies the most commonly reported service outcome was retention, however, the evidence was variable, with retention primarily only reported across the period of the transition intervention. In China, Zhang et al. (2019) reported on a one-year transition programme and noted significant lower rates of turnover in the intervention group compared to the control, however, rates in the second and third year of practice were no different. Some of the studies were across multiple sites.

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Yuping Zhang and Xin Huang should be considered joint first author.

View full text