A general trend of rare earth ions in the KRE(WO4)2 double tungstates (RE = Y, Yb, Gd, Lu)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2010.04.023Get rights and content

Abstract

Crystal-field energy levels of Er3+ ions doped in KYb(WO4)2, KY(WO4)2 and KLu(WO4)2 laser crystals were fitted to the parameters of semi-empirical Hamiltonian including J-mixing. A simulation of the energy level scheme is carried out. The crystal-field effect is introduced through the 14 non-zero crystal-field parameters allowed by C2 symmetry site occupied by the rare earth. Very satisfactory correlations were obtained between 58, 64 and 15 calculated and experimental Stark energy levels, with an r.m.s. of 8.7 cm−1, 9.3 cm−1 and 2.6 cm−1 for Er3+ ions doped in KYb(WO4)2, KY(WO4)2 and KLu(WO4)2 respectively. These results are compared with those reported for other rare earth ions in the same hosts and with Er3+ ions in KGd(WO4)2 crystal. Furthermore, based on the extended electrostatic point charge model, interesting results are obtained for Yb3+ ions doped KYb(WO4)2, KY(WO4)2, KLu(WO4)2 and KGd(WO4)2 crystals. The concordance between the crystal-field strength parameters indicates the consistence of our analysis. A general trend is then proposed for the rare earth ions in the KRE(WO4)2 double tungstates.

Introduction

In recent years, the Yb3+ ion has been recognized as a dopant with interesting potential for diode-pumped solid-state lasers in the 1 μm spectral region. Yb3+ doped materials are attractive as efficient active media because they possess several important advantages over the widely used Nd3+: a small thermal loading due to a single de-excitation channel, no excited state absorption or up-conversion losses, a large transparency over the visible range, a weaker cross-relaxation process, and a long (μs) radiative lifetime [1], [3]. In other hand, erbium has played an important role in the development of optical communication technology. The erbium ion is suitable for obtaining laser radiation in the near-infrared region after diode pumping because of its 4I11/2 energy level to absorb the pump radiation and its 4I13/2 energy level to emit to the ground state (1.5 μm emission). Its absorption band between 0.9 μm and 1.1 μm (11111–9091 cm−1), corresponding to the 4I11/2 energy level, is the easily available diode-laser emission range, but its low absorption cross section in the above-mentioned spectral range limits pump efficiency. In this field, ytterbium ions are widely used as sensitizer ions for increasing the absorption of light. Ytterbium ions posses a high absorption cross section in the above-mentioned spectral range and its 2F5/2 energy level overlaps in energy with the 4I11/2 energy level of erbium. This energy overlap derives to a very good resonant energy transfer between these two ions and the consequently greater efficiency of erbium luminescence generation. All of these advantages make ytterbium an ideal sensitizer ion of erbium [4]. The 1.5 μm (6667 cm−1) erbium emission comprises a very efficient-level laser system, trough the 4I15/2, 4I13/2 and 2H11/2 multiplets. The determination of the possibility of energy transfer between Yb3+ and Er3+ ions can be illustrated by the theoretical investigations of these ions in order to determinate their Stark energy levels. In this work, we are interested by erbium and ytterbium doped KYb(WO4)2, KY(WO4)2, KLu(WO4)2 and KGd(WO4)2 and we estimate a general trend for the rare earth ions in the KRE(WO4)2 double tungstates.

Section snippets

The KRE(WO4)2 double tungstates

Monoclinic potassium rare earth double tungstates, KRE(WO4)2 (RE = rare earth = Yb, Y, Gd, Lu, hereafter KREW), belong to the monoclinic system, with space group C2/c and unit cell parameters a = 10.590 Å, b = 10.290 Å, c = 7.478 Å, β = 130.70° for KYbW [5], a = 10.64 Å, b = 10.35 Å, c = 7.54 Å, β = 130.5° for KYW [6], a = 10.652 Å, b = 10.374 Å, c = 7.582 Å, β = 130.80° for KGdW [7] and a = 10.576 Å, b = 10.214 Å, c = 7.487 Å, β = 130.68° for KLuW [8]. The RE is coordinated with 8 oxygen atoms, which form a distorted square antiprism with

Crystal-field calculation procedure

The total model Hamiltonian used for crystal-field analysis consists of the free-ion (HFI) and crystal-field (HCF) parts:Hˆ=HˆFI+HˆCFwhereHˆFI=Hˆ0+kEkeˆk+ξSOAˆSO+αLˆ(Lˆ+1)+βGˆ(G2)+γGˆ(R7)+kTitˆiin which H0 represents the kinetic energy of 4f interactions with the nucleus, Ek are Racah parameters and ξSO is the spin–orbit coupling constant. α, β and γ are the Trees parameters and Ti the three-body interactions parameters [25].

The crystal-field Hamiltonian is expressed as a sum of products of

Free-ion energy levels

The digitalization of the whole matrix associated with HˆFI Hamiltonian acting on the basis formed by the |4f11αSLJM〉 coupled states allows us to obtain the eigenstates of erbium ion in the intermediate coupling scheme. In experimental support, we have taken into account centroïds of the 4I15/2, 4I13/2, 4I9/2, 4F9/2, 4S3/2, 2H11/2, 4F7/2, 4F5/2, 4F3/2, 2H9/2, 4G9/2 and 4G11/2 levels observed previously for the excited energy levels of erbium observed in KYbW [9]. All calculated parameters are

Conclusion

In summary, Stark energy levels of C2 symmetry center of Er3+ in KREW crystal, calculated by using a whole Hamiltonian including free-ion and crystal-field parameters in an intermediate coupling scheme, are in a good agreement with the experimental energy levels. The r.m.s. deviation of the fit of 8.7 cm−1, 9.3 cm−1 and 2.6 cm−1 respectively for KYbW, KYW and KLuW crystals, indicates the success of the fitting. Besides, the calculated CF parameters are compared with those reported for Er3+ ions in

References (41)

  • X. Mateos et al.

    Opt. Mater.

    (2006)
  • A. Majchrowski et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2004)
  • A.A. Lagatsky et al.

    Opt. Commun.

    (1999)
  • M.T. Borowiec et al.

    Cryst. Res. Technol.

    (1999)
  • G. Boulon

    Opt. Mater.

    (2003)
  • G. Metrat et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (1999)
  • A. Brenier et al.

    Opt. Mater.

    (2001)
  • R. Maâlej et al.

    J. Lumin.

    (2007)
  • M. Dammak et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2006)
  • C.R. Ronda

    J. Lumin.

    (1997)
  • M.C. Pujol et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2001)
  • V.S. Mironov et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (1998)
  • X. Mateos et al.

    J. Opt. Mater.

    (2006)
  • M. Dammak et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2006)
  • L.D. Deloach et al.

    IEEE J. Quantum Electron.

    (1993)
  • W.F. Krupe

    IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.

    (2000)
  • X. Zou et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1995)
  • S. Taccheo et al.

    Appl. Phys. B

    (1996)
  • M.C. Pujol et al.

    J. Appl. Crystallogr.

    (2002)
  • M.C. Pujol et al.

    J. Appl. Crystallogr.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Magnetic properties of NaY<inf>1−x−y</inf>Ho<inf>x</inf>Yb<inf>y</inf>(WO<inf>4</inf>)<inf>2</inf>: x = 0.05, y = 0.02 and KY<inf>1−x−y</inf>Ho<inf>x</inf>Yb<inf>y</inf>(WO<inf>4</inf>)<inf>2</inf>: x = 0.02, y = 0.01 nanopowders obtained by Pechini and hydrothermal methods

      2019, Chemical Physics Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the KRe(WO4)2 single crystals, where Re is Kramers ion, the introduction of a small paramagnetic dopant may not affect the EPR spectrum. As shown in [27–32], a strong EPR signal from the paramagnetic host ions prevails. The host ions are in C2 symmetry but in non-equivalent sites, as well as strong dipolar and exchange interactions take place.

    • The crystal structure and luminescence quenching of poly- and single-crystalline KYW<inf>2</inf>O<inf>8</inf>:Tb<sup>3+</sup>

      2015, Journal of Luminescence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, KYW2O8 was studied with europium as a radiation converter in LEDs [10]. Especially for laser applications the yttrium site is partly replaced by ytterbium or erbium [11,12]. To our surprise, terbium was not studied in this host so far, even though it is an interesting candidate for efficient luminescence due to its small multi-phonon relaxation [13].

    • Crystal-field study for the orthorhombic Yb<sup>3+</sup> centers in Ca<inf>3</inf>Sc<inf>2</inf>Ge<inf>3</inf>O<inf>12</inf> and Lu<inf>3</inf>Ga<inf>5</inf>O<inf>12</inf> garnets

      2015, Journal of Alloys and Compounds
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, several ways of tackling this problem were taken by different groups. For example, the extrapolation method based on the point charge model (PCM) was utilized by Trabelsi et al. [21]; keeping ratios between CFPs fixed to reduce free variables was adopted by Kamińska et al. [18] and more works [22–26] are based on effective crystal-field models such as simple overlap model (SOM) [27], exchange charge model (ECM) [28] and superposition model (SPM) [29]. In this study, the combination of complete diagonalization (of energy matrix) method (CDM) [30] and SPM are employed to explain optical spectra for CaSGG:Yb3+ and LuGG:Yb3+ garnets and EPR g factors of such two garnets are also investigated (see Section 2).

    • Crystal-field study for Yb<sup>3+</sup> doped KY(WO<inf>4</inf>) <inf>2</inf> crystal - Revisited based on superposition model

      2013, Optical Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Three shortcomings in a recent work [9] concerning: (i) settling the ‘over-fit’ problem, (ii) performing monoclinic standardization transformations and (iii) explaining experimental EPR parameters have been clarified and solved in the present work. According to our results, the CFPs of Yb3+:KYW crystal given in [9] are unable to reasonably interpret EPR experiments, though they have reached the global minimum in CFP space. Generally, it should be recognized that the best fitted CFPs to explain successfully optical spectroscopy of a paramagnetic rare earth ion in crystal can not always do well in predicting EPR parameters of the studied system.

    View full text