Microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded duplex Mg–Li alloy LZ91

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.138730Get rights and content

Abstract

Superlight duplex Mg–Li alloy LZ91 with a thickness of 3 mm was successfully joined by friction stir welding utilizing a tungsten carbide tool. The microstructures in the stir zone showed refined grains consisting of an equiaxed Mg-rich α phase and a Li-rich β phase. The grains in the Mg-rich α phase showed randomized crystal orientations after dynamic recrystallization. Due to the grain refinement and the random orientation of the Mg-rich α phase, the mechanical properties of the stir zone were optimized, and the hardness of the stir zones were higher than that of the base metal. At the same time, the heat affected zone showed no decrease in its strength. Digital image correlation analyses revealed that the strain in the stir zone and base metal were respectively 0.05 and 0.6 before the samples fractured during the joint tensile tests. Therefore, the joints demonstrated 100% tensile efficiency compared with the base metal.

Introduction

Due to the intrinsic hexagonal closed-packed (hcp) lattice structure of Mg and many of its common alloys, these materials often have poor ductility and unfavorable formability at room temperature due to the lack of an available slip system [1]. Recent studies have revealed that the addition of lithium can optimize the ductility and formability of Mg alloys [2]. When more than 5 wt% Li (equivalent to Mg-17 at% Li) is added, the newly introduced Li-rich bcc phase (β phase in Mg–Li systems) provides more available slip systems which significantly improves the formability and ductility of the alloys [2,3]. Lithium addition has also been reported to decrease the critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) of the non-basal slip systems (especially <a> prismatic, <a> pyramidal, and <c+a> pyramidal) in the initial Mg-rich α phase (hcp structure) by decreasing the c/a ratio [2]. These two advantages improve the room-temperature ductility of two-phase Mg–Li alloys [3]. Moreover, because of the ultra-low density (typically less than 1.6 g/cm3) of Li-added Mg alloys, they are widely considered to be ideal structural materials for replacing Al alloys and steels in the manufacturing of high-speed transportation vehicles in order to increase the energy efficiency [4]. To expand the industrial applications of Mg–Li alloys, it is necessary to develop an effective and environmentally-friendly joining method. Only a few studies have reported the application of fusion welding to join Mg–Li alloys [5,6], and most of the joints obtained by fusion welding typically show lower strengths compared with the base metal (BM) due to grain coarsening in the heat affected zone (HAZ). Moreover, the addition of Li to Mg alloys significantly increases the chemical reactivity. To prevent ignition, a large amount of argon gas is needed during the fusion welding of Mg–Li alloys. Therefore, an environmentally-friendly and economically practical welding method other than conventional fusion welding is needed to expand the industrial applications of Mg–Li alloys.

Friction stir welding (FSW), a novel solid-state joining technique developed by TWI is considered an ideal welding method for light metals [7]. FSW does not require melting and can be used to obtain high-strength joints without defects caused by conventional fusion welding. Researchers have successfully used FSW on light metals such as Al alloys, Mg alloys, and Ti alloys [[8], [9], [10], [11]], but few studies have reported its use for duplex Mg–Li alloys.

In this study, FSW was performed using a steel tool (SKD61, equal to H-13) and a cemented carbide tool (WC) on 3-mm thick samples of a duplex Mg–Li alloy (LZ91). Three tool rotation speeds were finallyused to evaluate the effect of the heat input on the microstructure and mechanical properties.

Section snippets

Experimental procedures

The chemical compositions of the as-rolled Mg–Li alloy LZ91 plates were 9 wt% Li, 1 wt% Zn, and Mg balance. LZ91 consists of a Mg-rich α phase (hcp structure) and a Li-rich β phase (bcc structure) with respective volume fractions of 32% and 68%. The microstructure, along with the (0001) inverse pole figures (IPF) of the Mg-rich α phase of the as-rolled Mg–Li alloy LZ91 BM, are shown in Fig. 1. The Mg-rich α phase and the Li-rich β phase are marked by white and black arrows, respectively. All

Tool materials

The process windows of the LZ91 FSW using the steel tool (SKD61) and the cemented carbide tool are shown in Fig. 3. The optical microscopy images confirmed that all welding trials using the steel tool failed regardless of the welding conditions (Fig. 3a) because of severe material adherence to the tool surface after FSW. Additionally, visible defects with a large amount of flash formed. In contrast, a defect-free sound joint was obtained using the cemented carbide tool over a wide range of

Tool material selection for FSW of LZ91

Fig. 3 confirms that the conventional steel tool completely failed to form a defect-free sound joint. Considering the relatively low mechanical strength and excellent ductility of the Mg–Li alloy LZ91, this phenomenon may be related to the wettability of the tool material and the welding material. It has been reported that the wettability of a tool material and welding material significantly influences the formation of a sound joint [12,13]. The welding torque during FSW, as well as material

Conclusions

In this study, FSW was applied to the superlight duplex Mg–Li alloy LZ91. The obtained results are summarized as follows.

  • 1.

    Defect-free Mg–Li alloy LZ91 joints were formed by FSW with the WC cemented carbide tool under a wide range of welding conditions.

  • 2.

    Grain refinement and uniform mixing of the Mg-rich α phase and the Li-rich β phase were achieved in the SZ after FSW. The grain size increased with the tool rotation speed.

  • 3.

    The stir zone of LZ91 showed a higher hardness and better tensile properties

Data availability

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time due to technical or time limitations.

Author contribution statement

Mengran Zhou: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Writing - Original Draft.

Yoshiaki Morisada: Data curation, Writing - Review & Editing.

Hidetoshi Fujii: Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Jian-Yih Wang: Supervision, Resources, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was partly supported by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) under the “Innovation Structural Materials Project (Future Pioneering Projects)”.

References (27)

Cited by (30)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text