Psychosocial health and prevention of crisis in rural areas – Results of a pilot panel on psychosocial problems, subjective burden, and utilization of help in Germany
Introduction
Psychosocial health is characterized by individuals’ well-being, satisfaction, self-confidence, and ability to maintain interpersonal relationships (World Health Organization, 2015). Depending on their living conditions, individuals spend their entire lifespan completing different tasks and satisfying different requirements. Personal life crises triggered by adverse events or adverse social circumstances can cause a so-called "psychosocial crisis" (Filipp, 1990), for which successful management is important for maintaining psychosocial and mental health.
The term psychosocial crisis describes an excessive and overly burdensome demand (Caplan, 1964) and is divided into four stages: shock, reaction, adaptation, and re-orientation (Cullberg, 1978). In a value-neutral description psychosocial crisis is defined as a decision, turning point, climax or conflict in the broadest sense (Klauer & Greve, 2005). Psychosocial crises are those critical life events that, statistically, have occurred independent of the individuals' behavior and past symptoms of a disorder and are unpredictable and uncontrollable loss events (Klauer & Filipp, 1995). As a risk factor, the accumulation of critical life events must also be considered. Psychosocial crises are perceived, understood and evaluated in a subjective manner, meaning that subjective, personal and individual experience and behavior are the decisive factors for well-being (Ciompi, 2016).
A psychosocial crisis has an external origin, and affected individuals feel stress that goes beyond a maximum subjective burden. In addition, individuals suffering from psychosocial crises are at significantly higher risk of developing mental, psychiatric or psychosomatic disorders. Although psychosocial crises in all stages can limit individual performance and social functioning, systematic data about prevalence rates and diagnosis in alignment with the WHO's International Classification of Disorders, 10th Version (Dilling, Mombour, & Schmidt, 1991), are missing. Therefore, specific treatments for psychosocial crises are not outlined. The German health insurance system, based on the Fifth book of the German Social Code (SGB V; Sozialgesetzbuch V), does not cover the therapeutic costs of a psychosocial crisis.
Under the assumptions that psychosocial crises are considered to be a precursor to mental disorders, the described significant deficit in healthcare and health-related care systems is particularly noticeable in rural areas (Jacobi, 2009, Jacobi et al., 2014), where mental disorders are often occur because of social dynamics and demographic transformations (Glaesmer et al., 2008, Hessel, Gunzelmann, Geyer and Brähler, 2000).
Especially in rural areas, access to all types of potentially effective mental treatments is limited. The major barriers include a lack of care infrastructure (Wagenfeld, 2003), financial concerns such as insufficient coverage problems (Fox, Merwin, & Blank, 1995), and beliefs regarding the appropriateness of treatment, including the stigma surrounding mental health treatment (Jameson and Blank, 2007, Mukolo, Heflinger and Wallston, 2010).
The current research data on psychosocial crises and interventions are highly inconsistent due to different definitions and interpretations of the concept of psychosocial crisis and therefore are difficult to compare. In addition, to date, no systematic, interdisciplinary and integrated services exist for the care of people experiencing psychosocial crises in rural areas. At a national level, demand, care and effectiveness of prompt outpatient psychosocial counseling and interventions in research and development are increasingly being discussed. However, studies primarily focus on specific disease contexts that are intended to legitimize implementation and action demands (i.e., Diehl and Schneider, 2011, Grabe et al., 2005).
International studies often associate psychosocial crisis projects with specific target groups, such as HIV/AIDS sufferers (Rachlis et al., 2013), individuals with bipolar disorder (Beynon, Soares-Weiser, Woolacott, Duffy, & Geddes, 2008), students (Vonk, 1997), or referenced emergency situations in a pastoral context (Perren-Klingler, 2015). In addition, the "mismatch" of psychosocial needs and their care is discussed internationally (Vannieuwenborg, Buntinx, & De Lepeleire, 2015).
Overall, the available data do not explain (1) how people in rural areas manage psychosocial crisis situations, (2) how high their subjective burden is, and (3) what resources and help they provide and utilize in case of a psychosocial crisis.
The investigated district of Mecklenburgische Seenplatte (MSE), which is in the southeast part of the state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (M-V) in northern Germany, is the epitome of a rural area with a considerable lack of professional psychosocial aid for psychosocial crises. A total of 261,816 inhabitants live in the district, which has an area of 5470 square kilometers (48 inhabitants per square kilometer); 65,175 of the inhabitants live in the city of Neubrandenburg (NB), the regional center. The present pilot study examined epidemiological data on psychosocial crises caused by various psychosocial problems. In addition, the study examined which aids are utilized in situations of psychosocial crises. It did so by administering an online survey and conducting structured interviews in public places, asking participants about their experiences, needs and attitudes regarding psychosocial crises.
Section snippets
Methods
The pilot survey addressed the population in the rural area of MSE. Information about the survey was provided via the local print medium (Nordkurier) and digital media (Facebook pages of the district, the city and NB surrounding areas). The entire study took place over a period of five months (01.03.2016 to 31.07.2016).
A uniform questionnaire was provided to the participants 1) via web-based software (http://ww3.unipark.de/uc/sozialer_versorgungsbedarf/) and 2) in personal interviews at public
Sample
A total of 399 subjects participated in both surveys (online questionnaire + interview). Respondents were 18–83 years old (mean: 32.86 years old, SD = 12.81); 75.1% were women (n = 299), and 24.9% were men (n = 99). More details are given in Table 1.
Relevance and satisfaction of psychosocial issues by gender
As indicated on a scale of 1 (not important/satisfied) to 5 (very important/satisfied), the areas of "health", "family", and "marriage/partnership" were most relevant. Almost all respondents felt that health was important or very important (91.1%, n
Discussion
The pilot survey focused on problematic psychosocial situations, their subjective meaning and the knowledge and utilization of different health care or healthcare-related systems in a rural area of the federal state Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in Northern Germany.
The results show strong preferences in relation to somatic and mental health problems and simultaneously a low level of satisfaction, which confirms previous findings (i. e., Hinz, Hübscher, Brähler, & Berth, 2010). The pilot study data on
Limitations
It is important to note the limitations of the study. It is a non-representative study with a small sample; the data therefore do not facilitate reliable conclusions about the whole population. The results are not representative of Germany or other countries, and they are not representative of non-rural areas with other characteristics in patient-centered or client-centered care. Furthermore, the study included significantly more women than men, so there is a gender bias that limits the
Conclusion
The results of the study may seem to suggest that although psychosocial crises persist in the rural population, knowledge of psychosocial care services is low among clients. If additional medical, psychological or psychiatric outpatient treatment and care services are lacking or clients fail the reimbursement criteria for any type of mental disorder and its treatment, they fall through a "grid of care".
A possible solution could be an association of interdisciplinary psychosocial service
Conflicts of interests
The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgment
The survey was supported by the university research funding (No. 12111902) of the Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences.
References (62)
- et al.
How relevant are district characteristics in explaining subjective health in Germany?–A multilevel analysis
Social science & medicine
(2011) - et al.
Arbeitsunfähigkeitsregelungen als Faktor für Inanspruchnahme ärztlicher Versorgung in Deutschland
Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen
(2015) - et al.
Dementia care in rural and remote settings: A systematic review of informal/family caregiving
Maturitas
(2011) - et al.
The stigma of childhood mental disorders: A conceptual framework
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
(2010) - et al.
Does social capital enhance health and well-being? Evidence from rural China
Social Science & Medicine
(2007) - et al.
The experience of caregivers of people living with serious mental disorders: A study from rural Ghana
Global Health Action
(2015) - et al.
Elder mistreatment and emotional symptoms among older adults in a largely rural population: The South Carolina elder mistreatment study
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
(2011) - et al.
Psychosocial interventions for the prevention of relapse in bipolar disorder: Systematic review of controlled trials
The British Journal of Psychiatry
(2008) - et al.
Tele-social work and mental health in rural and remote communities in Australia
International Social Work
(2018) - et al.
Social relationships and health: The toxic effects of perceived social isolation
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
(2014)