Psychosocial health and prevention of crisis in rural areas – Results of a pilot panel on psychosocial problems, subjective burden, and utilization of help in Germany

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mph.2019.200161Get rights and content

Abstract

Subject

Medical care, psychological help, and social support are often required in psychosocial problem situations and crises. Without an ICD-10-classification, psychosocial crises are not legally entitled to treatment with medical and psychotherapeutic care according to the German Social Code. However, untreated psychosocial crises often lead to mental disorders.

Methods

A pilot study was conducted among 399 participants using a mixed-methods approach in a rural district in North Germany, which led to the collection of epidemiological data on psychosocial problems and coping strategies among the population.

Results

The majority of respondents attributed high degrees of relevance to health; however, only a few were satisfied. Half of the respondents had somatic symptoms, and just under one third had mental disorder symptoms. Respondents also had family problems. Overall, women were more vulnerable than men. Respondents used more aid in the form of consultation from friends or partners than from professional social services.

Discussion

Regarding the utilization of help, it is striking that particularly the unemployed often did not seek help in the presence of psychosocial crises. Although there are many social services available in the rural study area, only a minimal number of respondents were aware of their existence. The lack of utilization of these services suggests a relatively low level of knowledge and acceptance of psychosocial professional groups’ competences as well as the general psychosocial self-help and self-care system among the population.

Conclusion

An interdisciplinary psychosocial care system could provide the population with adequate services and prevention approaches.

Introduction

Psychosocial health is characterized by individuals’ well-being, satisfaction, self-confidence, and ability to maintain interpersonal relationships (World Health Organization, 2015). Depending on their living conditions, individuals spend their entire lifespan completing different tasks and satisfying different requirements. Personal life crises triggered by adverse events or adverse social circumstances can cause a so-called "psychosocial crisis" (Filipp, 1990), for which successful management is important for maintaining psychosocial and mental health.

The term psychosocial crisis describes an excessive and overly burdensome demand (Caplan, 1964) and is divided into four stages: shock, reaction, adaptation, and re-orientation (Cullberg, 1978). In a value-neutral description psychosocial crisis is defined as a decision, turning point, climax or conflict in the broadest sense (Klauer & Greve, 2005). Psychosocial crises are those critical life events that, statistically, have occurred independent of the individuals' behavior and past symptoms of a disorder and are unpredictable and uncontrollable loss events (Klauer & Filipp, 1995). As a risk factor, the accumulation of critical life events must also be considered. Psychosocial crises are perceived, understood and evaluated in a subjective manner, meaning that subjective, personal and individual experience and behavior are the decisive factors for well-being (Ciompi, 2016).

A psychosocial crisis has an external origin, and affected individuals feel stress that goes beyond a maximum subjective burden. In addition, individuals suffering from psychosocial crises are at significantly higher risk of developing mental, psychiatric or psychosomatic disorders. Although psychosocial crises in all stages can limit individual performance and social functioning, systematic data about prevalence rates and diagnosis in alignment with the WHO's International Classification of Disorders, 10th Version (Dilling, Mombour, & Schmidt, 1991), are missing. Therefore, specific treatments for psychosocial crises are not outlined. The German health insurance system, based on the Fifth book of the German Social Code (SGB V; Sozialgesetzbuch V), does not cover the therapeutic costs of a psychosocial crisis.

Under the assumptions that psychosocial crises are considered to be a precursor to mental disorders, the described significant deficit in healthcare and health-related care systems is particularly noticeable in rural areas (Jacobi, 2009, Jacobi et al., 2014), where mental disorders are often occur because of social dynamics and demographic transformations (Glaesmer et al., 2008, Hessel, Gunzelmann, Geyer and Brähler, 2000).

Especially in rural areas, access to all types of potentially effective mental treatments is limited. The major barriers include a lack of care infrastructure (Wagenfeld, 2003), financial concerns such as insufficient coverage problems (Fox, Merwin, & Blank, 1995), and beliefs regarding the appropriateness of treatment, including the stigma surrounding mental health treatment (Jameson and Blank, 2007, Mukolo, Heflinger and Wallston, 2010).

The current research data on psychosocial crises and interventions are highly inconsistent due to different definitions and interpretations of the concept of psychosocial crisis and therefore are difficult to compare. In addition, to date, no systematic, interdisciplinary and integrated services exist for the care of people experiencing psychosocial crises in rural areas. At a national level, demand, care and effectiveness of prompt outpatient psychosocial counseling and interventions in research and development are increasingly being discussed. However, studies primarily focus on specific disease contexts that are intended to legitimize implementation and action demands (i.e., Diehl and Schneider, 2011, Grabe et al., 2005).

International studies often associate psychosocial crisis projects with specific target groups, such as HIV/AIDS sufferers (Rachlis et al., 2013), individuals with bipolar disorder (Beynon, Soares-Weiser, Woolacott, Duffy, & Geddes, 2008), students (Vonk, 1997), or referenced emergency situations in a pastoral context (Perren-Klingler, 2015). In addition, the "mismatch" of psychosocial needs and their care is discussed internationally (Vannieuwenborg, Buntinx, & De Lepeleire, 2015).

Overall, the available data do not explain (1) how people in rural areas manage psychosocial crisis situations, (2) how high their subjective burden is, and (3) what resources and help they provide and utilize in case of a psychosocial crisis.

The investigated district of Mecklenburgische Seenplatte (MSE), which is in the southeast part of the state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (M-V) in northern Germany, is the epitome of a rural area with a considerable lack of professional psychosocial aid for psychosocial crises. A total of 261,816 inhabitants live in the district, which has an area of 5470 square kilometers (48 inhabitants per square kilometer); 65,175 of the inhabitants live in the city of Neubrandenburg (NB), the regional center. The present pilot study examined epidemiological data on psychosocial crises caused by various psychosocial problems. In addition, the study examined which aids are utilized in situations of psychosocial crises. It did so by administering an online survey and conducting structured interviews in public places, asking participants about their experiences, needs and attitudes regarding psychosocial crises.

Section snippets

Methods

The pilot survey addressed the population in the rural area of MSE. Information about the survey was provided via the local print medium (Nordkurier) and digital media (Facebook pages of the district, the city and NB surrounding areas). The entire study took place over a period of five months (01.03.2016 to 31.07.2016).

A uniform questionnaire was provided to the participants 1) via web-based software (http://ww3.unipark.de/uc/sozialer_versorgungsbedarf/) and 2) in personal interviews at public

Sample

A total of 399 subjects participated in both surveys (online questionnaire + interview). Respondents were 18–83 years old (mean: 32.86 years old, SD = 12.81); 75.1% were women (n = 299), and 24.9% were men (n = 99). More details are given in Table 1.

Relevance and satisfaction of psychosocial issues by gender

As indicated on a scale of 1 (not important/satisfied) to 5 (very important/satisfied), the areas of "health", "family", and "marriage/partnership" were most relevant. Almost all respondents felt that health was important or very important (91.1%, n

Discussion

The pilot survey focused on problematic psychosocial situations, their subjective meaning and the knowledge and utilization of different health care or healthcare-related systems in a rural area of the federal state Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in Northern Germany.

The results show strong preferences in relation to somatic and mental health problems and simultaneously a low level of satisfaction, which confirms previous findings (i. e., Hinz, Hübscher, Brähler, & Berth, 2010). The pilot study data on

Limitations

It is important to note the limitations of the study. It is a non-representative study with a small sample; the data therefore do not facilitate reliable conclusions about the whole population. The results are not representative of Germany or other countries, and they are not representative of non-rural areas with other characteristics in patient-centered or client-centered care. Furthermore, the study included significantly more women than men, so there is a gender bias that limits the

Conclusion

The results of the study may seem to suggest that although psychosocial crises persist in the rural population, knowledge of psychosocial care services is low among clients. If additional medical, psychological or psychiatric outpatient treatment and care services are lacking or clients fail the reimbursement criteria for any type of mental disorder and its treatment, they fall through a "grid of care".

A possible solution could be an association of interdisciplinary psychosocial service

Conflicts of interests

The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgment

The survey was supported by the university research funding (No. 12111902) of the Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences.

References (62)

  • G. Caplan

    Principles of preventive psychiatry

    (1964)
  • L. Ciompi

    Die emotionalen Grundlagen des Denkens: Entwurf einer fraktalen Affektlogik

    (2016)
  • S. Cohen et al.

    Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1985)
  • J. Cullberg

    Krisen und Krisentherapie

    Psychiatrische Praxis

    (1978)
  • E.G. de Matos et al.

    Substanzkonsum in der Allgemeinbevölkerung in Deutschland

    Sucht

    (2016)
  • H. Dilling et al.

    Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10 Kapitel V (F), Klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien

    (1991)
  • Bundespsychotherapeutenkammer-Studie zu Wartezeiten in der ambulanten psychotherapeutischen Versorgung

    (2011)
  • S. Filipp

    Ein allgemeines modell für die analyse kritischer Lebensereignisse. S. 3-52

  • J. Fox et al.

    De facto mental health services in the rural south

    Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

    (1995)
  • M. Galuske et al.

    Handlungsformen in der Sozialen Arbeit Geschichte und Entwicklung Grundriss Soziale Arbeit

    (2012)
  • Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. (2017). Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesauschusses über die Durchführung der...
  • H. Glaesmer et al.

    Die Bedeutung psychischer Beschwerden für die medizinische Inanspruchnahme und das Krankheitsverhalten Älterer

    Psychiatrische Praxis

    (2008)
  • W. Görgen et al.

    Ambulante psychotherapeutische Versorgung von psychosekranken Menschen sowie älteren Menschen in Berlin. Kammer für Psychologische Psychotherapeuten und Kinder- und Jugendlichenpsychotherapeuten im Land Berlin

    (2005)
  • H.J. Grabe et al.

    Mental distress and the use of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic treatments services: Results of the Study of Health in Pomerania

    Psychiatrische Praxis

    (2005)
  • D. Grunow

    Gesundheitsselbsthilfe im Alltag Sozialmedizin Sozialrecht Gesundheitsökonomie

    (1986)
  • D. Grunow

    Selbst-und Laienhilfe in der prämedizinischen Phase Der kranke Mensch

    (1986)
  • U. Hapke et al.

    Chronischer stress bei Erwachsenen in Deutschland

    Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz

    (2013)
  • A. Hessel et al.

    Inanspruchnahme des Gesundheitswesens und Akzeptanz psychosozialer Kompetenzen

    Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie

    (2000)
  • A. Hessel et al.

    Inanspruchnahme medizinischer Leistungen und Medikamenteneinnahme bei über 60jährigen in Deutschland – gesundheitliche, sozialstrukturelle, sozio-demographische und subjektive Faktoren

    Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie

    (2000)
  • A. Hinz et al.

    Ist Gesundheit das höchste Gut?-Ergebnisse einer bevölkerungsrepräsentativen Umfrage zur subjektiven Bedeutung von Gesundheit

    Das Gesundheitswesen

    (2010)
  • A. Höhne et al.

    Hausarztzentrierte Versorgung in Deutschland. Der Hausarzt als Lotse?

    Das Gesundheitswesen

    (2009)
  • View full text