Elsevier

Microchemical Journal

Volume 158, November 2020, 105099
Microchemical Journal

Reliable and sensitive detection of pancreatic cancer marker by gold nanoflower-based SERS mapping immunoassay

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.105099Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Uniformly distributed Au-nanoflowers on Si-wafer as support for capture surface.

  • LSPR coupling between Au-nanoflowers helps improve detection sensitivity.

  • SERS mapping reduces spot-to-spot variation in quantitative SERS.

  • Incubating capture surface in microwell plates significantly reduces positive error.

Abstract

Reliability of a method for cancer detection is a key issue. It is because of fear for false positive and false negative results that no tumor marker has been recommended for cancer screening test yet. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is highly sensitive and a promising technique for cancer detection. However, huge spot-to-spot variation in SERS signal and false positive result in SERS-based immunoassay degrade its reliability. In this work, we designed gold nanoflower (AuNF)-based SERS method for detection of pancreatic cancer marker MUC4 and demonstrated approaches to improve reliability of the method. We employed Raman mapping over a large area of the substrate to minimize effect of spot-to-spot variation. Furthermore, the use of microwell plate for incubation of capture substrate minimized blank value significantly. The designed method is sensitive enough to detect MUC4 down to 0.1 ng mL−1. The use of AuNFs to construct both ERL and capture surface has contributed to the improved detection sensitivity.

Introduction

The International Agency for Research on Cancer estimated 18.1 million new cases of cancer and 9.6 million deaths from cancer in 2018, indicating that cancer remained a major public health problem regardless of decades of efforts.[1], [2] Cancer is asymptomatic at early stage and most patients are diagnosed with advanced cancer that is difficult for treatment. Hence, in parallel to the prevention and treatment strategies, there is a huge demand to develop reliable early detection techniques. Recently, SERS has become a promising method for cancer detection as it has ultrahigh detection sensitivity, specificity and little or no sample preparation.[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] However, there are issues that need to be addressed to improve reliability of quantitative SERS, and realize its practical application for cancer detection.

Only less than 10% of pancreatic cancer patients can survive for five years, mainly due to lack of early detection and effective treatments.[10] To date, both chemotherapy and radiation therapy have been found ineffective in treatment of pancreatic cancer,[11] and hence surgery is the only curative and palliative treatment. Unfortunately, most patients are diagnosed with advanced pancreatic cancer that cannot be treated by resection.[12] Thus, there is a need for early detection of pancreatic cancer. Early detection could be made possible by monitoring level of biomarkers in the serum. Lack of specific tumor markers remains a challenging issue in serum-based detection of cancer.[13], [14] Recently, MUC4 (a transmembrane glycoprotein) has been found to aberrantly overexpressed in most pancreatic cancers, but not detected in chronic pancreatitis and in the normal pancreas.[11], [15] This makes MUC4 a potential pancreatic cancer marker for early detection.[16] However, the serum level of MU4 is below the detection limits of immunoassay platforms routinely used in clinics. In fact, detection of MUC4 in the serum was made possible for the first time by making use of SERS-based immunoassay.[17]

SERS has ultra-high detection sensitivity down to a single molecule and there are many more approaches being proposed by researchers in the field to further improve detection sensitivity.[18], [19], [20] Unfortunately, spot-to-spot variation in SERS signal remained a serious inherent challenge that degrades reliability and hinders practical applicability of quantitative SERS.[21] The challenge is even worse in SERS-based sandwich immunoassay as there are a lot more heterogeneous processes involved.[3] Non-uniform immobilization of capture antibody on a support surface, heterogeneous binding of antigen and extrinsic Raman label (ERL) on the capture surface are among the issues. Even in label free direct detection, such variability becomes significant as the concentration of analyte decreases. Designing uniform SERS substrate is the common approach to address this issue though this alone cannot eliminate the challenge. SERS measurement in homogeneous solution phase is another approach. [22] Using spinning sample stage could also be an option. It is also good idea to use objective lens with larger laser spot size for acquisition of SERS signals from a larger area of a substrate per measurement. In this work, we employed Raman mapping over a large area of substrate to minimize the effect of spot-to-spot variation in SERS signal.

High blank value, which is indicative of false positive result, is another serious challenge related to SERS-based sandwich immunoassay. The assumption in sandwich immunoassay is that ERLs that remain on capture surface and detected by final measurement are only those that are covalently bonded to captured antigen. On the other hand, ERL can also be physically adsorbed and remain on capture surface though it is not bonded to any antigen. As a result, after long incubation time, even blank sample may produce significant SERS signal. Blocking non-specific binding cites and adequate washing procedures are the common measures employed to minimize such error. The error becomes even worse if the ERL partially dries on capture surface. In this work, microwell plates were employed for incubation of capture surface to minimize blank value. By adopting these approaches, the overall reliability of the measurement can be significantly enhanced and make SERS-based analysis a viable solution for clinical application of precise cancer detection.

Section snippets

Reagents

Gold(III) chloride trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O), boric acid (99.5%), sodium tetraborate decahydrate (99.5%), Ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl] carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) and dry dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Acros Organics. Hydroquinone (99.5%), anti-MUC4 antibody, Prest antigen MUC4, bovine serum albumin (BSA), 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (MBA; 99%), and dithiobis-(succinimidyl propionate) (DSP) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. 3-merecaptopropyl

Synthesis, characterization and SERS performance test of AuNFs

AuNFs were synthesized by seed-mediated particle growth approach, using small spherical gold nanoparticles (shown in Fig. 1A) as seeds. The TEM image (Fig. 1B and C) has substantiated successful synthesis of highly branched AuNFs with about 55 nm in diameter (core plus the branching). Estimation of particle size distribution and polydispersity index by DLS (Fig. S2 and Table S1) further confirmed that the synthesized AuNFs are highly monodispersed and are of desired size. Importantly, the

Conclusion

AuNF-based SERS immunoassay for detection of pancreatic cancer marker MUC4 has been developed and approaches that improve reliability were suggested. Spot-to-spot variation in point-based Raman measurements is quite huge and makes the quantitative SERS meaningless. The challenge is worse in sandwich immunoassay as many more heterogeneous processes are involved. Even in direct label free detection, as the concentration of analyte decreases, the variation will be significant and cannot be

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Agaje Bedemo Beyene: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Formal analysis, Investigation. Bing Joe Hwang: Validation, Resources. Wodaje Addis Tegegne: Software. Jun-Sheng Wang: Software. Hsieh-Chih Tsai: Supervision. Wei-Nien Su: Supervision, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, (MOST) for financial support. The supporting facilities from National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (NTUST) and National Synchrotron Radiation Research Centre (NSRRC) are gratefully acknowledged.

References (39)

  • A. Vincent et al.

    Pancreatic cancer

    The Lancet

    (2011)
  • A.V. Krasnoslobodtsev et al.

    Nano-immunoassay with improved performance for detection of cancer biomarkers Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology

    Biology, and Medicine

    (2015)
  • O. Hosu et al.

    Mucin 4 detection with a label-free electrochemical immunosensor

    Electrochem. Commun.

    (2017)
  • F. Bray et al.

    GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2018)
  • R.L. Siegel et al.

    Cancer statistics

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2018)
  • C. Zong et al.

    Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Bioanalysis: Reliability and Challenges

    Chem Rev

    (2018)
  • R. Ravanshad et al.

    Application of nanoparticles in cancer detection by Raman scattering based techniques

    Nano Rev Exp

    (2018)
  • L.E. Jamieson et al.

    Bioanalytical Measurements Enabled by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Probes

    Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)

    (2017)
  • M. Kahraman et al.

    Fundamentals and applications of SERS-based bioanalytical sensing

    Nanophotonics

    (2017)
  • T.J. Moore et al.

    In Vitro and In Vivo SERS Biosensing for Disease Diagnosis

    Biosensors (Basel)

    (2018)
  • K.C. Bantz et al.

    Recent progress in SERS biosensing

    Phys Chem Chem Phys

    (2011)
  • J. Smolsky et al.

    Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering-Based Immunoassay Technologies for Detection of Disease Biomarkers

    Biosensors (Basel)

    (2017)
  • S. Bafna et al.

    Pancreatic cancer cells resistance to gemcitabine: the role of MUC4 mucin

    Br J Cancer

    (2009)
  • G.M. Petersen et al.

    Pancreatic cancer genetic epidemiology consortium

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (2006)
  • M.J. Duffy

    Tumor markers in clinical practice: a review focusing on common solid cancers

    Med Princ Pract

    (2013)
  • G.L. Perkins et al.

    Serum Tumor Markers

    Am. Fam. Physician

    (2003)
  • M. Andrianifahanana et al.

    Mucin (MUC) Gene Expression in Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Chronic Pancreatitis: A Potential Role of MUC4 as a Tumor Marker of Diagnostic Significance

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2001)
  • P. Chaturvedi et al.

    MUC4 mucin potentiates pancreatic tumor cell proliferation, survival, and invasive properties and interferes with its interaction to extracellular matrix proteins

    Mol Cancer Res

    (2007)
  • G. Wang et al.

    Detection of the Potential Pancreatic Cancer Marker MUC4 in Serum Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering

    Anal. Chem.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Gap-enhance Raman tags (GERTs) competitive immunoassay based Raman imaging for the quantitative detection of trace florfenicol in milk

      2022, Food Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      SERS tags by embedding Raman reporter in the junction of core and shell exhibit amplified SERS signal and avoid the interference from surrounding environment (Qiu et al., 2018). Another issue that impedes the quantitative analysis is the non-uniform distribution of nanoparticles on the substrate, which is caused by the non-uniform captured antibody immobilized GERTs particles by the binding of antigen (Beyene et al., 2020). Hence, it is difficult to achieve a consistent enhancement by averaging several randomly selected points on the substrate.

    • Recent progress on three-dimensional substrates for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic analysis

      2022, Microchemical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      To address the problem, three-dimensional SERS substrates should focus on the development of integrated 3D substrate, such as rapid pre-concentration to air contaminant, increasing adsorption with special interaction and fabricating substrate with novel material. Employing 3D SERS substrates to detect the bio-analytes of biological and medical samples has become a hot topic in recent years [79,80]. Bio-analytes can be sensitively discriminated by fingerprints information of molecules such as biomolecules [81] and biomarkers [82].

    • Emerging nanolabels-based immunoassays: Principle and applications in food safety

      2021, TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has already been demonstrated that noble metal with tough or porous structure keeps better light scattering property than traditional metal NPs. Therefore, Au nanostars [122], hierarchical flowerlike Au NPs [123], hollow gold nanospheres [124], and other metal nanostructures were adopted as the SERS substrates. And by loading with Raman reporter molecules which can present distinctive characteristic peaks in Raman spectra, above substrate particles are transformed into specific SERS labels.

    • Recent advances on immunosensors for mycotoxins in foods and other commodities

      2021, TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the measured Raman intensity by averaging the randomly selected detection points (usually 10–20) is not enough for obtaining a final value. Fortunately, Raman imaging over a large area of 3D substrates through the fast mapping of all randomly distributed hot spots is developed [178], make it possible for SERS mapping technology to achieve reliable quantification of mycotoxins. Wang et al. developed a SERS-based highly-sensitive mapping technique for detecting multiple mycotoxins [179].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text